Pembrolizumab-axitinib versus nivolumab-cabozantinib as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective real-world comparison (ARON-1)
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie, multicentrická studie
PubMed
40423789
PubMed Central
PMC12116974
DOI
10.1007/s00262-025-04043-x
PII: 10.1007/s00262-025-04043-x
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- ARON-1 study, Axitinib plus pembrolizumab, Cabozantinib plus nivolumab, Immune-oncology combinations,
- MeSH
- anilidy * terapeutické užití farmakologie aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- axitinib * terapeutické užití farmakologie aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky * terapeutické užití farmakologie aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- karcinom z renálních buněk * farmakoterapie mortalita patologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory ledvin * farmakoterapie patologie mortalita MeSH
- nivolumab * terapeutické užití farmakologie aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití MeSH
- pyridiny terapeutické užití MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- anilidy * MeSH
- axitinib * MeSH
- cabozantinib MeSH Prohlížeč
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky * MeSH
- nivolumab * MeSH
- pembrolizumab MeSH Prohlížeč
- pyridiny MeSH
BACKGROUND: The optimal first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains uncertain, despite recent advancements in immune-based combinations. This retrospective study compares the effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus axitinib (PA) and nivolumab plus cabozantinib (NC) as first-line treatments for mRCC in a real-world setting. METHODS: Patient data were collected from 55 centers across 16 countries, encompassing individuals diagnosed with mRCC receiving first-line treatment with PA or NC between January 2016 and October 2023. Clinical and tumor features and treatment responses were recorded. The primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to second progression. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, Cox proportional hazard models, and chi-square tests. RESULTS: A total of 760 patients with a median age of 64 years (range, 29-88) were included. Of them, 607 received PA, and only 153 NC. In the overall study population, ORR was 59% for and 49% for PA. Median OS was 55.7 months and not reached (NR) for PA and NC, respectively (P = .51), while median PFS was longer with NC (27.6 months) than for PA (16.2 months, P = .003). Subgroup analysis suggested a PFS benefits for NC in male, younger patients, intermediate risk group, clear cell histology, and lung involvement, as well as ORR favored NC in good risk patients. Multivariate analysis identified first-line therapy as a significant factor associated with PFS. CONCLUSIONS: In this certainly biased retrospective comparison, NC demonstrated superior ORR and longer PFS compared to PA in mRCC. These findings underscore the importance of considering individual patient characteristics and risk profiles when selecting first-line therapy for mRCC.
Clinical Oncology Sociedad de Oncología y Hematología del Cesar Valledupar Colombia
Department of Medical Oncology Army Hospital Research and Referral New Delhi India
Department of Medical Oncology Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc 1200 Brussels Belgium
Department of Medical Oncology MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid Madrid Spain
Department of Medical Oncology San Camillo Forlanini Hospital Rome Italy
Department of Oncology and Hematology University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy
Department of Urology Medical University of Innsbruck Anichstrasse 35 6020 Innsbruck Austria
Department of Urology University Hospital Bonn 53127 Bonn Germany
Division of Medical Oncology National Cancer Centre Singapore Singapore Singapore
Finnish Medicines Agency Fimea Tampere Finland
Hospital Ramón y Cajal Madrid Spain
Markey Cancer Center University of Kentucky Lexington KY 40536 0293 USA
Medical Oncology Department CHU Insular Materno Infantil Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Spain
Medical Oncology Department La Paz University Hospital Madrid Spain
Medical Oncology IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Di Bologna Via Albertoni 15 Bologna Italy
Medical Oncology Tawam Hospital Al Ain United Arab Emirates
Medical Oncology Unit Santa Chiara Hospital Trento Italy
Medical Oncology Unit University Hospital of Parma 43126 Parma Italy
Oncology 3 Unit Department of Oncology Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS Padua Italy
Oncology Unit Macerata Hospital Macerata Italy
Urologic Oncology Champalimaud Clinical Center 1400 038 Lisbon Portugal
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209–249. 10.3322/CAAC.21660 PubMed
Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H et al (2003) Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 27:612–624. 10.1097/00000478-200305000-00005 PubMed
Dabestani S, Thorstenson A, Lindblad P et al (2016) Renal cell carcinoma recurrences and metastases in primary non-metastatic patients: a population-based study. World J Urol 34:1081–1086. 10.1007/s00345-016-1773-y PubMed
Motzer RJ, Bacik J, Murphy BA et al (2002) Interferon-alfa as a comparative treatment for clinical trials of new therapies against advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20:289–296. 10.1200/jco.2002.20.1.289 PubMed
