The existing plant trait databases' applicability is limited for studies dealing with the flora and vegetation of the eastern and central part of Europe and for large-scale comparisons across regions, mostly because their geographical data coverage is limited and they incorporate records from several different sources, often from regions with markedly different climatic conditions. These problems motivated the compilation of a regional dataset for the flora of the Pannonian region (Eastern Central Europe). PADAPT, the Pannonian Dataset of Plant Traits relies on regional data sources and collates data on 54 traits and attributes of the plant species of the Pannonian region. The current version covers approximately 90% of the species of the region and consists of 126,337 records on 2745 taxa. By including species of the eastern part of Europe not covered by other databases, PADAPT can facilitate studying the flora and vegetation of the eastern part of the continent. Although data coverage is far from complete, PADAPT meets the longstanding need for a regional database of the Pannonian flora.

Aggtelek National Park Directorate Jósvafő Hungary

Balaton felvidéki National Park Directorate Csopak Hungary

Botanical Garden University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

Botanical Garden University of Pécs Pécs Hungary

Budapest Gyula u 9 Budapest Hungary

Budapest Halmi u 5 3 16 Budapest Hungary

Budapest Piroska u 4 Budapest Hungary

Department of Botany Hungarian Natural History Museum Budapest Hungary

Department of Botany Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Budai Campus Budapest Hungary

Department of Botany University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

Department of Ecology University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

Department of Ecology University of Pécs H 7624 Pécs Ifjúság u 6 Pécs Hungary

Department of Ecology University of Szeged Szeged Hungary

Department of Environmental and Landscape Geography Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary

Department of Environmental Sustainability Institute of Environmental Sciences Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Georgikon Campus H 8360 Keszthely Deák F u 16 Keszthely Hungary

Department of Plant Systematics Ecology and Theoretical Biology Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary

Doctoral School of Biology Faculty of Sciences University of Pécs Pécs Hungary

Herman Ottó Institute Nonprofit Ltd Budapest Hungary

HUN REN UD Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Research Group Debrecen Hungary

HUN REN UD Conservation Biology Research Group Debrecen Hungary

HUN REN UD Functional and Restoration Ecology Research Group Debrecen Hungary

Hungarian Natural History Museum Budapest Hungary

Institute for Soil Sciences HUN REN Centre for Agricultural Research Budapest Hungary

Institute for Wildlife Management and Nature Conservation Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Gödöllő Hungary

Institute of Botany Czech Academy of Sciences Třeboň Czech Republic

Institute of Ecology and Botany HUN REN Centre for Ecological Research Vácrátót Hungary

Institute of Environmental Protection and Nature Conservation University of Sopron Sopron Hungary

Institute of Silviculture and Forest Protection University of Sopron Sopron Hungary

József Attila City Library and Museum Collection Komló Hungary

Lendület Seed Ecology Research Group Institute of Ecology and Botany HUN REN Centre for Ecological Research Vácrátót Hungary

MTA SZTE 'Momentum' Applied Ecology Research Group University of Szeged Szeged Hungary

National Food Chain Safety Office Budapest Hungary

Natural History Department Savaria Museum Szombathely Hungary

ÖMKi Hungarian Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Budapest Hungary

Polish Academy of Sciences Botanical Garden Center for Biological Diversity Conservation in Powsin Warszawa Poland

Saint Orsolya Catholic Secondary and Elementary School Sopron Hungary

Wetland Ecology Research Group Institute of Aquatic Ecology HUN REN Centre for Ecological Research Debrecen Hungary

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Lavorel S, Garnier É. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct. Ecol. 2002;16:545–556. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x. DOI

Török P, Bullock JM, Jiménez-Alfaro B, Sonkoly J. The importance of dispersal and species establishment in vegetation dynamics and resilience. J. Veg. Sci. 2020;31:935–942. doi: 10.1111/jvs.12958. DOI

Kühn I, Durka W, Klotz S. BiolFlor: a new plant-trait database as a tool for plant invasion ecology. Divers. Distrib. 2004;10:363–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00106.x. DOI

