Intravenous Thrombolysis in Posterior versus Anterior Circulation Stroke: Clinical Outcome Differs Only in Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
Cooperatio Program, research area NEUR
Charles University
DRO - UHHK 00179906
Ministry of Health
IRIS-TEPUS Project No. LTC20051 (INTER-EXCELLENCE INTER-COST Program)
Ministry of Education Youth and Sports
No. CA18118 (IRENE COST Action)
COST Association
STROCZECH within CZECRIN Large Research Infrastructure (No. LM2023049)
Czech Republic
PubMed
38398006
PubMed Central
PMC10887309
DOI
10.3390/biomedicines12020404
PII: biomedicines12020404
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- anterior circulation, clinical outcome, intracerebral hemorrhage, intravenous thrombolysis, posterior circulation, stroke,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) are well established in anterior circulation stroke (ACS) but are much less clear for posterior circulation stroke (PCS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of parenchymal hematoma (PH) and 3-month clinical outcomes after IVT in PCS and ACS. In an observational, cohort multicenter study, we analyzed data from ischemic stroke patients treated with IVT prospectively collected in the SITS (Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke) registry in the Czech Republic between 2004 and 2018. Out of 10,211 patients, 1166 (11.4%) had PCS, and 9045 (88.6%) ACS. PH was less frequent in PCS versus ACS patients: 3.6 vs. 5.9%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.594 in the whole set, 4.4 vs. 7.8%, OR = 0.543 in those with large vessel occlusion (LVO), and 2.2 vs. 4.7%, OR = 0.463 in those without LVO. At 3 months, PCS patients compared with ACS patients achieved more frequently excellent clinical outcomes (modified Rankin scale [mRS] 0-1: 55.5 vs. 47.6%, OR = 1.371 in the whole set and 49.2 vs. 37.6%, OR = 1.307 in those with LVO), good clinical outcomes (mRS 0-2: 69.9 vs. 62.8%, OR = 1.377 in the whole set and 64.5 vs. 50.5%, OR = 1.279 in those with LVO), and had lower mortality (12.4 vs. 16.6%, OR = 0.716 in the whole set and 18.4 vs. 25.5%, OR = 0.723 in those with LVO) (p < 0.05 in all cases). In PCS versus ACS patients, an extensive analysis showed a lower risk of PH both in patients with and without LVO, more frequent excellent and good clinical outcomes, and lower mortality 3 months after IVT in patients with LVO.
Neurocenter Regional Hospital Liberec 460 63 Liberec Czech Republic
Research Institute for Biomedical Science 500 02 Hradec Králové Czech Republic
Stroke Center Department of Neurology City Hospital Ostrava 703 00 Ostrava Czech Republic
Stroke Center Department of Neurology Krnov Hospital 794 01 Krnov Czech Republic
Stroke Center Department of Neurology Thomayer University Hospital 140 59 Prague Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Neumann J., Šaňák D., Tomek A., Bar M., Herzig R., Kovář M., Mikulík R., Reková P., Součková D., Škoda O., et al. Doporučení pro intravenózní trombolýzu v léčbě akutního mozkového infarktu—Verze 2021. Cesk. Slov. Neurol. N. 2021;84/117:291–299. doi: 10.48095/cccsnn2021291. DOI
Powers W.J., Rabinstein A.A., Ackerson T., Adeoye O.M., Bambakidis N.C., Becker K., Biller J., Brown M., Demaerschalk B.M., Hoh B., et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019;50:e344–e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. PubMed DOI
Hacke W., Kaste M., Bluhmki E., Brozman M., Dávalos A., Guidetti D., Larrue V., Lees K.R., Medeghri Z., ECASS Investigators et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;359:1317–1329. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804656. PubMed DOI
Lees K.R., Bluhmki E., von Kummer R., Brott T.G., Toni D., Grotta J.C., Albers G.W., Kaste M., Marler J.R., Hamilton S.A., et al. Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: An updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials. Lancet. 2010;375:1695–1703. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60491-6. PubMed DOI
Ma H., Campbell B.C.V., Parsons M.W., Churilov L., Levi C.R., Hsu C., Kleinig T.J., Wijeratne T., Curtze S., EXTEND Investigators et al. Thrombolysis guided by perfusion imaging up to 9 hours after onset of stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019;380:1795–1803. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1813046. PubMed DOI
Dorňák T., Král M., Hazlinger M., Herzig R., Veverka T., Buřval S., Šaňák D., Zapletalová J., Antalíková K., Kaňovský P. Posterior vs. anterior circulation infarction: Demography, outcomes, and frequency of hemorrhage after thrombolysis. Int. J. Stroke. 2015;10:1224–1228. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12626. PubMed DOI
Förster A., Gass A., Kern R., Griebe M., Hennerici M.G., Szabo K. Thrombolysis in posterior circulation stroke: Stroke subtypes and patterns, complications and outcome. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2011;32:349–353. doi: 10.1159/000330346. PubMed DOI
Keselman B., Gdovinová Z., Jatuzis D., Mělo T.P.E., Vilionskis A., Cavallo R., Frol S., Jurak L., Koyuncu B., Nunes A.P., et al. Safety and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis in posterior versus anterior circulation stroke: Results from the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke Registry and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2020;51:876–882. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027071. PubMed DOI
Sung S.F., Chen C.H., Chen Y.W., Tseng M.C., Shen H.C., Lin H.J. Predicting symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis: Stroke territory as a potential pitfall. J. Neurol. Sci. 2013;335:96–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.08.036. PubMed DOI
De Marchis G.M., Kohler A., Renz N., Arnold M., Mono M.L., Jung S., Fischer U., Karameshev A.I., Brekenfeld C., Gralla J., et al. Posterior versus anterior circulation strokes: Comparison of clinical, radiological and outcome characteristics. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2011;82:33–37. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.211151. PubMed DOI
Nair S.S., Sylaja P.N., Pandian J., Srivastava M.V.P., Khurana D., Kaul S., Arora D., Sarma P.S., Khatter H., Singhal A.B. Impact of revascularization therapies on outcome of posterior circulation ischemic stroke: The Indo-US stroke project. J. Neurol. Sci. 2021;427:117499. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117499. PubMed DOI PMC
Sarikaya H., Arnold M., Engelter S.T., Lyrer P.A., Mattle H.P., Georgiadis D., Bonati L.H., Fluri F., Fischer U., Findling O., et al. Outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis in posterior versus anterior circulation stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:2498–2502. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.607614. PubMed DOI
Sarraj A., Medrek S., Albright K., Martin-Schild S., Bibars W., Vahidy F., Grotta J.C., Savitz S.I. Posterior circulation stroke is associated with prolonged door-to-needle time. Int. J. Stroke. 2015;10:672–678. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00952.x. PubMed DOI
Taha N.A., El Khawas H., Tork M.A., Roushdy T.M. Intravenous thrombolysis outcome in posterior vs anterior circulation stroke in a tertiary stroke center in Egypt. Egypt. J. Neurol. Psychiatry Neurosurg. 2021;57:73. doi: 10.1186/s41983-021-00325-0. DOI
Tong X., Liao X., Pan Y., Cao Y., Wang C., Liu L., Zheng H., Zhao X., Wang C., Wang Y., et al. Intravenous thrombolysis is more safe and effective for posterior circulation stroke: Data from the Thrombolysis Implementation and Monitor of Acute Ischemic Stroke in China (TIMS-China) Medicine. 2016;95:e3848. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003848. PubMed DOI PMC
Lee M., Saver J.L., Alger J.R., Hao Q., Starkman S., Ali L.K., Kim D., Ovbiagele B., Vespa P.M., Froehler M.T., et al. Blood-brain barrier permeability derangements in posterior circulation ischemic stroke: Frequency and relation to hemorrhagic transformation. J. Neurol. Sci. 2012;313:142–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2011.08.048. PubMed DOI PMC
Menon B.K., O’Brien B., Bivard A., Spratt N.J., Demchuk A.M., Miteff F., Lu X., Levi C., Parsons M.W. Assessment of leptomeningeal collaterals using dynamic CT angiography in patients with acute ischemic stroke. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33:365–371. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.171. PubMed DOI PMC
Neumann J., Tomek A., Školoudík D., Škoda O., Mikulík R., Herzig R., Václavík D., Bar M., Šaňák D. Doporučený postup pro intravenózní trombolýzu v léčbě akutního mozkového infarktu—Verze 2014. Cesk. Slov. Neurol. N. 2014;77/110:381–385.
