Respectful and disrespectful care in the Czech Republic: an online survey
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
30514394
PubMed Central
PMC6280471
DOI
10.1186/s12978-018-0648-7
PII: 10.1186/s12978-018-0648-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Abuse, Consent, Disrespectful care, Intervention, Labour, Maternity care, Obstetric violence, Respectful care,
- MeSH
- babictví MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kvalita zdravotní péče normy MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- medicína založená na důkazech MeSH
- postoj zdravotnického personálu * MeSH
- průzkumy zdravotní péče MeSH
- služby zdravotní péče o matku normy MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- uznání * MeSH
- vedení porodu psychologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
BACKGROUND: Respectful maternity care includes treating women with dignity, consulting them about preferences, gaining consent for treatment, respecting their wishes, and giving care based on evidence, not routines. In the absence of any documented evidence, this study aimed to ascertain maternity care-givers' perceptions of respectful care provided for childbearing women in Czech Republic. METHODS: Following ethical approval, an online quantitative survey with qualitative comments was completed by 52 respondents recruited from workshops on promoting normal birth, followed by snowball sampling. The majority were midwives (50%) or doulas (46%) working in one of 51 hospitals, or with homebirths. Chi-square analysis was used for comparisons. RESULTS: Non-evidenced-based interventions, described as 'always' or 'frequently' used in hospitals, included application of electronic fetal monitoring in normal labour (n = 40, 91%), shaving the perineum (n = 10, 29%), and closed-glottal pushing (n = 32, 94%). Positions stated as most often used for spontaneous vaginal births were semi-recumbent (n = 31, 65%) or lying flat (n = 15, 31%) in hospital, and upright at home (n = 27, 100%). Average episiotomy and induction of labour rates were estimated at 40 and 26%, respectively, higher than accepted norms. Eighteen respondents (46%) said reasons for performing vaginal examinations were not explained to women in hospitals, and 21 (51%) said consent was 'never' sought. At home, 25 (89%) said reasons were explained, and permission 'always' sought (n = 22, 81%). Thirteen (32%) said hospital clinicians explained why artificial rupture of membranes was necessary, but only ten (25%) said they 'always' sought permission. The majority said that hospital clinicians 'never'/'almost never' explained reasons for performing an episiotomy (13 = 34%), gained permission (n = 20, 54%) or gave local anaesthetic (n = 19, 51%). Contrastingly, 17 (100%) said midwives at home explained the reasons for episiotomy and asked permission. When clinicians disagreed with women's decisions, 13 (35%) respondents said women might be told to 'face the consequences', six (16%) stated that the 'psychological pressure' experienced caused women to 'give up and give their permission', and four (11%) said the intervention would be performed 'against her will.' CONCLUSIONS: Findings reveal considerable levels of disrespectful, non-evidenced-based, non-consensual and abusive practices that may leave women with life-long trauma.
Association for Birth Houses and Centers Masarykovo nábřeží 234 26 11000 Prague 1 Czech Republic
Institute of Health and Care Sciences Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden
School of Nursing and Midwifery Trinity College Dublin 24 D'Olier Street Dublin DO2 T283 Ireland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring Evidence for Disrespect and Abuse in Facility-Based Childbirth Report of a Landscape Analysis. USAID-TRAction Project. Harvard School of Public Health, 2010. Available at: https://www.ghdonline.org/uploads/Respectful_Care_at_Birth_9-20-101_Final1.pdf
Sadler M, Santos MJ, Ruiz-Berdun D, Rojas GL, Skoko E, Gillen P, Clausen JA. Moving beyond disrespect and abuse: addressing the structural dimensions of obstetric violence. Reprod Health Matters. 2016;24(47):47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.rhm.2016.04.002. PubMed DOI
Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, Ciapponi A, Colaci D, Comande D, Diaz V, Geller S, Hanson C, Langer A, Manuelli V, Millar K, Morhason-Bello I, Castro CP, Pileggi VN, Robinson N, Skaer M, Souza JP, Vogel JP, Althabe F. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet. 2016;388(10056):2176–2192. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31472-6. PubMed DOI
Ouedraogo A, Kiemtore S, Zamane H, Bonane BT, Akotionga M, Lankoande J. Respectful maternity care in three health facilities in Burkina Faso: the experience of the Society of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians of Burkina Faso. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;127(Suppl 1):S40–S42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.07.009. PubMed DOI
