Rhythm versus rate control in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation - Observations from the GARFIELD-AF registry

. 2023 Dec ; 49 () : 101302. [epub] 20231116

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Irsko Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid38020059
Odkazy

PubMed 38020059
PubMed Central PMC10656718
DOI 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101302
PII: S2352-9067(23)00133-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: Investigate real-world outcomes of early rhythm versus rate control in patients with recent onset atrial fibrillation. METHODS: The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-AF (GARFIELD-AF) is an international multi-centre, non-interventional prospective registry of newly diagnosed (≤6 weeks' duration) atrial fibrillation patients at risk for stroke. Patients were stratified according to treatment initiated at baseline (≤48 days post enrolment), and outcome risks evaluated by overlap propensity weighted Cox proportional-hazards models. RESULTS: Of 45,382 non-permanent atrial fibrillation patients, 23,858 (52.6 %) received rhythm control and 21,524 (47.4 %) rate control. Rhythm-controlled patients had lower median age (68.0 [Q1;Q3: 60.0;76.0] versus 73.0 [65.0;79.0]), fewer histories of stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism (9.4 % versus 13.0 %), and lower expected probabilities of death (median GARFIELD-AF death score 4.0 [2.3;7.5] versus 5.1 [2.8;9.2]). The two groups had the same median CHA2DS2-VASc scores (3.0 [2.0;4.0]) and similar proportions of anticoagulated patients (rhythm control: 66.0 %, rate control: 65.5 %). The propensity-score-weighted hazard ratios of rhythm vs rate control (reference) were 0.85 (95 % CI: 0.79-0.92, p-value < 0.0001) for all-cause mortality, 0.84 (0.72-0.97, p-value 0.020) for non-haemorrhagic stroke/systemic embolism and 0.90 (0.78-1.04, p-value 0.164) for major bleeding. CONCLUSION: Rhythm control strategy was initiated in about half of the patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular non-permanent atrial fibrillation. After balancing confounders, significantly lower risks of all-cause mortality and non-haemorrhagic stroke were observed in patients who received early rhythm control.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Kannel W.B., et al. Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population-based estimates. Am. J. Cardiol. 1998;82(8a):2n–9n. PubMed

Wolf P.A., Abbott R.D., Kannel W.B. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991;22(8):983–988. PubMed

Wang T.J., et al. Temporal relations of atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure and their joint influence on mortality: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2003;107(23):2920–2925. PubMed

Stewart S., et al. A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew/Paisley study. Am. J. Med. 2002;113(5):359–364. PubMed

Steinberg B.A., et al. Drivers of hospitalization for patients with atrial fibrillation: Results from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) Am. Heart J. 2014;167(5):735. PubMed PMC

Go A.S., et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129(3):e28–e292. PubMed PMC

Marzona I., et al. Increased risk of cognitive and functional decline in patients with atrial fibrillation: results of the ONTARGET and TRANSCEND studies. CMAJ. 2012;184(6):E329–E336. PubMed PMC

Dagres N., et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus on arrhythmias and cognitive function: what is the best practice? Europace. 2018;20(9):1399–1421. PubMed PMC

Andersson T., et al. All-cause mortality in 272,186 patients hospitalized with incident atrial fibrillation 1995–2008: a Swedish nationwide long-term case-control study. Eur. Heart J. 2013;34(14):1061–1067. PubMed PMC

Benjamin E.J., et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1998;98(10):946–952. PubMed

Thrall G., et al. Quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Am. J. Med. 2006;119(5):448.e1. PubMed

Kim M.H., et al. Estimation of total incremental health care costs in patients with atrial fibrillation in the United States. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes. 2011;4(3):313–320. PubMed

Stewart S., et al. Cost of an emerging epidemic: an economic analysis of atrial fibrillation in the UK. Heart. 2004;90(3):286–292. PubMed PMC

Camm A.J., et al. The increasing role of rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation: JACC state-of-the-art review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2022;79(19):1932–1948. PubMed

Hindricks G., et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur. Heart J. 2020;42(5):373–498. PubMed

Nattel S., Burstein B., Dobrev D. Atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation: mechanisms and implications. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2008;1(1):62–73. PubMed

Cosio F.G., et al. Delayed rhythm control of atrial fibrillation may be a cause of failure to prevent recurrences: reasons for change to active antiarrhythmic treatment at the time of the first detected episode. Europace. 2008;10(1):21–27. PubMed

Zhang Y.Y., et al. Predictors of progression of recently diagnosed atrial fibrillation in REgistry on Cardiac Rhythm DisORDers Assessing the Control of Atrial Fibrillation (RecordAF)-United States cohort. Am. J. Cardiol. 2013;112(1):79–84. PubMed

Al-Khatib S.M., et al. Rate- and rhythm-control therapies in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Ann. Intern. Med. 2014;160(11):760–773. PubMed

