Combining proton and phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy offers a unique opportunity to study the oxidative and glycolytic components of metabolism in working muscle. This paper presents a 7 T proton calf coil design that combines dipole and loop elements to achieve the high performance necessary for detecting metabolites with low abundance and restricted visibility, specifically lactate, while including the option of adding a phosphorus array. We investigated the transmit, receive, and parallel imaging performance of three transceiver dipoles with six pair-wise overlap-decoupled standard or twisted pair receive-only coils. With a higher SNR and more efficient transmission decoupling, standard loops outperformed twisted pair coils. The dipoles with standard loops provided a four-fold-higher image SNR than a multinuclear reference coil comprising two proton channels and 32% more than a commercially available 28-channel proton knee coil. The setup enabled up to three-fold acceleration in the right-left direction, with acceptable g-factors and no visible aliasing artefacts. Spectroscopic phantom measurements revealed a higher spectral SNR for lactate with the developed setup than with either reference coil and fewer restrictions in voxel placement due to improved transmit homogeneity. This paper presents a new use case for dipoles and highlights their advantages for the integration in multinuclear calf coils.

High Field MR Center Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Medical University of Vienna 1090 Vienna Austria

Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine 140 21 Prague Czech Republic

Institute of Biophysics and Informatics 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University 121 08 Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Meyerspeer M., Boesch C., Cameron D., Dezortová M., Forbes S.C., Heerschap A., Jeneson J.A.L., Kan H.E., Kent J., Layec G., et al. 31P Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Skeletal Muscle: Experts’ Consensus Recommendations. NMR Biomed. 2021;34:e4246. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4246. PubMed DOI PMC

Kumar V., Chang H., Reiter D.A., Bradley D.P., Belury M., McCormack S.E., Raman S.V. Phosphorus-31 Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A Tool for Measuring In Vivo Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation Capacity in Human Skeletal Muscle. J. Vis. Exp. 2017;119:54977. doi: 10.3791/54977. PubMed DOI PMC

Šedivý P., Christina Kipfelsberger M., Dezortová M., Krššák M., Drobný M., Chmelík M., Rydlo J., Trattnig S., Hájek M., Valkovič L. Dynamic 31 P MR Spectroscopy of Plantar Flexion: Influence of Ergometer Design, Magnetic Field Strength (3 and 7 T), and RF-coil Design. Med. Phys. 2015;42:1678–1689. doi: 10.1118/1.4914448. PubMed DOI

Schmid A.I., Meyerspeer M., Robinson S.D., Goluch S., Wolzt M., Fiedler G.B., Bogner W., Laistler E., Krššák M., Moser E., et al. Dynamic PCr and pH Imaging of Human Calf Muscles during Exercise and Recovery Using 31 P gradient-Echo MRI at 7 Tesla. Magn. Reson. Med. 2016;75:2324–2331. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25822. PubMed DOI

Krššák M., Lindeboom L., Schrauwen-Hinderling V., Szczepaniak L.S., Derave W., Lundbom J., Befroy D., Schick F., Machann J., Kreis R., et al. Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Skeletal Muscle: Experts’ Consensus Recommendations. NMR Biomed. 2021;34:e4266. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4266. PubMed DOI PMC

Ren J., Lakoski S., Haller R.G., Sherry A.D., Malloy C.R. Dynamic Monitoring of Carnitine and Acetylcarnitine in the Trimethylamine Signal after Exercise in Human Skeletal Muscle by 7T 1H-MRS. Magn. Reson. Med. 2013;69:7–17. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24249. PubMed DOI PMC

Klepochová R., Niess F., Meyerspeer M., Slukova D., Just I., Trattnig S., Ukropec J., Ukropcová B., Kautzky-Willer A., Leutner M., et al. Correlation between Skeletal Muscle Acetylcarnitine and Phosphocreatine Metabolism during Submaximal Exercise and Recovery: Interleaved 1H/31P MRS 7 T Study. Sci. Rep. 2024;14:3254. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53221-x. PubMed DOI PMC

Boesch C. Musculoskeletal Spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2007;25:321–338. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20806. PubMed DOI

Kreis R., Bruegger K., Skjelsvik C., Zwicky S., Ith M., Jung B., Baumgartner I., Boesch C. Quantitative 1H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Myoglobin de- and Reoxygenation in Skeletal Muscle: Reproducibility and Effects of Location and Disease. Magn. Reson. Med. 2001;46:240–248. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1184. PubMed DOI

Kreis R., Jung B., Slotboom J., Felblinger J., Boesch C. Effect of Exercise on the Creatine Resonances in 1H MR Spectra of Human Skeletal Muscle. J. Magn. Reson. 1999;137:350–357. doi: 10.1006/jmre.1998.1683. PubMed DOI

