Identifying conditions and traits that allow an introduced species to grow and spread, from being initially rare to becoming abundant (defined as invasiveness), is the crux of invasion ecology. Invasiveness and abundance are related but not the same, and we need to differentiate these concepts. Predicting both species abundance and invasiveness and their relationship in an invaded community is highly contextual, being contingent on the community trait profile and its invasibility. We operationalised a three-pronged invasion framework that considers traits, environmental context, and propagule pressure. Specifically, we measure the invasiveness of an alien species by combining three components (performance reflecting environmental suitability, product of species richness and the covariance between interaction strength and species abundance, and community-level interaction pressure); the expected population growth rate of alien species simply reflects the total effect of propagule pressure and the product of their population size and invasiveness. The invasibility of a community reflects the size of opportunity niches (the integral of positive invasiveness in the trait space) under the given abiotic conditions of the environment. Both species abundance and the surface of invasiveness over the trait space can be dynamic and variable. Whether an introduced species with functional traits similar to those of an abundant species in the community exhibits high or low invasiveness depends largely on the kernel functions of performance and interaction strength with respect to traits and environmental conditions. Knowledge of the covariance between interaction strength and species abundance and these kernel functions, thus, holds the key to accurate prediction of invasion dynamics.

Biodiversity Informatics Unit African Institute for Mathematical Sciences Muizenberg South Africa

Centre for Invasion Biology Department of Botany and Zoology Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa

Centre for Invasion Biology Department of Mathematical Sciences Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa

Department of Ecology Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Institute of Botany Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic

National Institute for Theoretical and Computational Sciences Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Gaston, K. J. Rarity (Chapman & Hall, 1994).

Lurgi, M., Brook, B. W., Saltré, F. & Fordham, D. A. Modelling range dynamics under global change: Which framework and why? Methods Ecol. Evol.6, 247–256 (2015).10.1111/2041-210X.12315 DOI

Rabinowitz, D. In The Biological Aspects of Rare Plant Conservation Ch. 17 (Wiley, 1981).

McGeoch, M. A. & Latombe, G. Characterizing common and range expanding species. J. Biogeogr.43, 217–228 (2016).10.1111/jbi.12642 DOI

He, F. & Gaston, K. J. Occupancy-abundance relationships and sampling scales. Ecography23, 503–511 (2000).10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00306.x DOI

Sheth, S. N., Morueta-Holme, N. & Angert, A. L. Determinants of geographic range size in plants. N. Phytol.226, 650–665 (2020).10.1111/nph.16406 PubMed DOI

Latombe, G., Richardson, D. M., Pyšek, P., Kučera, T. & Hui, C. Drivers of species turnover vary with species commonness for native and alien plants with different residence times. Ecology99, 2763–2775 (2018). 10.1002/ecy.2528 PubMed DOI

Latombe, G., Roura-Pascual, N. & Hui, C. Similar compositional turnover but distinct insular environmental and geographical drivers of native and exotic ants in two oceans. J. Biogeogr.46, 2299–2310 (2019).10.1111/jbi.13671 DOI

Tokeshi, M. Species abundance patterns and community structure. Adv. Ecol. Res.24, 111–186 (1993).10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60042-2 DOI

McGill, B. J. & Nekola, J. C. Mechanisms in macroecology: AWOL or purloined letter? Towards a pragmatic view of mechanism. Oikos119, 591–603 (2010).10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17771.x DOI

Brown, J. H. & Gillooly, J. F. Ecological food webs: high-quality data facilitate theoretical unification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100, 1467–1468 (2003). 10.1073/pnas.0630310100 PubMed DOI PMC

Allen, A. P., Brown, J. H. & Gillooly, J. F. Global biodiversity, biochemical kinetics, and the energetic-equivalence rule. Science297, 1545–1548 (2002). 10.1126/science.1072380 PubMed DOI

Enquist, B. J., Brown, J. H. & West, G. B. Allometric scaling of plant energetics and population density. Nature395, 163–165 (1998).10.1038/25977 DOI

