Performance and safety of the PRICO closed-loop oxygen saturation targeting system in neonates: pragmatic multicentre cross-over study (TarOx Study)
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Pragmatic Clinical Trial
PubMed
39019542
PubMed Central
PMC11253729
DOI
10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002583
PII: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002583
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- neonatology, technology,
- MeSH
- Hyperoxia prevention & control MeSH
- Hypoxia MeSH
- Intensive Care Units, Neonatal * MeSH
- Cross-Over Studies * MeSH
- Oxygen blood administration & dosage MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Infant, Premature MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Oxygen Inhalation Therapy methods adverse effects instrumentation MeSH
- Oximetry methods MeSH
- Oxygen Saturation * MeSH
- Respiration, Artificial adverse effects MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Pragmatic Clinical Trial MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Oxygen MeSH
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the performance of the fabian-Predictive-Intelligent-Control-of-Oxygenation (PRICO) system for automated control of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2). DESIGN: Multicentre randomised cross-over study. SETTING: Five neonatal intensive care units experienced with automated control of FiO2 and the fabian ventilator. PATIENTS: 39 infants: median gestational age of 27 weeks (IQR: 26-30), postnatal age 7 days (IQR: 2-17), weight 1120 g (IQR: 915-1588), FiO2 0.32 (IQR: 0.22-0.43) receiving both non-invasive (27) and invasive (12) respiratory support. INTERVENTION: Randomised sequential 24-hour periods of automated and manual FiO2 control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion (%) of time in normoxaemia (90%-95% with FiO2>0.21 and 90%-100% when FiO2=0.21) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were severe hypoxaemia (<80%) and severe hyperoxaemia (>98% with FiO2>0.21) and prevalence of episodes ≥60 s at these two SpO2 extremes. RESULTS: During automated control, subjects spent more time in normoxaemia (74%±22% vs 51%±22%, p<0.001) with less time above and below (<90% (9%±8% vs 12%±11%, p<0.001) and >95% with FiO2>0.21 (16%±19% vs 35%±24%) p<0.001). They spent less time in severe hyperoxaemia (1% (0%-3.5%) vs 5% (1%-10%), p<0.001) but exposure to severe hypoxaemia was low in both arms and not different. The differences in prolonged episodes of SpO2 were consistent with the times at extremes. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the ability of the PRICO automated oxygen control algorithm to improve the maintenance of SpO2 in normoxaemia and to avoid hyperoxaemia without increasing hypoxaemia.
2 Department of Neonatology Poznan University of Medical Sciences Poznan Poland
Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute UMC Amsterdam The Netherlands
Department of Neonatology Centre for Postgraduate Medical Education Warsaw Poland
Department of Neonatology Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin Szczecin Poland
Department of Neonatology Ujastek Medical Cetner Krakow Poland
Department of Neontology Ujastek Medical Center Krakow Poland
Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology National Medical Institute Warsaw Poland
Faculty Biomedical Engineering Czech Technical University Prague Kladno Czech Republic
See more in PubMed
Sweet DG, Carnielli VP, Greisen G, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome: 2022 update. Neonatology. 2023;120:3–23. doi: 10.1159/000528914. PubMed DOI PMC
Hagadorn JI, Furey AM, Nghiem T-H, et al. Achieved versus intended pulse Oximeter saturation in infants born less than 28 weeks' gestation: the Aviox study. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1574–82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0413. PubMed DOI
van Zanten HA, Tan RNGB, van den Hoogen A, et al. Compliance in oxygen saturation targeting in Preterm infants: a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr. 2015;174:1561–72. doi: 10.1007/s00431-015-2643-0. PubMed DOI PMC
Askie LM, Darlow BA, Finer N, et al. Association between oxygen saturation targeting and death or disability in extremely Preterm infants in the neonatal oxygenation prospective meta-analysis collaboration. JAMA. 2018;319:2190–201. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5725. PubMed DOI PMC
Poets CF, Roberts RS, Schmidt B, et al. Association between intermittent hypoxemia or bradycardia and late death or disability in extremely Preterm infants. JAMA. 2015;314:595–603. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8841. PubMed DOI
Raffay TM, Dylag AM, Sattar A, et al. Neonatal intermittent hypoxemia events are associated with diagnosis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks postmenstrual age. Pediatr Res. 2019;85:318–23. doi: 10.1038/s41390-018-0253-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Di Fiore JM, Bloom JN, Orge F, et al. A higher incidence of intermittent hypoxemic episodes is associated with severe retinopathy of prematurity. J Pediatr. 2010;157:69–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.01.046. PubMed DOI PMC
Askie LM, Henderson-Smart DJ, Irwig L, et al. Oxygen-saturation targets and outcomes in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:959–67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa023080. PubMed DOI
Abdo M, Hanbal A, Asla MM, et al. Automated versus manual oxygen control in preterm infants receiving respiratory support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35:6069–76. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1904875. PubMed DOI
Stafford IG, Lai NM, Tan K. Automated oxygen delivery for preterm infants with respiratory dysfunction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;11:CD013294. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013294.pub2. PubMed DOI PMC
Salverda HH, Cramer SJE, Witlox RSGM, et al. Automated oxygen control in preterm infants, how does it work and what to expect: a narrative review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021;106:215–21. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-318918. PubMed DOI
Dani C, Pratesi S, Luzzati M, et al. Cerebral and splanchnic oxygenation during automated control of inspired oxygen (Fio2) in preterm infants. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021;56:2067–72. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25379. PubMed DOI
Dijkman KP, Mohns T, Dieleman JP, et al. Predictive intelligent control of oxygenation (PRICO) in preterm infants on high flow nasal cannula support: a randomised cross-over study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021;106:621–6. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-320728. PubMed DOI
Hütten MC, Goos TG, Ophelders D, et al. Fully automated predictive intelligent control of oxygenation (PRICO) in resuscitation and ventilation of preterm lambs. Pediatr Res. 2015;78:657–63. doi: 10.1038/pr.2015.158. PubMed DOI
Bachman TE, Iyer NP, Newth CJL, et al. Thresholds for oximetry alarms and target range in the NICU: an observational assessment based on likely oxygen tension and maturity. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20:317. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02225-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Bachman TE, Newth CJL, Iyer NP, et al. Hypoxemic and hyperoxemic likelihood in pulse oximetry ranges: NICU observational study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019;104:F274–9. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314448. PubMed DOI
Dijkman KP, Goos TG, Dieleman JP, et al. Predictive intelligent control of oxygenation in preterm infants: a two-center feasibility study. Neonatology. 2023;120:235–41. doi: 10.1159/000527539. PubMed DOI
Bachman T, Rafl J, LeMoyne R. Comparison of the relative effectiveness of automated Fio2 control in neonates of differing stability: individual patient analysis. EPNV Conf. 2023
Bachman TE, Onland W, van Kaam AH, et al. Frequency and duration of extreme hypoxemic and hyperoxemic episodes during manual and automatic oxygen control in preterm infants: a retrospective cohort analysis from randomized studies. BMC Pediatr. 2022;22:350. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03407-x. PubMed DOI PMC
Lim K, Wheeler KI, Jackson HD, et al. Lost without trace: oximetry signal dropout in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100:F436–8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-308108. PubMed DOI
Bachman T, Roubik K. Crossover from automated to manual titration of Fio2 in the NICU: is there a transition lag? Clin Technol. 2016;46:37–40.