Proposal of neural network model for neurocognitive rehabilitation and its comparison with fuzzy expert system model
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
37845677
PubMed Central
PMC10580608
DOI
10.1186/s12911-023-02321-1
PII: 10.1186/s12911-023-02321-1
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- ACE-R, CHC, Fuzzy expert system model, Neural network model, Neurocognitive rehabilitation,
- MeSH
- Algorithms MeSH
- Expert Systems * MeSH
- Fuzzy Logic MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neural Networks, Computer MeSH
- Neurological Rehabilitation * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
This article focuses on the development of algorithms for a smart neurorehabilitation system, whose core is made up of artificial neural networks. The authors of the article have proposed a completely unique transfer of ACE-R results to the CHC model. This unique approach allows for the saturation of the CHC model domains according to modified ACE-R factor analysis. The outputs of the proposed algorithm thus enable the automatic creation of a personalized and optimized neurorehabilitation plan for individual patients to train their cognitive functions. A set of tasks in 6 levels of difficulty (level 1 to level 6) was designed for each of the nine CHC model domains. For each patient, the results of the ACE-R screening helped deter-mine the specific CHC domains to be rehabilitated, as well as the initial gaming level for rehabilitation in each domain. The proposed artificial neural network algorithm was adapted to real data from 703 patients. Experimental outputs were compared to the outputs of the initially designed fuzzy expert system, which was trained on the same real data, and all outputs from both systems were statistically evaluated against expert conclusions that were available. It is evident from the conducted experimental study that the smart neurorehabilitation system using artificial neural networks achieved significantly better results than the neurorehabilitation system whose core is a fuzzy expert system. Both algorithms are implemented into a comprehensive neurorehabilitation portal (Eddie), which was supported by a research project from the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic.
See more in PubMed
Wilson BA. Goal planning rather than neuropsychological tests should be used to structure and evaluate cognitive rehabilitation. Brain Impair. 2003;4(1):25–30. doi: 10.1375/brim.4.1.25.27030. DOI
Connolly ML, Bowden SC, Simpson LC, Horne M, McGregor S. The latent-variable structure of the Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination-revised. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2020;35:205–12. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acz081. PubMed DOI
Kotyrba M, Habiballa H, Volná E, Jarusek R, Smolka P, Prasek M, Malina M, Jaremova V, Vantuch J, Bar M, Kulistak P. Expert System for Neurocognitive Rehabilitation based on the transfer of the ACE-R to CHC Model factors. Mathematics. 2023;11(1):7. doi: 10.3390/math11010007. DOI
Laver KE, Lange B, George S, Deutsch JE, Saposnik G, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017;11. 10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub4. PubMed PMC
Aulisio MC, Han DY, Glueck AC. Virtual reality gaming as a neurorehabilitation tool for brain injuries in adults: a systematic review. Brain Injury. 2020;34(10):1322–30. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1802779. PubMed DOI
Srivastav AK, Samuel AJ. E-Neurorehabilitation: use of mobile phone based health applications during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Rehabil Med. 2020;52(9):1–2. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2734. PubMed DOI
Chen J, Jin W, Zhang XX, Xu W, Liu XN, Ren CC. Telerehabilitation approaches for stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(12):2660–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.014. PubMed DOI
Messinis L, Kosmidis MH, Nasios G, Dardiotis E, Tsaousides T. Cognitive neurorehabilitation in acquired neurological brain injury. Behav Neurol. 2019 doi: 10.1155/2019/8241951. PubMed DOI PMC
Díez-Cirarda M, Ibarretxe-Bilbao N, Peña J, Ojeda N. Neurorehabilitation in Parkinson’s disease: a critical review of cognitive rehabilitation effects on cognition and brain. Neural Plast. 2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/2651918. PubMed DOI PMC
Rizzo A. In: Virtual reality for psychological and neurocognitive interventions. Bouchard S, editor. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2019.
