Rhythm versus rate control in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation - Observations from the GARFIELD-AF registry
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Irsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
38020059
PubMed Central
PMC10656718
DOI
10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101302
PII: S2352-9067(23)00133-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Atrial fibrillation, Mortality, Rate control, Real-world evidence, Rhythm control, Stroke,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Investigate real-world outcomes of early rhythm versus rate control in patients with recent onset atrial fibrillation. METHODS: The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-AF (GARFIELD-AF) is an international multi-centre, non-interventional prospective registry of newly diagnosed (≤6 weeks' duration) atrial fibrillation patients at risk for stroke. Patients were stratified according to treatment initiated at baseline (≤48 days post enrolment), and outcome risks evaluated by overlap propensity weighted Cox proportional-hazards models. RESULTS: Of 45,382 non-permanent atrial fibrillation patients, 23,858 (52.6 %) received rhythm control and 21,524 (47.4 %) rate control. Rhythm-controlled patients had lower median age (68.0 [Q1;Q3: 60.0;76.0] versus 73.0 [65.0;79.0]), fewer histories of stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism (9.4 % versus 13.0 %), and lower expected probabilities of death (median GARFIELD-AF death score 4.0 [2.3;7.5] versus 5.1 [2.8;9.2]). The two groups had the same median CHA2DS2-VASc scores (3.0 [2.0;4.0]) and similar proportions of anticoagulated patients (rhythm control: 66.0 %, rate control: 65.5 %). The propensity-score-weighted hazard ratios of rhythm vs rate control (reference) were 0.85 (95 % CI: 0.79-0.92, p-value < 0.0001) for all-cause mortality, 0.84 (0.72-0.97, p-value 0.020) for non-haemorrhagic stroke/systemic embolism and 0.90 (0.78-1.04, p-value 0.164) for major bleeding. CONCLUSION: Rhythm control strategy was initiated in about half of the patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular non-permanent atrial fibrillation. After balancing confounders, significantly lower risks of all-cause mortality and non-haemorrhagic stroke were observed in patients who received early rhythm control.
Department of Cardiology Oslo University Hospital Ullevål Oslo Norway
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Motol University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University Thailand
Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway
Sylvia Haas Formerly Department of Medicine Technical University of Munich Munich Germany
Thrombosis Research Institute London the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Kannel W.B., et al. Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population-based estimates. Am. J. Cardiol. 1998;82(8a):2n–9n. PubMed
Wolf P.A., Abbott R.D., Kannel W.B. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991;22(8):983–988. PubMed
Wang T.J., et al. Temporal relations of atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure and their joint influence on mortality: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2003;107(23):2920–2925. PubMed
Stewart S., et al. A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew/Paisley study. Am. J. Med. 2002;113(5):359–364. PubMed
Steinberg B.A., et al. Drivers of hospitalization for patients with atrial fibrillation: Results from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) Am. Heart J. 2014;167(5):735. PubMed PMC
Go A.S., et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129(3):e28–e292. PubMed PMC
Marzona I., et al. Increased risk of cognitive and functional decline in patients with atrial fibrillation: results of the ONTARGET and TRANSCEND studies. CMAJ. 2012;184(6):E329–E336. PubMed PMC
Dagres N., et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus on arrhythmias and cognitive function: what is the best practice? Europace. 2018;20(9):1399–1421. PubMed PMC
Andersson T., et al. All-cause mortality in 272,186 patients hospitalized with incident atrial fibrillation 1995–2008: a Swedish nationwide long-term case-control study. Eur. Heart J. 2013;34(14):1061–1067. PubMed PMC
Benjamin E.J., et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1998;98(10):946–952. PubMed
Thrall G., et al. Quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Am. J. Med. 2006;119(5):448.e1. PubMed
Kim M.H., et al. Estimation of total incremental health care costs in patients with atrial fibrillation in the United States. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes. 2011;4(3):313–320. PubMed
Stewart S., et al. Cost of an emerging epidemic: an economic analysis of atrial fibrillation in the UK. Heart. 2004;90(3):286–292. PubMed PMC
Camm A.J., et al. The increasing role of rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation: JACC state-of-the-art review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2022;79(19):1932–1948. PubMed
Hindricks G., et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur. Heart J. 2020;42(5):373–498. PubMed
Nattel S., Burstein B., Dobrev D. Atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation: mechanisms and implications. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2008;1(1):62–73. PubMed
Cosio F.G., et al. Delayed rhythm control of atrial fibrillation may be a cause of failure to prevent recurrences: reasons for change to active antiarrhythmic treatment at the time of the first detected episode. Europace. 2008;10(1):21–27. PubMed
Zhang Y.Y., et al. Predictors of progression of recently diagnosed atrial fibrillation in REgistry on Cardiac Rhythm DisORDers Assessing the Control of Atrial Fibrillation (RecordAF)-United States cohort. Am. J. Cardiol. 2013;112(1):79–84. PubMed
Al-Khatib S.M., et al. Rate- and rhythm-control therapies in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Ann. Intern. Med. 2014;160(11):760–773. PubMed
