OBJECTIVE: To ascertain and explore the views of women and their partners, giving birth in the Czech Republic, of the level of respectful or disrespectful care provided during pregnancy and early labour. DESIGN: Ethical approval was granted for a descriptive, online anonymous survey of 65 questions, with quantitative and qualitative responses. SETTING: The Czech Republic.The survey was completed by 8,767 women and 69 partners in 2018. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to present results. The majority of women were aged 26-35 years. Most had birthed in one of 93 hospitals, with 1.5% home births. Almost 40% never had an abdominal examination.in pregnancy. Quantitative data analysis revealed that less than half were given information on place of birth, or how to keep labour normal or non-interventionist. Almost 60% did not get information on positions for birth. Most (68%) commenced labour naturally, 25% had labour induced, 40% of them before term, and 7% had an elective caesarean section; 55% stated they had not been given any choice in the decision. Over half of those who had a membrane sweep said permission had not been sought. Half (54%) only had 'checking' visits from the midwife in labour. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Findings reveal a lack of information-giving, discussion and shared decision-making from healthcare professionals during pregnancy and early labour. Some practices were non-evidenced-based, and interventions were sometimes made without consent. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The examples of disrespectful care described in this study caused women distress during childbirth, which may result in an increased fear of childbirth or an increase in free-birthing.

Association for Birth Houses and Centers Týnská ulička 1064 6 Prague 1 11000 Czech Republic

Faculty of Medicine Department of Health Sciences Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

School of Nursing and Midwifery Trinity College Dublin 24 D'Olier Street Dublin DO2 T283 Ireland

See more in PubMed

Hrešanová E. Nobody in a maternity hospital really talks to you: socialist legacies and consumerism in Czech women’s childbirth narratives. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociol Rev. 2014;50(6):961–85. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2014.50.6.150. DOI

Šmídová I, Šlesingerová E, Slepičková L. Games of Life. Czech Republic: Masarykova Univerzita.201. Availabe at: https://www.perlego.com/book/3514299/games-of-life-czech-reproductive-biomedicine-sociological-perspectives-pdf.

Hořejší A. Analysis of the current situation in obstetrics with regard to the position of midwives and the possibility of free choice of women. 2020. https://www.unipa.cz/analyza-soucasneho-stavu-v-porodnictvi-s-ohledem-na-postaveni-porodnich-asistentek-a-moznosti-svobodne-volby-zen/.

Ministry of Health. Methodical recommendation of Ministry of Health for providers of care in fields of gynaecology, obstetrics and neonatology 2020. https://www.mzcr.cz/metodicke-doporuceni-mz-pro-poskytovatele-zdravotnich-sluzeb-v-oboru-gynekologie-a-porodnictvi-a-neonatologie/.

Vondráčková L, Šmídová I, Working Group on Obstetrics of the Government Council for Gender Equality. Analysis of the discussion Experiences from maternity hospitals established by the Ministry of Health on Facebook. Research report for the. 2015. Masaryk University: Czech Republic. https://vlada.gov.cz/cz/ppov/rovne-prilezitosti-zen-a-muzu/dokumenty/analyza-diskuse-_zkusenosti-z-porodnic_-zalozene-ministerstvem-zdravotnictvi-na-facebooku-146451/.

Hrešanová E. The Island of Alternatives: power, Medical Science, and Gentle Birthing in Socialist Czechoslovakia. J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2018;73(1):73–95. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/jrx056. PubMed DOI

White Ribbon Alliance. Respectful Maternity Care: The Universal Rights of Childbearing Women. 2011. http://whiteribbonalliance.org/campaigns2/respectful-maternity-care/.

WHO. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. 2014. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/134588/1/WHO_RHR_14.23_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1

Durnová A, Hejzlarová E. Domácí porody v Česku: motivace, důvody a názory žen, které rodily plánovaně doma (2015–2020) [Data set]. Zenodo [Role of the intimacy in Czech controversy about home births (GAČR, 18-10042S)]. 2021. 10.5281/zenodo.4767126.

Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring Evidence for Disrespect and Abuse in Facility-Based Childbirth Report of a Landscape Analysis. USAID-TRAction Project. Harvard School of Public Health. 2020. https://www.ghdonline.org/uploads/Respectful_Care_at_Birth_9-20-101_Final1.pdf.

Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, Ciapponi A, Colaci D, Comande D, et al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet. 2016;388(10056):2176–92. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31472-6. PubMed DOI

Lappeman M, Swartz L. Rethinking obstetric violence and the neglect of neglect: the silence of a labour ward milieu in a South African district hospital. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2019;19(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12914-019-0218-2. PubMed DOI PMC

Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al. The mistreatment of women during Childbirth in Health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847. PubMed DOI PMC

Watson HL, Downe S. Discrimination against childbearing Romani women in maternity care in Europe: a mixed-methods systematic review. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0263-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Annborn A, Finnbogadóttir HR. Obstetric violence a qualitative interview study. Midwifery. 2022;105:103212. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103212. PubMed DOI

Correa M, Klein K, Vasquez P, Williams CR, Gibbons L, Cormick G, et al. Observations and reports of incidents of how birthing persons are treated during childbirth in two public facilities in Argentina. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;158(1):35–43. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13938. PubMed DOI

Greely JT, Dongarwar D, Crear L, Adeyeye M, Reyna-Carrillo A, Salihu HM. Violence against pregnant women and adverse maternal/ fetal outcomes in the United States: racial/ethnic disparities. Women Health. 2022;62(6):513–21. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2022.2074610. PubMed DOI

Kuipers YJ, Thomson G, Goberna-Tricas J, Zurera A, Hresanová E, Temesgenová N et al. The social conception of space of birth narrated by women with negative and traumatic birth experiences. Women Birth. 2022;S1871-5192(22):00079 – 8. 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.04.013. PubMed

van der Pijl MSG, Verhoeven CJM, Verweij R, van der Linden T, Kingma E, Hollander MH, et al. Disrespect and abuse during labour and birth amongst 12,239 women in the Netherlands: a national survey. Reprod Health. 2022;19(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01460-4. PubMed DOI PMC

O’Brien E, Rich M. Obstetric violence in historical perspective. Lancet. 2022;399(10342):2183–5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01022-4. PubMed DOI

Český Žurnál. Pět zrození, Žurnál Č. Editor. 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-CZgwTC5bk.

Hnilicová J. Jak se kde rodí? 2021. http://jaksekderodi.cz/soudni-spor-2/.

Begley C, Sedlicka N, Daly D. Respectful and disrespectful care in the Czech Republic: an online survey. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0648-7. PubMed DOI PMC

Formánková L, Hejzlarová E. Giving birth as a struggle between bodily needs and medical practice, in Making and Doing Exhibition Society for Social Studies of Science (4S). 2020. Available at; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jHBw8NB_8Y.

Shakibazadeh E, Namadian M, Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Rashidian A, Nogueira Pileggi V, et al. Respectful care during childbirth in health facilities globally: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BJOG. 2018;125(8):932–42. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15015. PubMed DOI PMC

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. DOI

Kitto SC, Chesters J, Grbich C. Quality in qualitative research. Med J Aust. 2008;188(4):243–6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01595.x. PubMed DOI

Hinton L, Dumelow C, Rowe R, Hollowell J. Birthplace choices: what are the information needs of women when choosing where to give birth in England? A qualitative study using online and face to face focus groups. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1601-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Naylor Smith J, Taylor B, Shaw K, Hewison A, Kenyon S. I didn’t think you were allowed that, they didn’t mention that.’ A qualitative study exploring women’s perceptions of home birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1733-1. PubMed DOI PMC

Halfdansdottir B, Wilson ME, Hildingsson I, Olafsdottir OA, Smarason AK, Sveinsdottir H. Autonomy in place of birth: a concept analysis. Med Health Care Philos. 2015;18(4):591–600. doi: 10.1007/s11019-015-9624-y. PubMed DOI

Takács L, Seidlerová J. [Psychosocial climate in maternity hospitals from the perspective of parturients I. results from a national survey on perinatal care satisfaction using a representative sample of 1195 Czech parturients] Ceska Gynekol. 2013;78(2):157–68. PubMed

Holten L, de Miranda E. Women׳s motivations for having unassisted childbirth or high-risk homebirth: an exploration of the literature on ‘birthing outside the system’. Midwifery. 2016;38:55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.03.010. PubMed DOI

Amyx M, Philibert M, Farr A, Donati S, Smárason AK, Tica V, Velebil P, Alexander S, Durox M, Elorriaga MF, Heller G, Kyprianou T, Mierzejewska E, Verdenik I, Zīle-Velika I, Zeitlin J. Trends in caesarean section rates in Europe from 2015 to 2019 using Robson’s Ten Group classification system: a Euro-Peristat study. BJOG. 2023 doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17670. PubMed DOI

Czech Gynecological and Obstetrical Society. Post-term pregnancy. 2016. https://www.figo.org/czech-gynecological-and-obstetrical-society.

