Efficiency of two-member crews in delivering prehospital advanced life support cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A scoping review
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country Netherlands Media electronic-ecollection
Document type Journal Article, Scoping Review
PubMed
38784406
PubMed Central
PMC11111834
DOI
10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100661
PII: S2666-5204(24)00112-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Advanced life support, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Crew size, Emergency medical service, Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, Two-member team,
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Scoping Review MeSH
BACKGROUND: Advanced Life Support (ALS) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is frequently administered by two-member crews. However, ALS CPR is mostly designed for larger crews, and the feasibility and efficacy of implementing ALS guidelines for only two rescuers remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to examine the existing evidence and identify knowledge gaps in the efficiency of pre-hospital ALS CPR performed by two-member teams. DESIGN: A comprehensive search was undertaken across the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The search covered publications in English or German from January 1, 2005, to November 30, 2023. The review included studies that focused on ALS CPR procedures carried out by two-member teams in adult patients in either simulated or clinical settings. RESULTS: A total of 22 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis. Seven topics in two-person prehospital ALS/CPR delivery were identified: 1) effect of team configuration on clinical outcome and CPR quality, 2) early airway management and ventilation techniques, 3) mechanical chest compressions, 4) prefilled syringes, 5) additional equipment, 6) adaptation of recommended ALS/CPR protocols, and 7) human factors. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of comprehensive data regarding the adaptation of the recommended ALS algorithm in CPR for two-member crews. Although simulation studies indicate potential benefits arising from the employment of mechanical chest compression devices, prefilled syringes, and automation-assisted protocols, the current evidence is too limited to support specific modifications to existing guidelines.
Medical College Duškova 7 150 00 Prague Czech Republic
PULS Austrian Cardiac Arrest Awareness Association Vienna Austria
See more in PubMed
Kurz M.C., Schmicker R.H., Leroux B., et al. Advanced vs. basic life support in the treatment of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest in the resuscitation outcomes consortium. Resuscitation. 2018;128:132–137. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.04.031. PubMed DOI
Dick W.F. Anglo-American vs. Franco-German emergency medical services system. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003;18:29–35. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00000650. PubMed DOI
Dabrowski M., Sip M., Dabrowska, et al. It is impossible to follow the ERC algorithm in a two-paramedics ambulance team. Resuscitation. 2017;118:e43. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017. DOI
Soar J., Böttiger B.W., Carli P., et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2021;161:115–151. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.010. PubMed DOI
Brucke M., Helm M., Schwartz A., Lampl L. Two rescuer resuscitation–mission impossible? A pilot study using a manikin setting. Resuscitation. 2007;74:317–324. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.12.013. PubMed DOI
Ventzke M.M., Gässler H., Brucke M., Helm M. Modifizierter Zweihelferreanimationsalgorithmus. Alternative im Auslandseinsatz der Bundeswehr! [Modified two-rescuer resuscitation algorithm. Alternative for international missions of the German Armed Forces!] Anaesthesist. 2011;60:49–56. doi: 10.1007/s00101-010-1778-7. PubMed DOI
Kłosiewicz T., Puślecki M., Zalewski R., Sip M., Perek B. Analysis of the quality of chest compressions during resuscitation in an understaffed team — randomised crossover manikin study. Disaster Emerg Med J. 2020;5:24–29. doi: 10.5603/DEMJ.a2020.0008. DOI
Kłosiewicz T., Puślecki M., Szarpak L., Dąbrowski M., Perek B. Automatic compression improves adherence to advanced life support protocol in two-paramedic team. A randomized simulation study. Signa Vitae. 2021;17 doi: 10.22514/sv.2020.16.0110. DOI
Guyette F.X., Rittenberger J.C., Platt T., Suffoletto B., Hostler D., Wang H.E. Feasibility of basic emergency medical technicians to perform selected advanced life support interventions. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006;10:518–521. doi: 10.1080/10903120600726015. PubMed DOI
Schröder J., Bucher M., Meyer O. Effect of the laryngeal tube on the no-flow-time in a simulated two rescuer basic life support setting with inexperienced users. Auswirkung des Larynx-Tubus auf die No-Flow-Zeit in einem simulierten zwei-Helfer Basic Life Support Szenario mit unerfahrenen Anwendern. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2016;111:493–500. doi: 10.1007/s00063-015-0088-x. PubMed DOI
Asselin N., Choi B., Pettit C.C., et al. Comparative analysis of emergency medical service provider workload during simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation using standard versus experimental protocols and equipment. Simul Healthc. 2018;13:376–386. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000339. PubMed DOI
Harari Y., Riemer R., Jaffe E., Wacht O., Bitan Y. Paramedic equipment bags: How their position during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) affect paramedic ergonomics and performance. Appl Ergon. 2020;82 doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102977. PubMed DOI
Choi B., Asselin N., Pettit C.C., et al. Simulation-based randomized comparative assessment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation bundle completion by emergency medical service teams using standard life support or an experimental automation-assisted approach. Simul Healthc. 2016;11:365–375. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000178. PubMed DOI
Eschmann N.M., Pirrallo R.G., Aufderheide T.P., Lerner E.B. The association between emergency medical services staffing patterns and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010;14:71–77. doi: 10.3109/10903120903349820. PubMed DOI
Nichol G., Detsky A.S., Stiell I.G., O'Rourke K., Wells G., Laupacis A. Effectiveness of emergency medical services for victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a metaanalysis. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27:700–710. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70187-7. PubMed DOI
Berg K.M., Bray J.E., Ng K.C., et al. 2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces. Circulation. 2023 doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001179. PubMed DOI
Peters M.D.J., Marnie C., Tricco A.C., et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18:2119–2126. PubMed
Tricco A.C., Lillie E., Zarin W., et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–473. PubMed
Sykora R, Keselica M, Peran D. Adaptation of advanced life support recommendation for two-member ambulance crew: a scoping review protocol. Registration. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/vx34z.