Meyerspeer M., Kemp G.J., Mlynárik V., Krššák M., Szendroedi J., Nowotny P., Roden M., Moser E. Direct Noninvasive Quantification of Lactate and High Energy Phosphates Simultaneously in Exercising Human Skeletal Muscle by Localized Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007;57:654–660. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21188. PubMed DOI PMC

Niess F., Roat S., Bogner W., Krššák M., Kemp G.J., Schmid A.I., Trattnig S., Moser E., Zaitsev M., Meyerspeer M. 3D Localized Lactate Detection in Muscle Tissue Using Double-Quantum Filtered 1H MRS with Adiabatic Refocusing Pulses at 7T. Magn. Reson. Med. 2022;87:1174–1183. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29061. PubMed DOI

Damon B.M., Gore J.C. Physiological Basis of Muscle Functional MRI: Predictions Using a Computer Model. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005;98:264–273. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00369.2004. PubMed DOI

Dooley K., Snodgrass S.J., Stanwell P., Birse S., Schultz A., Drew M.K., Edwards S. Spatial Muscle Activation Patterns during Different Leg Exercise Protocols in Physically Active Adults Using Muscle Functional MRI: A Systematic Review. J. Appl. Physiol. 2020;129:934–946. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00290.2020. PubMed DOI

Niess F., Schmid A.I., Bogner W., Wolzt M., Carlier P., Trattnig S., Moser E., Meyerspeer M. Interleaved 31P MRS/1H ASL for Analysis of Metabolic and Functional Heterogeneity along Human Lower Leg Muscles at 7T. Magn. Reson. Med. 2020;83:1909–1919. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28088. PubMed DOI PMC

Englund E.K., Langham M.C., Li C., Rodgers Z.B., Floyd T.F., Mohler E.R., Wehrli F.W. Combined Measurement of Perfusion, Venous Oxygen Saturation, and Skeletal Muscle T2* during Reactive Hyperemia in the Leg. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2013;15:70. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-70. PubMed DOI PMC

Damon B.M., Froeling M., Buck A.K.W., Oudeman J., Ding Z., Nederveen A.J., Bush E.C., Strijkers G.J. Skeletal Muscle Diffusion Tensor-MRI Fiber Tracking: Rationale, Data Acquisition and Analysis Methods, Applications and Future Directions. NMR Biomed. 2017;30:e3563. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3563. PubMed DOI PMC

Fouré A., Ogier A.C., Le Troter A., Vilmen C., Feiweier T., Guye M., Gondin J., Besson P., Bendahan D. Diffusion Properties and 3D Architecture of Human Lower Leg Muscles Assessed with Ultra-High-Field-Strength Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging and Tractography: Reproducibility and Sensitivity to Sex Difference and Intramuscular Variability. Radiology. 2018;287:592–607. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171330. PubMed DOI

Englund E.K., Elder C.P., Xu Q., Ding Z., Damon B.M. Combined Diffusion and Strain Tensor MRI Reveals a Heterogeneous, Planar Pattern of Strain Development during Isometric Muscle Contraction. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2011;300:R1079–R1090. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00474.2010. PubMed DOI PMC

Ladd M.E., Bachert P., Meyerspeer M., Moser E., Nagel A.M., Norris D.G., Schmitter S., Speck O., Straub S., Zaiss M. Pros and Cons of Ultra-High-Field MRI/MRS for Human Application. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2018;109:1–50. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2018.06.001. PubMed DOI

Choi C.-H., Hong S.-M., Felder J., Shah N.J. The State-of-the-Art and Emerging Design Approaches of Double-Tuned RF Coils for X-Nuclei, Brain MR Imaging and Spectroscopy: A Review. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2020;72:103–116. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.07.003. PubMed DOI

Isaac G., Schnall M.D., Lenkinski R.E., Vogele K. A Design for a Double-Tuned Birdcage Coil for Use in an Integrated MRI/MRS Examination. J. Magn. Reson. 1990;89:41–50. doi: 10.1016/0022-2364(90)90160-B. DOI

Schnall M.D., Harihara Subramanian V., Leigh J.S., Chance B. A New Double-Tuned Probed for Concurrent 1H and 31P NMR. J. Magn. Reson. 1985;65:122–129. doi: 10.1016/0022-2364(85)90380-4. DOI

Lim H., Thind K., Martinez-Santiesteban F.M., Scholl T.J. Construction and Evaluation of a Switch-tuned 13C-1H Birdcage Radiofrequency Coil for Imaging the Metabolism of Hyperpolarized 13C-enriched Compounds. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2014;40:1082–1090. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24458. PubMed DOI

