Use of pus metagenomic next-generation sequencing for efficient identification of pathogens in patients with sepsis
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
38341816
PubMed Central
PMC11379781
DOI
10.1007/s12223-024-01134-7
PII: 10.1007/s12223-024-01134-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), Obligate anaerobic infection, Pus, Sepsis, Mixed infection,
- MeSH
- Bacteria * genetika izolace a purifikace klasifikace MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hnisání mikrobiologie MeSH
- houby genetika izolace a purifikace klasifikace MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metagenomika * metody MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- sepse * mikrobiologie diagnóza MeSH
- vysoce účinné nukleotidové sekvenování * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The positive detection rate of blood metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) was still too low to meet clinical needs, while pus from the site of primary infection may be advantageous for identification of pathogens. To assess the value of mNGS using pus in patients with sepsis, thirty-five samples were collected. Pathogen identification and mixed infection diagnosis obtained by use of mNGS or cultivation methods were compared. Fifty-three aerobic or facultative anaerobes, 59 obligate anaerobes and 7 fungi were identified by the two methods. mNGS increased the accuracy rate of diagnosing aerobic or facultative anaerobic infections from 44.4% to 94.4%; mNGS also increased the sensitivity of diagnosing obligate anaerobic infections from 52.9% to 100.0%; however, mNGS did not show any advantage in terms of fungal infections. Culture and mNGS identified 1 and 24 patients with mixed infection, respectively. For obligate anaerobes, source of microorganisms was analyzed. The odontogenic bacteria all caused empyema (n = 7) or skin and soft tissue infections (n = 5), whereas the gut-derived microbes all caused intra-abdominal infections (n = 7). We also compared the clinical characteristics of non-obligate anaerobic and obligate anaerobic infection groups. The SOFA score [9.0 (7.5, 14.3) vs. 5.0 (3.0, 8.0), P = 0.005], procalcitonin value [4.7 (1.8, 39.9) vs. 2.50 (0.7, 8.0), P = 0.035], the proportion of septic shock (66.7% vs. 35.3%, P = 0.044) and acute liver injury (66.7% vs. 23.5%, P = 0.018) in the non-obligate anaerobic infection group were significantly higher than those in the obligate anaerobic infection group. In patients with sepsis caused by purulent infection, mNGS using pus from the primary lesion may yield more valuable microbiological information.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Böttger S, Zechel-Gran S, Streckbein P, Knitschke M, Hain T, Weigel M, Wilbrand JF, Domann E, Howaldt HP, Attia S (2020) A New Type of Chronic Wound Infection after Wisdom Tooth Extraction: A Diagnostic Approach with 16S-rRNA Gene Analysis, Next-Generation Sequencing, and Bioinformatics. Pathogens 9:798. 10.3390/pathogens9100798 10.3390/pathogens9100798 PubMed DOI PMC
Böttger S, Zechel-Gran S, Schmermund D, Streckbein P, Wilbrand JF, Knitschke M, Pons-Kühnemann J, Hain T, Weigel M, Imirzalioglu C, Howaldt HP, Domann E, Attia S (2021) Clinical Relevance of the Microbiome in Odontogenic Abscesses. Biology (Basel) 10:916. 10.3390/biology10090916 10.3390/biology10090916 PubMed DOI PMC
Cao XG, Zhou SS, Wang CY, Jin K, Meng HD (2022) The diagnostic value of next-generation sequencing technology in sepsis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:899508. 10.3389/fcimb.2022.899508 PubMed PMC
DiEuliis D, Johnson KR, Morse SS, Schindel DE (2016) Opinion: Specimen collections should have a much bigger role in infectious disease research and response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:4–7. 10.1073/pnas.1522680112 10.1073/pnas.1522680112 PubMed DOI PMC
Fang X, Mei Q, Fan X, Zhu C, Yang T, Zhang L, Geng S, Pan A (2020) Diagnostic Value of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Pathogens in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Patients. Front Microbiol 11:599756. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.599756 PubMed PMC
Geng S, Mei Q, Zhu C, Fang X, Yang T, Zhang L, Fan X, Pan A (2021) Metagenomic next-generation sequencing technology for detection of pathogens in blood of critically ill patients. Int J Infect Dis 103:81–87. 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.166 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.166 PubMed DOI
Han D, Li Z, Li R, Tan P, Zhang R, Li J (2019) mNGS in clinical microbiology laboratories: on the road to maturity. Crit Rev Microbiol 45:668–685. 10.1080/1040841X.2019.1681933 10.1080/1040841X.2019.1681933 PubMed DOI
Kanaujia R, Biswal M, Angrup A, Ray P (2022) Diagnostic accuracy of the metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for detection of bacterial meningoencephalitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 41:881–891. 10.1007/s10096-022-04445-0 10.1007/s10096-022-04445-0 PubMed DOI