Tsai B.M., Sun J.T., Hsieh M.J., et al. Optimal paramedic numbers in resuscitation of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled study in a simulation setting. PLoS One. 2020;15 PubMed PMC
Krzyżanowski K., Ślęzak K., Dąbrowski S., et al. Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of performing advanced resuscitation procedures undertaken by two- and three- person basic medical rescue teams in adults under simulated conditions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:4834. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094834. PubMed DOI PMC
Robakowska M., Ślęzak D., Żuratyński P., et al. Management decisions: the effectiveness and size of the emergency medical team. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:3753. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073753. PubMed DOI PMC
Martin-Gill C., Guyette F.X., Rittenberger J.C. Effect of crew size on objective measures of resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010;14:229–234. doi: 10.3109/10903120903572293. PubMed DOI PMC
Bayley R., Weinger M., Meador S., Slovis C. Impact of ambulance crew configuration on simulated cardiac arrest resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008;12:62–68. doi: 10.1080/10903120701708011. PubMed DOI
Dundar Z.D., Ayranci M.K., Kocak S., Girisgin A.S. Bag-valve-mask versus laryngeal mask airway ventilation in cardiopulmonary resuscitation with continuous compressions: a simulation study. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Apr;36:189–194. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21000054. PubMed DOI
Siebers C., Müßig B., Huppertz T., Kanz K.G. Atemwegsmanagement in der Initialphase der Reanimation. Notfall + Rettungsmedizin. 2009;12:277–282. doi: 10.1007/s10049-009-1149-6. DOI
Robak O., Pruc M., Malysz M., et al. Pre-filled syringes with adrenaline during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in nonshockable rhythms. Pilot randomised crossover simulation study. Disaster. Emerg Med J. 2020;5:79–84. doi: 10.5603/DEMJ.a2020.0025. DOI
Zalewski R., Puslecki M., Klosiewicz T., Sip M., Perek B. The use of prefilled adrenaline syringes improves cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality-high-fidelity simulator-based study. J Thorac Dis. 2020;12:2105–2112. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.04.33. PubMed DOI PMC
Zalewski R., Telec W., Puslecki M., Dabrowski M., Perek B., Szarpak L. Sudden cardiac arrest pharmacotherapy with prefilled syringes improves adherence to Advanced Life Support protocol in understaffed resuscitation pre-hospital care teams. Signa Vitae. 2020;17:69–74. doi: 10.22514/sv.2020.16.0098. DOI
Zalewski R., Puślecki M., Szarpak Ł., Kłosiewicz T., Dąbrowski M., Perek B. Impact of Application of Multifunction Electrode (MFE) Pads on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality. Emerg Med Int. 2020;19:2675214. doi: 10.1155/2020/2675214. PubMed DOI PMC
Kern K.B., Stickney R.E., Gallison L., Smith R.E. Metronome improves compression and ventilation rates during CPR on a manikin in a randomized trial. Resuscitation. 2010;81:206–210. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.10.015. PubMed DOI
Nitzschke R., Doehn C., Kersten J.F., et al. Effect of an interactive cardiopulmonary resuscitation assist device with an automated external defibrillator synchronised with a ventilator on the CPR performance of emergency medical service staff: a randomised simulation study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017;25:36. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0379-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Carlson J.N., Colella M.R., Daya M.R., et al. Prehospital cardiac arrest airway management: an NAEMSP position statement and resource document. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022;26:54–63. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1971349. PubMed DOI
Benger J.R., Kirby K., Black S., et al. Supraglottic airway device versus tracheal intubation in the initial airway management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the AIRWAYS-2 cluster RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2022;26:1–158. doi: 10.3310/VHOH9034. PubMed DOI PMC
Forestell B., Ramsden S., Sharif S., et al. Supraglottic airway versus tracheal intubation for airway management in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med. 2024;52(2):e89–e99. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006112. PubMed DOI
Penketh J., Nolan J.P. Airway management during cardiac arrest. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2023;29:175–180. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001033. PubMed DOI
Stuby L., Jampen L., Sierro J., et al. Effect of early supraglottic airway device insertion on chest compression fraction during simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: randomised controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2021;11:217. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010217. PubMed DOI PMC
Stuby L., Suppan L., Jampen L., Thurre D. Impact of the over-the-head position with a supraglottic airway device on chest compression depth and rate: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Healthcare (Basel) 2022;10:718. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040718. PubMed DOI PMC
Stevens A.D., Hernandez C., Jones S., et al. Color-coded prefilled medication syringes decrease time to delivery and dosing errors in simulated prehospital pediatric resuscitations: a randomized crossover trial. Resuscitation. 2015;96:85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.035. PubMed DOI PMC