Sheferaw ED, Bazant E, Gibson H, Fenta HB, Ayalew F, Belay TB, Worku MM, Kebebu AE, Woldie SA, Kim YM, van den Akker T, Stekelenburg J. Respectful maternity care in Ethiopian public health facilities. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0323-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Binfa L, Pantoja L, Ortiz J, Gurovich M, Cavada G, Foster J. Assessment of the implementation of the model of integrated and humanised midwifery health services in Chile. Midwifery. 2016;35:53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.01.018. PubMed DOI
Amroussia N, Hernandez A, Vives-Cases C, Goicolea I. "Is the doctor God to punish me?!" An intersectional examination of disrespectful and abusive care during childbirth against single mothers in Tunisia. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0290-9. PubMed DOI PMC
Bradley S, McCourt C, Rayment J, Parmar D. Disrespectful intrapartum care during facility-based delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis of women's perceptions and experiences. Soc Sci Med. 2016;169:157–170. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.09.039. PubMed DOI
McMahon SA, George AS, Chebet JJ, Mosha IH, Mpembeni RN, Winch PJ. Experiences of and responses to disrespectful maternity care and abuse during childbirth; a qualitative study with women and men in Morogoro region, Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:268. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-268. PubMed DOI PMC
Moyer CA, Rominski S, Nakua EK, Dzomeku VM, Agyei-Baffour P, Lori JR. Exposure to disrespectful patient care during training: data from midwifery students at 15 midwifery schools in Ghana. Midwifery. 2016;41:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.07.009. PubMed DOI
Sando D, Kendall T, Lyatuu G, Ratcliffe H, McDonald K, Mwanyika-Sando M, Emil F, Chalamilla G, Langer A. Disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Tanzania: are women living with HIV more vulnerable? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;67(Suppl 4):S228–S234. doi: 10.1097/qai.0000000000000378. PubMed DOI PMC
Perez D'Gregorio R. Obstetric violence: a new legal term introduced in Venezuela. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;111(3):201–202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.09.002. PubMed DOI
Balde MD, Bangoura A, Diallo BA, Sall O, Balde H, Niakate AS, Vogel JP, Bohren MA. A qualitative study of women’s and health providers’ attitudes and acceptability of mistreatment during childbirth in health facilities in Guinea. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0262-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Warren CE, Njue R, Ndwiga C, Abuya T. Manifestations and drivers of mistreatment of women during childbirth in Kenya: implications for measurement and developing interventions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1288-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, Aguiar C, Saraiva Coneglian F, Diniz AL, Tuncalp O, Javadi D, Oladapo OT, Khosla R, Hindin MJ, Gulmezoglu AM. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847. PubMed DOI PMC
Ishola F, Owolabi O, Filippi V. Disrespect and abuse of women during childbirth in Nigeria: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0174084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174084. PubMed DOI PMC
Lukasse M, Schroll AM, Karro H, Schei B, Steingrimsdottir T, Van Parys AS, Ryding EL, Tabor A. Prevalence of experienced abuse in healthcare and associated obstetric characteristics in six European countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(5):508–517. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12593. PubMed DOI
Watson HL, Downe S. Discrimination against childbearing Romani women in maternity care in Europe: a mixed-methods systematic review. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0263-4. PubMed DOI PMC
White Ribbon Alliance. Respectful Maternity Care: The Universal Rights of Childbearing Women 2011 [Accessed 7 July 2017]. Available from: https://www.whiteribbonalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Final_RMC_Charter.pdf.
WHO. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth WHO, Geneva: WHO; 2014 [Accessed 7 July 2017]. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/134588/1/WHO_RHR_14.23_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1
FIGO. Mother and Newborn Friendly Birthing Facility Working Paper February 2014: FIGO; 2014 [Accessed 8 July 2017]. Available at: http://www.figo.org/sites/default/files/uploads/project-publications/SMN/Mother%20newborn%20friendly%20birthing%20facility-%20FIGO%20working%20paper%20Feb%202014.pdf.
