Pericentric heterochromatin (PCH) forms spatio-temporarily distinct compartments and affects chromosome organization and stability. Albeit some of its components are known, an elucidation of its proteome and how it differs between tissues in vivo is lacking. Here, we find that PCH compartments are dynamically organized in a tissue-specific manner, possibly reflecting compositional differences. As the mouse brain and liver exhibit very different PCH architecture, we isolated native PCH fractions from these tissues, analyzed their protein compositions using quantitative mass spectrometry, and compared them to identify common and tissue-specific PCH proteins. In addition to heterochromatin-enriched proteins, the PCH proteome includes RNA/transcription and membrane-related proteins, which showed lower abundance than PCH-enriched proteins. Thus, we applied a cut-off of PCH-unspecific candidates based on their abundance and validated PCH-enriched proteins. Amongst the hits, MeCP2 was classified into brain PCH-enriched proteins, while linker histone H1 was not. We found that H1 and MeCP2 compete to bind to PCH and regulate PCH organization in opposite ways. Altogether, our workflow of unbiased PCH isolation, quantitative mass spectrometry, and validation-based analysis allowed the identification of proteins that are common and tissue-specifically enriched at PCH. Further investigation of selected hits revealed their opposing role in heterochromatin higher-order architecture in vivo.

Cell Biology and Epigenetics Department of Biology Technical University of Darmstadt 64287 Darmstadt Germany

Clemens Schöpf Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry Department of Chemistry Technical University of Darmstadt 64287 Darmstadt Germany

Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital Prague 128 00 Prague Czech Republic

Institute of Molecular Biology 55128 Mainz Germany

Proteomics Platform Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association 13125 Berlin Germany

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Heitz E. Das heterochromatin der moose. Jahrbücher Für Wiss. Bot. 1928;69:762–818.

Jost K.L., Bertulat B., Cardoso M.C. Heterochromatin and gene positioning: Inside, outside, any side? Chromosoma. 2012;121:555–563. doi: 10.1007/s00412-012-0389-2. PubMed DOI PMC

Nishibuchi G., Déjardin J. The molecular basis of the organization of repetitive DNA-containing constitutive heterochromatin in mammals. Chromosome Res. 2017;25:77–87. doi: 10.1007/s10577-016-9547-3. PubMed DOI

Brown K.E., Guest S.S., Smale S.T., Hahm K., Merkenschlager M., Fisher A.G. Association of transcriptionally silent genes with Ikaros complexes at centromeric heterochromatin. Cell. 1997;91:845–854. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80472-9. PubMed DOI

Trojer P., Reinberg D. Facultative heterochromatin: Is there a distinctive molecular signature? Mol. Cell. 2007;28:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.09.011. PubMed DOI

Saksouk N., Simboeck E., Déjardin J. Constitutive heterochromatin formation and transcription in mammals. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2015;8:3. doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-8-3. PubMed DOI PMC

Pardue M.L., Gall J.G. Chromosomal localization of mouse satellite DNA. Science. 1970;168:1356–1358. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3937.1356. PubMed DOI

Wong A.K., Rattner J.B. Sequence organization and cytological localization of the minor satellite of mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16:11645–11661. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.24.11645. PubMed DOI PMC

Joseph A., Mitchell A.R., Miller O.J. The organization of the mouse satellite DNA at centromeres. Exp. Cell Res. 1989;183:494–500. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(89)90408-4. PubMed DOI

Baccarini P. Sulle cinesi vegetative del “Cynomorium coccineum L.”. N. Giorn. Bot. Ital. N. Ser. 1908;15:189–203.

Brändle F., Frühbauer B., Jagannathan M. Principles and functions of pericentromeric satellite DNA clustering into chromocenters. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022;128:26–39. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.02.005. PubMed DOI

Falk M., Feodorova Y., Naumova N., Imakaev M., Lajoie B.R., Leonhardt H., Joffe B., Dekker J., Fudenberg G., Solovei I., et al. Heterochromatin drives compartmentalization of inverted and conventional nuclei. Nature. 2019;570:395–399. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1275-3. PubMed DOI PMC

Guenatri M., Bailly D., Maison C., Almouzni G. Mouse centric and pericentric satellite repeats form distinct functional heterochromatin. J. Cell Biol. 2004;166:493–505. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200403109. PubMed DOI PMC

Solovei I., Grandi N., Knoth R., Volk B., Cremer T. Positional changes of pericentromeric heterochromatin and nucleoli in postmitotic Purkinje cells during murine cerebellum development. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2004;105:302–310. doi: 10.1159/000078202. DOI

Brero A., Easwaran H.P., Nowak D., Grunewald I., Cremer T., Leonhardt H., Cardoso M.C. Methyl CpG-binding proteins induce large-scale chromatin reorganization during terminal differentiation. J. Cell Biol. 2005;169:733–743. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200502062. PubMed DOI PMC

Singleton M.K., Gonzales M.L., Leung K.N., Yasui D.H., Schroeder D.I., Dunaway K., LaSalle J.M. MeCP2 is required for global heterochromatic and nucleolar changes during activity-dependent neuronal maturation. Neurobiol. Dis. 2011;43:190–200. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.03.011. PubMed DOI PMC

Bertulat B., De Bonis M.L., Della Ragione F., Lehmkuhl A., Milden M., Storm C., Jost K.L., Scala S., Hendrich B., D’Esposito M., et al. MeCP2 dependent heterochromatin reorganization during neural differentiation of a novel Mecp2-deficient embryonic stem cell reporter line. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e47848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047848. PubMed DOI PMC

Carone D.M., Lawrence J.B. Heterochromatin instability in cancer: From the Barr body to satellites and the nuclear periphery. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2013;23:99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2012.06.008. PubMed DOI PMC

Agarwal N., Becker A., Jost K.L., Haase S., Thakur B.K., Brero A., Hardt T., Kudo S., Leonhardt H., Cardoso M.C. MeCP2 Rett mutations affect large scale chromatin organization. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011;20:4187–4195. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr346. PubMed DOI

Casas-Delucchi C.S., Becker A., Bolius J.J., Cardoso M.C. Targeted manipulation of heterochromatin rescues MeCP2 Rett mutants and re-establishes higher order chromatin organization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:e176. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks784. PubMed DOI PMC

Ito-Ishida A., Baker S.A., Sillitoe R.V., Sun Y., Zhou J., Ono Y., Iwakiri J., Yuzaki M., Zoghbi H.Y. Mecp2 levels regulate the 3D structure of heterochromatic foci in mouse neurons. J. Neurosci. 2020;40:8746–8766. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1281-19.2020. PubMed DOI PMC

Eymery A., Callanan M., Vourc’h C. The secret message of heterochromatin: New insights into the mechanisms and function of centromeric and pericentric repeat sequence transcription. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2009;53:259–268. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.082673ae. PubMed DOI

Lu J., Gilbert D.M. Proliferation-dependent and cell cycle regulated transcription of mouse pericentric heterochromatin. J. Cell Biol. 2007;179:411–421. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200706176. PubMed DOI PMC

Rudert F., Bronner S., Garnier J.M., Dollé P. Transcripts from opposite strands of gamma satellite DNA are differentially expressed during mouse development. Mamm. Genome. 1995;6:76–83. doi: 10.1007/BF00303248. PubMed DOI

Probst A.V., Okamoto I., Casanova M., El Marjou F., Le Baccon P., Almouzni G. A strand-specific burst in transcription of pericentric satellites is required for chromocenter formation and early mouse development. Dev. Cell. 2010;19:625–638. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.09.002. PubMed DOI

Martens J.H.A., O’Sullivan R.J., Braunschweig U., Opravil S., Radolf M., Steinlein P., Jenuwein T. The profile of repeat-associated histone lysine methylation states in the mouse epigenome. EMBO J. 2005;24:800–812. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600545. PubMed DOI PMC

Terranova R., Sauer S., Merkenschlager M., Fisher A.G. The reorganisation of constitutive heterochromatin in differentiating muscle requires HDAC activity. Exp. Cell Res. 2005;310:344–356. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.07.031. PubMed DOI

Enukashvily N.I., Malashicheva A.B., Waisertreiger I.S.R. Satellite DNA spatial localization and transcriptional activity in mouse embryonic E-14 and IOUD2 stem cells. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2009;124:277–287. doi: 10.1159/000218132. PubMed DOI

Enukashvily N.I., Donev R., Waisertreiger I.S.R., Podgornaya O.I. Human chromosome 1 satellite 3 DNA is decondensed, demethylated and transcribed in senescent cells and in A431 epithelial carcinoma cells. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2007;118:42–54. doi: 10.1159/000106440. PubMed DOI

Rizzi N., Denegri M., Chiodi I., Corioni M., Valgardsdottir R., Cobianchi F., Riva S., Biamonti G. Transcriptional activation of a constitutive heterochromatic domain of the human genome in response to heat shock. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2004;15:543–551. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e03-07-0487. PubMed DOI PMC

Valgardsdottir R., Chiodi I., Giordano M., Cobianchi F., Riva S., Biamonti G. Structural and functional characterization of noncoding repetitive RNAs transcribed in stressed human cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2005;16:2597–2604. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e04-12-1078. PubMed DOI PMC

Jolly C., Metz A., Govin J., Vigneron M., Turner B.M., Khochbin S., Vourc’h C. Stress-induced transcription of satellite III repeats. J. Cell Biol. 2004;164:25–33. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200306104. PubMed DOI PMC

Valgardsdottir R., Chiodi I., Giordano M., Rossi A., Bazzini S., Ghigna C., Riva S., Biamonti G. Transcription of Satellite III non-coding RNAs is a general stress response in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:423–434. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm1056. PubMed DOI PMC

Alexiadis V., Ballestas M.E., Sanchez C., Winokur S., Vedanarayanan V., Warren M., Ehrlich M. RNAPol-ChIP analysis of transcription from FSHD-linked tandem repeats and satellite DNA. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2007;1769:29–40. doi: 10.1016/j.bbaexp.2006.11.006. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhu Q., Pao G.M., Huynh A.M., Suh H., Tonnu N., Nederlof P.M., Gage F.H., Verma I.M. BRCA1 tumour suppression occurs via heterochromatin-mediated silencing. Nature. 2011;477:179–184. doi: 10.1038/nature10371. PubMed DOI PMC

Ting D.T., Lipson D., Paul S., Brannigan B.W., Akhavanfard S., Coffman E.J., Contino G., Deshpande V., Iafrate A.J., Letovsky S., et al. Aberrant overexpression of satellite repeats in pancreatic and other epithelial cancers. Science. 2011;331:593–596. doi: 10.1126/science.1200801. PubMed DOI PMC

Janssen A., Colmenares S.U., Karpen G.H. Heterochromatin: Guardian of the genome. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018;34:265–288. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100617-062653. PubMed DOI

Thakur J., Packiaraj J., Henikoff S. Sequence, chromatin and evolution of satellite DNA. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:4309. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094309. PubMed DOI PMC

Hsu T.C., Arrighi F.E. Distribution of constitutive heterochromatin in mamallian chromosomes. Chromosoma. 1971;34:243–253. doi: 10.1007/BF00286150. PubMed DOI

Manuelidis L. Different central nervous system cell types display distinct and nonrandom arrangements of satellite DNA sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1984;81:3123–3127. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.10.3123. PubMed DOI PMC

Martou G., De Boni U. Nuclear topology of murine, cerebellar Purkinje neurons: Changes as a function of development. Exp. Cell Res. 2000;256:131–139. doi: 10.1006/excr.1999.4793. PubMed DOI

Prusov A.N., Zatsepina O.V. Isolation of the chromocenter fraction from mouse liver nuclei. Biochemistry. 2002;67:423–431. PubMed

Zatsepina O.V., Zharskaya O.O., Prusov A.N. Isolation of the constitutive heterochromatin from mouse liver nuclei. Methods Mol. Biol. 2008;463:169–180. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-406-3_12. PubMed DOI

Wessel D., Flügge U.I. A method for the quantitative recovery of protein in dilute solution in the presence of detergents and lipids. Anal. Biochem. 1984;138:141–143. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90782-6. PubMed DOI

Kanashova T., Popp O., Orasche J., Karg E., Harndorf H., Stengel B., Sklorz M., Streibel T., Zimmermann R., Dittmar G. Differential proteomic analysis of mouse macrophages exposed to adsorbate-loaded heavy fuel oil derived combustion particles using an automated sample-preparation workflow. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015;407:5965–5976. doi: 10.1007/s00216-015-8595-4. PubMed DOI

Boersema P.J., Raijmakers R., Lemeer S., Mohammed S., Heck A.J.R. Multiplex peptide stable isotope dimethyl labeling for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 2009;4:484–494. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.21. PubMed DOI

Rappsilber J., Mann M., Ishihama Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat. Protoc. 2007;2:1896–1906. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.261. PubMed DOI

Cox J., Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008;26:1367–1372. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1511. PubMed DOI

Tyanova S., Temu T., Cox J. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 2016;11:2301–2319. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.136. PubMed DOI

UniProt Consortium UniProt: A worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D506–D515. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1049. PubMed DOI PMC

Geiger T., Wisniewski J.R., Cox J., Zanivan S., Kruger M., Ishihama Y., Mann M. Use of stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture as a spike-in standard in quantitative proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 2011;6:147–157. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.192. PubMed DOI

R Core Team R . A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2013.

Eden E., Navon R., Steinfeld I., Lipson D., Yakhini Z. GOrilla: A tool for discovery and visualization of enriched GO terms in ranked gene lists. BMC Bioinform. 2009;10:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-48. PubMed DOI PMC

Frauer C., Rottach A., Meilinger D., Bultmann S., Fellinger K., Hasenöder S., Wang M., Qin W., Söding J., Spada F., et al. Different binding properties and function of CXXC zinc finger domains in Dnmt1 and Tet1. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e16627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016627. PubMed DOI PMC

Lehnertz B., Ueda Y., Derijck A.A.H.A., Braunschweig U., Perez-Burgos L., Kubicek S., Chen T., Li E., Jenuwein T., Peters A.H.F.M. Suv39h-mediated histone H3 lysine 9 methylation directs DNA methylation to major satellite repeats at pericentric heterochromatin. Curr. Biol. 2003;13:1192–1200. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00432-9. PubMed DOI

Ovesný M., Křížek P., Borkovec J., Svindrych Z., Hagen G.M. ThunderSTORM: A comprehensive ImageJ plug-in for PALM and STORM data analysis and super-resolution imaging. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2389–2390. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu202. PubMed DOI PMC

Th’ng J.P.H., Sung R., Ye M., Hendzel M.J. H1 family histones in the nucleus. Control of binding and localization by the C-terminal domain. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:27809–27814. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501627200. PubMed DOI

Schneider C.A., Rasband W.S., Eliceiri K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. PubMed DOI PMC

Schindelin J., Arganda-Carreras I., Frise E., Kaynig V., Longair M., Pietzsch T., Preibisch S., Rueden C., Saalfeld S., Schmid B., et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. PubMed DOI PMC

Torrente M.P., Zee B.M., Young N.L., Baliban R.C., LeRoy G., Floudas C.A., Hake S.B., Garcia B.A. Proteomic interrogation of human chromatin. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e24747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024747. PubMed DOI PMC

van Mierlo G., Dirks R.A.M., De Clerck L., Brinkman A.B., Huth M., Kloet S.L., Saksouk N., Kroeze L.I., Willems S., Farlik M., et al. Integrative Proteomic Profiling Reveals PRC2-Dependent Epigenetic Crosstalk Maintains Ground-State Pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;24:123–137.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.10.017. PubMed DOI

Iglesias N., Paulo J.A., Tatarakis A., Wang X., Edwards A.L., Bhanu N.V., Garcia B.A., Haas W., Gygi S.P., Moazed D. Native chromatin proteomics reveals a role for specific nucleoporins in heterochromatin organization and maintenance. Mol. Cell. 2020;77:51–66.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.10.018. PubMed DOI PMC

