Conflicts of Interest in the Assessment of Chemicals, Waste, and Pollution

. 2023 Dec 05 ; 57 (48) : 19066-19077. [epub] 20231109

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu přehledy, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid37943968

Pollution by chemicals and waste impacts human and ecosystem health on regional, national, and global scales, resulting, together with climate change and biodiversity loss, in a triple planetary crisis. Consequently, in 2022, countries agreed to establish an intergovernmental science-policy panel (SPP) on chemicals, waste, and pollution prevention, complementary to the existing intergovernmental science-policy bodies on climate change and biodiversity. To ensure the SPP's success, it is imperative to protect it from conflicts of interest (COI). Here, we (i) define and review the implications of COI, and its relevance for the management of chemicals, waste, and pollution; (ii) summarize established tactics to manufacture doubt in favor of vested interests, i.e., to counter scientific evidence and/or to promote misleading narratives favorable to financial interests; and (iii) illustrate these with selected examples. This analysis leads to a review of arguments for and against chemical industry representation in the SPP's work. We further (iv) rebut an assertion voiced by some that the chemical industry should be directly involved in the panel's work because it possesses data on chemicals essential for the panel's activities. Finally, (v) we present steps that should be taken to prevent the detrimental impacts of COI in the work of the SPP. In particular, we propose to include an independent auditor's role in the SPP to ensure that participation and processes follow clear COI rules. Among others, the auditor should evaluate the content of the assessments produced to ensure unbiased representation of information that underpins the SPP's activities.

Center for International Environmental Law Washington D C 20005 United States

Department of Applied Sciences Northumbria University Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST United Kingdom

Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Gothenburg 40530 Gothenburg Sweden

Department of Biology Norwegian University of Science and Technology 7491 Trondheim Norway

Department of Chemistry and Department of Mechanical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 15217 United States

Department of Earth Sciences and School of the Environment University of Toronto Toronto M5S 3B1 Canada

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Milken Institute School of Public Health The George Washington University Washington D C 20052 United States

Department of Environmental Chemistry IDAEA CSIC 08034 Barcelona Catalonia Spain

Department of Environmental Health Sciences School of Public Health and Health Sciences University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst Massachusetts 01003 United States

Department of Environmental Science Stockholm University 10691 Stockholm Sweden

Department of Wildlife Fish and Environmental Studies Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå 907 36 Sweden

Department of Zoology Stockholm University Stockholm 114 18 Sweden

Division of Environmental Health Korea Environment Institute 30147 Sejong Republic of Korea

Eawag Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology 8600 Dübendorf Switzerland

Environmental Technology Wageningen University and Research 6700 AA Wageningen The Netherlands

Food Packaging Forum Foundation 8045 Zurich Switzerland

Global Toxics and Human Rights Project American University Washington College of Law Washington D C 20016 United States

Graduate School of Oceanography University of Rhode Island Narragansett Rhode Island 02881 United States

Greenpeace Research Laboratories Department of Biosciences University of Exeter Exeter EX4 4RN United Kingdom

Indiana University Bloomington Indiana 47405 United States

Institute for Environmental Research RWTH Aachen University 52074 Aachen Germany

Institute for Environmental Sciences Landau RPTU Kaiserslautern Landau 76829 Landau Germany

Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics ETH Zürich 8092 Zürich Switzerland

Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho Federal University of Rio de Janeiro 21941 902 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil

Institute of Marine Sciences University of Portsmouth Portsmouth PO4 9LY United Kingdom

International Panel on Chemical Pollution 8044 Zürich Switzerland

Key Laboratory of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region's Eco Environment Chongqing University 400045 Chongqing China

Marine Sciences University of Connecticut Groton Connecticut 06340 United States

National Institute for Environmental Studies 16 2 Onogawa Tsukuba 305 8506 Ibaraki Japan

RECETOX Masaryk University 625 00 Brno Czech Republic

School of Biological Sciences Monash University Melbourne 3800 Australia

School of Civil Engineering Universiti Sains Malaysia 14300 Nibong Tebal Penang Malaysia

State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse School of the Environment 210023 Nanjing China

State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture Institute of Soil Science Chinese Academy of Sciences Nanjing 210008 China

The Centre for Environmental and Climate Science Lund University 22362 Lund Sweden

