In this study we tested classification performance of a sex estimation method from the mandible originally developed by Sella-Tunis et al. (2017) on a heterogeneous Israeli population. Mandibular linear dimensions were measured on 60 CT scans derived from the Czech living population. Classification performance of Israeli discriminant functions (DFs-IL) was analyzed in comparison with calculated Czech discriminant functions (DFs-CZ) while different posterior probability thresholds (currently discussed in the forensic literature) were employed. Our results comprehensively illustrate sensitivity of different discriminant functions to population differences in body size and degree of sexual dimorphism. We demonstrate that the error rate may be biased when presented per posterior probability threshold. DF-IL 1 showed least sensitivity to population origin and fulfilled criteria of sufficient classification performance when applied on the Czech sample with a minimum posterior probability threshold of 0.88 reaching overall accuracy ≥ 95%, zero sex bias, and 80% of classified individuals. The last parameter was higher in DF-CZ 1 which was the main difference between those two DFs suggesting relatively low dependance on population origin. As the use of population-specific methods is often prevented by complicated assessment of population origin, DF-IL 1 is a candidate for a sufficiently robust method that could be reliably applied outside the reference sample, and thus, its classification performance deserves further testing on more population samples.

Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics Faculty of Science Charles University Viničná 7 128 43 Prague Czech Republic

Hrdlicka Museum of Man Faculty of Science Charles University Viničná 7 128 00 Prague 2 Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Langley N, Tersigni-Tarrant M (2017) Forensic anthropology: a comprehensive introduction. CRC Press, Boca Raton DOI

Messer DL, Getz SM (2020) Effect of sex misclassification on the skeletal biological profile. In: Klales AR (ed) Sex estimation of the human skeleton. Academic Press, London, pp 53–72 DOI

Obertova Z, Stewart A, Cattaneo C (2020) Statistics and probability in forensic anthropology. Academic Press, London

Brůžek J, Murail P (2006) Methodology and reliability of sex determination from the skeleton. In: Schmitt A, Cunha E, Pinheiro J (eds) Forensic anthropology and medicine: complementary sciences from recovery to cause of death. Humana Press, Totowa (New Jersey), pp 225–242 DOI

Bertsatos A, Chovalopoulou M-E, Brůžek J, Bejdová Š (2020) Advanced procedures for skull sex estimation using sexually dimorphic morphometric features. Int J Legal Med 134:1927–1937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02334-9 PubMed DOI

Steyn M, Işcan MY (1998) Sexual dimorphism in the crania and mandibles of South African whites. Forensic Sci Int 98:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(98)00120-0 PubMed DOI

Black S, Ferguson E (2011) Forensic anthropology: 2000 to 2010. CRC Press, Boca Raton DOI

Franklin D, O’Higgins P, Oxnard CE, Dadour I (2008) Discriminant function sexing of the mandible of Indigenous South Africans. Forensic Sci Int 179:84.e1-84.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.03.014 PubMed DOI

Beschiu LM, Ardelean LC, Tigmeanu CV, Rusu L-C (2022) Cranial and odontological methods for sex estimation—A scoping review. Medicina (Mex) 58:1273. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091273 DOI

Scheuer L (2002) A blind test of mandibular morphology for sexing mandibles in the first few years of life. Am J Phys Anthropol 119:189–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10098 PubMed DOI

Coquerelle M, Bookstein FL, Braga J et al (2011) Sexual dimorphism of the human mandible and its association with dental development. Am J Phys Anthropol 145:192–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21485 PubMed DOI

Fan Y, Penington A, Kilpatrick N et al (2019) Quantification of mandibular sexual dimorphism during adolescence. J Anat 234:709–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12949 PubMed DOI PMC

Guevara Perez SV, de la Rosa CG, Thollon L, Behr M (2018) A 3D characterization method of geometric variation in edentulous mandibles. Morphologie 102:255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2018.08.001 PubMed DOI

Oettlé AC, Becker PJ, De Villiers E, Steyn M (2009) The influence of age, sex, population group, and dentition on the mandibular angle as measured on a South African sample. Am J Phys Anthropol 139:505–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21009 PubMed DOI