Federation A.J., Nandakumar V., Searle B.C., Stergachis A., Wang H., Pino L.K., Merrihew G., Ting Y.S., Howard N., Kutyavin T., et al. Highly parallel quantification and compartment localization of transcription factors and nuclear proteins. Cell Rep. 2020;30:2463–2471.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.01.096. PubMed DOI

Spector D.L., Fu X.D., Maniatis T. Associations between distinct pre-mRNA splicing components and the cell nucleus. EMBO J. 1991;10:3467–3481. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04911.x. PubMed DOI PMC

Baker N.M., Rajan R., Mondragón A. Structural studies of type I topoisomerases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:693–701. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn1009. PubMed DOI PMC

Lee S.K., Wang W. Roles of topoisomerases in heterochromatin, aging, and diseases. Genes. 2019;10:884. doi: 10.3390/genes10110884. PubMed DOI PMC

Kernohan K.D., Jiang Y., Tremblay D.C., Bonvissuto A.C., Eubanks J.H., Mann M.R.W., Bérubé N.G. ATRX partners with cohesin and MeCP2 and contributes to developmental silencing of imprinted genes in the brain. Dev. Cell. 2010;18:191–202. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.12.017. PubMed DOI

Nan X., Hou J., Maclean A., Nasir J., Lafuente M.J., Shu X., Kriaucionis S., Bird A. Interaction between chromatin proteins MECP2 and ATRX is disrupted by mutations that cause inherited mental retardation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:2709–2714. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608056104. PubMed DOI PMC

Larrigan S., Shah S., Fernandes A., Mattar P. Chromatin Remodeling in the Brain-a NuRDevelopmental Odyssey. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:4768. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094768. PubMed DOI PMC

Kalimuthu S.N., Chetty R. Gene of the month: SMARCB1. J. Clin. Pathol. 2016;69:484–489. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-203650. PubMed DOI PMC

Maze I., Noh K.-M., Soshnev A.A., Allis C.D. Every amino acid matters: Essential contributions of histone variants to mammalian development and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014;15:259–271. doi: 10.1038/nrg3673. PubMed DOI PMC

Lennox R.W., Cohen L.H. The histone H1 complements of dividing and nondividing cells of the mouse. J. Biol. Chem. 1983;258:262–268. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)33251-4. PubMed DOI

Meergans T., Albig W., Doenecke D. Varied expression patterns of human H1 histone genes in different cell lines. DNA Cell Biol. 1997;16:1041–1049. doi: 10.1089/dna.1997.16.1041. PubMed DOI

Fan Y., Sirotkin A., Russell R.G., Ayala J., Skoultchi A.I. Individual somatic H1 subtypes are dispensable for mouse development even in mice lacking the H1(0) replacement subtype. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001;21:7933–7943. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.23.7933-7943.2001. PubMed DOI PMC

Happel N., Doenecke D. Histone H1 and its isoforms: Contribution to chromatin structure and function. Gene. 2009;431:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2008.11.003. PubMed DOI

Skene P.J., Illingworth R.S., Webb S., Kerr A.R.W., James K.D., Turner D.J., Andrews R., Bird A.P. Neuronal MeCP2 is expressed at near histone-octamer levels and globally alters the chromatin state. Mol. Cell. 2010;37:457–468. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.030. PubMed DOI PMC

Pearson E.C., Bates D.L., Prospero T.D., Thomas J.O. Neuronal nuclei and glial nuclei from mammalian cerebral cortex. Nucleosome repeat lengths, DNA contents and H1 contents. Eur. J. Biochem. 1984;144:353–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1984.tb08471.x. PubMed DOI

Ghosh R.P., Horowitz-Scherer R.A., Nikitina T., Shlyakhtenko L.S., Woodcock C.L. MeCP2 binds cooperatively to its substrate and competes with histone H1 for chromatin binding sites. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010;30:4656–4670. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00379-10. PubMed DOI PMC