University of British Columbia Vancouver BC V6T 1Z4 Canada

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Wang Z. Y.; Walker G. W.; Muir D. C. G.; Nagatani-Yoshida K. Toward a Global Understanding of Chemical Pollution: A First Comprehensive Analysis of National and Regional Chemical Inventories. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54 (5), 2575–2584. 10.1021/acs.est.9b06379. PubMed DOI

Cousins I. T.; Johansson J. H.; Salter M. E.; Sha B.; Scheringer M. Outside the Safe Operating Space of a New Planetary Boundary for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56 (16), 11172–11179. 10.1021/acs.est.2c02765. PubMed DOI PMC

Persson L.; Carney Almroth B. M.; Collins C. D.; Cornell S.; de Wit C. A.; Diamond M. L.; Fantke P.; Hassellöv M.; MacLeod M.; Ryberg M. W.; et al. Outside the safe operating space of the planetary boundary for novel entities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56 (3), 1510–1521. 10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. PubMed DOI PMC

Anonymous . Managing the systemic use of chemicals in Europe. European Environment Agency - Briefing 2023. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/managing-the-systemic-use-of (accessed 2023-05-29).

Naidu R.; Biswas B.; Willett I. R.; Cribb J.; Kumar Singh B.; Paul Nathanail C.; Coulon F.; Semple K. T.; Jones K. C.; Barclay A.; et al. Chemical pollution: A growing peril and potential catastrophic risk to humanity. Environ. Int. 2021, 156, 106616.10.1016/j.envint.2021.106616. PubMed DOI

Moller A.; Xie Z. Y.; Cai M. H.; Zhong G. C.; Huang P.; Cai M. G.; Sturm R.; He J. F.; Ebinghaus R. Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers vs Alternate Brominated Flame Retardants and Dechloranes from East Asia to the Arctic. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (16), 6793–6799. 10.1021/es201850n. PubMed DOI

Napper I. E.; Davies B. F. R.; Clifford H.; Elvin S.; Koldewey H. J.; Mayewski P. A.; Miner K. R.; Potocki M.; Elmore A. C.; Gajurel A. P.; et al. Reaching New Heights in Plastic Pollution-Preliminary Findings of Microplastics on Mount Everest. One Earth 2020, 3 (5), 621–630. 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.10.020. DOI

Jamieson A. J.; Malkocs T.; Piertney S. B.; Fujii T.; Zhang Z. L. Bioaccumulation of persistent organic pollutants in the deepest ocean fauna. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 1 (3), 0051.10.1038/s41559-016-0051. PubMed DOI

Guzzella L.; Salerno F.; Freppaz M.; Roscioli C.; Pisanello F.; Poma G. POP and PAH contamination in the southern slopes of Mt. Everest (Himalaya, Nepal): Long-range atmospheric transport, glacier shrinkage, or local impact of tourism?. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 544, 382–390. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.118. PubMed DOI

Anonymous . What a Waste 2.0 - A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. The World Bank, 2023. https://datatopics.worldbank.org/what-a-waste/ (accessed 2023-05-27).

Wilkinson J. L.; Boxall A. B. A.; Kolpin D. W.; Leung K. M. Y.; Lai R. W. S.; Galban-Malagon C.; Adell A. D.; Mondon J.; Metian M.; Marchant R. A.; et al. Pharmaceutical pollution of the world’s rivers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2022, 119 (8), e2113947119.10.1073/pnas.2113947119. PubMed DOI PMC

Kidd K. A.; Blanchfield P. J.; Mills K. H.; Palace V. P.; Evans R. E.; Lazorchak J. M.; Flick R. W. Collapse of a fish population after exposure to a synthetic estrogen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104 (21), 8897–8901. 10.1073/pnas.0609568104. PubMed DOI PMC

Malaj E.; von der Ohe P. C.; Grote M.; Kuhne R.; Mondy C. P.; Usseglio-Polatera P.; Brack W.; Schafer R. B. Organic chemicals jeopardize the health of freshwater ecosystems on the continental scale. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111 (26), 9549–9554. 10.1073/pnas.1321082111. PubMed DOI PMC

Fuller R.; Landrigan P. J.; Balakrishnan K.; Bathan G.; Bose-O’Reilly S.; Brauer M.; Caravanos J.; Chiles T.; Cohen A.; Corra L.; et al. Pollution and health: a progress update. Lancet Planet. Health 2022, 6 (6), E535–E547. 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00090-0. PubMed DOI

Landrigan P. J.; Fuller R.; Acosta N. J. R.; Adeyi O.; Arnold R.; Basu N.; Balde A. B.; Bertollini R.; Bose-O’Reilly S.; Boufford J. I.; et al. The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet 2018, 391 (10119), 462–512. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0. PubMed DOI

Wang Z. Y.; Altenburger R.; Backhaus T.; Covaci A.; Diamond M. L.; Grimalt J. O.; Lohmann R.; Schaffer A.; Scheringer M.; Selin H.; et al. We need a global science-policy body on chemicals and waste. Science 2021, 371 (6531), 774–776. 10.1126/science.abe9090. PubMed DOI

UNEP . Resolution adopted by the United Nations Environment Assembly on 2 March 2022 - Science-policy panel to contribute further to the sound management of chemicals and waste and to prevent pollution. 2022. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/39846/SOUND%20MANAGEMENT%20OF%20CHEMICALS%20AND%20WASTE.%20English.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

Anonymous . The Importance of Chemical Research to the U.S. Economy. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2022.10.17226/26568. DOI

European Commission . Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability. Towards a Toxic-Free Environment. 2020, 24.http://www.saicm.org/Portals/12/Documents/saicmtexts/New%20SAICM%20Text%20with%20ICCM%20resolutions_E.pdf.

Anonymous . From dump site to the heart of a community. Global Environmental Facility (GEF), 2023. https://www.thegef.org/ (accessed 2023-05-20).

Schenk L.; Johanson G. Management of bias and conflict of interest among occupational exposure limit expert groups. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2021, 123, 104929.10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104929. PubMed DOI

IPCC . IPCC Conflict of interest policy. 2016. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/09/ipcc-conflict-of-interest-2016.pdf.

Bero L. A.; Grundy Q. Why Having a (Nonfinancial) Interest Is Not a Conflict of Interest. PLoS Biol. 2016, 14 (12), e200122110.1371/journal.pbio.2001221. PubMed DOI PMC

Resnik D. Disclosing and managing non-financial conflicts of interest in scientific publications. Res. Ethics 2023, 19 (2), 121–138. 10.1177/17470161221148387. PubMed DOI PMC

Komesaroff P. A.; Kerridge I.; Lipworth W. Conflicts of interest: new thinking, new processes. Intern. Med. J. 2019, 49 (5), 574–577. 10.1111/imj.14233. PubMed DOI

Andersen M. S.; Clubb D. O.. Understanding and accounting for the costs of inaction. Chapter 23. In Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution, innovation; European Environment Agency, 2013; pp 564–580.

Goldberg R. F.; Vandenberg L. N. The science of spin: targeted strategies to manufacture doubt with detrimental effects on environmental and public health. Environ. Health 2021, 20 (1), 33.10.1186/s12940-021-00723-0. PubMed DOI PMC

Chan G.; Carraro C.; Edenhofer O.; Kolstad C.; Stavins R. Reforming the IPCC’s assessment of climate change economics. Clim. Chang. Econ. 2016, 7 (1), 1640001.10.1142/S2010007816400017. DOI

Michaels D.Doubt is their product; Oxford University Press, 2008. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/doubt-is-their-product-9780195300673?cc=de&lang=en&.

Oreskes N.; Conway E. M.. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming; Bloomsbury Press, 2010. https://books.google.de/books?id=fpMh3nh3JI0C&pg=PP4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false.

Goldberg R. F.; Vandenberg L. N. Distract, delay, disrupt: examples of manufactured doubt from five industries. Rev. Environ. Health 2019, 34 (4), 349–363. 10.1515/reveh-2019-0004. PubMed DOI

Mann M. E.Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front Lines; Columbia University Press, 2013. https://academic.oup.com/columbia-scholarship-online/book/13972.

Waldman S.; Heikkinen N.. As climate scientists speak out, sexist attacks are on the rise. Sci. Am. 2018, August 22. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/as-climate-scientists-speak-out-sexist-attacks-are-on-the-rise/ (accessed 2023-05-29).

Milman O.Climate scientists face harassment, threats and fears of ‘McCarthyist attacks’. The Guardian 2017, February 22. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/feb/22/climate-change-science-attacks-threats-trump (accessed 2023-05-28).

Aviv R.A valuable reputation. The New Yorker - Annals of Science 2014, February 10. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/02/10/a-valuable-reputation (accessed 2023-05-22).

