Estimating Disability in Patients with Essential Tremor: Comparison of Tremor Rating Scale, Spiral Drawing, and Accelerometric Tremor Power
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie
Grantová podpora
580218
Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova
MH CZ-DRO-VFN64165
Všeobecná Fakultní Nemocnice v Praze
National Institute for Neurological Research, Programme EXCELES, ID Project No. LX22NPO5107
PubMed
38989643
PubMed Central
PMC11647970
DOI
10.1002/mdc3.14160
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- TETRAS, accelerometry, activities of daily living, essential tremor, spiral drawing, water pouring,
- MeSH
- akcelerometrie * metody MeSH
- činnosti denního života * MeSH
- esenciální tremor * patofyziologie diagnóza MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- posuzování pracovní neschopnosti MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Although performance rating scales, spiral drawing, water pouring, and accelerometry are commonly used to assess tremor severity, the extent to which their results correlate with impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to identify the most effective predictors of ADL in essential tremor (ET). METHODS: Forty ET patients were examined using The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS), spiral drawing, volume of water spilled, and accelerometric tremor power. Root-mean-square error, R2, and F-test were calculated for models predicting TETRAS ADL subscore. RESULTS: TETRAS Performance Subscale explained the variability in TETRAS ADL with an R2 value of 0.686. Models incorporating spiral rating and accelerometric tremor power (R2 = 0.731) and water spillage volume (R2 = 0.756) were not statistically superior. CONCLUSIONS: TETRAS performance subscore predicted nearly 70% ADL impairment in ET patients. Incorporating the spiral rating, accelerometric tremor power, and water pouring test did not enhance ADL estimation.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Louis ED, Ottman R, Hauser WA. How common is the most common adult movement disorder? Estimates of the prevalence of essential tremor throughout the world. Mov Disord 1998;13:5–10. PubMed
Fahn S, Tolosa E, Marín C. Clinical rating scale for tremor. In: Jankovic J, Tolosa E, eds. Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1993:271–280.
Elble R, Comella C, Fahn S, et al. Reliability of a new scale for essential tremor. Mov Disord 2012;27:1567–1569. PubMed PMC
Elble RJ, Pullman SL, Matsumoto JY, Raethjen J, Deuschl G, Tintner R. Tremor amplitude is logarithmically related to 4‐ and 5‐point tremor rating scales. Brain 2006;129:2660–2666. PubMed
Elble R, Bain P, Forjaz MJ, et al. Task force report: scales for screening and evaluating tremor: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord 2013;28:1793–1800. PubMed
Elble RJ, Ondo W. Tremor rating scales and laboratory tools for assessing tremor. J Neurol Sci 2022;435:120202. PubMed
Bain PG, Findley LJ. Assessing Tremor Severity: A Clinical Handbook. London: Smith‐Gordon; 1993.
Louis ED, Gillman A, Boschung S, Hess CW, Yu Q, Pullman SL. High width variability during spiral drawing: further evidence of cerebellar dysfunction in essential tremor. Cerebellum 2012;11:872–879. PubMed
Louis ED, Ford B, Wendt KJ, Lee H, Andrews H. A comparison of different bedside tests for essential tremor. Mov Disord 1999;14:462–467. PubMed
Kraus PH, Hoffmann A. Spiralometry: computerized assessment of tremor amplitude on the basis of spiral drawing. Mov Disord 2010;25:2164–2170. PubMed
Haubenberger D, Kalowitz D, Nahab FB, et al. Validation of digital spiral analysis as outcome parameter for clinical trials in essential tremor. Mov Disord 2011;26:2073–2080. PubMed PMC
Kim CY, Luo L, Yu Q, et al. Repeated spiral drawings in essential tremor: a possible limb‐based measure of motor learning. Cerebellum 2019;18:178–187. PubMed
Elble RJ, Brilliant M, Leffler K, Higgins C. Quantification of essential tremor in writing and drawing. Mov Disord 1996;11:70–78. PubMed
Hess CW, Pullman SL. Tremor: clinical phenomenology and assessment techniques. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (NY) 2012;2:tre‐02‐65‐365‐1. PubMed PMC
R Core Team . R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.3.1) [Computer software] R Foundation for Statistical Computing; https://www.R-project.org/ 2023.
Elble RJ. The essential tremor rating assessment scale. J Neurol Neuromedicine 2016;1(4):34–38. PubMed
Louis ED, Wendt KJ, Albert SM, Pullman SL, Yu Q, Andrews H. Validity of a performance‐based test of function in essential tremor. Arch Neurol 1999;56:841–846. PubMed
van der Veen S, Klamer MR, Elting JWJ, Koelman J, van der Stouwe AMM, Tijssen MAJ. The diagnostic value of clinical neurophysiology in hyperkinetic movement disorders: a systematic review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2021;89:176–185. PubMed
van der Stouwe AM, Elting JW, van der Hoeven JH, et al. How typical are ‘typical’ tremor characteristics? Sensitivity and specificity of five tremor phenomena. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2016;30:23–28. PubMed
Gauthier‐Lafreniere E, Aljassar M, Rymar VV, Milton J, Sadikot AF. A standardized accelerometry method for characterizing tremor: application and validation in an ageing population with postural and action tremor. Front Neuroinform 2022;16:878279. PubMed PMC
van Brummelen EMJ, Ziagkos D, de Boon WMI, et al. Quantification of tremor using consumer product accelerometry is feasible in patients with essential tremor and Parkinson's disease: a comparative study. J Clin Mov Disord 2020;7:4. PubMed PMC
Ulmanova O, Homann CN, Ulman R, et al. Tremor magnitude: a single index to assess writing and drawing in essential tremor. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2007;13:250–253. PubMed
Bain PG, Findley LJ, Atchison P, et al. Assessing tremor severity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:868–873. PubMed PMC