Unrelated donor transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs ATG for myelodysplastic neoplasms
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
39008719
PubMed Central
PMC11414667
DOI
10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013468
PII: 517033
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- antilymfocytární sérum * terapeutické užití MeSH
- cyklofosfamid * terapeutické užití MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- homologní transplantace MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- myelodysplastické syndromy * terapie mortalita MeSH
- nemoc štěpu proti hostiteli * prevence a kontrola etiologie MeSH
- nepříbuzný dárce * MeSH
- příprava pacienta k transplantaci metody MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- transplantace hematopoetických kmenových buněk * metody škodlivé účinky MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antilymfocytární sérum * MeSH
- cyklofosfamid * MeSH
It has been reported in prospective randomized trials that antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has benefits in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with unrelated donors (UDs). However, the optimal GVHD prophylaxis strategy has been challenged recently by the increasing use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY). We report from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry the outcomes of 960 patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms who underwent allo-HSCT from UD with PTCY or ATG as GVHD prophylaxis. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The disease characteristics were similar in both groups. Day 28 neutrophil engraftment was significantly better with ATG (93% vs 85%). Over a median follow-up of 4.4 years, the 5-year OS was 58% with PTCY, and 49% in the ATG group. The 5-year PFS was higher for PTCY at 53% vs 44% for ATG. Grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD incidence was lower when PTCY was used (23%), whereas there was no difference in the incidence of chronic GVHD at 5 years. Multivariable analyses confirmed better OS and PFS with PTCY with a hazard ratio (HR) for ATG of 1.32 (1-1.74) and a better PFS for PTCY with a HR for ATG of 1.33. This study suggests that GVHD prophylaxis using PTCY instead of ATG in this setting remains a valid option. Further prospective randomized studies would be essential to confirm these results.
CHU de Lille Univ Lille INSERM U1286 INFINITE 59000 Lille France
Demiroglu Bilim University Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital Istanbul Turkey
Department of Biomedicine and Prevention University of Rome Tor Vergata Rome Italy
EBMT Leiden Statistical Unit Leiden The Netherlands
EBMT Leiden Study Unit Leiden The Netherlands
Fundeni Clinical Institute Bucharest Romania
Hematology and BMT Unit ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco University of Milan Milan Italy
Hôpital Saint Louis APHP Université de Paris Cité Paris France
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève and Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Prague Czech Republic
King's College Hospital London United Kingdom
Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet Oslo Oslo Norway
Ospedale San Raffaele s r l Milan Italy
RM Gorbacheva Research Institute Pavlov University St Petersburg Russia
Turku University Hospital Turku Finland
University Clinical Centre Medical University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom
University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Khoury JD, Solary E, Abla O, et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of haematolymphoid tumours: myeloid and histiocytic/dendritic neoplasms. Leukemia. 2022;36(7):1703–1719. PubMed PMC
Garcia-Manero G. Myelodysplastic syndromes: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2023;98(8):1307–1325. PubMed PMC
de Witte T, Bowen D, Robin M, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for MDS and CMML: recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2017;129(13):1753–1762. PubMed PMC
DeFilipp Z, Ciurea SO, Cutler C, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation in the management of myelodysplastic syndrome: an evidence-based review from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Committee on practice guidelines. Transplant Cell Ther. 2023;29(2):71–81. PubMed
Kröger N, Iacobelli S, Franke G-N, et al. Dose-reduced versus standard conditioning followed by allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: a prospective randomized phase III study of the EBMT (RICMAC trial) J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(19):2157–2164. PubMed
Nakamura R, Saber W, Martens MJ, et al. Biologic assignment trial of reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation based on donor availability in patients 50-75 years of age with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(30):3328–3339. PubMed PMC
Kröger N, Sockel K, Wolschke C, et al. Comparison between 5-azacytidine treatment and allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in elderly patients with advanced MDS according to donor availability (VidazaAllo Study) J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(30):3318–3327. PubMed
Walker I, Panzarella T, Couban S, et al. Pretreatment with anti-thymocyte globulin versus no anti-thymocyte globulin in patients with haematological malignancies undergoing haemopoietic cell transplantation from unrelated donors: a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(2):164–173. PubMed
Kröger N, Solano C, Wolschke C, et al. Antilymphocyte globulin for prevention of chronic graft-versus-host disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(1):43–53. PubMed
Finke J, Bethge WA, Schmoor C, et al. Standard graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with or without anti-T-cell globulin in haematopoietic cell transplantation from matched unrelated donors: a randomised, open-label, multicentre phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(9):855–864. PubMed
Bolaños-Meade J, Hamadani M, Wu J, et al. Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(25):2338–2348. PubMed PMC
Bolaños-Meade J, Reshef R, Fraser R, et al. Prevention of graft versus host disease with hematopoietic cell transplantation with reduced intensity conditioning—a comparison of three prophylaxis regimens (tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil/cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus/methotrexate/bortezomib or tacrolimus/methotrexate/maraviroc) versus tacrolimus/methotrexate: a randomised phase 2 trial with a non-randomised contemporaneous control group (BMT CTN 1203) Lancet Haematol. 2019;6(3):e132–e143. PubMed PMC