Roy D., et al. Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358(25):2667–2677. PubMed

Wyse D.G., et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;347(23):1825–1833. PubMed

Van Gelder I.C., et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;347(23):1834–1840. PubMed

Kirchhof P., et al. Early Rhythm-Control Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383(14):1305–1316. PubMed

Kakkar A.K., et al. International longitudinal registry of patients with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke: Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD (GARFIELD) Am. Heart J. 2012;163(1):13–19.e1. PubMed

Fox K.A.A., et al. Evolving quality standards for large-scale registries: the GARFIELD-AF experience. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017;3(2):114–122. PubMed

Bray J.J.H., et al. Oral Class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs for maintaining sinus rhythm after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2023;3(3) PubMed PMC

Fox K.A.A., et al. GARFIELD-AF risk score for mortality, stroke, and bleeding within 2 years in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022;8(2):214–227. PubMed PMC

Lip G.Y., et al. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2010;137(2):263–272. PubMed

Schulman S., Kearon C. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2005;3(4):692–694. PubMed

Thomas L.E., Li F., Pencina M.J. Overlap weighting: A propensity score method that mimics attributes of a randomized clinical trial. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2020;323(23):2417–2418. PubMed

Liu Y., De A. Multiple imputation by fully conditional specification for dealing with missing data in a large epidemiologic study. Int J Stat Med Res. 2015;4(3):287–295. PubMed PMC

Noheria A., et al. Rhythm control versus rate control and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the ORBIT-AF registry. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;2(2):221–229. PubMed

Kirchhof P., et al. Management of atrial fibrillation in seven European countries after the publication of the 2010 ESC Guidelines on atrial fibrillation: primary results of the PREvention oF thromboemolic events–European Registry in Atrial Fibrillation (PREFER in AF) Europace. 2014;16(1):6–14. PubMed PMC

Camm A.J., et al. Real-life observations of clinical outcomes with rhythm- and rate-control therapies for atrial fibrillation RECORDAF (Registry on Cardiac Rhythm Disorders Assessing the Control of Atrial Fibrillation) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011;58(5):493–501. PubMed

January C.T., et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014;64(21):e1–e76. PubMed

Kirchhof P., et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur. Heart J. 2016;37(38):2893–2962. PubMed

Camm A.J., et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J. 2010;31(19):2369–2429. PubMed

Ionescu-Ittu R., et al. Comparative effectiveness of rhythm control vs rate control drug treatment effect on mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation. Arch. Intern. Med. 2012;172(13):997–1004. PubMed

Goette A., et al. Presenting pattern of atrial fibrillation and outcomes of early rhythm control therapy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2022;80(4):283–295. PubMed

Hohnloser S.H., Crijns H.J., van Eickels M., et al. Effect of dronedarone on cardiovascular events in atrial fibrillation. The New England journal of medicine. 2009;360(7):668–678. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19213680/ PubMed

Blomström-Lundqvist C., et al. Efficacy and safety of dronedarone by atrial fibrillation history duration: Insights from the ATHENA study. Clin. Cardiol. 2020;43(12):1469–1477. PubMed PMC

Connolly S.J., et al. Analysis of stroke in ATHENA: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-arm trial to assess the efficacy of dronedarone 400 mg BID for the prevention of cardiovascular hospitalization or death from any cause in patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter. Circulation. 2009;120(13):1174–1180. PubMed

Jensen M., et al. Early rhythm-control therapy for atrial fibrillation in patients with a history of stroke: a subgroup analysis of the EAST-AFNET 4 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2023;22(1):45–54. PubMed

Yang E., et al. The role of timing in treatment of atrial fibrillation: An AFFIRM substudy. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(5):674–681. PubMed

Kim D., et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Early Rhythm Control Versus Rate Control for Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021;10(24):e023055. PubMed PMC

Kim D., et al. Treatment timing and the effects of rhythm control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation: nationwide cohort study. BMJ. 2021;373 PubMed PMC

Dickow J., et al. Generalizability of the EAST-AFNET 4 Trial: assessing outcomes of early rhythm-control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022;11(11):e024214. PubMed PMC

Pope M.K., et al. Cardioversion in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation: observational study using prospectively collected registry data. BMJ. 2021;375:e066450. PubMed PMC

Ding W.Y., et al. Impact of early ablation of atrial fibrillation on long-term outcomes: results from phase II/III of the GLORIA-AF registry. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2022;111(9):1057–1068. PubMed PMC

Proietti M., et al. Real-world applicability and impact of early rhythm control for European patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF Long-Term General Registry. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2022;111(1):70–84. PubMed PMC

Fox K.A.A., et al. Why are outcomes different for registry patients enrolled prospectively and retrospectively? Insights from the global anticoagulant registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2018;4(1):27–35. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace