Measurement of the top quark mass using a profile likelihood approach with the lepton + jets final states in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV

. 2023 ; 83 (10) : 963. [epub] 20231025

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Francie Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid37906635

The mass of the top quark is measured in 36.3fb-1 of LHC proton-proton collision data collected with the CMS detector at s=13TeV. The measurement uses a sample of top quark pair candidate events containing one isolated electron or muon and at least four jets in the final state. For each event, the mass is reconstructed from a kinematic fit of the decay products to a top quark pair hypothesis. A profile likelihood method is applied using up to four observables per event to extract the top quark mass. The top quark mass is measured to be 171.77±0.37GeV. This approach significantly improves the precision over previous measurements.

1 Physikalisches Institut RWTH Aachen University Aachen Germany

3 Physikalisches Institut A RWTH Aachen University Aachen Germany

3 Physikalisches Institut B RWTH Aachen University Aachen Germany

Academy of Scientific Research and Technology of the Arab Republic of Egypt Egyptian Network of High Energy Physics Cairo Egypt

Adiyaman University Adiyaman Turkey

Ain Shams University Cairo Egypt

Another Institute or International Laboratory Covered by a Cooperation Agreement with CERN Geneva Switzerland

Authors Affiliated with an Institute or an International Laboratory Covered by a Cooperation Agreement with CERN Geneva Switzerland

Baylor University Waco TX USA

Beihang University Beijing China

Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla Puebla Mexico

Bergische University Wuppertal Wuppertal Germany

Bethel University St Paul MN USA

Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Mumbai India

Bingol University Bingol Turkey

Bogazici University Istanbul Turkey

Boston University Boston MA USA

Bozok Universitetesi Rektörlügü Yozgat Turkey

Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus Germany

British University in Egypt Cairo Egypt

Brown University Providence RI USA

Brunel University Uxbridge UK

Cairo University Cairo Egypt

California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA

Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

Catholic University of America Washington DC USA

Center for High Energy Physics Fayoum University El Fayoum Egypt

Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rio de Janeiro Brazil

Centro de Investigacion y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN Mexico City Mexico

Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas Medioambientales y Tecnológicas Madrid Spain

Centro Siciliano di Fisica Nucleare e di Struttura Della Materia Catania Italy

CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research Geneva Switzerland

Charles University Prague Czech Republic

College of Engineering and Technology American University of the Middle East Dasman Kuwait

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología Mexico City Mexico

Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto Officina dei Materiali Perugia Italy

Cornell University Ithaca NY USA

Department of Applied Physics Faculty of Science and Technology Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Bangi Malaysia

Department of Physics Faculty of Science Chulalongkorn University Bangkok Thailand

Department of Physics Isfahan University of Technology Isfahan Iran

Department of Physics Kyung Hee University Seoul Korea

Department of Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China

Department of Physics University of California Santa Barbara Santa Barbara CA USA

Department of Physics University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland

Department of Physics University of Ruhuna Matara Sri Lanka

Department of Physics University of Science and Technology of Mazandaran Behshahr Iran

Department of Physics Yonsei University Seoul Korea

Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron Hamburg Germany

Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland

Erciyes University Kayseri Turkey

Erzincan Binali Yildirim University Erzincan Turkey

Escuela Politecnica Nacional Quito Ecuador

ETH Zurich Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Zurich Switzerland

Facultatea de Fizica Universitatea Babes Bolyai Cluj Napoca Romania

Faculty of Computer Science Electronics and Telecommunications AGH University of Krakow Krakow Poland

Faculty of Electrical Engineering Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture University of Split Split Croatia

Faculty of Engineering Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Istanbul Turkey

Faculty of Informatics University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

Faculty of Physics University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia

Faculty of Science Monash University Clayton Australia

Faculty of Science University of Split Split Croatia

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia IL USA

Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne FL USA

Florida State University Tallahassee FL USA

Forschungszentrum Jülich Jülich Germany

Georgian Technical University Tbilisi Georgia

Ghent University Ghent Belgium

Hacettepe University Ankara Turkey

Hanyang University Seoul Korea

Helsinki Institute of Physics Helsinki Finland

Helwan University Cairo Egypt

IIT Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar India

Imperial College London UK

Indian Institute of Science Bangalore India

Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune India

Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai India

Indian Institute of Technology Mumbai India

INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati Frascati Italy

INFN Sezione di Bari Università di Bari Politecnico di Bari Bari Italy

INFN Sezione di Bologna Università di Bologna Bologna Italy

INFN Sezione di Catania Università di Catania Catania Italy

INFN Sezione di Firenze Università di Firenze Florence Italy

INFN Sezione di Genova Università di Genova Genoa Italy

INFN Sezione di Milano Bicocca Università di Milano Bicocca Milan Italy

INFN Sezione di Napoli Università di Napoli 'Federico II' Napoles Italy; Università della Basilicata Potenza Italy; Università G Marconi Rome Italy