Seijmonsbergen-Schermers AE, van den Akker T, Rydahl E, Beeckman K, Bogaerts A, Binfa L, et al. Variations in use of childbirth interventions in 13 high-income countries: a multinational cross-sectional study. PLoS Med. 2020;17(5):e1003103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003103. PubMed DOI PMC

Salahuddin M, Davidson C, Lakey DL, Patel DA. Characteristics Associated with induction of Labor and Delivery Route among Primiparous Women with Term deliveries in the listening to mothers III study. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2018;27(5):590–8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6598. PubMed DOI

Declercq ER, Belanoff C, Sakala C. Intrapartum Care and experiences of women with midwives Versus obstetricians in the listening to mothers in California Survey. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020;65(1):45–55. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13027. PubMed DOI PMC

Finucane, Murphy, Biesty, Gyte, Cotter, Ryan, et al. Membrane sweeping for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;2(2):Cd000451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.pub3. PubMed DOI PMC

Roberts J, Evans K, Spiby H, Evans C, Pallotti P, Eldridge J. Women’s information needs, decision-making and experiences of membrane sweeping to promote spontaneous labour. Midwifery. 2020;83:102626. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102626. PubMed DOI

Bohren MA, Mehrtash H, Fawole B, Maung TM, Balde MD, Maya E, et al. How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: a cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys. Lancet. 2019;394(10210):1750–63. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31992-0. PubMed DOI PMC

Khalil M, Carasso KB, Kabakian-Khasholian T. Exposing Obstetric Violence in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a review of women’s narratives of disrespect and abuse in Childbirth. Front Glob Womens Health. 2022;3:850796. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.850796. PubMed DOI PMC

Mayra K, Sandall J, Matthews Z, Padmadas SS. Breaking the silence about obstetric violence: body mapping women’s narratives of respect, disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Bihar, India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04503-7. PubMed DOI PMC

Smith-Oka V. Cutting women: unnecessary cesareans as iatrogenesis and obstetric violence. Soc Sci Med. 2022;296:114734. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114734. PubMed DOI

WHO. WHO recommendation on companionship during labour and childbirth. 2018. https://extranet.who.int/rhl/topics/preconception-pregnancy-childbirth-and-postpartum-care/care-during-childbirth/who-recommendation-companionship-during-labour-and-childbirth.

Begley C, Devane D, Clarke M, McCann C, Hughes P, Reilly M, et al. Comparison of midwife-led and consultant-led care of healthy women at low risk of childbirth complications in the Republic of Ireland: a randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:85. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-85. PubMed DOI PMC

Loewenberg Weisband Y, Klebanoff M, Gallo MF, Shoben A, Norris AH. Birth outcomes of women using a midwife versus women using a physician for prenatal care. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018;63(4):399–409. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12750. PubMed DOI

Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7(7):Cd003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6. PubMed DOI PMC

Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:Cd004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5. PubMed DOI PMC

Hildingsson I, Karlström A, Larsson B. A continuity of care project with two on-call schedules: findings from a rural area in Sweden. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2020;26:100551. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100551. PubMed DOI

Takács L, Seidlerová J. [Psychosocial climate in maternity hospitals from the perspective of parturients II. Predictors of womens satisfaction with perinatal care in the Czech Republic] Ceska Gynekol. 2013;78(3):269–75. PubMed

Hussein S, Dahlen HG, Ogunsiji O, Schmied V. Uncovered and disrespected. A qualitative study of Jordanian women’s experience of privacy in birth. Women Birth. 2020;33(5):496–504. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.10.006. PubMed DOI

Deliktas Demirci A, Kabukcuglu K, Haugan G, Aune I. I want a birth without interventions: women’s childbirth experiences from Turkey. Women Birth. 2019;32(6):e515–22. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.12.011. PubMed DOI

Srivastava A, Avan BI, Rajbangshi P, Bhattacharyya S. Determinants of women’s satisfaction with maternal health care: a review of literature from developing countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:97. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0525-0. PubMed DOI PMC

Cohen Shabot S. Making loud bodies feminine: a Feminist-Phenomenological analysis of Obstetric Violence. Hum Stud. 2016;39(2):231–47. doi: 10.1007/s10746-015-9369-x. DOI

Office of the Government of the Czech Republic. Gender Equality Strategy for 2021–2030. 2021: Czech Republic. https://vlada.gov.cz/assets/ppov/gcfge/Gender-Equality-Strategy-2021-2030.pdf.

Gartland D, Lansakara N, Flood M, Brown SJ. Assessing obstetric risk factors for maternal morbidity: congruity between medical records and mothers’ reports of obstetric exposures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(2):e1521–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.10.863. PubMed DOI

Takehara K, Noguchi M, Shimane T, Misago C. A longitudinal study of women’s memories of their childbirth experiences at five years postpartum. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):221. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-221. PubMed DOI PMC