Kleyer M, et al. The LEDA Traitbase: a database of life-history traits of the Northwest European flora. J. Ecol. 2008;96:1266–1274. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01430.x. DOI

Tavşanoğlu Ç, Pausas JG. A functional trait database for Mediterranean Basin plants. Sci. Data. 2018;5:1–18. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.135. PubMed DOI PMC

Falster D, et al. AusTraits, a curated plant trait database for the Australian flora. Sci. Data. 2021;8:1–20. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-01006-6. PubMed DOI PMC

Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. Seed Information Database (SID), version 7.1. http://data.kew.org/sid/ (2022).

Hintze C, et al. D3: the dispersal and diaspore database–baseline data and statistics on seed dispersal. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2013;15:180–192. doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2013.02.001. DOI

Fernández-Pascual E. SylvanSeeds, a seed germination database for temperate deciduous forests. J. Veg. Sci. 2021;32:e12960. doi: 10.1111/jvs.12960. DOI

Chytrý M, et al. Pladias Database of the Czech flora and vegetation. Preslia. 2021;93:1–87. doi: 10.23855/preslia.2021.001. DOI

Kattge J, et al. TRY plant trait database–enhanced coverage and open access. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2020;26:119–188. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14904. PubMed DOI

Albert CH, et al. A multi-trait approach reveals the structure and the relative importance of intra vs. interspecific variability in plant traits. Funct. Ecol. 2010;24:1192–1201. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01727.x. DOI

Cerabolini BE, et al. Can CSR classification be generally applied outside Britain? Plant Ecol. 2010;210:253–261. doi: 10.1007/s11258-010-9753-6. DOI

Fekete G, Király G. & Molnár, Zs. Delineation of the Pannonian vegetation region. Comm. Ecol. 2016;17:114–124. doi: 10.1556/168.2016.17.1.14. DOI

Bartha, D., Bán, M., Schmidt, D. & Tiborcz, V. Vascular plants of Hungary online database (http://floraatlasz.uni-sopron.hu) Department of Botany and Nature Conservation, Faculty of Forestry, Sopron University (2022)

McIntosh-Buday A, et al. New data of plant leaf traits from Central Europe. Data Br. 2022;42:108286. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108286. PubMed DOI PMC

Törő-Szijgyártó, et al. New thousand-seed weight dataset for plant species of Central Europe. Data Br. 2023;48:109081. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109081. PubMed DOI PMC

Perez-Harguindeguy N, et al. Corrigendum to: new handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot. 2016;64:715–716. doi: 10.1071/BT12225_CO. DOI

Csontos, P. A természetes magbank kutatásának módszerei (Scientia Kiadó, 2001).

Török P, et al. New thousand-seed weight records of the Pannonian flora and their application in analysing social behaviour types. Acta Bot. Hung. 2013;55:429–472. doi: 10.1556/ABot.55.2013.3-4.17. DOI

Török P, et al. New measurements of thousand-seed weight of species in the Pannonian Flora. Acta Bot. Hung. 2016;58:187–198. doi: 10.1556/034.58.2016.1-2.10. DOI

Sádlo J, Chytrý M, Pergl J, Pyšek P. Plant dispersal strategies: a new classification based on the multiple dispersal modes of individual species. Preslia. 2018;90:1–22. doi: 10.23855/preslia.2018.001. DOI

Soó, R. A magyar flóra és vegetáció rendszertani-növényföldrajzi kézikönyve, I–VI. (Akadémiai Kiadó, 1964-1980).

Borhidi A. Social behaviour types, the naturalness and relative ecological indicator values of the higher plants in the Hungarian Flora. Acta Bot. Hung. 1995;39:97–181.

Sonkoly J, 2023. PADAPT 1.0 – the Pannonian Dataset of Plant Traits. figshare. PubMed DOI PMC

Király, G. Új magyar füvészkönyv. Magyarország hajtásos növényei. Határozókulcsok. [New Hungarian Herbal. The Vascular Plants of Hungary. Identification key.] (Aggteleki Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság, 2009).