INFN Sezione di Padova Università di Padova Padua Italy; Università di Trento Trento Italy

INFN Sezione di Pavia Università di Pavia Pavia Italy

INFN Sezione di Perugia Università di Perugia Perugia Italy

INFN Sezione di Pisa Università di Pisa Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa Pisa Italy; Università di Siena Siena Italy

INFN Sezione di Roma Sapienza Università di Roma Rome Italy

INFN Sezione di Torino Università di Torino Turin Italy; Università del Piemonte Orientale Novara Italy

INFN Sezione di Trieste Università di Trieste Trieste Italy

Institut de Physique des 2 Infinis de Lyon Villeurbanne France

Institut für Hochenergiephysik Vienna Austria

Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria

Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences Tehran Iran

Institute for Scintillation Materials of National Academy of Science of Ukraine Kharkiv Ukraine

Institute for Universe and Elementary Particles Chonnam National University Kwangju Korea

Institute of Basic and Applied Sciences Faculty of Engineering Arab Academy for Science Technology and Maritime Transport Alexandria Egypt

Institute of Experimental Physics Faculty of Physics University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland

Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing China

Institute of Modern Physics and Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion beam Application Fudan University Shanghai China

Institute of Nuclear and Particle Physics NCSR Demokritos Aghia Paraskevi Greece

Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences Tashkent Uzbekistan

Institute of Nuclear Research ATOMKI Debrecen Hungary

Institute of Physics Bhubaneswar India

Institute of Physics University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

Institute or an International Laboratory Covered by a Cooperation Agreement with CERN Geneva Switzerland

Institute Rudjer Boskovic Zagreb Croatia

Instituto De Alta Investigación Universidad de Tarapacá Casilla 7 D Arica Chile

Instituto de Física de Cantabria CSIC Universidad de Cantabria Santander Spain

Instituto Universitario de Ciencias y Tecnologías Espaciales de Asturias Universidad de Oviedo Oviedo Spain

IPPP Durham University Durham UK

IRFU CEA Université Paris Saclay Gif sur Yvette France

Isfahan University of Technology Isfahan Iran

Istanbul Gedik University Istanbul Turkey

Istanbul Technical University Istanbul Turkey

Istanbul University Istanbul Turkey

Italian National Agency for New Technologies Energy and Sustainable Economic Development Bologna Italy

Izmir Bakircay University Izmir Turkey

Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA

Kafkas University Kars Turkey

Kansas State University Manhattan KS USA

Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University Karaman Turkey

Karlsruher Institut für Technologie Karlsruhe Germany

Karoly Robert Campus MATE Institute of Technology Gyongyos Hungary

Konya Technical University Konya Turkey

Korea University Seoul Korea

Kyungpook National University Daegu Korea

Laboratoire d'Annecy le Vieux de Physique des Particules IN2P3 CNRS Annecy le Vieux France

Laboratoire Leprince Ringuet CNRS IN2P3 Ecole Polytechnique Institut Polytechnique de Paris Palaiseau France

Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro dell'INFN Legnaro Italy

Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas Lisbon Portugal

Lappeenranta Lahti University of Technology Lappeenranta Finland

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore CA USA

Marmara University Istanbul Turkey

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA USA

Milli Savunma University Istanbul Turkey

MTA ELTE Lendület CMS Particle and Nuclear Physics Group Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary

Nanjing Normal University Nanjing China

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece

National Central University Chung Li Taiwan

National Centre for Nuclear Research Swierk Poland

National Centre for Particle Physics Universiti Malaya Kuala Lumpur Malaysia

National Centre for Physics Quaid 1 Azam University Islamabad Pakistan

National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics Tallinn Estonia

National Institute of Science Education and Research An OCC of Homi Bhabha National Institute Bhubaneswar Odisha India

National Science Centre Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology Kharkiv Ukraine

National Taiwan University Taipei Taiwan

National Technical University of Athens Athens Greece

Necmettin Erbakan University Konya Turkey

Northeastern University Boston MA USA

Northwestern University Evanston IL USA

Ozyegin University Istanbul Turkey

Panjab University Chandigarh India

Paul Scherrer Institut Villigen Switzerland

Physics Department Faculty of Science Assiut University Assiut Egypt

Physics Department Middle East Technical University Ankara Turkey

Physics Department Science and Art Faculty Çukurova University Adana Turkey

Princeton University Princeton NJ USA

Punjab Agricultural University Ludhiana India

Purdue University Northwest Hammond IN USA

Purdue University West Lafayette IN USA

Research Center of Experimental Health Science Near East University Mersin Turkey