Moreno A, Wall KJ, Thangavelu K, Craven L, Ward E, Dissanayaka NN. A systematic review of the use of virtual reality and its effects on cognition in individuals with neurocognitive disorders. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions; 2019. pp. 834–50. PubMed PMC
Klimova B. Computer-based cognitive training in aging. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016;8:313. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00313. PubMed DOI PMC
Yang S, Li R, Li H, Xu K, Shi Y, Wang Q, Yang T, Sun X. Exploring the use of brain-computer interfaces in stroke neurorehabilitation. Biomed Res Int. 2021 doi: 10.1155/2021/9967348. PubMed DOI PMC
Templeton JM, Poellabauer C, Schneider S. Enhancement of neurocognitive assessments using smartphone capabilities: Systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2020;8(6):e15517. doi: 10.2196/15517. PubMed DOI PMC
Fazekas G, Tavaszi I. The future role of robots in neuro-rehabilitation. Expert Rev Neurother. 2019;19(6):471–3. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2019.1617700. PubMed DOI
Channa A, Popescu N, Ciobanu V. Wearable solutions for patients with Parkinson’s disease and neurocognitive disorder: a systematic review. Sensors. 2020;20(9):2713. doi: 10.3390/s20092713. PubMed DOI PMC
Solana J, Caceres C, Garcia-Molina A, Opisso E, Roig T, Tormos JM, Gomez EJ. Improving brain injury cognitive rehabilitation by personalized telerehabilitation services: Guttmann neuropersonal trainer. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf. 2014;19(1):124–31. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2014.2354537. PubMed DOI
Jung HT, Daneault JF, Lee H, Kim K, Kim B, Park S, Ryu T, Kim Y, Lee SI. Remote assessment of cognitive impairment level based on serious mobile game performance: an initial proof of concept. IEEE J Biomedical Health Inf. 2019;23(3):1269–77. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2893897. PubMed DOI
Walton CC, Lampit A, Boulamatsis C, Hallock H, Barr P, Ginige JA, Valenzuela M. Design and development of the brain training system for the digital maintain your brain dementia prevention trial. JMIR Aging. 2019;2(1):13135. doi: 10.2196/13135. PubMed DOI PMC
Lin, P. J., Zhai, X., Li, W., Li, T., Cheng, D., Li, C., … Ji, L. (2022). A Transferable Deep Learning Prognosis Model for Predicting Stroke Patients’ Recovery in Different Rehabilitation Trainings. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 26(12),6003–6011. PubMed
Rodrigues PAG. (2022) A framework for AI-driven neurorehabilitation training: the profiling challenge, Doctoral dissertation, Universidade da Madeira.
Bonanno M, De Luca R, De Nunzio AM, Quartarone A, Calabro RS. Innovative technologies in the neurorehabilitation of traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Sci. 2022;12(12):1678. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12121678. PubMed DOI PMC
Mathuranath PS, Nestor PJ, Berrios GE, Rakowicz W, Hodges JR. A brief cognitive test battery to differentiate Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2000;55(11):1613–20. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000434309.85312.19. PubMed DOI
McGrew K. CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence. 2009;37(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004. DOI
Hecht-Nielsen R. Neural networks for perception. Academic Press; 1992. Theory of the backpropagation neural network; pp. 65–93.
Martinkova L, Prasek M, Kotyrba M, Volna E. (2022, April). Application for training long-term memory on the basis of the CHC intelligence model. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2425, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
Dvorak A, Habiballa H, Novak V, Pavliska V. The software package LFLC 2000-its specificity, recent and perspective applications. Comput Ind. 2003;51:269–80. doi: 10.1016/S0166-3615(03)00060-5. DOI
Novak V. Fuzzy logic. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2007. Mathematical fuzzy logic in modeling of natural language semantics; pp. 135–72.
Belohlavek R, Novak V. Learning rule base in linguistic expert systems. Soft Comput. 2002;7(2):79–88. doi: 10.1007/s00500-002-0174-x. DOI
Vujičić T, Matijevi T, Ljucović J, Balota A, Ševarac Z. (2016). Comparative analysis of methods for determining number of hidden neurons in artificial neural network. In Central European conference on information and intelligent systems (Vol. 219), 2019 – 223.