Ujvárosi, M. Gyomnövények (Mezőgazdasági Kiadó, 1973).

Botta-Dukát Z, Bartha D, Dancza I, Lukács BA, Pinke G. Adaptation of life form categorization of Ellenberg and Mueller-Dombois to the Hungarian flora. Acta Bot. Hung. 2023;65:1–34. doi: 10.1556/034.65.2023.1-2.1. DOI

Schermann, S. Magismeret I-II. (Akadémiai Kiadó, 1967).

Csontos P, Tamás J, Balogh L. Thousand seed weight records of species from the flora of Hungary, I. Monocotyledonopsida. Stud. Bot. Hung. 2003;34:121–126.

Csontos P, Tamás J, Balogh L. Thousand seed weight records of species from the flora of Hungary, II. Dicotyledonopsida. Stud. Bot. Hung. 2007;38:179–189.

Csontos P, Kalapos T, Tamás J. Comparison of seed longevity for thirty forest, grassland and weed species of the Central European Flora: Results of a seed burial experiment. Polish J. Ecol. 2016;64:313–326. doi: 10.3161/15052249PJE2016.64.3.002. DOI

Matus G, Tóthmérész B, Papp M. Restoration prospects of abandoned species-rich sandy grasslands in Hungary. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2003;6:169–178.

Valkó O, Török P, Tóthmérész B, Matus G. Restoration potential in seed banks of acidic fen and dry‐mesophilous meadows: can restoration be based on local seed banks? Rest. Ecol. 2011;19:9–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00679.x. DOI

Török, P. A magkészlet szerepe mészkerülő gyepek rehabilitációjában. (PhD dissertation, Debreceni Egyetem, 2008)

Tóth, K. A magbank szerepe a természetes gyepek diverzitásának fenntartásában és a gyepregenerációban. (PhD dissertation, Debreceni Egyetem, 2015).

Bódis J, et al. Biological flora of Central Europe Himantoglossum adriaticum H. Baumann. PPEES. 2019;40:125461.

Canne JM. Determinations of chromosome numbers in Viola (Violaceae) Can. J. Bot. 1987;65:653–655. doi: 10.1139/b87-086. DOI

de Castro D. Novas numeros de cromosomas para o genero Cytisus L. Agronomia Lusitana. 1949;11:85–89.

Ciocarlan, V. Flora Ilustrata a Romaniei (Editura CERES, 2009)

Dvořak F. Study of chromosomes of Angiosperms 5. Scripta Fac. Sci. Nat. UJEP Brun., Biol. 1977;l:9–30.

D’Emerico S, Paciola C, Tomasi F. Contribution to the karyomorphology of some species of the genus Quercus. Silvae Genetica. 2000;49:243–245.

Dönmez AA. The genus Crataegus L. (Rosaceae) with special reference to hybridisation and biodiversity in Turkey. Turk. J. Bot. 2004;28:29–37.

Forissier, R. IOPB Chromosome number reports XLVII. Taxon24, 143-146. & 671–678 (1973).

Forissier R. Recherches cytotaxonomiques préliminaires sur les genres Lembotropis, Cytisus, Chamaecytisus, Genista et Chamaespartium. Bulletin de la Société Neuchâteloise des Sciences Naturelles. 1973;96:51–65.

Gilot J. Contribution à l’étude cytotaxonomique des Genisteae et des Loteae. Cellule. 1965;65:317–347.

Gregor T, Hand R. Chromosomenzahlen von Farn- und Samenpflanzen aus Deutschland. Kochia. 2014;8:63–70. doi: 10.21248/kochia.v8.72. DOI

Holubová-Klásková A. Bemerkungen zur Gliederung der Gattung Cytisus L. s.l. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Biolgica. 1964;2:1–23.

Kole, C. Forest Trees (Springer, 2007)

Kovanda M. Polyploidy and variation in the Campanula rotundifolia complex. Part II (Taxonomic). 2. Revision of the groups Saxicolae, Lanceolatae and Alpicolae in Czechoslovakia and adjacent regions. Folia Geobotanica & Phytotaxonomica. 1970;5:171–208. doi: 10.1007/BF02851825. DOI

Majure CL, et al. Phylogeny of Opuntia s.s. (Cactaceae): Clade delineation, geographic origins, and reticulate evolution. Amer. J. Bot. 2012;99:847–864. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1100375. PubMed DOI

Löve Á. IOPB chromosome number reports XLII. Taxon. 1973;22:647–654. doi: 10.1002/j.1996-8175.1973.tb03416.x. DOI

Májovsky, J. & Murin, A. Karyotaxonomický Prehľad Flóry Slovenska (Veda, 1987).

Moore, D. M. Flora Europaea Check-list and Chromosome Index. (Cambridge University Press, 1982).

McKelvey SD, Sax K. Taxonomic and cytological relationships of Yucca and Agave. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum. 1933;14:76–81. doi: 10.5962/bhl.part.9957. DOI

Moulanis D, Illies ZM. Vergleichende zytologische Untersuchungen der Chromosomenstruktur von Abies borisii-regis Mattf., A. cephalonica Loud, und A. alba Mill. Silvae Genetica. 1975;24:115–118.

Nebel BR. Chromosome counts in Vitis and Pyrus. Amer. Natur. 1929;63:188–189. doi: 10.1086/280251. DOI

Németh C. Sorbus pelsoensis (Sorbus subgenus Tormaria), a new species from the surroundings of Lake Balaton, Hungary. Stud. Bot. Hung. 2015;46:49–60. doi: 10.17110/StudBot.2015.46.1.49. DOI

Ohri D, Ahuja MR. Giemsa C-banded karyotype in Quercus L. (oak) Silvae Genetica. 1990;39:216–219.

Paule J, et al. Chromosome numbers of the flora of Germany – a new online database of georeferenced chromosome counts and flow cytometric ploidy estimates. Plant Syst. Evol. 2017;303:1123–1129. doi: 10.1007/s00606-016-1362-y. DOI

Pinkava DJ, McLeod MG. Chromosome numbers in some cacti of western North America. Brittonia. 1971;23:171–176. doi: 10.2307/2805433. DOI

Rice A, et al. The Chromosome Counts Database (CCDB) – a community resource of plant chromosome numbers. New Phytol. 2014;206:19–26. doi: 10.1111/nph.13191. PubMed DOI

Dos Santos AC. Algumas contagens de Cromosomas nos Géneros Genista L. e Cytisus L. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana. 1944;19:519–522.

Scaltsoyiannes A, Tsaktsira M, Drouzas AD. Allozyme differentiation in the Mediterranean firs (Abies, Pinaceae). A first comparative study with phylogenetic implications. Plant Syst. Evol. 1999;216:289–307. doi: 10.1007/BF01084404. DOI

Sennikov AN, Kurtto A. A phylogenetic checklist of Sorbus s.l. (Rosaceae) in Europe. Memoranda Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica. 2017;93:1–78.

Sochor M, Trávníček B, Király G. Ploidy level variation in the genus Rubus in the Pannonian Basin and the northern Balkans, and evolutionary implications. Plant Syst. Evol. 2019;305:611–626. doi: 10.1007/s00606-019-01593-3. DOI

Sramkó G, et al. Molecular phylogenetics, seed morphometrics, chromosome number evolution and systematics of European Elatine L. (Elatinaceae) species. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2800. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2800. PubMed DOI PMC

Siljak, S. Basic data on the chromosome complement of the Acer tataricum L. I.er Symposium of Biosystematic in Yougoslavia Proceedings 139–144 (1971).

Zaldos V, Papes D, Brown SC, Panaus O, Siljak-Yakovlev S. Genome size and base composition of seven Quercus species: inter and intra-population variation. Genome. 1998;41:162–168. doi: 10.1139/g98-006. DOI

Horváth, F. et al. Flóra Adatbázis 1.2. Taxon-lista és attribútum állomány. [Flora database 1.2, List of taxa and attributes.] (MTA ÖBKI 1995).