Ong E. K.; Glantz S. A. Constructing ″sound science″ and ″good epidemiology″: Tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms. Am. J. Public Health 2001, 91 (11), 1749–1757. 10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1749. PubMed DOI PMC

Markowitz G.; Rosner D. Monsanto, PCBs, and the creation of a “world-wide ecological problem”. J. Public Health Policy 2018, 39 (4), 463–540. 10.1057/s41271-018-0146-8. PubMed DOI

Campbell J.; Clewell H.; Cox T.; Dourson M.; Ethridge S.; Forsberg N.; Gadagbui B.; Hamade A.; Naidu R.; Pechacek N.; et al. The Conundrum of the PFOA human half-life, an international collaboration. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2022, 132, 105185.10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105185. PubMed DOI

Campbell J.; Clewell H.; Cox T.; Dourson M.; Ethridge S.; Forsberg N.; Gadagbui B.; Hamade A.; Naidu R.; Pechacek N.; et al. Response to letter to editor ″letter to the editors regarding “the Conundrum of the PFOA human half-life, an international collaboration”. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2022, 134, 105246.10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105246. PubMed DOI

Post G. B.; Birnbaum L. S.; DeWitt J. C.; Goeden H.; Heiger-Bernays W. J.; Schlezinger J. J. Letter to the editors regarding ″The conundrum of the PFOA human half-life, an international collaboration″. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2022, 134, 105240.10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105240. PubMed DOI

Stecula D. A.; Merkley E. Framing Climate Change: Economics, Ideology, and Uncertainty in American News Media Content From 1988 to 2014. Front. Commun. 2019, 4, 6.10.3389/fcomm.2019.00006. DOI

Maani N.; Van Schalkwyk M. C. I.; Filippidis F. T.; Knai C.; Petticrew M. Manufacturing doubt: Assessing the effects of independent vs industry-sponsored messaging about the harms of fossil fuels, smoking, alcohol, and sugar sweetened beverages. SSM-Popul. Health 2022, 17, 101009.10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.101009. PubMed DOI PMC

Barnes D. E.; Bero L. A. Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA 1998, 279 (19), 1566–1570. 10.1001/jama.279.19.1566. PubMed DOI

Bero L. A. Tobacco industry manipulation of research. Public Health Rep. 2005, 120 (2), 200–208. 10.1177/003335490512000215. PubMed DOI PMC

Miller J.; Vijayaraghavan M. Tobacco Industry Efforts to Respond to Smoke-Free Policies in Multi-Unit Housing: An Evaluation of Tobacco Industry Documents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19 (5), 3053.10.3390/ijerph19053053. PubMed DOI PMC

Pisinger C.; Godtfredsen N.; Bender A. M. A conflict of interest is strongly associated with tobacco industry-favourable results, indicating no harm of e-cigarettes. Prev. Med. 2019, 119, 124–131. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.011. PubMed DOI

Martinez C.; Fu M.; Galan I.; Perez-Rios M.; Martinez-Sanchez J. M.; Lopez M. J.; Sureda X.; Montes A.; Fernandez E. Conflicts of interest in research on electronic cigarettes. Tob. Induced Dis. 2018, 16, 28.10.18332/tid/90668. PubMed DOI PMC

Vartanian L. R.; Schwartz M. B.; Brownell K. D. Effects of Soft Drink Consumption on Nutrition and Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Public Health 2007, 97 (4), 667–675. 10.2105/AJPH.2005.083782. PubMed DOI PMC

Bes-Rastrollo M.; Schulze M. B.; Ruiz-Canela M.; Martinez-Gonzalez M. A. Financial Conflicts of Interest and Reporting Bias Regarding the Association between Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Weight Gain: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews. PLoS Med. 2013, 10 (12), e1001578.10.1371/journal.pmed.1001578. PubMed DOI PMC

Zaltz D. A.; Bisi L. E.; Ruskin G.; Hoe C. How independent is the international food information council from the food and beverage industry? A content analysis of internal industry documents. Global. Health 2022, 18 (1), 91.10.1186/s12992-022-00884-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Shrader-Frechette K. Climate Change, Nuclear Economics, and Conflicts of Interest. Sci. Eng. Ethics 2011, 17 (1), 75–107. 10.1007/s11948-009-9181-y. PubMed DOI

Kogevinas M.; Takaro T. Sponsorship by Big Oil, Like the Tobacco Industry, Should be Banned by the Research Community. Epidemiology 2019, 30 (5), 615–616. 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001042. PubMed DOI