Roy D., et al. Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358(25):2667–2677. PubMed
Wyse D.G., et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;347(23):1825–1833. PubMed
Van Gelder I.C., et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;347(23):1834–1840. PubMed
Kirchhof P., et al. Early Rhythm-Control Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383(14):1305–1316. PubMed
Kakkar A.K., et al. International longitudinal registry of patients with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke: Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD (GARFIELD) Am. Heart J. 2012;163(1):13–19.e1. PubMed
Fox K.A.A., et al. Evolving quality standards for large-scale registries: the GARFIELD-AF experience. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017;3(2):114–122. PubMed
Bray J.J.H., et al. Oral Class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs for maintaining sinus rhythm after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2023;3(3) PubMed PMC
Fox K.A.A., et al. GARFIELD-AF risk score for mortality, stroke, and bleeding within 2 years in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022;8(2):214–227. PubMed PMC
Lip G.Y., et al. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2010;137(2):263–272. PubMed
Schulman S., Kearon C. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2005;3(4):692–694. PubMed
Thomas L.E., Li F., Pencina M.J. Overlap weighting: A propensity score method that mimics attributes of a randomized clinical trial. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2020;323(23):2417–2418. PubMed
Liu Y., De A. Multiple imputation by fully conditional specification for dealing with missing data in a large epidemiologic study. Int J Stat Med Res. 2015;4(3):287–295. PubMed PMC
Noheria A., et al. Rhythm control versus rate control and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the ORBIT-AF registry. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;2(2):221–229. PubMed
Kirchhof P., et al. Management of atrial fibrillation in seven European countries after the publication of the 2010 ESC Guidelines on atrial fibrillation: primary results of the PREvention oF thromboemolic events–European Registry in Atrial Fibrillation (PREFER in AF) Europace. 2014;16(1):6–14. PubMed PMC
Camm A.J., et al. Real-life observations of clinical outcomes with rhythm- and rate-control therapies for atrial fibrillation RECORDAF (Registry on Cardiac Rhythm Disorders Assessing the Control of Atrial Fibrillation) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011;58(5):493–501. PubMed
January C.T., et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014;64(21):e1–e76. PubMed
Kirchhof P., et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur. Heart J. 2016;37(38):2893–2962. PubMed
Camm A.J., et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J. 2010;31(19):2369–2429. PubMed
Ionescu-Ittu R., et al. Comparative effectiveness of rhythm control vs rate control drug treatment effect on mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation. Arch. Intern. Med. 2012;172(13):997–1004. PubMed
Goette A., et al. Presenting pattern of atrial fibrillation and outcomes of early rhythm control therapy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2022;80(4):283–295. PubMed
Hohnloser S.H., Crijns H.J., van Eickels M., et al. Effect of dronedarone on cardiovascular events in atrial fibrillation. The New England journal of medicine. 2009;360(7):668–678. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19213680/ PubMed
Blomström-Lundqvist C., et al. Efficacy and safety of dronedarone by atrial fibrillation history duration: Insights from the ATHENA study. Clin. Cardiol. 2020;43(12):1469–1477. PubMed PMC
Connolly S.J., et al. Analysis of stroke in ATHENA: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-arm trial to assess the efficacy of dronedarone 400 mg BID for the prevention of cardiovascular hospitalization or death from any cause in patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter. Circulation. 2009;120(13):1174–1180. PubMed
Jensen M., et al. Early rhythm-control therapy for atrial fibrillation in patients with a history of stroke: a subgroup analysis of the EAST-AFNET 4 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2023;22(1):45–54. PubMed
Yang E., et al. The role of timing in treatment of atrial fibrillation: An AFFIRM substudy. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(5):674–681. PubMed
Kim D., et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Early Rhythm Control Versus Rate Control for Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021;10(24):e023055. PubMed PMC
Kim D., et al. Treatment timing and the effects of rhythm control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation: nationwide cohort study. BMJ. 2021;373 PubMed PMC
Dickow J., et al. Generalizability of the EAST-AFNET 4 Trial: assessing outcomes of early rhythm-control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022;11(11):e024214. PubMed PMC
Pope M.K., et al. Cardioversion in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation: observational study using prospectively collected registry data. BMJ. 2021;375:e066450. PubMed PMC
Ding W.Y., et al. Impact of early ablation of atrial fibrillation on long-term outcomes: results from phase II/III of the GLORIA-AF registry. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2022;111(9):1057–1068. PubMed PMC
Proietti M., et al. Real-world applicability and impact of early rhythm control for European patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF Long-Term General Registry. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2022;111(1):70–84. PubMed PMC
Fox K.A.A., et al. Why are outcomes different for registry patients enrolled prospectively and retrospectively? Insights from the global anticoagulant registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2018;4(1):27–35. PubMed