Bagi I, Székely Á. Az Elymus elongatus (Host) Runemark, magas tarackbúza előfordulása a Kiskunság déli részén - a korábbi lelőhelyek rövid áttekintés. Bot. Közl. 2006;93:77–92.

Barina Z, Somogyi G, Pifkó D. Typification of names in the Dianthus plumarius group in the Carpatho-Pannonian region. Taxon. 2020;69:161–169. doi: 10.1002/tax.12186. DOI

Bátori Z, Erdős L, Somlyay L. Euphorbia prostrata (Euphorbiaceae), a new alien in the Carpathian Basin. Acta Bot. Hung. 2012;54:235–243. doi: 10.1556/ABot.54.2012.3-4.2. DOI

Bauer N, Somlyay L. A Crepis mollis (Jacq.) Asch. subsp. hieracioides (Waldst. & Kit.) Domin újrafelfedezése Magyarországon/Rediscovery of Crepis mollis (Jacq.) Asch. subsp. hieracioides (Waldst. & Kit.) Domin in Hungary. Kitaibelia. 2015;20:150–156. doi: 10.17542/kit.20.150. DOI

Czimber G, Varga Z, Radics L. Új mediterrán fajok a hazai gyomflórában: a fehér kányazsázsa (Diplotaxis erucoides (Torner) DC.) Növénytermelés. 2008;57:253–265.

Csecserits A, Barabás S. A labodalevelű szárnyaslibatop (Cycloloma atriplicifolia) újabb előfordulása a Kiskunság északi részén. Kitaibelia. 2020;25:107–108. doi: 10.17542/kit.25.107. DOI

Csiky J. A Cuscuta approximata Babington Magyarországon (Cuscutaceae Dumort.) Kitaibelia. 2003;8:75–80.

Csiky J, et al. A Cirsium boujartii (Pill. et Mitterp.) Schultz Bip. újrafelfedezése Magyarországon/Rediscovery of Cirsium boujartii (Pill. et Mitterp.) Schultz Bip. in Hungary. Flora Pannonica. 2005;3:69–78.

Csiky J, Mesterházy A, Szalontai B, Pótó-Oláh E. A morphological study of Ceratophyllum tanaiticum, a species new to the flora of Hungary. Preslia. 2010;82:247–259.

Dancza I, Hoffmann ZP, Doma C. Cyperus esculentus (yellow nutsedge) - a new weed in Hungary. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz. 2004;19:223–229.

Dítě D, Eliáš P, Király G. Dactylorhiza lapponica (Laest. ex Hartm.) Soó, a new taxon for Hungary. Flora Pannonica. 2006;4:91–97.

Fekete R, Mesterházy A, Valkó O, Molnár V. A. A hitchhiker from the beach: the spread of the maritime halophyte Cochlearia danica along salted continental roads. Preslia. 2018;90:23–37. doi: 10.23855/preslia.2018.023. DOI

Hroudová Z, Zákravský P, Ducháček M, Marhold K. Taxonomy, distribution and ecology of Bolboschoenus in Europe. Annales Botanici Fennici. 2007;44:81–102.

Kerényi-Nagy, V. in Magyarország ritka fa- és cserjefajainak atlasza. (ed. Bartha D.) Piros áltermésű ritka galagonyafajok – Crataegus spp. (Kossuth Kiadó, 2012).

Király G. Kiegészítések a magyar adventív-flóra ismeretéhez II. Az Epilobium ciliatum Rafin. Magyarországon. Flora Pannonica. 2005;3:27–39.

Király G, Király A. Az Agrimonia procera Wallr. előfordulása Magyarországon. Flora Pannonica. 2004;2:7–24.

