Blood loss quantification during major abdominal surgery: prospective observational cohort study

. 2024 Jan 02 ; 24 (1) : 5. [epub] 20240102

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu pozorovací studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid38166991
Odkazy

PubMed 38166991
PubMed Central PMC10763373
DOI 10.1186/s12893-023-02288-w
PII: 10.1186/s12893-023-02288-w
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: Blood loss during major abdominal surgery is an essential parameter in the evaluation of strategies aimed at reducing perioperative bleeding. However, blood loss quantification remains unreliable and inaccurate. The aim of this study was to compare several methods of blood loss quantification-visual estimation by surgeon and anesthesiologist, the gravimetric method, the calculation method with spectrophotometric measurement. The spectrophotometric measurement is considered as the most accurate method. METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective observational cohort single-center study. We analyzed 61 patients who underwent elective liver or pancreatic resection. The anesthesiologists' and surgeons' estimate of blood loss was based on a visual assessment. The gravimetric method was based on weighing the suction canister and surgical drapes before and after use. The basis of calculation method was anthropometric and hematological parameters, we used López-Picado's formula. The spectrophotometric method was based on the spectrophotometric determination of hemoglobin mass in the lost blood. We compared the methods using paired t-test, non-parametric Wilcoxon test and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Visual estimation by surgeons and anesthesiologists, gravimetric measurement, and calculation method were significantly different from spectrophotometric measurement at the significance level α = 0.05. All methods overestimated blood loss which was measured by spectrophotometric method. The estimate by surgeons was the closest to the spectrophotometric measurement, difference 68.7 ml (95% confidence interval [CI]: -129.3--8.2). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the estimate of blood loss by surgeons and anesthesiologists, as well as gravimetric method and calculation method are all significantly inaccurate in real surgical setting. We did not confirm the commonly accepted assumption that surgeons underestimate the blood loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered under the title " Blood Loss Quantification During Major Abdominal Surgery" at ClinicalTrials.gov with the registration number NCT05316649. Date of the first registration was 20/3/2022.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Jaramillo S, Montane-Muntane M, Gambus PL, Capitan D, Navarro-Ripoll R, Blasi A. Perioperative blood loss: estimation of blood volume loss or Haemoglobin mass loss? Blood Transfus. 2020;18(1):20–29. doi: 10.2450/2019.0204-19. PubMed DOI PMC

Franchini M, Marano G, Veropalumbo E, Masiello F, Pati I, Candura F, Profili S, Catalano L, Piccinini V, Pupella S, Vaglio S, Liumbruno GM. Patient Blood Management: a Revolutionary Approach to Transfusion Medicine. Blood Transfus. 2019;17:191–195. doi: 10.2450/2019.0109-19. PubMed DOI PMC

Clevenger B, Mallett SV, Klein AA, Richards T. Patient blood management to reduce surgical risk. Br J Surg. 2015;102:1325–1337. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9898. PubMed DOI

Flordal PA. Measurement of Blood Loss in Clinical Studies. Eur J Anaesthesiol Supl. 1997;14:35–37. doi: 10.1097/00003643-199703001-00007. PubMed DOI

Goodnough LT, Panigrahi AK. Estimating Blood Loss. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(1):13–4. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002121. PubMed DOI

Gerdessen L, Meybohm P, Choorapoikayil S, Herrmann E, Taeuber I, Neef V, Raimann FJ, Zacharowski K, Piekarski F. Comparison of common perioperative blood loss estimation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021;35(2):245–258. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00579-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Schorn MN. Measurement of blood loss: review of the literature. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010;55(1):20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.02.014. PubMed DOI

Meiser A, Casagranda O, Skipka G, et al. Quantification of blood loss. How precise is visual estimation and what does its accuracy depend on? Anaesthesist. 2001;50(1):13–20. doi: 10.1007/s001010050957. PubMed DOI

Thomas S, Ghee L, Sill AM, Patel ST, Kowdley GC, Cunningham SC. Measured versus Estimated Blood Loss: Interim Analysis of a Prospective Quality Improvement Study. Am Surg. 2020;86(3):228–231. doi: 10.1177/000313482008600332. PubMed DOI

Rothermel LD, Lipman JM. Estimation of blood loss is inaccurate and unreliable. Surgery. 2016;160(4):946–953. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.006. PubMed DOI

Wangensteen OH. The controlled administration of fluid to surgical patients. Minn Med. 1942;25:783.

Nowicki PD, Ndika A, Kemppainen J, Cassidy J, Forness M, Satish S, Hassan N. Measurement of intraoperative blood loss in pediatric Orthopaedic patients: evaluation of a new method. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018;2(5):e014. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00014. PubMed DOI PMC

Johar RS, Smith RP. Assessing gravimetric estimation of intraoperative blood loss. J Gynecol Surg. 1993;9(3):151–154. doi: 10.1089/gyn.1993.9.151. PubMed DOI

Holmes AA, Konig G, Ting V, Philip B, Puzio T, Satish S, Waters JH. Clinical evaluation of a novel system for monitoring surgical hemoglobin loss. Anesth Analg. 2014;119(3):588–594. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000181. PubMed DOI PMC

Konig G, Waters JH, Javidroozi M, Philip B, Ting V, Abbi G, Hsieh E, Tully G, Adams G. Real-time evaluation of an image analysis system for monitoring surgical hemoglobin loss. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018;32(2):303–310. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-0016-0. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhang WH, Deneux-Tharaux C, Brocklehurst P, Juszczak E, Joslin M, Alexander S, EUPHRATES Group Effect of a collector bag for measurement of postpartum blood loss after vaginal delivery: Cluster Randomised Trial in 13 European Countries. BMJ. 2010;340:293. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c293. PubMed DOI PMC

Legendre G, Richard M, Brun S, Chancerel M, Matuszewski S, Sentilhes L. Evaluation by obstetric care providers of simulated postpartum blood loss using a collector bag: a French prospective study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(21):3575–3581. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1139569. PubMed DOI

ICSH. Recommendations for Haemoglobinometry in Human Blood. Br J Haematol. 1967; 13 (suppl:71–6).

López-Picado A, Albinarrate A, Barrachina B. Determination of perioperative blood loss: accuracy or approximation? Anesth Analg. 2017;125:280–286. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001992. PubMed DOI

Perri G, Marchegiani G, Reich F, Casetti L, Fontana M, Esposito A, Ruzzenente A, Salvia R, Bassi C. Intraoperative blood loss estimation in Hepato-Pancreato-biliary surgery – relevant, not reported, not standardized: results from a systematic review and a worldwide snapshot survey. Ann Surg. 2023;277(4):e849–e855. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005536. PubMed DOI

Zobrazit více v PubMed

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05316649

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace