Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the confirmation of congenital anomalies found on routine mid-trimester ultrasound
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
PubMed
38445385
DOI
10.5507/bp.2024.008
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- anomaly scan, developmental, magnetic resonance imaging, mid-trimester, prenatal diagnosis,
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- druhý trimestr těhotenství * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie * MeSH
- prenatální diagnóza metody MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ultrasonografie prenatální * metody MeSH
- vrozené vady * diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To determine the added value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when clarifying a suspected anomaly detected by mid-trimester scan. METHODS: Women attending two centers of fetal medicine between January 2017 and December 2021 were identified. The centers carried out routine mid-trimester ultrasound scans to detect fetal anomalies. Those with a suspected anomaly which required further clarification were referred for fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The medical records of all referred women were examined to determine the anomalies found at scan, MRI and termination of pregnancy or delivery. A total of 9571 women had a routine mid-trimester scan and an anomaly was either diagnosed or suspected in 449 (4.7%); an MRI examination was made in 76 cases (0.79%). RESULTS: MRI confirmed the presence of an abnormality in 61 referrals (80%) and failed to yield a result in one case. Outcome information was available for 69 cases: the MRI confirmation rate was 89% (48/54) in those with abnormal outcome and 40% (6/15) if the outcome was normal, P.
Department of Imaging Methods Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Israel
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Tomas Bata Regional Hospital Zlin Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Kaelin Agten A, Xia J, Servante JA, Thornton JG, Jones NW. Routine ultrasound for fetal assessment before 24 weeks' gestation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;8(8):CD014698. DOI
Wataganara T, Ebrashy A, Aliyu LD, Moreira de Sa RA, Pooh R, Kurjak A, Sen C, Adra A, Stanojevic M. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound. J Perinat Med 2016;44(5):533-42. DOI
Reddy UM, Filly RA, Copel JA; Pregnancy and Perinatology Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Department of Health and Human Services, NIH. Prenatal imaging: ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112(1):145-57. DOI
Rossi AC, Prefumo F. The additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:388-93. DOI
Moradi B, Parooie F, Kazemi MA, Hashemi H, Miratashi Yazdi SN. Fetal brain imaging: A comparison between fetal ultrasonography and intra uterine magnetic resonance imaging (a systematic review and meta-analysis). J Clin Ultrasound 2022;50(4):491-9. DOI
Mailáth-Pokorny M, Worda C, Krampl-Bettelheim E, Watzinger F, Brugger PC, Prayer D. What does magnetic resonance imaging add to the prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of facial clefts? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36(4):445-51. DOI
Wang G, Shan R, Zhao L, Zhu X, Zhang X. Fetal cleft lip with and without cleft palate: comparison between MR imaging and US for prenatal diagnosis. Eur J Radiol 2011;79(3):437-42. DOI
Manganaro L, Tomei A, Fierro F, Di Maurizio M, Sollazzo P, Sergi ME, Vinci V, Bernardo S, Irimia D, Cascone P, Marini M. Fetal MRI as a complement to US in the evaluation of cleft lip and palate. Radiol Med 2011;116 (7):1134-48. DOI
Zemet R, Amdur-Zilberfarb I, Shapira M, Ziv-Baran T, Hoffmann C, Kassif E, Katorza E. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital head, face, and neck malformations-Is complementary fetal MRI of value? Prenat Diagn 2020;40(1):142-50. DOI
Yan X, Xing G, Wang X, Li J, Sun Q, Shang X. Diagnostic Value and Application of Prenatal MRI and Ultrasound in Fetal Cleft Lip and Palate. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2022;2022:9410161. DOI
van der Hoek-Snieders HEM, van den Heuvel AJML, van Os-Medendorp H, Kamalski DMA. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI to detect cleft palate: a meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr 2020;179(1):29-38. DOI
Tonni G, Peixoto AB, Werner H, Grisolia G, Ruano R, Sepulveda F, Sepulveda W, Araujo Júnior E. Ultrasound and fetal magnetic resonance imaging: Clinical performance in the prenatal diagnosis of orofacial clefts and mandibular abnormalities. J Clin Ultrasound 2023;51(2):346-61. DOI
Pardy C, D'Antonio F, Khalil A, Giuliani S. Prenatal detection of esophageal atresia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019;98(6):689-99. DOI
Gonçalves LF, Lee W, Mody S, Shetty A, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Romero R. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of fetal anomalies: a blinded case-control study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48(2):185-92. DOI
Dhaifalah I, Magalova E, Studnykova D, Havalova J, Slintakova E, Cuckle H. Quality assessment of first-trimester screening for preterm pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022;60:746-50. DOI
