Pronuclear transfer has been successfully used in human-assisted reproduction to suppress the adverse effects of a defective oocyte cytoplasm or to bypass an idiopathic developmental arrest. However, the effects of the initial parental genome remodelling in a defective cytoplasm on the subsequent development after pronucleus transfer have not been systematically studied. By performing pronuclear transfer in pre-replication and post-replication mouse embryos, we show that the timing of the procedure plays a critical role. Although apparently morphologically normal blastocysts were obtained in both pre- and post-replication pronuclear transfer groups, post-replication pronuclear transfer led to a decrease in developmental competence and profound changes in embryonic gene expression. By inhibiting the replication in the abnormal cytoplasm before pronuclear transfer into a healthy cytoplasm, the developmental potential of embryos could be largely restored. This shows that the conditions under which the first embryonic replication occurs strongly influence developmental potential. Although pronuclear transfer is the method of choice for mitigating the impact of a faulty oocyte cytoplasm on early development, our results show that the timing of this intervention should be restricted to the pre-replication phase.

Department of Animal Sciences Genetics Institute University of Florida Gainesville FL USA

Department of Biology of Reproduction Institute of Animal Science Prague Czech Republic

Department of Cell Nucleus Plasticity Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Borel F, Lacroix FB, Margolis RL.  Prolonged arrest of mammalian cells at the G1/S boundary results in permanent S phase stasis. J Cell Sci  2002;115:2829–2838. PubMed

Burton A, Torres-Padilla M-E.  Epigenetic reprogramming and development: a unique heterochromatin organization in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Brief Funct Genomics  2010;9:444–454. PubMed PMC

Cohen J, Scott R, Schimmel T, Levron J, Willadsen S.  Birth of infant after transfer of anucleate donor oocyte cytoplasm into recipient eggs. Lancet  1997;350:186–187. PubMed

Craven L, Tuppen HA, Greggains GD, Harbottle SJ, Murphy JL, Cree LM, Murdoch AP, Chinnery PF, Taylor RW, Lightowlers RN  et al.  Pronuclear transfer in human embryos to prevent transmission of mitochondrial DNA disease. Nature  2010;465:82–85. PubMed PMC

Currie CE, Ford E, Benham Whyte L, Taylor DM, Mihalas BP, Erent M, Marston AL, Hartshorne GM, McAinsh AD.  The first mitotic division of human embryos is highly error prone. Nat Commun  2022;13:6755. PubMed PMC

Davis W, Schultz RM.  Role of the first round of DNA replication in reprogramming gene expression in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Mol Reprod Dev  1997;47:430–434. PubMed

Feu S, Unzueta F, Ercilla A, Pérez-Venteo A, Jaumot M, Agell N.  RAD51 is a druggable target that sustains replication fork progression upon DNA replication stress. PLoS One  2022;17:e0266645. PubMed PMC

Fulka H, Langerova A.  The maternal nucleolus plays a key role in centromere satellite maintenance during the oocyte to embryo transition. Development  2014;141:1694–1704. PubMed

Fulka H, Ogura A, Loi P, Fulka J Jr. Dissecting the role of the germinal vesicle nuclear envelope and soluble content in the process of somatic cell remodelling and reprogramming. J Reprod Dev  2019;65:433–441. PubMed PMC

Glover TW, Berger C, Coyle J, Echo B.  DNA polymerase α inhibition by aphidicolin induces gaps and breaks at common fragile sites in human chromosomes. Hum Genet  1984;67:136–142. PubMed

Graf A, Krebs S, Heininen-Brown M, Zakhartchenko V, Blum H, Wolf E.  Genome activation in bovine embryos: review of the literature and new insights from RNA sequencing experiments. Anim Reprod Sci  2014;149:46–58. PubMed

Greda P, Karasiewicz J, Modlinski JA.  Mouse zygotes as recipients in embryo cloning. Reproduction  2006;132:741–748. PubMed

Inoue A, Nakajima R, Nagata M, Aoki F.  Contribution of the oocyte nucleus and cytoplasm to the determination of meiotic and developmental competence in mice. Hum Reprod  2008;23:1377–1384. PubMed

Ishii T, Hibino Y.  Mitochondrial manipulation in fertility clinics: regulation and responsibility. Reprod Biomed Soc Online  2018;5:93–109. PubMed PMC