Škoda O., Herzig R., Mikulík R., Neumann J., Václavík D., Bar M., Šaňák D., Tomek A., Školoudík D. Klinický standard pro diagnostiku a léčbu pacientů s ischemickou cévní mozkovou příhodou a s tranzitorní ischemickou atakou—Verze 2016. Cesk. Slov. Neurol. N. 2016;79/112:351–363. doi: 10.14735/amcsnn2016351. DOI
Školoudík D., Bar M., Mikulík R., Neumann J., Václavík D., Herzig R., Škoda O., Kalita Z., Šaňák D., Polívka J. Standard pro podání systémové trombolýzy pacientům s akutním mozkovým infarktem. Neurol. Pro Praxi. 2006;1:55–58.
SITS. [(accessed on 15 December 2023)]. Available online: https://db.sitsinternational.org/
Goldstein L.B., Samsa G.P. Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial. Stroke. 1997;28:307–310. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.28.2.307. PubMed DOI
Hacke W., Kaste M., Fieschi C., von Kummer R., Davalos A., Meier D., Larrue V., Bluhmki E., Davis S., Donnan G., et al. for the Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II) Lancet. 1998;352:1245–1251. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08020-9. PubMed DOI
Wahlgren N., Ahmed N., Dávalos A., Ford G.A., Grond M., Hacke W., Hennerici M.G., Kaste M., Kuelkens S., SITS-MOST Investigators et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST): An observational study. Lancet. 2007;369:275–282. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60149-4. PubMed DOI
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995;333:1581–1587. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199512143332401. PubMed DOI
Hong K.S., Saver J.L. Quantifying the value of stroke disability outcomes: WHO global burden of disease project disability weights for each level of the modified Rankin Scale. Stroke. 2009;40:3828–3833. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.561365. PubMed DOI PMC
Kim J.T., Park M.S., Choi K.H., Kim B.J., Han M.K., Park T.H., Park S.S., Lee K.B., Lee B.C., Yu K.H., et al. Clinical outcomes of posterior versus anterior circulation infarction with low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores. Stroke. 2017;48:55–62. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013432. PubMed DOI
Hacke W., Kaste M., Fieschi C., Toni D., Lesaffre E., von Kummer R., Boysen G., Bluhmki E., Höxter G., Mahagne M.H., et al. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke: The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) JAMA. 1995;274:1017–1025. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03530130023023. PubMed DOI
Inoa V., Aron A.W., Staff I., Fortunato G., Sansing L.H. Lower NIH stroke scale scores are required to accurately predict a good prognosis in posterior circulation stroke. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2014;37:251–255. doi: 10.1159/000358869. PubMed DOI PMC
Kasner S.E. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:603–612. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70495-1. PubMed DOI
Martin-Schild S., Albright K.C., Tanksley J., Pandav V., Jones E.B., Grotta J.C., Savitz S.I. Zero on the NIHSS does not equal the absence of stroke. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2011;57:42–45. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.06.564. PubMed DOI PMC
Sato S., Toyoda K., Uehara T., Toratani N., Yokota C., Moriwaki H., Naritomi H., Minematsu K. Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score predicting outcome in anterior and posterior circulation strokes. Neurology. 2008;70:2371–2377. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000304346.14354.0b. PubMed DOI
Schneck M.J. Current stroke scales may be partly responsible for worse outcomes in posterior circulation stroke. Stroke. 2018;49:2565–2566. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023201. PubMed DOI
Sommer P., Seyfang L., Posekany A., Ferrari J., Lang W., Fertl E., Serles W., Töll T., Kiechl S., Greisenegger S. Prehospital and intra-hospital time delays in posterior circulation stroke: Results from the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry. J. Neurol. 2017;264:131–138. doi: 10.1007/s00415-016-8330-x. PubMed DOI PMC
Halúsková S., Herzig R., Krajíčková D., Hamza A., Krajina A., Chovanec V., Lojík M., Raupach J., Renc O., Šimůnek L., et al. Acute management should be optimized in patients with less specific stroke symptoms: Findings from a retrospective observational study. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:1143. doi: 10.3390/jcm10051143. PubMed DOI PMC
Dornak T., Herzig R., Sanak D., Skoloudik D. Management of acute basilar artery occlusion: Should any treatment strategy prevail? Biomed. Pap. Med. Fac. Univ. Palacky. Olomouc Czech Repub. 2014;158:528–534. doi: 10.5507/bp.2013.075. PubMed DOI
Zhu X., Wang N., Lin H., Zhang P., Chen L., Zhang M., Deng B., Wu T. Safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute posterior circulation stroke: A single-center study. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2020;29:104537. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104537. PubMed DOI