Rice University Houston TX USA

Riga Technical University Riga Latvia

Rutgers The State University of New Jersey Piscataway NJ USA

Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot UK

Saegis Campus Nugegoda Sri Lanka

Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics HBNI Kolkata India

School of Physics and Astronomy University of Southampton Southampton UK

Scuola Superiore Meridionale Università di Napoli 'Federico II' Naples Italy

Sejong University Seoul Korea

Seoul National University Seoul Korea

Sharif University of Technology Tehran Iran

Sinop University Sinop Turkey

State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing China

State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo NY USA

Stefan Meyer Institute for Subatomic Physics Vienna Austria

Suez University Suez Egypt

Sun Yat Sen University Guangzhou China

Sungkyunkwan University Suwon Korea

Tata Institute of Fundamental Research A Mumbai India

Tata Institute of Fundamental Research B Mumbai India

Texas A and M University at Qatar Doha Qatar

Texas A and M University College Station TX USA

Texas Tech University Lubbock TX USA

The Ohio State University Columbus OH USA

The Rockefeller University New York NY USA

The University of Alabama Tuscaloosa AL USA

The University of Iowa Iowa City IA USA

The University of Kansas Lawrence KS USA

The University of the State of Amazonas Manaus Brazil

Trincomalee Campus Eastern University Sri Lanka Nilaveli Sri Lanka

TU Wien Vienna Austria

UFMS Nova Andradina Brazil

United States Naval Academy Annapolis MD USA

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid Spain

Universidad de Antioquia Medellín Colombia

Universidad de Los Andes Bogotá Colombia

Universidad de Sonora Hermosillo Mexico

Universidad Iberoamericana Mexico City Mexico

Universidad San Francisco de Quito Quito Ecuador

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil

Universidade Estadual de Campinas Campinas Brazil

Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal do ABC São Paulo Brazil

Università degli Studi Guglielmo Marconi Rome Italy

Università di Napoli 'Federico II' Naples Italy

Università di Torino Turin Italy

Universität Zürich Zurich Switzerland

Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain la Neuve Belgium

Université de Haute Alsace Mulhouse France

Université de Strasbourg CNRS IPHC UMR 7178 Strasbourg France

Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium

Universiteit Antwerpen Antwerpen Belgium

University College Dublin Dublin Ireland

University of Bristol Bristol UK

University of California Davis Davis CA USA

University of California Los Angeles CA USA

University of California Riverside Riverside CA USA

University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China

University of Colombo Colombo Sri Lanka

University of Colorado Boulder Boulder CO USA

University of Cyprus Nicosia Cyprus

University of Delhi Delhi India

University of Florida Gainesville FL USA

University of Hamburg Hamburg Germany

University of Hyderabad Hyderabad India

University of Illinois Chicago Chicago USA

University of Ioánnina Ioannina Greece

University of Maryland College Park MD USA

University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA

University of Mississippi Oxford MS USA

University of Montenegro Podgorica Montenegro

University of Nebraska Lincoln Lincoln NE USA

University of Notre Dame Notre Dame IN USA

University of Puerto Rico Mayagüez PR USA

University of Rochester Rochester NY USA

University of Science and Technology of China Hefei China

University of Seoul Seoul Korea

University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria

University of Tennessee Knoxville TN USA

University of Virginia Charlottesville VA USA

University of Visva Bharati Santiniketan India

University of Wisconsin Madison Madison WI USA

UPES University of Petroleum and Energy Studies Dehra Dun India

Vanderbilt University Nashville TN USA

Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania

VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia

Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels Belgium

Wayne State University Detroit MI USA

Wigner Research Centre for Physics Budapest Hungary

Yerevan Physics Institute Yerevan Armenia

Yerevan State University Yerevan Armenia

Zhejiang University Hangzhou Zhejiang China

Zobrazit více v PubMed

CDF Collaboration, Observation of top quark production in PubMed

D0 Collaboration, Observation of the top quark. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2632 (1995). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2632. arXiv:hep-ex/9503003 PubMed

Degrassi G, et al. Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the standard model at NNLO. JHEP. 2012;08:1. doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2012)098. DOI

Bezrukov F, Kalmykov MY, Kniehl BA, Shaposhnikov M. Higgs boson mass and new physics. JHEP. 2012;10:140. doi: 10.1007/JHEP10(2012)140. DOI

The ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, and OPAL Collaborations and the LEP Electroweak Working Group, Electroweak measurements in electron–positron collisions at W-boson-pair energies at LEP. Phys. Rep. 532, 119 (2013). 10.1016/j.physrep.2013.07.004. arXiv:1302.3415

Baak M, et al. The electroweak fit of the standard model after the discovery of a new boson at the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2012;72:2205. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2205-9. DOI

Baak M, et al. The global electroweak fit at NNLO and prospects for the LHC and ILC. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2014;74:3046. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3046-5. DOI

Particle Data Group, P.A. Zyla et al., Review of particle physics. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020). 10.1093/ptep/ptaa104

CDF and D0 Collaborations, Combination of CDF and D0 results on the mass of the top quark using up

ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the top quark mass in the

CMS Collaboration, Measurement of the top quark mass using proton–proton data at

Hoang AH. What is the top quark mass? Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2020;70:225. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-101918-023530. DOI

CMS Collaboration Measurement of the top quark mass with lepton+jets final states using PubMed DOI PMC

DELPHI Collaboration, Measurement of the mass and width of the W boson in

CMS Collaboration, Measurement of the top-quark mass in

CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS pythia tunes from underlying-event measurements. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2020;80:4. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Bols E, et al. Jet flavour classification using DeepJet. JINST. 2020;15:P12012. doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/15/12/P12012. DOI

HEPData record for this analysis (2023). 10.17182/hepdata.127993

CMS Collaboration, The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC. JINST 3, S08004 (2008). 10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

CMS Collaboration, Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid. CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02 (2015). http://cds.cern.ch/record/2020886

CMS Collaboration, Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector. JINST 12, P10003 (2017). 10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003. arXiv:1706.04965

Cacciari M, Salam GP, Soyez G. The anti- DOI

Cacciari M, Salam GP, Soyez G. FastJet user manual. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2012;72:1896. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2. DOI

CMS Collaboration, Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV. JINST 12, P02014 (2017). 10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/P02014. arXiv:1607.03663

CMS Collaboration, Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV. JINST 13, P05011 (2018). 10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/P05011. arXiv:1712.07158

CMS Collaboration, Performance of the DeepJet b tagging algorithm using 41.9/fb of data from proton–proton collisions at 13 TeV with Phase 1 CMS detector. CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2018-058 (2018). http://cds.cern.ch/record/2646773

CMS Collaboration, Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton–proton collisions at

CMS Collaboration, Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC. JINST 16, P05014 (2021). 10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/P05014. arXiv:2012.06888

CMS Collaboration, ECAL 2016 refined calibration and Run2 summary plots. CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2020-021 (2020). https://cds.cern.ch/record/2717925

CMS Collaboration, Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton–proton collisions at

CMS Collaboration, Precision luminosity measurement in proton–proton collisions at PubMed PMC

CMS Collaboration, The CMS trigger system. JINST 12, P01020 (2017). 10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020. arXiv:1609.02366

Nason P. A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms. JHEP. 2004;11:040. doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040. DOI

Frixione S, Nason P, Oleari C. Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method. JHEP. 2007;11:070. doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070. DOI

Alioli S, Nason P, Oleari C, Re E. A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX. JHEP. 2010;06:043. doi: 10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043. DOI

Sjöstrand T, et al. An introduction to pythia8.2. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2015;191:159. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024. DOI

Butterworth J, et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II. J. Phys. G. 2016;43:023001. doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/43/2/023001. DOI

NNPDF Collaboration, Parton distributions from high-precision collider data. Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 663 (2017). 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5. arXiv:1706.00428 PubMed PMC

S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, E. Re, NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG:

Re E. Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2011;71:1547. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1547-z. DOI

Alwall J, et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations. JHEP. 2014;07:079. doi: 10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079. DOI

Alwall J, et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2008;53:473. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0490-5. DOI

Frederix R, Frixione S. Merging meets matching in MC@NLO. JHEP. 2012;12:061. doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2012)061. DOI

P. Skands, S. Carrazza, J. Rojo, Tuning pythia8.1: the Monash 2013 tune. Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3024 (2014). 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3024-y. arXiv:1404.5630

GEANT4 Collaboration, Geant4—a simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 506, 250 (2003). 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

Czakon M, Mitov A. Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2014;185:2930. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2014.06.021. DOI

Li Y, Petriello F. Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in FEWZ. Phys. Rev. D. 2012;86:094034. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.094034. DOI