Bernard P., Maure J.F., Partridge J.F., Genier S., Javerzat J.P., Allshire R.C. Requirement of heterochromatin for cohesion at centromeres. Science. 2001;294:2539–2542. doi: 10.1126/science.1064027. PubMed DOI

Larson A.G., Elnatan D., Keenen M.M., Trnka M.J., Johnston J.B., Burlingame A.L., Agard D.A., Redding S., Narlikar G.J. Liquid droplet formation by HP1α suggests a role for phase separation in heterochromatin. Nature. 2017;547:236–240. doi: 10.1038/nature22822. PubMed DOI PMC

Larson A.G., Narlikar G.J. The role of phase separation in heterochromatin formation, function, and regulation. Biochemistry. 2018;57:2540–2548. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00401. PubMed DOI PMC

Gibson B.A., Doolittle L.K., Schneider M.W.G., Jensen L.E., Gamarra N., Henry L., Gerlich D.W., Redding S., Rosen M.K. Organization of chromatin by intrinsic and regulated phase separation. Cell. 2019;179:470–484.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.037. PubMed DOI PMC

Qin W., Ugur E., Mulholland C.B., Bultmann S., Solovei I., Modic M., Smets M., Wierer M., Forné I., Imhof A., et al. Phosphorylation of the HP1β hinge region sequesters KAP1 in heterochromatin and promotes the exit from naïve pluripotency. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:7406–7423. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab548. PubMed DOI PMC

Mayer R., Brero A., von Hase J., Schroeder T., Cremer T., Dietzel S. Common themes and cell type specific variations of higher order chromatin arrangements in the mouse. BMC Cell Biol. 2005;6:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-6-44. PubMed DOI PMC

Schildkraut C.L., Maio J.J. Studies on the intranuclear distribution and properties of mouse satellite DNA. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Nucleic Acids Protein Synth. 1968;161:76–93. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(68)90296-7. PubMed DOI

Rae M.M., Franke W.W. The interphase distribution of satellite DNA-containing heterochromatin in mouse nuclei. Chromosoma. 1972;39:443–456. doi: 10.1007/BF00326177. PubMed DOI

Kochanova N.Y., Schauer T., Mathias G.P., Lukacs A., Schmidt A., Flatley A., Schepers A., Thomae A.W., Imhof A. A multi-layered structure of the interphase chromocenter revealed by proximity-based biotinylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:4161–4178. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa145. PubMed DOI PMC

Ji X., Dadon D.B., Abraham B.J., Lee T.I., Jaenisch R., Bradner J.E., Young R.A. Chromatin proteomic profiling reveals novel proteins associated with histone-marked genomic regions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:3841–3846. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502971112. PubMed DOI PMC

Durand-Dubief M., Persson J., Norman U., Hartsuiker E., Ekwall K. Topoisomerase I regulates open chromatin and controls gene expression in vivo. EMBO J. 2010;29:2126–2134. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.109. PubMed DOI PMC

Sperling A.S., Jeong K.S., Kitada T., Grunstein M. Topoisomerase II binds nucleosome-free DNA and acts redundantly with topoisomerase I to enhance recruitment of RNA Pol II in budding yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:12693–12698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106834108. PubMed DOI PMC

Dinh T.T., Gao L., Liu X., Li D., Li S., Zhao Y., O’Leary M., Le B., Schmitz R.J., Manavella P.A., et al. DNA topoisomerase 1α promotes transcriptional silencing of transposable elements through DNA methylation and histone lysine 9 dimethylation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004446. PubMed DOI PMC

Blattes R., Monod C., Susbielle G., Cuvier O., Wu J., Hsieh T., Laemmli U.K., Käs E. Displacement of D1, HP1 and topoisomerase II from satellite heterochromatin by a specific polyamide. EMBO J. 2006;25:2397–2408. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601125. PubMed DOI PMC