Hofmeyr GJ, Vogel JP, Cuthbert A, Singata M. Fundal pressure during the second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3. 10.1002/14651858.CD006067.pub3. PubMed PMC
EURO-PERISTAT Project with SCPE and EUROCAT. European Perinatal Health Report. The health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2010. May 2013. Available at: http://www.europeristat.com/index.php/reports/european-perinatal-health-report-2010.html
Hrešanovă E. Nobody in a maternity hospital really talks to you: socialist legacies and consumerism in Czech women’s childbirth narratives. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review. 2014;50(6):961–985. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2014.50.6.150. DOI
Mivsek P, Baskova M, Wilhelmova R. Midwifery education in Central-Eastern Europe. Midwifery. 2016;33:43–45. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.10.016. PubMed DOI
Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM, Cuthbert A. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:Cd006066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub3. PubMed DOI
Devane D, Lalor JG, Daly S, McGuire W, Cuthbert A, Smith V. Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1:Cd005122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005122.pub5. PubMed DOI PMC
Gupta JK, Sood A, Hofmeyr GJ, Vogel JP. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;5:Cd002006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub4. PubMed DOI PMC
Jaafar SH, Ho JJ, Lee KS. Rooming-in for new mother and infant versus separate care for increasing the duration of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(8):Cd006641. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006641.pub3/full PubMed DOI PMC
Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:Cd000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3. PubMed DOI PMC
Lawrence A, Lewis L, Hofmeyr GJ, Styles C. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(10):Cd003934. 10.1002/14651858.CD003934.pub4. PubMed
McDonald SJ, Middleton P, Dowswell T, Morris PS. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(7):Cd004074. 10.1002/14651858.CD004074.pub3. PubMed PMC
Moore ER, Bergman N, Anderson GC, Medley N. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 10.1002/14651858.CD003519.pub42016;11:Cd003519. PubMed PMC
Singata M, Tranmer J, Gyte GM. Restricting oral fluid and food intake during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(8):Cd003930. 10.1002/14651858.CD003930.pub3. PubMed PMC
Preacher K. Calculation for the chi-square test: an interactive calculation tool for chi-square tests of goodness of fit and independence. 2001. Available from: http://www.quantpsy.org/chisq/chisq.htm
Prins M, Boxem J, Lucas C, Hutton E. Effect of spontaneous pushing versus Valsalva pushing in the second stage of labour on mother and fetus: a systematic review of randomised trials. BJOG. 2011;118(6):662–670. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02910.x. PubMed DOI
Yildirim G, Beji NK. Effects of pushing techniques in birth on mother and fetus: a randomized study. Birth. 2008;35(1):25–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00208.x. PubMed DOI
Lemos A, Amorim MMR, Dornelas de Andrade A, de Souza AI, Cabral Filho JE, Correia JB. Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3. 10.1002/14651858.CD009124.pub3. PubMed PMC
Basevi V, Lavender T. Routine perineal shaving on admission in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;11. 10.1002/14651858.CD001236.pub2. PubMed PMC
Burch J, Martin-Lopez J. What are the benefits and harms of routine perineal shaving for women on admission during labor? Cochrane Clinical Answers 2017. 2017. DOI: 10.1002/cca.1603.
Reveiz L, Gaitán HG, Cuervo LG. Enemas during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;5. 10.1002/14651858.CD000330.pub3. PubMed PMC
WHO. Standards for Improving Quality of Care of Maternal and Newborn Care in Health Facilities Geneva: WHO, 2016. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/249155/1/9789241511216-eng.pdf?ua=1
Bernhard C, Zielinski R, Ackerson K, English J. Home birth after hospital birth: women's choices and reflections. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;59(2):160–166. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12113. PubMed DOI
Feeley C, Thomson G. Why do some women choose to freebirth in the UK? An interpretative phenomenological study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:59. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0847-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Boucher D, Bennett C, McFarlin B, Freeze R. Staying home to give birth: why women in the United States choose home birth. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009;54(2):119–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.09.006. PubMed DOI
Lindgren HE, Radestad IJ, Christensson K, Wally-Bystrom K, Hildingsson IM. Perceptions of risk and risk management among 735 women who opted for a home birth. Midwifery. 2010;26(2):163–172. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.04.010. PubMed DOI
Rigg EC, Schmied V, Peters K, Dahlen HG. Why do women choose an unregulated birth worker to birth at home in Australia: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1281-0. PubMed DOI PMC
Brandao T, Brites R, Nunes O, Pires M, Hipolito J. Anxiety and depressive symptoms during pregnancy, perceived control and posttraumatic stress symptoms after childbirth: A longitudinal mediation analysis. J Health Psychol. 2018. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1177/1359105318787018 PubMed
Waldenström U, Schytt E. A longitudinal study of women’s memory of labour pain-from 2 months to 5 years after the birth. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2008;116(4):577–583. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02020.x. PubMed DOI