Supran G.; Rahmstorf S.; Oreskes N. Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections. Science 2023, 379 (6628), eabk006310.1126/science.abk0063. PubMed DOI

Almond D.; Du X. M.; Papp A. Favourability towards natural gas relates to funding source of university energy centres. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2022, 12 (12), 1122–1128. 10.1038/s41558-022-01521-3. DOI

Brezis M. Big pharma and health care: Unsolvable conflict of interests between private enterprise and public health. Isr. J. Psychiatry Related Sci. 2008, 45 (2), 83–89. PubMed

Spithoff S.; Leece P.; Sullivan F.; Persaud N.; Belesiotis P.; Steiner L. Drivers of the opioid crisis: An appraisal of financial conflicts of interest in clinical practice guideline panels at the peak of opioid prescribing. PLoS One 2020, 15 (1), e0227045.10.1371/journal.pone.0227045. PubMed DOI PMC

Bekelman J. E.; Li Y.; Gross C. P. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research - A systematic review. JAMA 2003, 289 (4), 454–465. 10.1001/jama.289.4.454. PubMed DOI

Khan N. A.; Nguyen C. L.; Khawar T.; Spencer H.; Torralba K. D. Association of author’s financial conflict of interest with characteristics and outcome of rheumatoid arthritis randomized controlled trials. Rheumatology 2019, 58 (5), 776–785. 10.1093/rheumatology/key368. PubMed DOI

Jagsi R.; Sheets N.; Jankovic A.; Motomura A. R.; Amarnath S.; Ubel P. A. Frequency, Nature, Effects, and Correlates of Conflicts of Interest in Published Clinical Cancer Research. Cancer 2009, 115 (12), 2783–2791. 10.1002/cncr.24315. PubMed DOI

Anglemyer A. T.; Krauth D.; Bero L. Industry sponsorship and publication bias among animal studies evaluating the effects of statins on atherosclerosis and bone outcomes: a meta-analysis. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2015, 15, 12.10.1186/s12874-015-0008-z. PubMed DOI PMC

Bero L.; Anglemyer A.; Vesterinen H.; Krauth D. The relationship between study sponsorship, risks of bias, and research outcomes in atrazine exposure studies conducted in non-human animals: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Int. 2016, 92–93, 597–604. 10.1016/j.envint.2015.10.011. PubMed DOI PMC

Rocha G. M.; Grisolia C. K. Why pesticides with mutagenic, carcinogenic and reproductive risks are registered in Brazil. Dev. World Bioeth. 2019, 19 (3), 148–154. 10.1111/dewb.12211. PubMed DOI

Jarrell Z. R.; Ahammad M. U.; Benson A. P. Glyphosate-based herbicide formulations and reproductive toxicity in animals. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2020, 10, 100126.10.1016/j.vas.2020.100126. PubMed DOI PMC

Mesnage R.; Benbrook C.; Antoniou M. N. Insight into the confusion over surfactant co-formulants in glyphosate-based herbicides. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 128, 137–145. 10.1016/j.fct.2019.03.053. PubMed DOI

Mesnage R.; Defarge N.; Spiroux de Vendomois J.; Seralini G. E. Potential toxic effects of glyphosate and its commercial formulations below regulatory limits. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015, 84, 133–153. 10.1016/j.fct.2015.08.012. PubMed DOI

Novotny E. Glyphosate, Roundup and the Failures of Regulatory Assessment. Toxics 2022, 10 (6), 321.10.3390/toxics10060321. PubMed DOI PMC

Mie A.; Ruden C. What you don’t know can still hurt you – under reporting in EU pesticide regulation. Environ. Health 2022, 21 (1), 79.10.1186/s12940-022-00891-7. PubMed DOI PMC

Mie A.; Rudén C. Non-disclosure of developmental neurotoxicity studies obstructs the safety assessment of pesticides in the European Union. Environ. Health 2023, 22, 44.10.1186/s12940-023-00994-9. PubMed DOI PMC

IPCP . Webinar: Unwrapping Conflict of Interest in Chemicals and Waste Governance. 2023, January 26. https://www.ipcp.ch/activities/webinar-unwrapping-conflict-of-interest-in-chemicals-and-waste-governance (accessed 2023-05-26).

