The wild cost of invasive feral animals worldwide
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
38101642
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169281
PII: S0048-9697(23)07911-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Agriculture, Biological invasions, Conservation, Economic impacts, InvaCost, Non-native species,
- MeSH
- divoká zvířata * MeSH
- hospodářská zvířata MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- zavlečené druhy * MeSH
- zemědělství MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Severní Amerika MeSH
Invasive non-native species are a growing burden to economies worldwide. While domesticated animals (i.e. livestock, beasts of burden or pets) have enabled our ways of life and provide sustenance for countless individuals, they may cause substantial impacts when they escape or are released (i.e. become feral) and then become invasive with impacts. We used the InvaCost database to evaluate monetary impacts from species in the Domestic Animal Diversity Information System database. We found a total cost of $141.95 billion from only 18 invasive feral species. Invasive feral livestock incurred the highest costs at $90.03 billion, with pets contributing $50.93 billion and beasts of burden having much lower costs at $0.98 billion. Agriculture was the most affected sector at $80.79 billion, followed by the Environment ($43.44 billion), and Authorities-Stakeholders sectors ($5.52 billion). Damage costs comprised the majority ($124.94 billion), with management and mixed damage-management costs making up the rest ($9.62 and $7.38 billion, respectively). These economic impacts were observed globally, where Oceania, North America and Europe were the most impacted regions. Islands recorded a higher economic burden than continental areas, with livestock species dominating costs more on islands than mainlands compared to other feral species. The costs of invasive feral animals were on average twice higher than those of wild species. The management of invasive feral populations requires higher investment, updated regulations, and comprehensive risk assessments. These are especially complex when considering the potential conflicts arising from interventions with species that have close ties to humans. Effective communication to raise public awareness of the impacts of feral populations and appropriate legislation to prevent or control such invasive feral populations will substantially contribute to minimizing their socioeconomic and environmental impacts.
Department of Botany University of Kashmir Hazratbal Srinagar 190006 India
Odum School of Ecology Athens GA USA
School of Biological Sciences King's College University of Aberdeen Aberdeen AB24 3FX UK
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Using species ranges and macroeconomic data to fill the gap in costs of biological invasions
Parallels and discrepancies between non-native species introductions and human migration