BACKGROUND: The topic of adolescent mental health is currently a subject of much debate due to the increasing prevalence of mental health problems among this age group. Therefore, it is crucial to have high-quality and validated mental well-being measurement tools. While such tools do exist, they are often not tailored specifically to adolescents and are not available in Czech language. The aim of this study is to validate and test the Czech version of the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (SWEMWBS) on a large sample of Czech adolescents aged 15 to 18 years. METHODS: The analysis is based on data from the first wave of the Czech Education Panel Survey (CZEPS) and was mainly conducted using Item Response Theory (IRT), which is the most appropriate method for this type of analysis. Specifically, the Graded Response Model (GRM) was applied to the data. This comprehensive validation study also included reliability and three types of validity (construct, convergent and criterion) testing. RESULTS: The study found that the Czech version of the SWEMWBS for adolescents aged 15 to 18 years (N = 22,498) has good quality and psychometric properties. The data was analysed using the GRM model as it met the assumptions for the use of IRT. The estimated parameter values by GRM demonstrated good discriminant and informative power for all items, except for item 7, which showed poorer results compared to the others. However, excluding it from the scale would not enhance the overall quality of the scale. The five-category response scale functions effectively. Additionally, the results demonstrated high reliability, and all types of validity tested were also confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: The Czech version of the SWEMWBS for adolescents has been validated as a psychometrically sound, reliable and valid instrument for measuring mental well-being. It can therefore be used with confidence in future studies.

Institute of Sociology of the Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Warwick Medical School. What is Mental Wellbeing? https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/med/research/platform/wemwbs/mentalwellbeing/. Assessed 17 June 2024.

World Health Organization. Mental health. 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response. Assessed 17 June 2024.

Global Burden of Disease Study. 2019. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/. Assessed 10 Apr 2024.

Lee Y, Jeon YJ, Kang S, Shin JI, Jung YC, Jung SJ. Social media use and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in young adults: a meta-analysis of 14 cross-sectional studies. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):995. PubMed PMC

Ludwig-Walz H, Dannheim I, Pfadenhauer LM, Fegert JM, Bujard M. Increase of depression among children and adolescents after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2022;16(1):109. PubMed PMC

Walsh SD, Sela T, De Looze M, Craig W, Cosma A, Harel-Fisch Y, et al. Clusters of contemporary risk and their relationship to mental well-being among 15-year-old adolescents across 37 countries. J Adolesc Health. 2020;66(6):S40–9. PubMed

Kessler RC, Amminger GP, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, Lee S, Ustün TB. Age of onset of mental disorders: a review of recent literature. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 2007;20(4):359–64. PubMed PMC

Orth Z, Moosajee F, Van Wyk B. Measuring mental wellness of adolescents: a systematic review of instruments. Front Psychol. 2022;13:835601. PubMed PMC

Pešout O, Kučera M, Tomášková H, Polášková M, Kågström A. Validace vybraných nástrojů pro monitorování a evaluaci duševního zdraví dětí a adolescent v České republice – Projekt SUPREME. Available from: https://dzda.cz/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Validace-SUPREME.pdf.

National Institute of Mental Health in Czechia. Národní monitoring duševního zdraví dětí: 40 % vykazuje známky střední až těžké deprese, 30 % úzkosti. Odborníci připravují preventivní opatření. Press Release. 2023. https://www.nudz.cz/pro-media/tiskove-zpravy/narodni-monitoring-dusevniho-zdravi-deti-40-vykazuje-znamky-stredni-az-tezke-deprese-30-uzkosti-odbornici-pripravuji-preventivni-opatreni. Accessed 10 Apr 2024.

Kudrnáč A, Hanzlová R, Spitzerová M, Aslan K, Bocskor Á. Czech Education Panel Survey 1. Wave – student questionnaire. 2024. Available from: https://archivdv.soc.cas.cz/citation?persistentId=10.14473/CSDA/OM42GN.