Small C, Brits D, Hemingway J (2016) Assessing the effects of tooth loss in adult crania using geometric morphometrics. Int J Legal Med 130:233–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1174-6 PubMed DOI

Giles E (1964) Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of the mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 22:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330220212 PubMed DOI

Calcagno JM (1981) On the applicability of sexing human skeletal material by discriminant function analysis. J Hum Evol 10:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(81)80017-6 DOI

Gamba TDO, Alves MC, Haiter-Neto F (2016) Mandibular sexual dimorphism analysis in CBCT scans. J Forensic Leg Med 38:106–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2015.11.024 PubMed DOI

Lopez-Capp TT, Rynn C, Wilkinson C et al (2018) Discriminant analysis of mandibular measurements for the estimation of sex in a modern Brazilian sample. Int J Legal Med 132:843–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1681-8 PubMed DOI

Pereira JGD, Lima KF, Da Silva RHA (2020) Mandibular measurements for sex and age estimation in brazilian sampling. Acta Stomatol Croat 54:294–301. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc54/3/7

Bento MIC, Crosato EM, Santiago BM et al (2021) Quantitative analysis of the mandible for sex estimation. Res Soc Dev 10:e45910414284-e45910414284. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14284

Bejdová Š, Krajíček V, Velemínská J et al (2013) Changes in the sexual dimorphism of the human mandible during the last 1200 years in Central Europe. Homo 64:437–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCHB.2013.05.003 PubMed DOI

Ogawa Y, Imaizumi K, Miyasaka S, Yoshino M (2013) Discriminant functions for sex estimation of modern Japanese skulls. J Forensic Leg Med 20:234–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2012.09.023 PubMed DOI

Lin C, Jiao B, Liu S et al (2014) Sex determination from the mandibular ramus flexure of Koreans by discrimination function analysis using three-dimensional mandible models. Forensic Sci Int 236:191.e1-191.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.015 PubMed DOI

Dong H, Deng M, Wang WP et al (2015) Sexual dimorphism of the mandible in a contemporary Chinese Han population. Forensic Sci Int 255:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.06.010 PubMed DOI

Zheng J, Ni S, Wang Y et al (2018) Sex determination of Han adults in Northeast China using cone beam computer tomography. Forensic Sci Int 289:450.e1-450.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.05.036 PubMed DOI

Saini V, Srivastava R, Shamal SN et al (2011) Sex determination using mandibular ramus flexure: a preliminary study on Indian population. J Forensic Leg Med 18:208–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2011.02.014 PubMed DOI

Sharma M, Gorea RK, Gorea A, Abuderman A (2016) A morphometric study of the human mandible in the Indian population for sex determination. Egypt J Forensic Sci 6:165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfs.2015.01.002 DOI

Dayal MR, Spocter MA, Bidmos MA (2008) An assessment of sex using the skull of black South Africans by discriminant function analysis. Homo 59:209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2007.01.001 PubMed DOI

Kharoshah MAA, Almadani O, Ghaleb SS et al (2010) Sexual dimorphism of the mandible in a modern Egyptian population. J Forensic Leg Med 17:213–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2010.02.005 PubMed DOI

Sella-Tunis T, Sarig R, Cohen H et al (2017) Sex estimation using computed tomography of the mandible. Int J Legal Med 131:1691–1700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1554-1 DOI

Gillet C, Costa-Mendes L, Rérolle C et al (2020) Sex estimation in the cranium and mandible: a Multislice Computed Tomography (MSCT) study using anthropometric and geometric morphometry methods. Int J Legal Med 134:823–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02203-0 PubMed DOI

Kranioti E, Donas JG, Langstaff H (2014) Sex estimation of the Greek mandible with the aid of discriminant function analysis and posterior probabilities. Rom J Leg Med 22:101–104. https://doi.org/10.4323/rjlm.2014.101 DOI

Bertsatos A, Athanasopoulou K, Chovalopoulou ME (2019) Estimating sex using discriminant analysis of mandibular measurements from a modern greek sample. Egypt J Forensic Sci 9:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-019-0133-7 DOI