Broers AEC, de Jong CN, Bakunina K, et al. Posttransplant cyclophosphamide for prevention of graft-versus-host disease: results of the prospective randomized HOVON-96 trial. Blood Adv. 2022;6(11):3378–3385. PubMed PMC
Luznik L, Pasquini MC, Logan B, et al. Randomized phase III BMT CTN trial of calcineurin inhibitor-free chronic graft-versus-host disease interventions in myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(4):356–368. PubMed PMC
Shaw BE, Jimenez-Jimenez AM, Burns LJ, et al. National marrow donor program-sponsored multicenter, phase II trial of HLA-mismatched unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation using post-transplant cyclophosphamide. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(18):1971–1982. PubMed PMC
Shaw BE, Jimenez-Jimenez AM, Burns LJ, et al. Three-year outcomes in recipients of mismatched unrelated bone marrow donor transplants using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide: follow-up from a national marrow donor program-sponsored prospective clinical trial. Transplant Cell Ther. 2023;29(3):208.e1–208.e6. PubMed PMC
Moiseev IS, Pirogova OV, Alyanski AL, et al. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in unrelated peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22(6):1037–1042. PubMed
Brissot E, Labopin M, Moiseev I, et al. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus antithymocyte globulin in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation from 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated donors. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):87. PubMed PMC
Sanz J, Galimard J-E, Labopin M, et al. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide after matched sibling, unrelated and haploidentical donor transplants in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a comparative study of the ALWP EBMT. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):46. PubMed PMC
Shah MV, Saliba RM, Rondon G, et al. Pilot study using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), tacrolimus and mycophenolate GVHD prophylaxis for older patients receiving 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019;54(4):601–606. PubMed PMC
Aydin M, de Leeuw DC, Rutten CE, et al. ATG versus PTCy in matched unrelated donor haematopoietic stem cell transplantations with non-myeloablative conditioning. Br J Haematol. 2023;203(3):439–445. PubMed
Bacigalupo A, Ballen K, Rizzo D, et al. Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15(12):1628–1633. PubMed PMC
Giralt S, Ballen K, Rizzo D, et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimen workshop: defining the dose spectrum. report of a workshop convened by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15(3):367–369. PubMed PMC
Weisdorf DJ, Hurd D, Carter S, et al. Prospective grading of graft-versus-host disease after unrelated donor marrow transplantation: a grading algorithm versus blinded expert panel review. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2003;9(8):512–518. PubMed
Harris AC, Young R, Devine S, et al. International, multicenter standardization of acute graft-versus-host disease clinical data collection: a report from the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22(1):4–10. PubMed PMC
Lee SJ, Wolff D, Kitko C, et al. Measuring therapeutic response in chronic graft-versus-host disease. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: IV. The 2014 Response Criteria Working Group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(6):984–999. PubMed PMC
Iacobelli S, EBMT Statistical Committee Suggestions on the use of statistical methodologies in studies of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48(suppl 1):S1–S37. PubMed
Teramoto M, Takahashi T, Matsumoto K, et al. Individualized rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin dosing in adult haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation with high-risk hematologic malignancy: exposure-response analysis and population pharmacokinetics simulations. Am J Hematol. 2024;99(3):387–395. PubMed
Brissot E, Labopin M, Labussière H, et al. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus anti-thymocyte globulin after reduced intensity peripheral blood allogeneic cell transplantation in recipients of matched sibling or 10/10 HLA matched unrelated donors: final analysis of a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 trial. Blood Cancer J. 2024;14(1):31. PubMed PMC
Battipaglia G, Labopin M, Kröger N, et al. Posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs antithymocyte globulin in HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplantation. Blood. 2019;134(11):892–899. PubMed
Modi D, Kondrat K, Kim S, et al. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus thymoglobulin in HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplant for acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021;27(9):760–767. PubMed
Battipaglia G, Labopin M, Hamladji R-M, et al. Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide versus antithymocyte globulin in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation from HLA-identical sibling donors: a retrospective analysis from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Cancer. 2021;127(2):209–218. PubMed
Bailén R, Kwon M, Pascual-Cascón MJ, et al. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide for GVHD prophylaxis compared to ATG-based prophylaxis in unrelated donor transplantation. Ann Hematol. 2021;100(2):541–553. PubMed
Mehta RS, Saliba RM, Rondon G, et al. Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide versus tacrolimus and methotrexate graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for HLA-matched donor transplantation. Transplant Cell Ther. 2022;28(10):695.e1–695.e10. PubMed
Jimenez JA, Komanduri K, Brown S, et al. Improved GRFS after posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based vs ATG-based HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplant. Blood Adv. 2022;6(15):4491–4500. PubMed PMC
Giebel S, Labopin M, Salmenniemi U, et al. Posttransplant cyclophosphamide versus antithymocyte globulin in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from matched unrelated donors: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Cancer. 2023;129(23):3735–3745. PubMed
Lee M-W, Yeon SH, Seo W-H, et al. A comparison of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide versus antithymocyte-globulin in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing HLA-matched unrelated donor transplantation. Medicine (Baltim) 2020;99(34) PubMed PMC