Definitions, End Points, and Clinical Trial Designs for Bladder Cancer: Recommendations From the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer and the International Bladder Cancer Group
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
37793077
PubMed Central
PMC10713193
DOI
10.1200/jco.23.00307
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- adjuvancia imunologická terapeutické užití MeSH
- imunoterapie MeSH
- karcinom z přechodných buněk * MeSH
- klinické zkoušky jako téma MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * patologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- adjuvancia imunologická MeSH
PURPOSE: There is a significant unmet need for new and efficacious therapies in urothelial cancer (UC). To provide recommendations on appropriate clinical trial designs across disease settings in UC, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) and the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) convened a multidisciplinary, international consensus panel. METHODS: Through open communication and scientific debate in small- and whole-group settings, surveying, and responses to clinical questionnaires, the consensus panel developed recommendations on optimal definitions of the disease state, end points, trial design, evaluations, sample size calculations, and pathology considerations for definitive studies in low- and intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), high-risk NMIBC, muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, and metastatic UC. The expert panel also solicited input on the recommendations through presentations and public discussion during an open session at the 2021 Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network (BCAN) Think Tank (held virtually). RESULTS: The consensus panel developed a set of stage-specific bladder cancer clinical trial design recommendations, which are summarized in the table that accompanies this text. CONCLUSION: These recommendations developed by the SITC-IBCG Bladder Cancer Clinical Trial Design consensus panel will encourage uniformity among studies and facilitate drug development in this disease.
Carolina Urologic Research Center Myrtle Beach SC
Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute NIH Bethesda MD
Department of Genitourinary Oncology H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa FL
Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland OH
Department of Pathology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Radiation Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA
Department of Urologic Sciences University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
Department of Urology Fundació Puigvert Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
Department of Urology North York General Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada
Department of Urology Rush University Medical Center Chicago IL
Department of Urology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX
Department of Urology University of Washington Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Seattle WA
Division of Urology Department of Surgery University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA
EAU NMIBC Guidelines Panel Arnhem the Netherlands
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Tisch Cancer Institute New York NY
Johns Hopkins Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD
Patient Advocate Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network Bethesda MD
Queen Mary University of London London United Kingdom
Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands
Scott Department of Urology Dan L Duncan Cancer Center Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Kamat AM, Sylvester RJ, Böhle A, et al. : Definitions, end points, and clinical trial designs for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Recommendations from the International Bladder Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 34:1935-1944, 2016 PubMed PMC
Galsky MD, Balar AV, Black PC, et al. : Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of urothelial cancer. J Immunother Cancer 9:e002552, 2021 PubMed PMC
Zimmermann K, Mostafaei H, Heidenreich A, et al. : Health-related quality of life in bladder cancer patients: Bladder cancer-specific instruments and domains. Part 2. Curr Opin Urol 31:304-314, 2021 PubMed
Leow JJ, Cole AP, Seisen T, et al. : Variations in the costs of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the USA. Eur Urol 73:374-382, 2018 PubMed
Netto GJ, Amin MB, Berney DM, et al. : The 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part B: Prostate and urinary tract tumors. Eur Urol 82:469-482, 2022 PubMed
Oosterlinck W, Bono AV, Mack D, et al. : Frequency of positive biopsies after visual disappearance of superficial bladder cancer marker lesions. Eur Urol 40:515-517, 2001 PubMed