Manthey L, Jantz RL, Vitale A, Cattaneo C (2018) Population specific data improves Fordisc®’s performance in Italians. Forensic Sci Int 292:263.e1-263.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.09.023 PubMed DOI

Cappella A, Gibelli D, Vitale A et al (2020) Preliminary study on sexual dimorphism of metric traits of cranium and mandible in a modern Italian skeletal population and review of population literature. Leg Med 44:101695. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEGALMED.2020.101695 DOI

Krüger GC, L’Abbé EN, Stull KE (2017) Sex estimation from the long bones of modern South Africans. Int J Legal Med 131:275–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1488-z PubMed DOI

Zaafrane M, Ben Khelil M, Naccache I et al (2018) Sex determination of a Tunisian population by CT scan analysis of the skull. Int J Legal Med 132:853–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1688-1 PubMed DOI

Lesciotto KM (2015) The impact of Daubert on the admissibility of forensic anthropology expert testimony. J Forensic Sci 60:549–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12740 PubMed DOI

Valsecchi A, Irurita Olivares J, Mesejo P (2019) Age estimation in forensic anthropology: methodological considerations about the validation studies of prediction models. Int J Legal Med 133:1915–1924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02064-7 PubMed DOI

Lesciotto KM, Christensen AM (2024) The over-citation of Daubert in forensic anthropology. J Forensic Sci 69:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15409 PubMed DOI

Christensen AM, Crowder CM (2009) Evidentiary standards for forensic anthropology. J Forensic Sci 54:1211–1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01176.x PubMed DOI

Avent PR, Hughes CE, Garvin HM (2022) Applying posterior probability informed thresholds to traditional cranial trait sex estimation methods. J Forensic Sci 67:440–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14947 PubMed DOI

Galeta P, Brůžek J (2020) Sex estimation using continuous variables: Problems and principles of sex classification in the zone of uncertainty. In: Obertova Z, Stewart A, Cattaneo C (eds) Statistics and probability in forensic anthropology. Academic Press, London, pp 155–182 DOI

Santos F, Guyomarc’h P, Cunha E, Brůžek J (2020) DSP: a probabilistic approach to sex estimation free from population specificity using innominate measurements. In: Klales AR (ed) Sex estimation of the human skeleton. Academic Press, London, pp 243–269

Murail P, Brůžek J, Houët F, Cunha E (2005) DSP: a tool for probabilistic sex diagnosis using worldwide variability in hip-bone measurements. Bull Mém Soc Anthropol Paris 17:167–176 DOI

Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A, Kuliukas A (2013) Estimation of sex from cranial measurements in a Western Australian population. Forensic Sci Int 229:158.e1-158.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.03.005 PubMed DOI

Kranioti EF, Apostol MA (2015) Sexual dimorphism of the tibia in contemporary Greeks, Italians, and Spanish: forensic implications. Int J Legal Med 129:357–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1045-6 PubMed DOI

Brůžek J, Santos F, Dutailly B et al (2017) Validation and reliability of the sex estimation of the human os coxae using freely available DSP2 software for bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol 164:440–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23282 PubMed DOI

Jerković I, Bašić Ž, Anđelinović Š, Kružić I (2020) Adjusting posterior probabilities to meet predefined accuracy criteria: a proposal for a novel approach to osteometric sex estimation. Forensic Sci Int 311:110273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110273 PubMed DOI

Attia MAH, Aboulnoor BAES (2020) Tailored logistic regression models for sex estimation of unknown individuals using the published population data of the humeral epiphyses. Leg Med 45:101708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2020.101708 DOI

Harris EF, Smith RN (2009) Accounting for measurement error: a critical but often overlooked process. Arch Oral Biol 54:S107–S117. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARCHORALBIO.2008.04.010 PubMed DOI

Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284 DOI

RStudio Team (2020) RStudio: integrated development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA URL http://www.rstudio.com/

Nikita E, Nikitas P (2020) Sex estimation: a comparison of techniques based on binary logistic, probit and cumulative probit regression, linear and quadratic discriminant analysis, neural networks, and naïve Bayes classification using ordinal variables. Int J Legal Med 134:1213–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02148-4 PubMed DOI

Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2(3):18–22

Walker PL (2008) Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits. Am J Phys Anthropol 136:39–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20776 PubMed DOI

Kotěrová A, Velemínská J, Dupej J et al (2017) Disregarding population specificity: its influence on the sex assessment methods from the tibia. Int J Legal Med 131:251–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1413-5 PubMed DOI

Hussein MHA, Abulnoor BAE-S (2019) Sex estimation of femur using simulated metapopulation database: a preliminary investigation. Forensic Sci Int Rep 1:100009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2019.100009 DOI

Garoufi N, Bertsatos A, Chovalopoulou M-E, Villa C (2020) Forensic sex estimation using the vertebrae: an evaluation on two European populations. Int J Legal Med 134:2307–2318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02430-w PubMed DOI

Swift L, Obertova Z, Franklin D (2023) Demonstrating the empirical effect of population specificity of anthropological standards in a contemporary Australian population. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03031-z PubMed DOI PMC

Bidmos MA, Dayal MR (2004) Further evidence to show population specificity of discriminant function equations for sex determination using the talus of South African Blacks. J Forensic Sci 49:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2003431 DOI

Oikonomopoulou EK, Valakos E, Nikita E (2017) Population-specificity of sexual dimorphism in cranial and pelvic traits: evaluation of existing and proposal of new functions for sex assessment in a Greek assemblage. Int J Legal Med 131:1731–1738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1655-x PubMed DOI

Garvin HM, Klales AR (2020) Adult skeletal sex estimation and global standardization. In: Parra RC, Zapico SC, Ubelaker DH (eds) Forensic science and humanitarian action. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp 199–209

Velemínská J, Krajíček V, Dupej J et al (2013) Geometric morphometrics and sexual dimorphism of the greater sciatic notch in adults from two skeletal collections: the accuracy and reliability of sex classification. Am J Phys Anthropol 152:558–565. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22373 PubMed DOI

Guyomarc’h P, Velemínská J, Sedlak P et al (2016) Impact of secular trends on sex assessment evaluated through femoral dimensions of the Czech population. Forensic Sci Int 262:284.e1-284.e6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.042

Franklin D, Flavel A (2019) Population specificity in the estimation of skeletal age and sex: case studies using a Western Australian population. Aust J Forensic Sci 51:S188–S192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2019.1569722 DOI

Musilová B, Dupej J, Brůžek J et al (2019) Sex and ancestry related differences between two Central European populations determined using exocranial meshes. Forensic Sci Int 297:364–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.02.034 PubMed DOI

Meinerová T, Šutoová D, Brukner Havelková P, et al (2023) How reliable is the application of the sex classifier based on exocranial surface (Musilová et al., 2016) for geographically and temporally distant skull series. Forensic Sci Int 352:111850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111850

Komar DA, Buikstra JE (2008) Forensic anthropology: contemporary theory and practice. Oxford University Press, New York

Klales AR (2020) MorphoPASSE: morphological pelvis and skull sex estimation program. In: Klales AR (ed) Sex estimation of the human skeleton. Academic Press, London, pp 271–278 DOI

Rogers TL (1999) A visual method of determining the sex of skeletal remains using the distal humerus. J Forensic Sci 44:14411J. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS14411J DOI

Decker SJ, Foley R, Hazelton JM, Ford JM (2019) 3D analysis of computed tomography (CT)–derived lumbar spine models for the estimation of sex. Int J Legal Med 133:1497–1506. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00414-019-02001-8/TABLES/8 PubMed DOI

Bartholdy BP, Sandoval E, Hoogland MLP, Schrader SA (2020) Getting rid of dichotomous sex estimations: why logistic regression should be preferred over discriminant function analysis. J Forensic Sci 65:1685–1691. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14482 PubMed DOI PMC

Morrison GS, Weber P, Basu N et al (2021) Calculation of likelihood ratios for inference of biological sex from human skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int Synergy 3:100202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100202 PubMed DOI

Attia MH, Attia MH, Tarek Farghaly Y et al (2022) Performance of the supervised learning algorithms in sex estimation of the proximal femur: a comparative study in contemporary Egyptian and Turkish samples. Sci Justice 62:288–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2022.03.003 DOI