Heng DYC, Xie W, Regan MM et al (2009) Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 27:5794–5799. 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4809 PubMed
Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V et al (2019) Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 380:1116–1127. 10.1056/nejmoa1816714 PubMed
Choueiri TK, Powles T, Burotto M et al (2021) Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 384:829–841. 10.1056/nejmoa2026982 PubMed PMC
Motzer R, Alekseev B, Rha S-Y et al (2021) Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or everolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 384:1289–1300. 10.1056/nejmoa2035716 PubMed
Motzer RJ, Penkov K, Haanen J et al (2019) Avelumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 380:1103–1115. 10.1056/nejmoa1816047 PubMed PMC
Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF et al (2018) Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 378:1277–1290. 10.1056/nejmoa1712126 PubMed PMC
Shah NJ, Sura SD, Shinde R et al (2023) Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the current treatment era. Eur Urol Open Sci 49:110. 10.1016/J.EUROS.2022.12.015 PubMed PMC
Santoni M, Massari F, Myint ZW et al (2023) Global real-world outcomes of patients receiving immuno-oncology combinations for advanced renal cell carcinoma: the ARON-1 study. Target Oncol 18:559–570. 10.1007/s11523-023-00978-2 PubMed
Santoni M, Massari F, Myint ZW et al (2023) Clinico-pathological features influencing the prognostic role of body mass index in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated by immuno-oncology combinations (ARON-1). Clin Genitourin Cancer. 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.03.006 PubMed
Santoni M, Buti S, Myint ZW et al (2023) Real-world outcome of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and intermediate- or poor-risk international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium criteria treated by immune-oncology combinations: differential effectiveness by risk group? Eur Urol Oncol. 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.003 PubMed
Porta C, Bamias A, Zakopoulou R et al (2023) Geographical differences in the management of metastatic de novo renal cell carcinoma in the era of immune-combinations. Minerva Urol Nephrol 75:460–470 PubMed
Schwartz LH, Litière S, De Vries E et al (2016) RECIST 1.1—update and clarification: from the RECIST committee. Eur J Cancer 62:132–137. 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.081 PubMed PMC
(2019) FDA approves pembrolizumab plus axitinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Case Med Res. 10.31525/fda1-ucm636395.htm
Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V et al (2023) Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib as first-line therapy for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma: 5-year analysis of KEYNOTE-426. J Clin Oncol 41(17_suppl):LBA4501–LBA4501. 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.17_suppl.LBA4501
FDA Approves Nivolumab Plus Cabozantinib for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma—The ASCO Post. https://ascopost.com/issues/february-10-2021/fda-approves-nivolumab-plus-cabozantinib-for-advanced-renal-cell-carcinoma/. Accessed 27 Oct 2023
Choueiri TK, Powles T, Burotto M et al (2020) 696O_PR Nivolumab + cabozantinib vs sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: first results from the randomized phase III CheckMate 9ER trial. Ann Oncol 31:S1159. 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2257
Burotto M, Powles T, Escudier B et al (2023) Nivolumab plus cabozantinib vs sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): 3-year follow-up from the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial. J Clin Oncol 41:603–603. 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.603
Quhal F, Mori K, Bruchbacher A et al (2021) First-line immunotherapy-based combinations for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 4:755–765. 10.1016/j.euo.2021.03.001 PubMed
Bin RI, He H, Ryu AJ et al (2021) A living, interactive systematic review and network meta-analysis of first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma [formula presented]. Eur Urol 80:712–723 PubMed
Lombardi P, Filetti M, Falcone R et al (2022) New first-line immunotherapy-based combinations for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 106:102377. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102377 PubMed
Catalano M, Procopio G, Sepe P et al (2023) Tyrosine kinase and immune checkpoints inhibitors in favorable risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Trick or treat? Pharmacol Ther. 10.1016/J.PHARMTHERA.2023.108499 PubMed
Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, Quhal F et al (2023) Impact of sex on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in kidney and urothelial cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 41:1763–1774. 10.1007/s00345-023-04412-0 PubMed PMC
Satkunasivam R, Guzman JC, Klaassen Z et al (2022) Association between prior nephrectomy and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig 40:64.e17-64.e24. 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.09.009 PubMed PMC
Yanagisawa T, Quhal F, Kawada T et al (2023) Association between age and efficacy of first-line immunotherapy-based combination therapies for mRCC: a meta-analysis. Immunotherapy. 10.2217/IMT-2023-0039 PubMed