Choi C.-H., Hong S.-M., Ha Y., Shah N.J. Design and Construction of a Novel 1H/19F Double-Tuned Coil System Using PIN-Diode Switches at 9.4 T. J. Magn. Reson. 2017;279:11–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2017.04.005. PubMed DOI

Raaijmakers A.J.E., Italiaander M., Voogt I.J., Luijten P.R., Hoogduin J.M., Klomp D.W.J., Van Den Berg C.A.T. The Fractionated Dipole Antenna: A New Antenna for Body Imaging at 7 Tesla. Magn. Reson. Med. 2016;75:1366–1374. doi: 10.1002/MRM.25596. PubMed DOI

Steensma B.R., Voogt I.J., Leiner T., Luijten P.R., Habets J., Klomp D.W.J., van den Berg C.A.T., Raaijmakers A.J.E. An 8-Channel Tx/Rx Dipole Array Combined with 16 Rx Loops for High-Resolution Functional Cardiac Imaging at 7T. Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. Biol. Med. 2018;31:7–18. doi: 10.1007/s10334-017-0665-5. PubMed DOI PMC

Avdievich N.I., Solomakha G., Ruhm L., Nikulin A.V., Magill A.W., Scheffler K. Folded-End Dipole Transceiver Array for Human Whole-Brain Imaging at 7T. NMR in Biomed. 2021;34:e4541. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4541. PubMed DOI

Clément J., Gruetter R., Ipek Ö. A Combined 32-channel Receive-loops/8-channel Transmit-dipoles Coil Array for Whole-brain MR Imaging at 7T. Magn. Reson. Med. 2019;82:1229–1241. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27808. PubMed DOI PMC

Avdievich N.I., Nikulin A.V., Ruhm L., Magill A.W., Glang F., Henning A., Scheffler K., Society M.P. A 32-Element Loop/Dipole Hybrid Array for Human Head Imaging at 7T. Magn. Reson. Med. 2022;88:1912–1916. doi: 10.1002/MRM.29347. PubMed DOI

Dai J., Gosselink M., van der Velden T.A., Meliadò E.F., Raaijmakers A.J.E., Klomp D.W.J. An RF Coil Design to Enable Quintuple Nuclear Whole-Brain MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2023;89:2131–2141. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29577. PubMed DOI

Ohliger M.A., Sodickson D.K. An Introduction to Coil Array Design for Parallel MRI. NMR Biomed. 2006;19:300–315. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1046. PubMed DOI

Hamilton J., Franson D., Seiberlich N. Recent Advances in Parallel Imaging for MRI. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2017;101:71–95. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2017.04.002. PubMed DOI PMC

Maravilla J.A., Gopalan K., Arias A.C., Lustig M. Transmission Line Receiver Coils (TLCs) for MRI; Proceedings of the the 30th Scientific Meeting, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; London, UK. 7–12 May 2022;

Vliem J., Xiao Y., Wenz D., Xin L., Teeuwise W., Ruytenberg T., Webb A., Zivkovic I. Twisted Pair Transmission Line Coil—A Flexible, Self-Decoupled and Robust Element for 7 T MRI. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2024;108:146–160. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.02.007. PubMed DOI

Czerny R., Frass-Kriegl R., Cap V., Laistler E., Nohava L. Twisted Pair Coils as Flexible Receive Elements for 7 T-SNR and Active Detuning Efficiency; Proceedings of the 31st Scientific Meeting, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; Toronto, ON, Canada. 3–8 June 2023;

Goluch S., Kuehne A., Meyerspeer M., Kriegl R., Schmid A.I., Fiedler G.B., Herrmann T., Mallow J., Hong S.M., Cho Z.H., et al. A Form-Fitted Three Channel 31P, Two Channel 1H Transceiver Coil Array for Calf Muscle Studies at 7T. Magn. Reson. Med. 2015;73:2376–2389. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25339. PubMed DOI

Avdievich N.I., Solomakha G., Ruhm L., Henning A., Scheffler K. Unshielded Bent Folded-End Dipole 9.4 T Human Head Transceiver Array Decoupled Using Modified Passive Dipoles. Magn. Reson. Med. 2021;86:581–597. doi: 10.1002/MRM.28711. PubMed DOI

Sun L., Li Y., Zhang Z., Wang H. Antenna Decoupling by Common and Differential Modes Cancellation. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2021;69:672–682. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2020.3009427. DOI

Roemer P.B., Edelstein W.A., Hayes C.E., Souza S.P., Mueller M. The NMR Phased Array. Magn. Reson. Med. 1990;16:192–225. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910160203. PubMed DOI

Standard Test Method for Measurement of Radio Frequency Induced Heating Near Passive Implants During Magnetic Resonance Imaging. ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 2019. DOI

Darrasse L., Kassab G. Quick Measurement of NMR-Coil Sensitivity with a Dual-Loop Probe. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1993;64:1841–1844. doi: 10.1063/1.1144020. DOI

Ginefri J.-C., Durand E., Darrasse L. Quick Measurement of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Coil Sensitivity with a Single-Loop Probe. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1999;70:4730–4731. doi: 10.1063/1.1150142. DOI

Chung S., Kim D., Breton E., Axel L. Rapid B1+ Mapping Using a Preconditioning RF Pulse with TurboFLASH Readout. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010;64:439–446. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22423. PubMed DOI PMC

Robson P.M., Grant A.K., Madhuranthakam A.J., Lattanzi R., Sodickson D.K., McKenzie C.A. Comprehensive Quantification of Signal-to-Noise Ratio and g-Factor for Image-Based and k-Space-Based Parallel Imaging Reconstructions. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008;60:895–907. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21728. PubMed DOI PMC

Breuer F.A., Kannengiesser S.A.R., Blaimer M., Seiberlich N., Jakob P.M., Griswold M.A. General Formulation for Quantitative G-Factor Calculation in GRAPPA Reconstructions. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009;62:739–746. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22066. PubMed DOI

Meyerspeer M., Scheenen T., Schmid A.I., Mandl T., Unger E., Moser E. Semi-LASER Localized Dynamic 31P Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Exercising Muscle at Ultra-High Magnetic Field: Dynamic Semi-LASER Localized 31P MRS in Exercising Muscle. Magn. Reson. Med. 2011;65:1207–1215. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22730. PubMed DOI PMC

Kreis R., Boer V., Choi I., Cudalbu C., De Graaf R.A., Gasparovic C., Heerschap A., Krššák M., Lanz B., Maudsley A.A., et al. Terminology and Concepts for the Characterization of in Vivo MR Spectroscopy Methods and MR Spectra: Background and Experts’ Consensus Recommendations. NMR Biomed. 2021;34:e4347. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4347. PubMed DOI PMC

Christ A., Kainz W., Hahn E., Honegger K., Zefferer M., Neufeld E., Rascher W., Janka R., Bautz W., Chen J., et al. The Virtual Family-Development of Surface-Based Anatomical Models of Two Adults and Two Children for Dosimetric Simulations. Phys. Med. Biol. 2010;55:N23. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/2/N01. PubMed DOI

Kozlov M., Turner R. Fast MRI Coil Analysis Based on 3-D Electromagnetic and RF Circuit Co-Simulation. J. Magn. Reson. 2009;200:147–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.06.005. PubMed DOI

Lemdiasov R.A., Obi A.A., Ludwig R. A Numerical Postprocessing Procedure for Analyzing Radio Frequency MRI Coils. Concepts Magn. Reson. Part A. 2011;38A:133–147. doi: 10.1002/cmr.a.20217. DOI

Graesslin I., Homann H., Biederer S., Börnert P., Nehrke K., Vernickel P., Mens G., Harvey P., Katscher U. A Specific Absorption Rate Prediction Concept for Parallel Transmission MR. Magn. Reson. Med. 2012;68:1664–1674. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24138. PubMed DOI

Kuehne A., Goluch S., Waxmann P., Seifert F., Ittermann B., Moser E., Laistler E. Power Balance and Loss Mechanism Analysis in RF Transmit Coil Arrays. Magn. Reson. Med. 2015;74:1165–1176. doi: 10.1002/MRM.25493. PubMed DOI

Wang W., Sánchez-Heredia J.D., Zhurbenko V., Ardenkjær-Larsen J.H. Condition for Optimal Preamplifier Decoupling in One-Turn Single- and Multi-Gap Shielded Loop MRI Detectors; Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 2nd Ukrainian Microwave Week (UkrMW); Kharkiv, Ukraine. 14–18 November 2022; pp. 150–154.

Vaughan J.T., Garwood M., Collins C.M., Liu W., DelaBarre L., Adriany G., Andersen P., Merkle H., Goebel R., Smith M.B., et al. 7T vs. 4T: RF Power, Homogeneity, and Signal-to-noise Comparison in Head Images. Magn. Reson. Med. 2001;46:24–30. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1156. PubMed DOI

Collins C.M., Liu W., Schreiber W., Yang Q.X., Smith M.B. Central Brightening Due to Constructive Interference with, without, and despite Dielectric Resonance. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2005;21:192–196. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20245. PubMed DOI

Meyerspeer M., Roig E.S., Gruetter R., Magill A.W. An Improved Trap Design for Decoupling Multinuclear RF Coils. Magn. Reson. Med. 2014;72:584–590. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24931. PubMed DOI