Király G, Király A. Adatok és kiegészítések a magyar flóra ismeretéhez III. Botanikai Közlemények. 2018;105:27–96. doi: 10.17716/BotKozlem.2018.105.1.27. DOI

Király, G., Steták, D. & Bányász, Á. in Biological Invasions – from Ecology to Conservation (eds. Rabitsch, W., Essl F. & Klingenstein F.) Spread of invasive macrophytes in Hungary (Neobiota 7, 123-130, 2008).

Király G, et al. Remote locality of the littoral Carex extensa (Cyperaceae) in Hungary — long distance dispersal from coastal to inland salt marshes. Biologia. 2013;68:872–878. doi: 10.2478/s11756-013-0219-x. DOI

Király G, et al. Taxonomical and chorological notes 10 (98–110) Stud. Bot. Hung. 2019;50:391–407. doi: 10.17110/StudBot.2019.50.2.391. DOI

Korda M. Újabb adat a magyar adventívflóra ismeretéhez: az Allium paradoxum (M. Bieb.) G. Don 1827 Magyarországon. Kitaibelia. 2013;18:31–34.

Kovács D, Mesterházy A. A Ceratochloa (DC. et P. Beauv.) Hack. alnemzetség (Bromus L., Poaceae) hazai története és elterjedése. Kitaibelia. 2015;20:44–47. doi: 10.17542/kit.20.44. DOI

Kun A. Az Apium repens császártöltési állományának monitorozása (2006–2015) Kitaibelia. 2019;24:1–8. doi: 10.17542/kit.24.1. DOI

Mandák B, Prach K. Cycloloma atriplicifolia, a new alien species in Hungary. Preslia. 2001;73:153–160.

Mesterházy A, Király G, Wallnöfer B. On the occurrence of Carex randalpina B. Wallnöfer (Cyperaceae) in Hungary. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien. Serie B für Botanik und Zoologie. 2011;112:177–180.

Mesterházy A, et al. Taxonomical and chorological notes 5 (59–68) Stud. Bot. Hung. 2017;48:263–275. doi: 10.17110/StudBot.2017.48.2.263. DOI

Molnár V., A. Magyarország orchideáinak atlasza (Kossuth Kiadó, 2011).

Molnár C, Juhász M. Az alacsony libatop (Chenopodium pumilio R.Br.) Zuglóban és új adatok Északkelet-Magyarország idegenhonos fajainak elterjedéséhez. Kitaibelia. 2016;21:221–226. doi: 10.17542/kit.21.221. DOI

Mosolygó-L Á, et al. Molecular genetic evidence for allotetraploid hybrid speciation in the genus Crocus L. (Iridaceae) Phytotaxa. 2016;258:121–136. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.258.2.2. DOI

Pal RW. Echinaria capitata (Seslerieae, poaceae), a new grass species for the Hungarian flora. Acta Bot. Hung. 2011;53:175–180. doi: 10.1556/ABot.53.2011.1-2.17. DOI

Partosfalvi P, Madarász J, Dancza I. Az ázsiai gyapjúfű (Eriochloa villosa (Thunb.) Kunth) megjelenése Magyarországon. Növényvédelem. 2008;44:297–304.

Pifkó D. Adatok a hazai Chamaecytisus fajok ismeretéhez I. Flora Pannonica. 2004;2:25–36.

Pinke G, Czimber G, Pál R. A Chorispora tenella (Pall.) DC. a Szigetközben. Kitaibelia. 1999;4:287–288.

Pinke G, Pál R, Király G, Szendrődi V, Mesterházy A. The occurrence and habitat conditions of Anthoxanthum puelii Lecoq & Lamotte and other Atlantic-Mediterranean weed species in Hungary. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz Sonderheft. 2006;20:587–596.

Pinke G, Molnár S, Garamvölgyi V, Barina Z. The first occurrence of Euphorbia davidii in Hungary. (Új gyomnövény Magyarországon a Dávid-Kutyatej (Euphorbia davidii Subils)) Növényvédelem. 2012;48:117–120.

Simon, T. A magyarországi edényes flóra határozója (Tankönyvkiadó, 1992).