MacLeod M.; Arp H. P. H.; Tekman M. B.; Jahnke A. The global threat from plastic pollution. Science 2021, 373 (6550), 61–65. 10.1126/science.abg5433. PubMed DOI

Beaumont N. J.; Aanesen M.; Austen M. C.; Borger T.; Clark J. R.; Cole M.; Hooper T.; Lindeque P. K.; Pasco C.; Wyles K. J. Global ecological, social and economic impacts of marine plastic. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 142, 189–195. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.03.022. PubMed DOI

Wilcox C.; Van Sebille E.; Hardesty B. D. Threat of plastic pollution to seabirds is global, pervasive, and increasing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015, 112 (38), 11899–11904. 10.1073/pnas.1502108112. PubMed DOI PMC

Neira M. The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health. Ann. Glob. Health 2023, 89 (1), 1–2. 10.5334/aogh.4083. PubMed DOI PMC

Mah A.Plastic Unlimited: How Corporations Are Fuelling the Ecological Crisis and What We Can Do About It; Wiley, 2022.

da Costa J. P. Micro-consumerist bollocks in the fight against plastic pollution: when good intentions - and regulatory initiatives - go awry. Water Emerg. Contam. Nanoplastics 2023, 2 (1), 7.10.20517/wecn.2022.24. DOI

Shipton L.; Dauvergne P. Health concerns of plastics: energizing the global diffusion of anti-plastic norms. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2022, 65 (11), 2124–2144. 10.1080/09640568.2021.1957796. DOI

Anonymous . Plastics Europe - Sustainability. 2023. https://plasticseurope.org/sustainability/ (accessed 2023-05-29).

Anonymous . Daily report for 1 December 2022: 1st Session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee to develop an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment (INC-1). IISD Earth Negotiations Bulletin 2022, December 1. https://enb.iisd.org/plastic-pollution-marine-environment-negotiating-committee-inc1-daily-report-1dec2022.

Anonymous . WHO: stop tobacco industry interference. WHO News Release 2012, May 30. https://www.who.int/news/item/30-05-2012-who-stop-tobacco-industry-interference (accessed 2023-05-29).

Geddie J.; Volcovici V.; Brock J.. U.N. pact may restrict plastic production. Big Oil aims to stop it. REUTERS press release 2022, February 18. https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/un-pact-may-restrict-plastic-production-big-oil-aims-stop-it-2022-02-18/ (accessed 2023-05-20).

McGreal C.How a powerful US lobby group helps big oil to block climate action. The Guardian 2021, July 19. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jul/19/big-oil-climate-crisis-lobby-group-api (accessed 2023-05-21).

Bell L.; Todoran G. S. Plastic bag legislation in the United States: influential factors on its creation. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 2022, 12 (2), 260–271. 10.1007/s13412-021-00736-8. DOI

Wang Z. Y.; Praetorius A. Integrating a Chemicals Perspective into the Global Plastic Treaty. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2022, 9 (12), 1000–1006. 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00763. PubMed DOI PMC

Harris L.Inside the chemical lobby’s unusual campaign to protect the fire retardant business. New York Focus 2021, May 22. https://www.nysfocus.com/2021/05/22/chemicals-lobby-campaign/ (accessed 2023-05-28).

Blades J.; Gable J.. Flame retardants in your earbuds? Toxic chemicals in homes? Left and right are sick of It. FULCRUM 2023, January 31. https://thefulcrum.us/government-regulations-aiding-special-interests (accessed 2023-05-28).

DiGangi J.; Blum A.; Bergman A.; de Wit C. A.; Lucas D.; Mortimer D.; Schecter A.; Scheringer M.; Shaw S. D.; Webster T. F. San Antonio Statement on Brominated and Chlorinated Flame Retardants. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118 (12), A516–A518. 10.1289/ehp.1003089. PubMed DOI PMC

Yang C. Q.; Jilkova S. R.; Melymuk L.; Harris S. A.; Jantunen L. M.; Pertili J.; Winn L.; Diamond M. L. Are We Exposed to Halogenated Flame Retardants from both Primary and Secondary Sources?. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2020, 7 (8), 585–593. 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00268. DOI

Charbonnet J. A.; Weber R.; Blum A. Flammability standards for furniture, building insulation and electronics: Benefit and risk. Emerg. Contam. 2020, 6, 432–441. 10.1016/j.emcon.2020.05.002. DOI

Anonymous . Chemical companies, Big Tobacco and the toxic products in your home. Tribune Watchdog 2014. https://media.apps.chicagotribune.com/flames/index.html (accessed 2023-05-22).