Aliev M, et al. HATHOR: HAdronic Top and Heavy quarks crOss section calculatoR. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2011;182:1034. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.12.040. DOI

Kant P, et al. HATHOR for single top-quark production: updated predictions and uncertainty estimates for single top-quark production in hadronic collisions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2015;191:74. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.02.001. DOI

D0 Collaboration, Direct measurement of the top quark mass at D0. Phys. Rev. D 58, 052001 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.052001. arXiv:hep-ex/9801025

ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the top quark mass in the

CMS Collaboration, Measurement of the PubMed PMC

ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the top quark mass in the PubMed PMC

CMS Collaboration, Measurement of the top quark mass in the all-jets final state at PubMed PMC

CMS Collaboration, Jet energy scale and resolution performance with 13 TeV data collected by CMS in 2016–2018. CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2020-019 (2020). https://cds.cern.ch/record/2715872

CMS Collaboration, Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at

CMS Collaboration, Measurement of the

CMS Collaboration, Cross section measurement of

CMS Collaboration, Measurement of the production cross section of a W boson in association with two b jets in pp collisions at PubMed PMC

CMS Collaboration, Measurements of the associated production of a Z boson and b jets in pp collisions at PubMed PMC

CMS Collaboration, Measurement of the WZ production cross section in pp collisions at

CMS Collaboration, Measurements of the PubMed PMC

T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna, P.Z. Skands, pythia 6.4 physics and manual. JHEP 05, 026 (2006). 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026. arXiv:hep-ph/0603175

Bähr M, et al. Herwig++ physics and manual. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2008;58:639. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0798-9. DOI

DELPHI Collaboration, A study of the b-quark fragmentation function with the DELPHI detector at LEP I and an averaged distribution obtained at the Z pole. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1557 (2011). 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1557-x. arXiv:1102.4748

ALEPH Collaboration, Study of the fragmentation of b quarks into B mesons at the Z peak. Phys. Lett. B 512, 30 (2001). 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00690-6. arXiv:hep-ex/0106051

Dulat S, et al. New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics. Phys. Rev. D. 2016;93:033006. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.033006. DOI

Harland-Lang LA, Martin AD, Motylinski P, Thorne RS. Parton distributions in the LHC era: MMHT 2014 PDFs. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2015;75:204. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3397-6. PubMed DOI PMC

CMS Collaboration, Investigations of the impact of the parton shower tuning in pythia8 in the modelling of

Mrenna S, Skands P. Automated parton-shower variations in pythia8. Phys. Rev. D. 2016;94:074005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.074005. DOI

Czakon M, Heymes D, Mitov A. High-precision differential predictions for top-quark pairs at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016;116:082003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.082003. PubMed DOI

Czakon M, et al. Top-pair production at the LHC through NNLO QCD and NLO EW. JHEP. 2017;10:186. doi: 10.1007/JHEP10(2017)186. DOI

Catani S, et al. Top-quark pair production at the LHC: fully differential QCD predictions at NNLO. JHEP. 2019;07:100. doi: 10.1007/JHEP07(2019)100. DOI

CMS Collaboration, Measurement of differential cross sections for top quark pair production using the lepton+jets final state in proton–proton collisions at 13 TeV. Phys. Rev. D 95, 092001 (2017). 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.092001. arXiv:1610.04191

CMS Collaboration, Measurement of normalized differential

Christiansen JR, Skands PZ. String formation beyond leading colour. JHEP. 2015;08:003. doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2015)003. DOI

Argyropoulos S, Sjöstrand T. Effects of color reconnection on DOI

CMS Collaboration, CMS pythia8 colour reconnection tunes based on underlying-event data. Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 587 (2023). 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11630-8. arXiv:2205.02905 PubMed PMC

W. Verkerke, D.P. Kirkby, The RooFit toolkit for data modeling, in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference for Computing in High-Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP03) (2003). arXiv:physics/0306116. [eConf C0303241, MOLT007]

James F, Roos M. Minuit: a system for function minimization and analysis of the parameter errors and correlations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1975;10:343. doi: 10.1016/0010-4655(75)90039-9. DOI

Barlow RJ, Beeston C. Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1993;77:219. doi: 10.1016/0010-4655(93)90005-W. DOI

J.S. Conway, Incorporating nuisance parameters in likelihoods for multisource spectra, in PHYSTAT 2011 (2011), p. 115. 10.5170/CERN-2011-006.115. arXiv:1103.0354

ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, Jet energy scale uncertainty correlations between ATLAS and CMS at 8 TeV. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-049, CMS-PAS-JME-15-001 (2015). http://cds.cern.ch/record/2104039

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...