Jiang Z, Sun J, Dong H, Luo O, Zheng X, Obergfell C, Tang Y, Bi J, O’Neill R, Ruan Y  et al.  Transcriptional profiles of bovine in vivo pre-implantation development. BMC Genomics  2014;15:756. PubMed PMC

Jukam D, Shariati SAM, Skotheim JM.  Zygotic genome activation in vertebrates. Dev Cell  2017;42:316–332. PubMed PMC

Kishigami S, Wakayama T.  Efficient strontium-induced activation of mouse oocytes in standard culture media by chelating calcium. J Reprod Dev  2007;53:1207–1215. PubMed

Lee MT, Bonneau AR, Giraldez AJ.  Zygotic genome activation during the maternal-to-zygotic transition. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol  2014;30:581–613. PubMed PMC

Maréchal A, Zou L.  RPA-coated single-stranded DNA as a platform for post-translational modifications in the DNA damage response. Cell Res  2015;25:9–23. PubMed PMC

Mashiko D, Ikeda Z, Yao T, Tokoro M, Fukunaga N, Asada Y, Yamagata K.  Chromosome segregation error during early cleavage in mouse pre-implantation embryo does not necessarily cause developmental failure after blastocyst stage. Sci Rep  2020;10:854. PubMed PMC

Memili E, First NL.  Control of gene expression at the onset of bovine embryonic development. Biol Reprod  1999;61:1198–1207. PubMed

Ménézo YJ, Hérubel F.  Mouse and bovine models for human IVF. Reprod Biomed Online  2002;4:170–175. PubMed

Milholland B, Dong X, Zhang L, Hao X, Suh Y, Vijg J.  Differences between germline and somatic mutation rates in humans and mice. Nat Commun  2017;8:15183. PubMed PMC

Moeglin E, Desplancq D, Conic S, Oulad-Abdelghani M, Stoessel A, Chiper M, Vigneron M, Didier P, Tora L, Weiss E.  Uniform widespread nuclear phosphorylation of histone H2AX is an indicator of lethal DNA replication stress. Cancers (Basel)  2019;11:355. PubMed PMC

Mohammed AA, Karasiewicz J, Modliński JA.  Developmental potential of selectively enucleated immature mouse oocytes upon nuclear transfer. Mol Reprod Dev  2008;75:1269–1280. PubMed

Nakatani T, Lin J, Ji F, Ettinger A, Pontabry J, Tokoro M, Altamirano-Pacheco L, Fiorentino J, Mahammadov E, Hatano Y  et al.  DNA replication fork speed underlies cell fate changes and promotes reprogramming. Nat Genet  2022;54:318–327. PubMed PMC

Nakatani T, Schauer T, Altamirano-Pacheco L, Klein KN, Ettinger A, Pal M, Gilbert DM, Torres-Padilla M-E.  Emergence of replication timing during early mammalian development. Nature  2024;625:401–409. PubMed PMC

Palacios-González C, Medina-Arellano MJ.  Mitochondrial replacement techniques and Mexico’s rule of law: on the legality of the first maternal spindle transfer case. J Law Biosci  2017;4:50–69. PubMed PMC

Palmerola KL, Amrane S, De Los Angeles A, Xu S, Wang N, Pinho J D, Zuccaro MV, Taglialatela A, Massey DJ, Turocy J  et al.  Replication stress impairs chromosome segregation and preimplantation development in human embryos. Cell  2022;185:2988–3007.e20. PubMed

Saxena S, Zou L.  Hallmarks of DNA replication stress. Mol Cell  2022;82:2298–2314. PubMed PMC

Spindle A, Nagano H, Pedersen RA.  Inhibition of DNA replication in preimplantation mouse embryos by aphidicolin. J Exp Zool  1985;235:289–295. PubMed

Takeo T, Nakagata N.  Reduced glutathione enhances fertility of frozen/thawed C57BL/6 mouse sperm after exposure to methyl-beta-cyclodextrin. Biol Reprod  2011;85:1066–1072. PubMed

Wang B, Pfeiffer MJ, Schwarzer C, Araúzo-Bravo MJ, Boiani M.  DNA replication is an integral part of the mouse oocyte’s reprogramming machinery. PLoS One  2014;9:e97199. PubMed PMC

Wang TS.  Eukaryotic DNA polymerases. Annu Rev Biochem  1991;60:513–552. PubMed