Martire S., Banaszynski L.A. The roles of histone variants in fine-tuning chromatin organization and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;21:522–541. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0262-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Buschbeck M., Uribesalgo I., Wibowo I., Rué P., Martin D., Gutierrez A., Morey L., Guigó R., López-Schier H., Di Croce L. The histone variant macroH2A is an epigenetic regulator of key developmental genes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009;16:1074–1079. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1665. PubMed DOI

Kozlowski M., Corujo D., Hothorn M., Guberovic I., Mandemaker I.K., Blessing C., Sporn J., Gutierrez-Triana A., Smith R., Portmann T., et al. MacroH2A histone variants limit chromatin plasticity through two distinct mechanisms. EMBO Rep. 2018;19:e44445. doi: 10.15252/embr.201744445. PubMed DOI PMC

Rogakou E.P., Pilch D.R., Orr A.H., Ivanova V.S., Bonner W.M. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:5858–5868. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.10.5858. PubMed DOI

Soldi M., Bonaldi T. The proteomic investigation of chromatin functional domains reveals novel synergisms among distinct heterochromatin components. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2013;12:764–780. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M112.024307. PubMed DOI PMC

Bassing C.H., Chua K.F., Sekiguchi J., Suh H., Whitlow S.R., Fleming J.C., Monroe B.C., Ciccone D.N., Yan C., Vlasakova K., et al. Increased ionizing radiation sensitivity and genomic instability in the absence of histone H2AX. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:8173–8178. doi: 10.1073/pnas.122228699. PubMed DOI PMC

Fernandez-Capetillo O., Mahadevaiah S.K., Celeste A., Romanienko P.J., Camerini-Otero R.D., Bonner W.M., Manova K., Burgoyne P., Nussenzweig A. H2AX is required for chromatin remodeling and inactivation of sex chromosomes in male mouse meiosis. Dev. Cell. 2003;4:497–508. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00093-5. PubMed DOI

Goldberg A.D., Banaszynski L.A., Noh K.-M., Lewis P.W., Elsaesser S.J., Stadler S., Dewell S., Law M., Guo X., Li X., et al. Distinct factors control histone variant H3.3 localization at specific genomic regions. Cell. 2010;140:678–691. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.003. PubMed DOI PMC

Lewis P.W., Elsaesser S.J., Noh K.-M., Stadler S.C., Allis C.D. Daxx is an H3.3-specific histone chaperone and cooperates with ATRX in replication-independent chromatin assembly at telomeres. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:14075–14080. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008850107. PubMed DOI PMC

Wong L.H., McGhie J.D., Sim M., Anderson M.A., Ahn S., Hannan R.D., George A.J., Morgan K.A., Mann J.R., Choo K.H.A. ATRX interacts with H3.3 in maintaining telomere structural integrity in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Genome Res. 2010;20:351–360. doi: 10.1101/gr.101477.109. PubMed DOI PMC

Parseghian M.H., Newcomb R.L., Hamkalo B.A. Distribution of somatic H1 subtypes is non-random on active vs. inactive chromatin II: Distribution in human adult fibroblasts. J. Cell. Biochem. 2001;83:643–659. doi: 10.1002/jcb.1224. PubMed DOI

Fan Y., Nikitina T., Morin-Kensicki E.M., Zhao J., Magnuson T.R., Woodcock C.L., Skoultchi A.I. H1 linker histones are essential for mouse development and affect nucleosome spacing in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003;23:4559–4572. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.13.4559-4572.2003. PubMed DOI PMC

Fan Y., Nikitina T., Zhao J., Fleury T.J., Bhattacharyya R., Bouhassira E.E., Stein A., Woodcock C.L., Skoultchi A.I. Histone H1 depletion in mammals alters global chromatin structure but causes specific changes in gene regulation. Cell. 2005;123:1199–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.028. PubMed DOI

Jones P.L., Veenstra G.J., Wade P.A., Vermaak D., Kass S.U., Landsberger N., Strouboulis J., Wolffe A.P. Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nat. Genet. 1998;19:187–191. doi: 10.1038/561. PubMed DOI

Meehan R.R., Lewis J.D., Bird A.P. Characterization of MeCP2, a vertebrate DNA binding protein with affinity for methylated DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20:5085–5092. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.19.5085. PubMed DOI PMC