Mostafid AH, Porta N, Cresswell J, et al. : CALIBER: A phase II randomized feasibility trial of chemoablation with mitomycin-C vs surgical management in low-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. BJU Int 125:817-826, 2020 PubMed PMC
Hendricksen K, van der Heijden AG, Cornel EB, et al. : Two-year follow-up of the phase II marker lesion study of intravesical apaziquone for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol 27:337-342, 2009 PubMed PMC
Chang SS, Boorjian SA, Chou R, et al. : Diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: AUA/SUO guideline. J Urol 196:1021-1029, 2016 PubMed
Veeratterapillay R, Heer R, Johnson MI, et al. : High-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer-therapy options during intravesical BCG shortage. Curr Urol Rep 17:68, 2016 PubMed PMC
Messing EM: The BCG shortage. Bladder Cancer 3:227-228, 2017 PubMed PMC
Abufaraj M, Mostafid H, Shariat SF, et al. : What to do during Bacillus Calmette-Guérin shortage? Valid strategies based on evidence. Curr Opin Urol 28:570-576, 2018 PubMed
Laukhtina E, Shim SR, Mori K, et al. : Diagnostic accuracy of novel urinary biomarker tests in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and Network meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 4:927-942, 2021 PubMed
Lotan Y, Roehrborn CG: Sensitivity and specificity of commonly available bladder tumor markers versus cytology: Results of a comprehensive literature review and meta-analyses. Urology 61:109-118, 2003; discussion 118 PubMed
Lokeshwar VB, Habuchi T, Grossman HB, et al. : Bladder tumor markers beyond cytology: International Consensus Panel on bladder tumor markers. Urology 66:35-63, 2005 PubMed
Kamat AM, Colombel M, Sundi D, et al. : BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Recommendations from the IBCG. Nat Rev Urol 14:244-255, 2017 PubMed
Lamm DL, Blumenstein BA, Crissman JD, et al. : Maintenance bacillus Calmette-Guerin immunotherapy for recurrent TA, T1 and carcinoma in situ transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: A randomized Southwest Oncology Group study. J Urol 163:1124-1129, 2000 PubMed
Roumiguié M, Kamat AM, Bivalacqua TJ, et al. : International Bladder Cancer Group consensus statement on clinical trial design for patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-exposed high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol 82:34-46, 2022 PubMed
Williams SB, Hudgins HK, Ray-Zack MD, et al. : Systematic review of factors associated with the utilization of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2:119-125, 2019 PubMed PMC
Jarow JP, Lerner SP, Kluetz PG, et al. : Clinical trial design for the development of new therapies for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer: Report of a Food and Drug Administration and American Urological Association public workshop. Urology 83:262-264, 2014 PubMed
Steinberg G, Bahnson R, Brosman S, et al. : Efficacy and safety of valrubicin for the treatment of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin refractory carcinoma in situ of the bladder. The Valrubicin Study Group. J Urol 163:761-767, 2000 PubMed
Lamm DL: Carcinoma in situ. Urol Clin North Am 19:499-508, 1992 PubMed
Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden A, Witjes JA, et al. : High-grade Ta urothelial carcinoma and carcinoma in situ of the bladder. Urology 66:90-107, 2005 PubMed
Steinberg RL, Thomas LJ, O'Donnell MA, et al. : Sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel for the salvage treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Bladder Cancer 1:65-72, 2015 PubMed PMC
Milbar N, Kates M, Chappidi MR, et al. : Oncological outcomes of sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Bladder Cancer 3:293-303, 2017 PubMed PMC
Soria F, Beleni AI, D'Andrea D, et al. : Pseudoprogression and hyperprogression during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for urothelial and kidney cancer. World J Urol 36:1703-1709, 2018 PubMed PMC
Daneshmand S, Schuckman AK, Bochner BH, et al. : Hexaminolevulinate blue-light cystoscopy in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Review of the clinical evidence and consensus statement on appropriate use in the USA. Nat Rev Urol 11:589-596, 2014 PubMed
Subiela JD, Palou J, Esquinas C, et al. : Clinical usefulness of random biopsies in diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) 42:285-298, 2018 PubMed
US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) : BCG-Unresponsive Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Developing Drugs and Biologics for Treatment. Silver Spring, MD, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, 2018