White, E. P., Ernest, S. K. M., Kerkhoff, A. J. & Enquist, B. J. Relationships between body size and abundance in ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol.22, 323–330 (2007). 10.1016/j.tree.2007.03.007 PubMed DOI

Labarbera, M. Analyzing body size as a factor in ecology and evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.20, 97–117 (1989).10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.000525 DOI

Fricke, E. C. & Svenning, J. C. Accelerating homogenization of the global plant–frugivore meta-network. Nature585, 74–78 (2020). 10.1038/s41586-020-2640-y PubMed DOI

Hui, C. Introduced species shape insular mutualistic networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA118, e2026396118 (2021). 10.1073/pnas.2026396118 PubMed DOI PMC

Hobbs, R. J. et al. Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.15, 1–7 (2006).10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00212.x DOI

Reeve, S. et al. Rare, common, alien and native species follow different rules in an understory plant community. Ecol. Evol.12, e8734 (2022). 10.1002/ece3.8734 PubMed DOI PMC

Catford, J. A., Wilson, J. R. U., Pyšek, P., Hulme, P. E. & Duncan, R. P. Addressing context dependence in ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol.37, 158–170 (2022). 10.1016/j.tree.2021.09.007 PubMed DOI

Hui, C. & Richardson, D. M. Invasion Dynamics (Oxford University Press, 2017).

Gurevitch, J., Fox, G. A., Wardle, G. M., Inderjit & Taub, D. Emergent insights from the synthesis of conceptual frameworks for biological invasions. Ecol. Lett.14, 407–418 (2011). 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01594.x PubMed DOI

Grainger, T. N., Levine, J. M. & Gilbert, B. The invasion criterion: a common currency for ecological research. Trends Ecol. Evol.34, 925–935 (2019). 10.1016/j.tree.2019.05.007 PubMed DOI

Hui, C. et al. Defining invasiveness and invasibility in ecological networks. Biol. Invasions18, 971–983 (2016).10.1007/s10530-016-1076-7 DOI

Le Roux, J. J. et al. Co-introduction versus ecological fitting pathways to the establishment of effective mutualisms during biological invasions. N. Phytol.215, 1354–1360 (2017).10.1111/nph.14593 PubMed DOI

Gaertner, M. et al. Invasive plants as drivers of regime shifts: identifying high-priority invaders that alter feedback relationships. Divers. Distrib.20, 733–744 (2014).10.1111/ddi.12182 DOI

Hui, C. & Richardson, D. M. How to invade an ecological network. Trends Ecol. Evol.34, 121–131 (2019). 10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.003 PubMed DOI

Novoa, A. et al. Invasion syndromes: a systematic approach for predicting biological invasions and facilitating effective management. Biol. Invasions22, 1801–1820 (2020).10.1007/s10530-020-02220-w DOI

Enders, M. et al. A conceptual map of invasion biology: integrating hypotheses into a consensus network. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.29, 978–991 (2020). 10.1111/geb.13082 PubMed DOI PMC

McGeoch, M. A. et al. Prioritizing species, pathways, and sites to achieve conservation targets for biological invasion. Biol. Invasions18, 299–314 (2016).10.1007/s10530-015-1013-1 DOI

Catford, J. A., Jansson, R. & Nilsson, C. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Divers. Distrib.15, 22–40 (2009).10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00521.x DOI

Pyšek, P. et al. MAcroecological Framework for Invasive Aliens (MAFIA): disentangling large-scale context dependence in biological invasions. NeoBiota62, 407–461 (2020).10.3897/neobiota.62.52787 DOI

Cassey, P., Delean, S., Lockwood, J. L., Sadowski, J. S. & Blackburn, T. M. Dissecting the null model for biological invasions: a meta-analysis of the propagule pressure effect. PLoS Biol.16, e2005987 (2018). 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005987 PubMed DOI PMC