Sand K.M., Næss H., Nilsen R.M., Thomassen L., Hoff J.M. Less thrombolysis in posterior circulation infarction—A necessary evil? Acta Neurol. Scand. 2017;135:546–552. doi: 10.1111/ane.12627. PubMed DOI
Handelsmann H., Herzog L., Kulcsar Z., Luft A.R., Wegener S. Predictors for affected stroke territory and outcome of acute stroke treatments are different for posterior versus anterior circulation strokea. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:10544. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89871-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Zürcher E., Richoz B., Faouzi M., Michel P. Differences in ischemic anterior and posterior circulation strokes: A clinico-radiological and outcome analysis. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2019;28:710–718. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.11.016. PubMed DOI
Lee S.H., Han J.H., Jung I., Jung J.M. Do thrombolysis outcomes differ between anterior circulation stroke and posterior circulation stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Stroke. 2020;15:849–857. doi: 10.1177/1747493020909634. PubMed DOI
Bang O.Y., Saver J.L., Kim S.J., Kim G.M., Chung C.S., Ovbiagele B., Lee K.H., Liebeskind D.S., UCLA-Samsung Stroke Collaborators Collateral flow averts hemorrhagic transformation after endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:2235–2239. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.604603. PubMed DOI
Chuang Y.-M., Chan L., Lai Y.J., Kuo K.H., Chiou Y.H., Huang L.W., Kwok Y.T., Lai T.H., Lee S.P., Wu H.M., et al. Configuration of the circle of Willis is associated with less symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. J. Crit. Care. 2013;28:166–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.08.018. PubMed DOI
Lindgren A., Norrving B., Rudling O., Johansson B.B. Comparison of clinical and neuroradiological findings in first-ever stroke. A population-based study. Stroke. 1994;25:1371–1377. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.25.7.1371. PubMed DOI
Singer O.C., Humpich M.C., Fiehler J., Albers G.W., Lansberg M.G., Kastrup A., Rovira A., Liebeskind D.S., Gass A., Rosso C., et al. Risk for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after thrombolysis assessed by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Ann. Neurol. 2008;63:52–60. doi: 10.1002/ana.21222. PubMed DOI
Bang O.Y., Saver J.L., Alger J.R., Shah S.H., Buck B.H., Starkman S., Ovbiagele B., Liebeskind D.S., UCLA MRI Permeability Investigators Patterns and predictors of blood-brain barrier permeability derangements in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2009;40:454–461. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.522847. PubMed DOI
Jones H.R., Jr., Millikan C.H., Sandok B.A. Temporal profile (clinical course) of acute vertebrobasilar system cerebral infarction. Stroke. 1980;11:173–177. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.11.2.173. PubMed DOI
McDowell F.H., Potes J., Groch S. The natural history of internal carotid and vertebral-basilar artery occlusion. Neurology. 1961;11:153–157. doi: 10.1212/WNL.11.4_Part_2.152. PubMed DOI
Frid P., Drake M., Giese A.K., Wasselius J., Schirmer M.D., Donahue K.L., Cloonan L., Irie R., Bouts M.J.R.J., McIntosh E.C., et al. Detailed phenotyping of posterior vs. anterior circulation ischemic stroke: A multi-center MRI study. J. Neurol. 2020;267:649–658. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09613-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Dorňák T., Král M., Sedláčková Z., Šaňák D., Čecháková E., Divišová P., Zapletalová J., Kaňovský P. Predictors for intracranial hemorrhage following intravenous thrombolysis in posterior circulation stroke. Transl. Stroke Res. 2018;9:582–588. doi: 10.1007/s12975-018-0608-0. PubMed DOI
Lin S.F., Chen C.I., Hu H.H., Bai C.H. Predicting functional outcomes of posterior circulation acute ischemic stroke in first 36 h of stroke onset. J. Neurol. 2018;265:926–932. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8746-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Liu M., Pan Y., Zhou L., Wang Y. Predictors of post-thrombolysis symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in Chinese patients with acute ischemic stroke. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0184646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184646. PubMed DOI PMC
Jalali N., Sadeghi Hokmabadi E., Ghoreishi A., Sariaslan P., Rafie S., Borhani-Haghighi A., Moghadam Ahmadi A., Azin H., Vakilian A., Khalili P., et al. Outcome predictors in anterior and posterior ischemic strokes: A study based on the Iranian SITS registry. Sci. Rep. 2023;13:1231. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28465-8. PubMed DOI PMC