Kang SH, Kim MK (2019) Antibiotic sensitivity and resistance of bacteria from odontogenic maxillofacial abscesses. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:324–331. 10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.6.324 10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.6.324 PubMed DOI PMC
Li S, Yu S, Peng M, Qin J, Xu C, Qian J, He M, Zhou P (2021) Clinical features and development of Sepsis in Klebsiella pneumoniae infected liver abscess patients: a retrospective analysis of 135 cases. BMC Infect Dis 21:597. 10.1186/s12879-021-06325-y 10.1186/s12879-021-06325-y PubMed DOI PMC
Mannan S, Tordik PA, Martinho FC, Chivian N, Hirschberg CS (2021) Dental Abscess to Septic Shock: A Case Report and Literature Review. J Endod 47:663–670. 10.1016/j.joen.2020.12.016 10.1016/j.joen.2020.12.016 PubMed DOI
Marik P (2003) Aliens, anaerobes, and the lung! Intensive Care Med 29:1035–7. 10.1007/s00134-003-1795-y 10.1007/s00134-003-1795-y PubMed DOI
Mitchell SL, Simner PJ (2019) Next-Generation Sequencing in Clinical Microbiology: Are We There Yet? Clin Lab Med 39:405–418. 10.1016/j.cll.2019.05.003 10.1016/j.cll.2019.05.003 PubMed DOI
Parahitiyawa NB, Jin LJ, Leung WK, Yam WC, Samaranayake LP (2009) Microbiology of odontogenic bacteremia: beyond endocarditis. Clin Microbiol Rev 22:46–64. 10.1128/CMR.00028-08 10.1128/CMR.00028-08 PubMed DOI PMC
Rasane RK, Centeno Coleoglou AA, Horn CB, Torres MB, Nohra E, Zhang Q, Bochicchio KM, Ilahi ON, Mazuski JE, Bochicchio GV (2020) Inadequate Antibiotic Therapy Results in Higher Recurrence Rate after Drainage of Complicated Peri-Rectal Abscess. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 21:823–827. 10.1089/sur.2019.308 10.1089/sur.2019.308 PubMed DOI
Sanghavi TH, Shah N, Shah RR, Sanghavi A (2014) Investigate the correlation between clinical sign and symptoms and the presence of P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia individually or as a “Red complex” by a multiplex PCR method. J Conserv Dent 17:555–60. 10.4103/0972-0707.144604 10.4103/0972-0707.144604 PubMed DOI PMC
Shenoy PA, Vishwanath S, Gawda A, Shetty S, Anegundi R, Varma M, Mukhopadhyay C, Chawla K (2017) Anaerobic Bacteria in Clinical Specimens - Frequent, But a Neglected Lot: A Five Year Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital. J Clin Diagn Res 11:DC44–DC48. 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26009.10311 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26009.10311 PubMed DOI PMC
Simner PJ, Miller S, Carroll KC (2018) Understanding the Promises and Hurdles of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing as a Diagnostic Tool for Infectious Diseases. Clin Infect Dis 66:778–788. 10.1093/cid/cix881 10.1093/cid/cix881 PubMed DOI PMC
Singh M, Kambalimath DH, Gupta KC (2014) Management of odontogenic space infection with microbiology study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 13:133–9. 10.1007/s12663-012-0463-6 10.1007/s12663-012-0463-6 PubMed DOI PMC
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN (2013) Microbiology and treatment of acute apical abscesses. Clin Microbiol Rev 26:255–73. 10.1128/CMR.00082-12 10.1128/CMR.00082-12 PubMed DOI PMC
Sudhaharan S, Kanne P, Chavali P, Vemu L (2018) Aerobic bacteriological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of pus isolates from tertiary care hospital in India. J Infect Dev Ctries 12:842–848. 10.3855/jidc.10473 10.3855/jidc.10473 PubMed DOI
Sun L, Zhang S, Yang Z, Yang F, Wang Z, Li H, Li Y, Sun T (2022) Clinical Application and Influencing Factor Analysis of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) in ICU Patients With Sepsis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:905132. 10.3389/fcimb.2022.905132 PubMed PMC
Wade WG (2021) Resilience of the oral microbiome. Periodontol 2000(86):113–122. 10.1111/prd.12365 10.1111/prd.12365 PubMed DOI
Wang WJ, Tao Z, Wu HL (2018) Etiology and clinical manifestations of bacterial liver abscess: A study of 102 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e12326. 10.1097/MD.0000000000012326 PubMed PMC
Yan G, Liu J, Chen W, Chen Y, Cheng Y, Tao J, Cai X, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Wang M, Lu G (2021) Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing of Bloodstream Microbial Cell-Free Nucleic Acid in Children With Suspected Sepsis in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:665226. 10.3389/fcimb.2021.665226 10.3389/fcimb.2021.665226 PubMed DOI PMC
Yang T, Mei Q, Fang X, Zhu S, Wang Y, Li W, Pan A (2022) Clinical Value of Metagenomics Next-Generation Sequencing in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid for Patients with Severe Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia: A Nested Case-Control Study. Infect Drug Resist 15:1505–1514. 10.2147/IDR.S356662 10.2147/IDR.S356662 PubMed DOI PMC
Zhan Y, Xu T, He F, Guan WJ, Li Z, Li S, Xie M, Li X, Chen R, Cheng L, Zhong N, Ye F (2021) Clinical Evaluation of a Metagenomics-Based Assay for Pneumonia Management. Front Microbiol 12:751073. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.751073 PubMed PMC