Lonsdale, W. M. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology80, 1522–1536 (1999).10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1522:GPOPIA]2.0.CO;2 DOI

Donaldson, J. E. et al. Invasion trajectory of alien trees: the role of introduction pathway and planting history. Glob. Chang. Biol.20, 1527–1537 (2014). 10.1111/gcb.12486 PubMed DOI

Pyšek, P. & Richardson, D. M. Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.35, 25–55 (2010).10.1146/annurev-environ-033009-095548 DOI

Vedder, D., Leidinger, L. & Sarmento Cabral, J. Propagule pressure and an invasion syndrome determine invasion success in a plant community model. Ecol. Evol.11, 17106–17116 (2021). 10.1002/ece3.8348 PubMed DOI PMC

Minnaar, I. A., Hui, C. & Clusella-Trullas, S. Jack, master or both? The invasive ladybird Harmonia axyridis performs better than a native coccinellid despite divergent trait plasticity. NeoBiota77, 179–207 (2022).10.3897/neobiota.77.91402 DOI

Pipek, P. et al. Lasting the distance: the survival of alien birds shipped to New Zealand in the 19th century. Ecol. Evol.10, 3944–3953 (2020). 10.1002/ece3.6143 PubMed DOI PMC

van Kleunen, M., Weber, E. & Fischer, M. A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol. Lett.13, 235–245 (2010). 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01418.x PubMed DOI

Mathakutha, R. et al. Invasive species differ in key functional traits from native and non-invasive alien plant species. J. Vegetation Sci.30, 994–1006 (2019).10.1111/jvs.12772 DOI

Hayes, K. R. & Barry, S. C. Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biol. Invasions10, 483–506 (2008).10.1007/s10530-007-9146-5 DOI

Pyšek, P. & Richardson, D. M. In Biological Invasions (ed. Nentwig, W.) 97–125 (Springer, 2007).

Funk, J. L. et al. Keys to enhancing the value of invasion ecology research for management. Biol. Invasions22, 2431–2445 (2020).10.1007/s10530-020-02267-9 DOI

Pyšek, P. et al. A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Glob. Chang. Biol.18, 1725–1737 (2012).10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02636.x DOI

Wilson, J. R. U. et al. Frameworks used in invasion science: progress and prospects. NeoBiota62, 1–30 (2020).10.3897/neobiota.62.58738 DOI

Daly, E. Z. et al. A synthesis of biological invasion hypotheses associated with the introduction-naturalisation-invasion continuum. Oikos2023, e09645 (2023).

Richardson, D. M. et al. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib.6, 93–107 (2000).10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x DOI

Blackburn, T. M. et al. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol.26, 333–339 (2011). 10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023 PubMed DOI

Hui, C. et al. Trait positions for elevated invasiveness in adaptive ecological networks. Biol. Invasions23, 1965–1985 (2021).10.1007/s10530-021-02484-w DOI

Saarinen, K., Lindström, L. & Ketola, T. Invasion triple trouble: environmental fluctuations, fluctuation-adapted invaders and fluctuation-mal-adapted communities all govern invasion success. BMC Evol. Biol.19, 42 (2019). 10.1186/s12862-019-1348-9 PubMed DOI PMC

Neubert, M. G., Kot, M. & Lewis, M. A. Invasion speeds in fluctuating environments. Proc. R. Soc. B267, 1603–1610 (2000). 10.1098/rspb.2000.1185 PubMed DOI PMC

Colautti, R. I., Alexander, J. M., Dlugosch, K. M., Keller, S. R. & Sultan, S. E. Invasions and extinctions through the looking glass of evolutionary ecology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B372, 20160031 (2017).10.1098/rstb.2016.0031 PubMed DOI PMC

Mace, G. M. & Lande, R. Assessing extinction threats: toward a reevaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conserv. Biol.5, 148–157 (1991).10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00119.x DOI

Suweis, S., Simini, F., Banavar, J. R. & Maritan, A. Emergence of structural and dynamical properties of ecological mutualistic networks. Nature500, 449–452 (2013). 10.1038/nature12438 PubMed DOI

Stone, L. The feasibility and stability of large complex biological networks: a random matrix approach. Sci. Rep.8, 8246 (2018). 10.1038/s41598-018-26486-2 PubMed DOI PMC

Hui, C. & Richardson, D. M. Invading Ecological Networks (Cambridge University Press, 2022).