Alcock R. E.; Busby J. Risk migration and scientific advance: The case of flame-retardant compounds. Risk Anal. 2006, 26 (2), 369–381. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00739.x. PubMed DOI

Steenland K.; Hofmann J. N.; Silverman D. T.; Bartell S. M. Risk assessment for PFOA and kidney cancer based on a pooled analysis of two studies. Environ. Int. 2022, 167, 107425.10.1016/j.envint.2022.107425. PubMed DOI PMC

Lerner S.3M Knew About the Dangers of PFOA and PFOS Decades Ago, Internal Documents Show. The Intercept 2018. https://theintercept.com/2018/07/31/3m-pfas-minnesota-pfoa-pfos/ (accessed 2023-05-23).

Lerner S.Lawsuit Reveals How Paid Expert Helped 3M “Command the Science” on Dangerous Chemicals. The Intercept 2018. https://theintercept.com/2018/02/23/3m-lawsuit-pfcs-pollution/ (accessed 2023-05-25).

Billott R.Exposure; Simon & Schuster, 2020.

Lohmann R.; Cousins I. T.; DeWitt J. C.; Gluge J.; Goldenman G.; Herzke D.; Lindstrom A. B.; Miller M. F.; Ng C. A.; Patton S.; et al. Are Fluoropolymers Really of Low Concern for Human and Environmental Health and Separate from Other PFAS?. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54 (20), 12820–12828. 10.1021/acs.est.0c03244. PubMed DOI PMC

Korzeniowski S. H.; Buck R. C.; Newkold R. M.; El Kassmi A.; Laganis E.; Matsuoka Y.; Dinelli B.; Beauchet S.; Adamsky F.; Weilandt K.; et al. A critical review of the application of polymer of low concern regulatory criteria to fluoropolymers II: Fluoroplastics and fluoroelastomers. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2023, 19, 326–354. 10.1002/ieam.4646. PubMed DOI

Gebbink W. A.; van Asseldonk L.; van Leeuwen S. P. J. Presence of Emerging Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in River and Drinking Water near a Fluorochemical Production Plant in the Netherlands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51 (19), 11057–11065. 10.1021/acs.est.7b02488. PubMed DOI PMC

Gebbink W. A.; van Leeuwen S. P. J. Environmental contamination and human exposure to PFASs near a fluorochemical production plant: Review of historic and current PFOA and GenX contamination in the Netherlands. Environ. Int. 2020, 137, 105583.10.1016/j.envint.2020.105583. PubMed DOI

Valsecchi S.A tale of PFAS, pollution, and patent claims. C&EN 2023. https://cen.acs.org/analytical-chemistry/A-tale-of-PFAS-pollution-and-patent-claims/99/i11 (accessed 2023-05-19).

Herrick R. L.; Buckholz J.; Biro F. M.; Calafat A. M.; Ye X. Y.; Xie C. C.; Pinney S. M. Polyfluoroalkyl substance exposure in the Mid-Ohio River Valley, 1991–2012. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 228, 50–60. 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.092. PubMed DOI PMC

Fromme H.; Wockner M.; Roscher E.; Volkel W. ADONA and perfluoroalkylated substances in plasma samples of German blood donors living in South Germany. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2017, 220 (2), 455–460. 10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.12.014. PubMed DOI

Bergman A.; Becher G.; Blumberg B.; Bjerregaard P.; Bornman R.; Brandt I.; Casey S. C.; Frouin H.; Giudice L. C.; Heindel J. J.; et al. Manufacturing doubt about endocrine disrupter science - A rebuttal of industry-sponsored critical comments on the UNEP/WHO report ″State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals 2012″. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015, 73 (3), 1007–1017. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.07.026. PubMed DOI

Bergman Å.; Heindel J. J.; Jobling S.; Kidd K. A.; Zoeller R. T.. State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals - 2012. World Health Organization2012, p 289. https://www.unep.org/resources/publication/state-science-endocrine-disputing-chemicals-ipcp-2012.

SAICM . Report of the International Conference on Chemicals Management on the work of its fourth session. 2015, SAICM/ICCM.4/15, 62. http://saicm.org/Portals/12/documents/meetings/ICCM4/doc/K1606013_e.pdf.