Simon T. A havasi varázslófű (Circaea alpina L.) hazai cönológiája. Bot. Közl. 2001;88:107–116.

Simon T, Podani J. Régi-új faj, az Euphorbia segetalis L. a magyar flórában. Kitaibelia. 2007;12:121–123.

Solymosi P. A magyarországi adventív flóra lappangó faja a sárgás varjúláb [Coronopus didymus (L.) Smith] Növényvédelem. 2016;52:598–599.

Somlyay L. Occurrence of Chamaesyce glyptosperma, and a survey of the genus Chamaesyce (Euphorbiaceae) in Hungary. Annales historico-naturales Musei nationalis Hungarici. 2009;101:23–32.

Štech M, et al. Calamagrostis purpurea (Poaceae) – A long neglected boreal element, new for the flora of Austria. Neilreichia - Zeitschrift für Pflanzensystematik und Floristik Österreichs. 2020;11:133–152.

Takács A, et al. Taxonomical and chorological notes 3 (28–37) Stud. Bot. Hung. 2016;47:345–357.

Vidéki R. Cycloloma atriplicifolia (Spreng.) J. M. Coulter és Salsola collina Pallas Magyarországon/Cycloloma atriplicifolia (Spreng.) J. M. Coulter und Salsola collina Pallas in Ungarn. Flora Pannonica. 2005;3:121–134.

Virók V, Farkas R. Új növényfaj a hazai edényes flórában: a Haller-kövifoszlár (Cardaminopsis halleri (L.) Hayek) Kitaibelia. 2008;13:29–33.

Vojtkó A. Mirigyes fodorka (Asplenium lepidum C. Presl.) előfordulása a Bükk-hegységben. Kitaibelia. 1996;1:25.

Wilhalm T. Digitaria ciliaris in Europe. Willdenowia. 2009;39:247–259. doi: 10.3372/wi.39.39203. DOI

Wirth T, Gyergyák K. Az Asparagus verticillatus L. Magyarországon. Kitaibelia. 2015;20:38–43. doi: 10.17542/kit.20.38. DOI

Wolf MA, Király G. Euphorbia serpens (Euphorbiaceae), a new alien apecies in Hungary. Acta Bot. Hung. 2014;56:243–250. doi: 10.1556/ABot.56.2014.1-2.16. DOI

Csiky J, et al. Checklit of alien vascular plants in Hungary and their invasion biological characteristics. Acta Bot. Hung. 2023;65:53–72. doi: 10.1556/034.65.2023.1-2.3. DOI

Király G. Vörös Lista. A magyarországi edényes flóra veszélyeztetett fajai./Red List of the Vascular Flora of Hungary. Sopron, 2007)

Simon T. A hazai edényes flóra természetvédelmi-érték besorolása. Abstracta Botanica. 1988;12:1–23.

Ellenberg, H. et al. Zeigerwerte von pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobotanica18 (1991).

Zólyomi B, et al. Einreihung von 1400 Arten der ungarischen Flora in ökologische Gruppen nach TWR-Zahlen. Fragm. Bot. Mus. Hist. Nat. Hung. 1967;4:101–142.

Lhotsky B, Csecserits A, Kovács B, Botta-Dukát Z. New plant trait records of the Hungarian flora. Acta Bot. Hung. 2016;58:397–400. doi: 10.1556/ABot.58.2016.3-4.8. DOI

E-Vojtkó A, et al. Leaf trait records of vascular plant species in the Pannonian flora with special focus on endemics and rarities. Folia Geobot. 2020;55:73–79. doi: 10.1007/s12224-020-09363-7. DOI

Gyalus A, et al. Plant trait records of the Hungarian and Serbian flora and methodological description of some hardly measurable plant species. Acta Bot. Hung. 2022;64:451–454. doi: 10.1556/034.64.2022.3-4.14. DOI

Ukrainian Plant Trait Database: UkrTrait v. 1.0

PADAPT 1.0 - the Pannonian Dataset of Plant Traits