Chahrour M., Jung S.Y., Shaw C., Zhou X., Wong S.T.C., Qin J., Zoghbi H.Y. MeCP2, a key contributor to neurological disease, activates and represses transcription. Science. 2008;320:1224–1229. doi: 10.1126/science.1153252. PubMed DOI PMC

Nan X., Campoy F.J., Bird A. MeCP2 is a transcriptional repressor with abundant binding sites in genomic chromatin. Cell. 1997;88:471–481. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81887-5. PubMed DOI

Schmidt A., Zhang H., Cardoso M.C. MeCP2 and chromatin compartmentalization. Cells. 2020;9:878. doi: 10.3390/cells9040878. PubMed DOI PMC

Song C., Feodorova Y., Guy J., Peichl L., Jost K.L., Kimura H., Cardoso M.C., Bird A., Leonhardt H., Joffe B., et al. DNA methylation reader MECP2: Cell type- and differentiation stage-specific protein distribution. Epigenet. Chromatin. 2014;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-7-17. PubMed DOI PMC

Shahbazian M.D., Antalffy B., Armstrong D.L., Zoghbi H.Y. Insight into Rett syndrome: MeCP2 levels display tissue- and cell-specific differences and correlate with neuronal maturation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2002;11:115–124. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.2.115. PubMed DOI

Jung B.P., Jugloff D.G.M., Zhang G., Logan R., Brown S., Eubanks J.H. The expression of methyl CpG binding factor MeCP2 correlates with cellular differentiation in the developing rat brain and in cultured cells. J. Neurobiol. 2003;55:86–96. doi: 10.1002/neu.10201. PubMed DOI

Agarwal N., Hardt T., Brero A., Nowak D., Rothbauer U., Becker A., Leonhardt H., Cardoso M.C. MeCP2 interacts with HP1 and modulates its heterochromatin association during myogenic differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:5402–5408. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm599. PubMed DOI PMC

McDowell T.L., Gibbons R.J., Sutherland H., O’Rourke D.M., Bickmore W.A., Pombo A., Turley H., Gatter K., Picketts D.J., Buckle V.J., et al. Localization of a putative transcriptional regulator (ATRX) at pericentromeric heterochromatin and the short arms of acrocentric chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:13983–13988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.24.13983. PubMed DOI PMC

Clynes D., Higgs D.R., Gibbons R.J. The chromatin remodeller ATRX: A repeat offender in human disease. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2013;38:461–466. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.06.011. PubMed DOI

Kernohan K.D., Vernimmen D., Gloor G.B., Bérubé N.G. Analysis of neonatal brain lacking ATRX or MeCP2 reveals changes in nucleosome density, CTCF binding and chromatin looping. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:8356–8368. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku564. PubMed DOI PMC

Marano D., Fioriniello S., Fiorillo F., Gibbons R.J., D’Esposito M., Della Ragione F. ATRX Contributes to MeCP2-Mediated Pericentric Heterochromatin Organization during Neural Differentiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:5371. doi: 10.3390/ijms20215371. PubMed DOI PMC

Minc E., Allory Y., Worman H.J., Courvalin J.C., Buendia B. Localization and phosphorylation of HP1 proteins during the cell cycle in mammalian cells. Chromosoma. 1999;108:220–234. doi: 10.1007/s004120050372. PubMed DOI

Eberhart A., Feodorova Y., Song C., Wanner G., Kiseleva E., Furukawa T., Kimura H., Schotta G., Leonhardt H., Joffe B., et al. Epigenetics of eu- and heterochromatin in inverted and conventional nuclei from mouse retina. Chromosome Res. 2013;21:535–554. doi: 10.1007/s10577-013-9375-7. PubMed DOI

Gilbert N., Boyle S., Sutherland H., de Las Heras J., Allan J., Jenuwein T., Bickmore W.A. Formation of facultative heterochromatin in the absence of HP1. EMBO J. 2003;22:5540–5550. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg520. PubMed DOI PMC