van den Bosch S, Alfred Witjes J: Long-term cancer-specific survival in patients with high-risk, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and tumour progression: A systematic review. Eur Urol 60:493-500, 2011 PubMed
Grossman HB, Natale RB, Tangen CM, et al. : Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med 349:859-866, 2003 PubMed
Griffiths G, Hall R, Sylvester R, et al. : International phase III trial assessing neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Long-term results of the BA06 30894 trial. J Clin Oncol 29:2171-2177, 2011 PubMed PMC
Zargar H, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Lotan Y, et al. : Final pathological stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for bladder cancer-does pT0 predict better survival than pTa/Tis/T1? J Urol 195:886-893, 2016 PubMed
Ravi P, Pond GR, Diamantopoulos LN, et al. : Optimal pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Results from a global, multicentre collaboration. BJU Int 128:607-614, 2021 PubMed
Chang SS, Bochner BH, Chou R, et al. : Treatment of non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer: AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO guideline. J Urol 198:552-559, 2017 PubMed PMC
Williams S, Cutie C, Keegan K, et al. : MP13-17 SUNRISE-2: A phase 3, multicenter, randomized study evaluating the efficacy of TAR-200 in combination with cetrelimab versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in participants with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol 206:e250, 2021
Jiang DM, Gupta S, Kitchlu A, et al. : Defining cisplatin eligibility in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol 18:104-114, 2021 PubMed
Galsky MD, Hahn NM, Rosenberg J, et al. : Treatment of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer "unfit" for Cisplatin-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 29:2432-2438, 2011 PubMed
Cook MR, Kim C: Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with HIV infection and advanced-stage cancer: A systematic review. JAMA Oncol 5:1049-1054, 2019 PubMed
Shah NJ, Al-Shbool G, Blackburn M, et al. : Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients with HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C viral infection. J Immunother Cancer 7:353, 2019 PubMed PMC
Bajorin DF, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, et al. : Adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med 384:2102-2114, 2021 PubMed PMC
Powles T, Assaf ZJ, Davarpanah N, et al. : ctDNA guiding adjuvant immunotherapy in urothelial carcinoma. Nature 595:432-437, 2021 PubMed
Kluger HM, Tawbi HA, Ascierto ML, et al. : Defining tumor resistance to PD-1 pathway blockade: Recommendations from the first meeting of the SITC Immunotherapy Resistance Taskforce. J Immunother Cancer 8:e000398, 2020 PubMed PMC
Tan MP, Attard G, Huddart RA: Circulating tumour DNA in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Int J Mol Sci 19:2568, 2018 PubMed PMC
Christensen E, Birkenkamp-Demtröder K, Nordentoft I, et al. : Liquid biopsy analysis of FGFR3 and PIK3CA hotspot mutations for disease surveillance in bladder cancer. Eur Urol 71:961-969, 2017 PubMed
Apolo AB, Milowsky MI, Kim L, et al. : Eligibility and radiologic assessment in adjuvant clinical trials in bladder cancer. JAMA Oncol 5:1790-1798, 2019 PubMed PMC
Bertolaso P, Brouste V, Cazeau AL, et al. : Impact of 18FDG-PET CT in the management of muscle invasive bladder cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 20:297-297.e6, 2022 PubMed
Kaufman HL, Schwartz LH, William WN, Jr, et al. : Evaluation of classical clinical endpoints as surrogates for overall survival in patients treated with immune checkpoint blockers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 144:2245-2261, 2018 PubMed
Powles T, Park SH, Voog E, et al. : Avelumab maintenance therapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med 383:1218-1230, 2020 PubMed
Huang SY, Wu CC, Hsieh MC, et al. : Comparative study of the safety and efficacy of first-line cisplatin and carboplatin chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Oncology 98:146-153, 2020 PubMed
Khaki AR, Li A, Diamantopoulos LN, et al. : A new prognostic model in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors. Eur Urol Oncol 4:464-472, 2021 PubMed PMC
He J, Pan H, Liang W, et al. : Prognostic effect of albumin-to-globulin ratio in patients with solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer 8:4002-4010, 2017 PubMed PMC
Suh J, Jung JH, Jeong CW, et al. : Clinical significance of pre-treated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in the management of urothelial carcinoma: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 9:1365, 2019 PubMed PMC
Apolo AB, Riches J, Schöder H, et al. : Clinical value of fluorine-18 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:3973-3978, 2010 PubMed PMC