BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To present the first study analyzing the clinical and radiological course of carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs) following incomplete embolization. The study compares magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to plain angiography (digital subtraction angiography [DSA]) and investigates the long-term ophthalmological impact of residual fistula. METHODS: Fistulas classified as partially embolized after the last endovascular treatment were prospectively followed with DSA, MRA, and ophthalmological examination. Both direct and indirect CCFs were included. RESULTS: Twenty-one CCFs were included in the study. Nine (43%) fistulas were direct and 12 (57%) were indirect. A favorable clinical outcome of modified Rankin scale ≤2 was recorded in 19 (90%) patients at the last follow-up. Postinterventional ophthalmologic examinations in 16 patients revealed no negative effects of residual fistulas; five remaining patients refused to undergo further examination. Spontaneous thrombosis and complete occlusion of the CCF were demonstrated in 90% of patients, with a mean time to occlusion of 5.7 ± 4.7 months. Fourteen (66%) patients completed the full imaging follow-up (MRA and DSA). In 21% of these cases, discrepancy between the two imaging modalities was observed-MRA failed to detect persistent fistulas identified by DSA. CONCLUSIONS: The goal of CCF treatment is safe and complete embolization. However, if adequate flow reduction is achieved, both direct and indirect CCFs tend to spontaneously thrombose. Residual flow does not result in ophthalmological deterioration until the fistula is completely closed. MRA may not be sufficiently sensitive to detect residues of fistulas including cortical venous drainage. Therefore, complete CCF closure should be confirmed through DSA.

Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology Charles University 1st Faculty of Medicine Military University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Department of Ophthalmology Charles University 1st Faculty of Medicine Military University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Department of Radiology Military University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Barrow DL, Spector RH, Braun IF, Landman JA, Tindall SC, Tindall GT. Classification and treatment of spontaneous carotid‐cavernous sinus fistulas. J Neurosurg. 1985;62:248‐256.

Gemmete JJ, Ansari SA, Gandhi D. Endovascular treatment of carotid cavernous fistulas. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2009;19:241‐255.

Ellis JA, Goldstein H, Connolly ES Jr, Meyers PM. Carotid‐cavernous fistulas. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;32:E9

d'Angelo VA, Monte V, Scialfa G, Fiumara E, Scotti G. Intracerebral venous hemorrhage in ‘high‐risk’ carotid‐cavernous fistula. Surg Neurol. 1988;30:387‐390.

Feiner L, Bennett J, Volpe NJ. Cavernous sinus fistulas: carotid cavernous fistulas and dural arteriovenous malformations. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2003;3:415‐420.

Kupersmith MJ, Kupersmith MJ. Circulation of the eye, orbit, cranial nerves, and brain. In: Kupersmith MJ, ed. Neurovascular neuro‐ophthalmology. Berlin: Springer; 1993:1‐67

Satomi J, Satoh K, Matsubara S, Nakajima N, Nagahiro S. Angiographic changes in venous drainage of cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistulae after palliative transarterial embolization or observational management: a proposed stage classification. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:494‐502.

Alexander MD, Halbach V, Hallam DK, et al. Long‐term outcomes of endovascular treatment of indirect carotid cavernous fistulae: superior efficacy, safety, and durability of transvenous coiling over other techniques. Clin Neurosurg. 2019;85:94‐100.

Lewis AI, Tomsick TA, Tew JM Jr. Management of 100 consecutive direct carotid‐cavernous fistulas: results of treatment with detachable balloons. Neurosurgery. 1992;36:239‐245.

Nishimuta Y, Awa R, Sugata S, et al. Long‐term outcome after endovascular treatment of cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula and a literature review. Acta Neurochir. 2017;159:2113‐2122.

Kurata A, Miyasaka Y, Kunii M, et al. The value of long‐term clinical follow‐up for cases of spontaneous carotid cavernous fistula. Acta Neurochirur. 1998;140:65‐72.

Rodrigues T, Willinsky R, Agid R, TerBrugge K, Krings T. Management of dural carotid cavernous fistulas: a single‐centre experience. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:3051‐3058.

Farb RI, Agid R, Willinsky RA, Johnstone DM, Terbrugge KG. Cranial dural arteriovenous fistula: diagnosis and classification with time‐resolved MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1546‐1551.

Travers B. A case of aneurism by anastomosis in the orbit, cured by the ligature of the common carotid artery. Med Chir Trans. 1811;2:1‐420.

Lang M, Habboub G, Mullin JP, Rasmussen PA. A brief history of carotid‐cavernous fistula. J Neurosurg. 2016;126:1995‐2001.

Serbinenko FA. Balloon catheterization and occlusion of major cerebral vessels. J Neurosurg. 1974;41:125‐145.

Chi CT, Nguyen D, Duc VT, Chau HH, Son VT. Direct traumatic carotid cavernous fistula: angiographic classification and treatment strategies: study of 172 cases. Interv Neuroradiol. 2014;20:461‐475.

Awad A, Regenhardt RW, Dmytriw AA, et al. Flow diversion in direct carotid‐cavernous fistula refractory to multiple coil embolizations: case report and review of the literature. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022;31:106840.

Sumdani H, Aguilar‐Salinas P, Avila MJ, El‐Ghanem M, Dumont TM. Carotid cavernous fistula treatment via flow diversion: a systematic review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2021;149:369‐377.

Piton J, Guilleux MH, Guibert‐Tranier F, Caille JM. Fistulae of the lateral sinus. J Neuroradiol. 1984;11:143‐159.

Viñuela F, Fox AJ, Debrun GM, Peerless SJ, Drake CG. Spontaneous carotid‐cavernous fistulas: clinical, radiological, and therapeutic considerations. J Neurosurg. 1984;60:976‐984.

Uranishi R, Nakase H, Sasaki T. Expression of angiogenic growth factors in dural arteriovenous fistula. J Neurosurg. 1999;91:781‐786.

Sasaki H, Nukui H, Kaneko M, et al. Long‐term observations in cases with spontaneous carotid‐cavernous fistulas. Acta Neurochir. 1988;90:117‐120

Satomi J, van Dijk JM, Terbrugge KG, Willinsky RA, Wallace MC. Benign cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: outcome of conservative management based on the natural history of the lesion. J Neurosurg. 2002;97:767‐770.

Gross BA, Du R. The natural history of cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulae. Neurosurgery. 2012;71:594‐603.

Cheng KM, Chan CM, Cheung YL. Transvenous embolisation of dural carotid‐cavernous fistulas by multiple venous routes: a series of 27 cases. Acta Neurochir. 2003;145:17‐29.

Nishino K, Ito Y, Hasegawa H, et al. Cranial nerve palsy following transvenous embolization for a cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula: association with the volume and location of detachable coils. J Neurosurg. 2008;109:208‐214.

Chen JC, Tsuruda JS, Halbach VV. Suspected dural arteriovenous fistula: results with screening MR anglography. Radiology. 1992;183:265‐271.

Chen CC, Chang PC, Shy CG, Chen WS, Hung HC. CT angiography and MR angiography in the evaluation of carotid cavernous sinus fistula prior to embolization: a comparison of techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2349‐2356