Agreement of ultra-short-term heart rate variability measure after different repeated bouts of sprint ability tests
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
39096045
PubMed Central
PMC11298065
DOI
10.1177/00368504241262150
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Cardiac-related responses, autonomic nervous system, exercise recovery, parasympathetic activation, time-domain measure,
- MeSH
- běh * fyziologie MeSH
- cvičení fyziologie MeSH
- elektrokardiografie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- sportovní výkon fyziologie MeSH
- srdeční frekvence * fyziologie MeSH
- zátěžový test * metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
This study aims to explore: (1) the validity of post-exercise ultra-short-term heart rate variability (HRVust) after two different bouts of repeated sprint ability test (RSA), and (2) the relationship between HRVust measure and RSA performance. Twenty adolescent male futsal players voluntarily participated in this study (age: 17.65 ± 1.81 years, body height: 170.88 ± 4.98 cm, body weight: 61.78 ± 4.67 kg). The participants performed a standard RSA test (RSAstandard) and an RSA test with a 10% decrement of the best sprint time test (RSA10%decrement) on two separate occasions within a week. On both occasions, a 5-min resting electrocardiography was administered pre- and post-RSA exercise protocols. The first 30-s (HRVust30s), 60-s (HRVust60s), and 60-120-s (HRVust1-2min) were extracted and used to compare with the standard of 5-min HRV recording (HRVcriterion). The natural logarithm (ln) of the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) and root mean square of successive normal-to-normal interval differences (RMSSD) HRV indices were utilised to establish intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), coefficient of variation (%CV), and Pearson product-moment correlation (r). Results revealed the ICC values of HRVust lnSDNN (RSAstandard = 0.77-0.88; RSA10%decrement = 0.41-0.71) and lnRMSSD (RSAstandard = 0.81-0.86; RSA10%decrement = 0.57-0.82). Furthermore, significantly positive correlations between best sprint time and post-exercise HRVust indices were found in lnSDNN (r = 0.47-0.62; p < 0.05) and lnRMSSD (r = 0.45; p < 0.05). Additionally, a large CV of lnSDNN (RSAstandard = 32%-45%; RSA10%decrement = 29%-39%), lnRMSSD (RSAstandard = 50%-66%; RSA10%decrement = 48%-52%), and ratio (RSAstandard = 45%-126%; RSA10%decrement = 27%-45%) was found after the RSA protocols. In conclusion, the number of bouts of RSA exercise potentially influences the agreement of post-exercise time-domain HRVust indices to standard HRV measure.
College of LOHAS Industry Fo Guang University Yilan
Department of Exercise and Health Sciences University of Taipei Taipei
Department of Internal Medicine Hsiao Chung Cheng Healthcare Group New Taipei City
Department of Internal Medicine Taipei Veterans General Hospital Hsinchu Branch Hsinchu County
Department of Physical Education Fu Jen Catholic University New Taipei City
Exercise and Health Promotion Association New Taipei City
Faculty of Physical Culture Institute of Active Lifestyle Palacký University Olomouc Czechia
High Performance Unit Chinese Taipei Football Association New Taipei City
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Lundstrom CJ, Foreman NA, Biltz G. Practices and applications of heart rate variability monitoring in endurance athletes. Int J Sports Med 2023; 44: 9–19. PubMed
Malik M, Bigger JT, Camm AJ, et al. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Eur Heart J 1996; 17: 354–381. PubMed
Sandercock GRH, Bromley PD, Brodie DA. The reliability of short-term measurements of heart rate variability. Int J Cardiol 2005; 103: 238–247. PubMed
Esco M, Williford H, Flatt A, et al. Ultra-shortened time-domain HRV parameters at rest and following exercise in athletes: an alternative to frequency computation of sympathovagal balance. Eur J Appl Physiol 2018; 118: 175–184. PubMed
Esco MR, Flatt AA. Ultra-short-term heart rate variability indexes at rest and post-exercise in athletes: evaluating the agreement with accepted recommendations. J Sports Sci Med 2014; 13: 535–541. PubMed PMC
Flatt AA, Esco MR. Heart rate variability stabilization in athletes: towards more convenient data acquisition. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2016; 36: 331–336. PubMed
Nakamura FY, Flatt AA, Pereira LA, et al. Ultra-short-term heart rate variability is sensitive to training effects in team sports players. J Sports Sci Med 2015; 14: 602–605. PubMed PMC
Nakamura FY, Antunes P, Nunes C, et al. Heart rate variability changes from traditional vs. Ultra–short-term recordings in relation to preseason training load and performance in futsal players. J Strength Cond Res 2020; 34: 2974–2981. PubMed
Nakamura FY, Pereira LA, Esco MR, et al. Intraday and interday reliability of ultra-short-term heart rate variability in rugby union players. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31: 548–551. PubMed
Castaldo R, Montesinos L, Melillo P, et al. Ultra-short term HRV features as surrogates of short term HRV: a case study on mental stress detection in real life. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19: 12. PubMed PMC
Pecchia L, Castaldo R, Montesinos L, et al. Are ultra-short heart rate variability features good surrogates of short-term ones? State-of-the-art review and recommendations. Healthc Technol Lett 2018; 5: 94–100. PubMed PMC
Chen Y-S, Lu W-A, Pagaduan JC, et al. A novel smartphone App for the measurement of ultra–short-term and short-term heart rate variability: validity and reliability study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8: e18761. PubMed PMC
Abad CCC, Pereira LA, Zanetti V, et al. Short-term cardiac autonomic recovery after a repeated sprint test in young soccer players. Sports 2019; 7: 102. PubMed PMC
Javorka M, Zila I, Balhárek T, et al. Heart rate recovery after exercise: relations to heart rate variability and complexity. Braz J Med Biol Res 2002; 35: 991–1000. PubMed
Dupuy A, Birat A, Maurelli O, et al. Post-exercise heart rate recovery and parasympathetic reactivation are comparable between prepubertal boys and well-trained adult male endurance athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 2022; 122: 345–355. PubMed PMC
Wu L, Shi P, Yu H, et al. An optimization study of the ultra-short period for HRV analysis at rest and post-exercise. J Electrocardiol 2020; 63: 57–63. PubMed
Hung C-H, Clemente FM, Bezerra P, et al. Post-exercise recovery of ultra-short-term heart rate variability after Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test and repeated sprint ability test. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 4070. PubMed PMC
Canino MC, Dunn-Lewis C, Proessl F, et al. Finding a rhythm: relating ultra-short-term heart rate variability measures in healthy young adults during rest, exercise, and recovery. Auton Neurosci 2022; 239: 102953. PubMed
Marcel-Millet P, Ravier G, Esco MR, et al. Does firefighters’ physical fitness influence their cardiac parasympathetic reactivation? Analysis with post-exercise heart rate variability and ultra-short-term measures. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2022; 28: 153–161. PubMed
Melo HM, Martins TC, Nascimento LM, et al. Ultra-short heart rate variability recording reliability: the effect of controlled paced breathing. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2018; 23: e12565. PubMed PMC
Shaffer F, Shearman S, Meehan Z. The promise of ultra-short-term (UST) heart rate variability measurements. Biofeedback 2016; 44: 229–233.
Tarvainen MP, Niskanen J-P, Lipponen JA, et al. Kubios HRV – heart rate variability analysis software. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2014; 113: 210–220. PubMed
Akenhead R, Marques J, Paul D. Accelerometer load: a new way to measure fatigue during repeated sprint training? Sci Med Football 2017; 1: 151–156.
Morin J-B, Dupuy J, Samozino P. Performance and fatigue during repeated sprints: what is the appropriate sprint dose? J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 1918–1924. PubMed
Chen Y-S, Liao C-J, Lu W-A, et al. Sympathetic enhancement in futsal players but not in football players after repeated sprint ability test. BMJ Open Sports Exerc Med 2015; 1: e000049. PubMed PMC
Impellizzeri FM, Rampinini E, Castagna C, et al. Validity of a repeated-sprint test for football. Int J Sports Med 2008; 29: 899–905. PubMed
Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assessment 1994; 6: 284–290.
Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, et al. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 3–12. PubMed
Peçanha T, Bartels R, Brito LC, et al. Methods of assessment of the post-exercise cardiac autonomic recovery: a methodological review. Int J Cardiol 2017; 227: 795–802. PubMed
Buchheit M. Monitoring training status with HR measures: do all roads lead to Rome? Front Physiol 2014; 5: 73. PubMed PMC
Storniolo JL, Cairo B, Porta A, et al. Symbolic analysis of the heart rate variability during the plateau phase following maximal sprint exercise. Front Physiol 2021; 12: 632883. PubMed PMC
Storniolo JL, Esposti R, Cavallari P. Heart rate kinetics and sympatho-vagal balance accompanying a maximal sprint test. Front Psychol 2020; 10: 2950. PubMed PMC
Buchheit M, Laursen PB, Ahmaidi S. Parasympathetic reactivation after repeated sprint exercise. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007; 293: H133–H141. PubMed