Lyons, K. G., Brigham, C. A., Traut, B. H. & Schwartz, M. W. Rare species and ecosystem functioning. Conserv. Biol.19, 1019–1024 (2005).10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00106.x DOI

Johnson, C. N. Species extinction and the relationship between distribution and abundance. Nature394, 272–274 (1998).10.1038/28385 DOI

Matthies, D., Bräuer, I., Maibom, W. & Tscharntke, T. Population size and the risk of local extinction: empirical evidence from rare plants. Oikos105, 481–488 (2004).10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12800.x DOI

Enquist, B. J. et al. The commonness of rarity: global and future distribution of rarity across land plants. Sci. Adv.5, aaz0414 (2019).10.1126/sciadv.aaz0414 PubMed DOI PMC

Säterberg, T., Jonsson, T., Yearsley, J., Berg, S. & Ebenman, B. A potential role for rare species in ecosystem dynamics. Sci. Rep.9, 11107 (2019). 10.1038/s41598-019-47541-6 PubMed DOI PMC

Leitão, R. P. et al. Rare species contribute disproportionately to the functional structure of species assemblages. Proc. R. Soc. B283, 20160084 (2016). 10.1098/rspb.2016.0084 PubMed DOI PMC

McCollin, D. Turnover dynamics of breeding land birds on islands: is Island biogeographic theory ‘True but trivial’ over decadal time-scales? Diversity9, 3 (2017).10.3390/d9010003 DOI

Chesson, P. L. & Ellner, S. Invasibility and stochastic boundedness in monotonic competition models. J. Math. Biol.27, 117–138 (1989).10.1007/BF00276099 DOI

Gallien, L. et al. The effects of intransitive competition on coexistence. Ecol. Lett.20, 791–800 (2017). 10.1111/ele.12775 PubMed DOI

Chesson, P. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.31, 343–366 (2000).10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 DOI

Shea, K. & Chesson, P. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol.17, 170–176 (2002).10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02495-3 DOI

Divíšek, J. et al. Similarity of introduced plant species to native ones facilitates naturalization, but differences enhance invasion success. Nat. Commun.9, 4631 (2018). 10.1038/s41467-018-06995-4 PubMed DOI PMC

Molofsky, J. et al. Optimal differentiation to the edge of trait space (EoTS). Evol. Ecol.36, 743–752 (2022).10.1007/s10682-022-10192-7 DOI

Messier, J., McGill, B. J. & Lechowicz, M. J. How do traits vary across ecological scales? A case for trait-based ecology. Ecol. Lett.13, 838–848 (2010). 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01476.x PubMed DOI

McGill, B. J., Enquist, B. J., Weiher, E. & Westoby, M. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol. Evol.21, 178–185 (2006). 10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002 PubMed DOI

Hui, C., Minoarivelo, H. O. & Landi, P. Modelling coevolution in ecological networks with adaptive dynamics. Math. Methods Appl. Sci.41, 8407–8422 (2018).10.1002/mma.4612 DOI

Latombe, G. et al. A vision for global monitoring of biological invasions. Biol. Conserv.213, 295–308 (2017).10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.013 DOI

Scheffer, M. & van Nes, E. H. Self-organized similarity, the evolutionary emergence of groups of similar species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103, 6230–6235 (2006). 10.1073/pnas.0508024103 PubMed DOI PMC

Barabás, G., D’Andrea, R., Rael, R., Meszéna, G. & Ostling, A. Emergent neutrality or hidden niches? Oikos122, 1565–1572 (2013).10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00298.x DOI