Bone targeting agents, but not radiation therapy, improves survival in patients with bone metastases from advanced urothelial carcinoma receiving pembrolizumab: results from the ARON-2 study
Jazyk angličtina Země Itálie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
37917218
DOI
10.1007/s10238-023-01235-6
PII: 10.1007/s10238-023-01235-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- ARON-2 study, Bone metastases, Immunotherapy, NCT05290038, Pembrolizumab, Real-world data, Survival, Tumor response, Urothelial cancer,
- MeSH
- karcinom z přechodných buněk * farmakoterapie radioterapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru MeSH
- nádory jater * farmakoterapie MeSH
- nádory kostí * farmakoterapie radioterapie MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * patologie MeSH
- protinádorové látky * terapeutické užití MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- pembrolizumab MeSH Prohlížeč
- protinádorové látky * MeSH
The ARON-2 study (NCT05290038) aimed to assess the real-world efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients recurred or progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. This retrospective analysis reports the outcomes of urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients with bone metastases (BM). Medical records of patients with documented metastatic UC treated by pembrolizumab as second-line therapy were reviewed from60 institutions in 20 countries. Patients were assessed for Overall Response Rate (ORR), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), and Overall Survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore the association of variables of interest with OS and PFS. 881 patients were included; of them, 263 (30%) presented BM. Median follow-up time was 22.7 months. Patients with BM showed both shorter median OS (5.9 months vs 13.1 months, p < 0.001) and PFS (3.5 months, vs 7.3 months, p < 0.001) compared to patients without BM. Patients who received bone targeted agents (BTAs) showed a significantly longer median OS (8.5 months vs 4.6 months, p = 0.003) and PFS (6.1 months vs 3.2 months, p = 0.003), while no survival benefits were observed among patients who received radiation therapy for BM during pembrolizumab treatment compared to those who did not. In multivariate analysis, performance status, concomitant liver metastases, and the lack of use of BTAs were significantly associated with worse OS and PFS. Bone involvement in UC patients treated with pembrolizumab predicts inferior survival. Poor performance status and liver metastases may further worsen outcomes, while the use of BTAs is associated with improved outcomes.
Chair of Oncology Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine University of Bari Aldo Moro Bari Italy
Clinical Oncology Sociedad de Oncología y Hematología del Cesar Valledupar Colombia
Dana Farber Cancer Institute Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA
Department of Medical Oncology Centre Hospitalier de Jolimont Haine Saint Paul La Louvière Belgium
Department of Medical Oncology Hospital Ramón y Cajal Madrid Spain
Department of Medical Oncology King Hussein Cancer Center Amman Jordan
Department of Medical Oncology MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid Madrid Spain
Department of Oncology San Camillo Forlanini Hospital Rome Italy
Department of Urology Medical University of Innsbruck Anichstrasse 35 6020 Innsbruck Austria
Department of Urology Saitama Medical Center Saitama Medical University Saitama Japan
Division of Medical Oncology A O U Consorziale Policlinico di Bari Bari Italy
Klinik fürUrologie Ratzeburger Allee 160 23538 Lübeck Germany
Medical Oncology IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna Via Albertoni 15 Bologna Italy
Medical Oncology Tawam Hospital Al Ain United Arab Emirates
National Cancer Centre Singapore Singapore Singapore
Oncology Unit Macerata Hospital via Santa Lucia 2 62100 Macerata Italy
Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre University of Southampton Southampton UK
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora CO USA
UOC Oncologia A Policlinico Umberto 1 Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Fornetti J, Welm AL, Stewart SA. Understanding the in cancer metastasis. J Bone Min Res. 2018;33:2099–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3618 . DOI
Makrakis D, Talukder R, Lin GI, et al. Association between sites of metastasis and outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022;20(5):e440–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2022.06.001 . PubMed DOI PMC
Baschuk N, Rautela J, Parker BS. Bone specific immunity and its impact on metastasis. BoneKEy Rep. 2015;4:665. https://doi.org/10.1038/bonekey.2015.32 . PubMed DOI PMC
Antonio G, Oronzo B, Vito L, et al. Immune system and bone microenvironment: rationale for targeted cancer therapies. Oncotarget. 2020;11:480–7. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27439 . DOI
Gabrilovich DI, Ostrand-Rosenbeerg S, Bronte V. Coordinated regulation of myeloid cells by tumours. Nat Rev Immun. 2012;12:253–68. DOI
Xue-Ru Wu. Urothelial tumorigenesis: a tale of divergent pathways. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:713–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3175 . DOI
Powles T, Park SH, Voog E, et al. Avelumab maintenance therapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1218–30. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002788 . PubMed DOI
Balar AV, Castellano D, O’Donnell PH, et al. First-line pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic urothelial cancer (KEYNOTE-052): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(11):1483–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30616-2 . PubMed DOI
Vuky J, Balar AV, Castellano D, et al. Long-term outcomes in KEYNOTE-052: phase II study investigating first-line pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(23):2658–66. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01213 . PubMed DOI
Bellmunt J, de Wit R, Vaughn DJ, et al. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1015–26. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1613683 . PubMed DOI PMC
Balar AV, Castellano DE, Grivas P, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma: results from KEYNOTE-045 and keynote-052 after up to 5 years of follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2023;34:289–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.11.012 . PubMed DOI
Salah S, Lee JL, Rozzi A, Kitamura H, Matsumoto K, Vis DJ, Srinivas S, Morales-Barrera R, Carles J, Al-Rimawi D, Lee S, Kim KH, Izumi K, Lewin J. Second-line chemotherapy in older patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: pooled analysis of 10 second-line studies. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017;15(4):e563–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2016.12.014 . PubMed DOI
Zhang C, Liu L, Tao F, Guo X, Feng G, Chen F, Xu Y, Li L, Han X, Baklaushev VP, Bryukhovetskiy AS, Wang X, Wang G. Bone metastases pattern in newly diagnosed metastatic bladder cancer: a population-based study. J Cancer. 2018;9:4706–11. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.28706 . PubMed DOI PMC
Sengelov L, Kamby C, von der Maase H. Pattern of metastases in relation of characteristics of primary tumor and treatment in patients with disseminated urothelial carcinoma. J Urol. 1996;155:111–4 (PMID: 7490804). PubMed DOI
Schwartz LH, Litière S, de Vries E, Ford R, Gwyther S, Mandrekar S, Shankar L, Bogaerts J, Chen A, Dancey J, Hayes W, Hodi FS, Hoekstra OS, Huang EP, Lin N, Liu Y, Therasse P, Wolchok JD, Seymour L. RECIST 1.1-Update and clarification: from the RECIST committee. Eur J Cancer. 2016;62:132–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.081 . PubMed DOI PMC
Sex as modifier of survival in patients with advanced urothelial cancer treated with pembrolizumab