Blumenthal J.; Diamond M. L.; Hoffmann M.; Wang Z. Y. Time to Break the ″Lock-In″ Impediments to Chemicals Management. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56 (7), 3863–3870. 10.1021/acs.est.1c06615. PubMed DOI PMC

Anonymous . Corporate surveillance: ‘Substantial’ payout in asbestos spying scandal. Hazards Magazine 2018, 144. https://www.hazards.org/asbestos/ispy.htm (accessed 2023-05-15).

Simon . Acclaimed ′Arica′ documentary prompts intervention from United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). Toxic Justice 2023. http://toxicjustice.org/acclaimed-arica-documentary-prompts-intervention-from-united-nations-human-rights-council-unhrc/ (accessed 2023-05-18).

Breithaupt H. The costs of REACH - REACH is largely welcomed, but the requirement to test existing chemicals for adverse effects is not good news for all. Embo Rep. 2006, 7 (10), 968–971. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400816. PubMed DOI PMC

Lerner S.How DuPont slipped past the EPA. The Intercept 2015, August 20. https://theintercept.com/2015/08/20/teflon-toxin-dupont-slipped-past-epa/ (accessed 2023-05-12).

Gaber N.; Bero L.; Woodruff T. J. The devil they knew: Chemical documents analysis of industry influence on PFAS science. Ann. Glob. Health 2023, 89 (1), 1–17. 10.5334/aogh.4013. PubMed DOI PMC

UNEP . Article 22 of the Dubai declaration on international Chemical Management. http://www.saicm.org/Portals/12/Documents/saicmtexts/New%20SAICM%20Text%20with%20ICCM%20resolutions_E.pdf. 2006, 195.

Nurick R.Final Report: Independent Evaluation of the Strategic Approach from 2006–2015. 2019, p 94. http://www.saicm.org/Portals/12/Documents/reporting/FinalReport_Independent-Evaluation-SAICM-2006-2015.pdf

Springer A.; Herrmann H.; Sittner D.; Herbst U.; Schulte A.. REACH Compliance: Data Availability of REACH Registrations - Part 1: Screening of chemicals > 1000 tpa. German Environment Agency, 2015, 43, 185. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/publikationen/reach-compliance-data-availability-of-reach.

Oertel A.; Maul K.; Menz J.; Kronsbein A. L.; Sittner D.; Springer A.; Müller A.-K.; Herbst U.; Schlegel K.; Schulte A.. REACH Compliance: Data availability in REACH registrations Part 2: Evaluation of data waiving and adaptations for chemicals ≥ 1000 tpa. German Environment Agency, 2018, 64, 205. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/publikationen/reach-compliance-data-availability-in-reach.

Oertel A.; Menz J.; Brüning A.; Schmeisser S.; Kronsbein A. L.; Maul K.; Heinze P.; Schulte A.. REACH Compliance: Data availability in REACH registrations – Part 3: Evaluation of 100 to 1000 tpa substances. German Environment Agency 2020, 39, 182. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/publikationen/reach-compliance-data-availability-in-reach-0.

Borchert F.; Beronius A.; Agerstrand M. Characterisation and analysis of key studies used to restrict substances under REACH. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2022, 34 (1), 83.10.1186/s12302-022-00662-8. DOI

Ågerstrand M.; Arinaitwe K.; Backhaus T.; Barra R. O.; Diamond M. L.; Grimalt J. O.; Groh K.; Kandie F.; Kurt-Karakus P. B.; Letcher R. J.; Lohmann R.; et al. Key Principles for the Intergovernmental Science–Policy Panel on Chemicals and Waste. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57 (6), 2205–2208. 10.1021/acs.est.2c08283. PubMed DOI PMC

Anonymous . Performance audit. Aware 2023. https://methodology.eca.europa.eu/aware/PA/Pages/default.aspx (accessed 2023-05-20).

Anonymous . Enhancing Global Environmental Benefits through Excellence in Evaluation. Independent Evaluation Office (IEO), 2023. https://www.gefieo.org/about-us (accessed 2023-05-22).

Wilkinson M. D.; Dumontier M.; Aalbersberg I. J.; Appleton G.; Axton M.; Baak A.; Blomberg N.; Boiten J. W.; da Silva Santos L. B.; Bourne P. E.; et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 2016, 3, 160018.10.1038/sdata.2016.18. PubMed DOI PMC

Anonymous . CARE principles for indigenous data governance. 2023. https://www.gida-global.org/care (accessed 2023-05-27).

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...