Stewart-Brown S, Tennant A, Tennant R, Platt S, Parkinson J, Weich S. Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): a Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7(1):15. PubMed PMC

Melendez-Torres GJ, Hewitt G, Hallingberg B, Anthony R, Collishaw S, Hall J, et al. Measurement invariance properties and external construct validity of the short Warwick-Edinburgh mental wellbeing scale in a large national sample of secondary school students in Wales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17(1):139. PubMed PMC

Haver A, Akerjordet K, Caputi P, Furunes T, Magee C. Measuring mental well-being: A validation of the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale in Norwegian and Swedish. Scand J Public Health. 2015;43(7):721–7. PubMed

Hanzlová R, Lynn P. Item response theory-based psychometric analysis of the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (SWEMWBS) among adolescents in the UK. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023;21(1):108. PubMed PMC

Harkness JA, Vijver FJR van de, Mohler PP. Cross-cultural survey methods. Hoboken: J. Wiley; 2003.

Kroenke K, Spitzer R, Williams J, Monahan P, Löwe B. Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:317–25. PubMed

Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The patient health questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care. 2003;41(11):1284–92. PubMed

Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, Christopher P, Bernard J. The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194–200. PubMed

Muraki E. A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Appl Psychol Meas. 1992;16(2):159–76.

Samejima F. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika. 1969;34(S1):1–97.

DeMars C. Item response theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.

Baker FB. The basics of item response theory (2nd ed.). College Park: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation; 2001.

Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.

West SG, Finch JF, Curran PJ. Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In: Hoyle RH, editor. Structural equation modelling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Sage Publications: Inc; 1995. p. 56–75.

Yen WM. Effects of local item dependence on the fit and equating performance of the three-parameter logistic model. Appl Psychol Meas. 1984;8(2):125–45.

Chen WH, Thissen D. Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. J Educ Behav Stat. 1997;22(3):265.

Toland MD. Practical guide to conducting an item response theory analysis. J Early Adolesc. 2014;34(1):120–51.

Edwards MC. An Introduction to Item Response Theory Using the Need for Cognition Scale: IRT INTRO. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2009;3(4):507–29.

West SG, Taylor AB, Wu W. Model fit and model selection in structural equation modelling. In: Hoyle RH, editor. Handbook of structural equation modelling. The Guilford Press; 2012. p. 209–31.

Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39–50.

Bagozzi RP. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: a comment. J Mark Res. 1981;18(3):375–81.

Cheung GW, Cooper-Thomas HD, Lau RS, Wang LC. Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pac J Manag. 2024;41(2):745–83.

Gignac GE, Szodorai ET. Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Pers Individ Dif. 2016;102:74–8.

Koushede V, Lasgaard M, Hinrichsen C, Meilstrup C, Nielsen L, Rayce SB, et al. Measuring mental well-being in Denmark: Validation of the original and short version of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS and SWEMWBS) and cross-cultural comparison across four European settings. Psychiatry Res. 2019;271:502–9. PubMed

Shah N, Cader M, Andrews B, McCabe R, Stewart-Brown SL. Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS): performance in a clinical sample in relation to PHQ-9 and GAD-7. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021;19(1):260. PubMed PMC

Pakpour AH, Eriksson M, Erixon I, Broström A, Bengtsson S, Jakobsson M, et al. The Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS) - A psychometric evaluation of adolescents in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon. 2024;10(6):e27620. PubMed PMC

Ng Fat L, Scholes S, Boniface S, Mindell J, Stewart-Brown S. Evaluating and establishing national norms for mental wellbeing using the short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS): findings from the Health Survey for England. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(5):1129–44. PubMed PMC

Ringdal R, Bradley Eilertsen ME, Bjørnsen HN, Espnes GA, Moksnes UK. Validation of two versions of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale among Norwegian adolescents. Scand J Public Health. 2018;46(7):718–25. PubMed

McKay MT, Andretta JR. Evidence for the psychometric validity, internal consistency and measurement invariance of warwick edinburgh mental well-being scale scores in Scottish and Irish adolescents. Psychiatry Res. 2017;255:382–6. PubMed