PURPOSE: Endoscopically assisted sagittal strip craniotomy with subsequent cranial orthosis is a frequently used surgical approach for non-syndromic sagittal synostosis. Originally, this technique involved a wide sagittal strip craniectomy with bilateral wedge osteotomies. More recent studies suggest omitting wedge osteotomies, achieving similar outcomes. The controversy surrounding wedge osteotomies and our efforts to refine our technique led us to create models and evaluate the mechanical impact of wedge osteotomies. METHODS: We conducted a 3D-print study involving preoperative CT scans of non-syndromic scaphocephaly patients undergoing minimally invasive-assisted remodelation (MEAR) surgery. The sagittal strip collected during surgery underwent thickness measurement, along with a 3-point bending test. These results were used to determine printing parameters for accurately replicating the skull model. Model testing simulated gravitational forces during the postoperative course and assessed lateral expansion under various wedge osteotomy conditions. RESULTS: The median sagittal strip thickness was 2.00 mm (range 1.35-3.46 mm) and significantly positively correlated (p = 0.037) with the median force (21.05 N) of the 3-point bending test. Model testing involving 40 models demonstrated that biparietal wedge osteotomies significantly reduced the force required for lateral bone shift, with a trend up to 5-cm-long cuts (p = 0.007). Additional cuts beyond this length or adding the occipital cut did not provide further significant advantage (p = 0.1643; p = 9.6381). CONCLUSION: Biparietal wedge osteotomies reduce the force needed for lateral expansion, provide circumstances for accelerated head shape correction, and potentially reduce the duration of cranial orthosis therapy.

Department of Neurosurgery 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Motol University Hospital 5 Úvalu 84 150 06 Prague 5 Prague Czech Republic

Department of Pediatrics 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Motol University Hospital Prague Prague Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Schulz M, Liebe-Puschel L, Seelbach K, Paulikat L, Fehlhaber F, Schwarz K, Blecher C, Thomale UW (2021) Quantitative and qualitative comparison of morphometric outcomes after endoscopic and conventional correction of sagittal and metopic craniosynostosis versus control groups. Neurosurg Focus 50:E2. https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.1.FOCUS20988 PubMed DOI

Lepard J, Akbari SHA, Mooney J, Arynchyna A, Iii SGM, Myers RP, Grant J, Johnston JM (2021) Comparison of aesthetic outcomes between open and endoscopically treated sagittal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 28:432–438. https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.3.PEDS20894 PubMed DOI

Jimenez DF, Barone CM (1998) Endoscopic craniectomy for early surgical correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 88:77–81. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.1.0077 PubMed DOI

Jimenez DF, Barone CM, McGee ME, Cartwright CC, Baker CL (2004) Endoscopy-assisted wide-vertex craniectomy, barrel stave osteotomies, and postoperative helmet molding therapy in the management of sagittal suture craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 100:407–417. https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2004.100.5.0407 PubMed DOI

Proctor MR, Meara JG (2019) A review of the management of single-suture craniosynostosis, past, present, and future. J Neurosurg Pediatr 24:622–631. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.7.PEDS18585 PubMed DOI

Ridgway EB, Berry-Candelario J, Grondin RT, Rogers GF, Proctor MR (2011) The management of sagittal synostosis using endoscopic suturectomy and postoperative helmet therapy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7:620–626. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.3.PEDS10418 PubMed DOI

Berry-Candelario J, Ridgway EB, Grondin RT, Rogers GF, Proctor MR (2011) Endoscope-assisted strip craniectomy and postoperative helmet therapy for treatment of craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Focus 31:E5. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.6.FOCUS1198 PubMed DOI

Liby P, Lomachinsky V, Taborsky J, Felici G, Drnkova J, Blazkova J, Krasnicanova H, Tichy M (2021) Minimally invasive endoscopically assisted remodelation (MEAR) of sagittal craniosynostosis: an alternative technique to open and endoscopic procedures with cranial orthosis time span reduction. Childs Nerv Syst 37:581–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-04836-8 PubMed DOI

PRUSA PRbJ (2023) Prusa Slicer 2.6.1. https://www.prusa3d.com/en/page/prusaslicer_424/ . Accessed 1 Apr 2024

Slicer D (2023) 3D Slicer. https://www.slicer.org/ . Accessed 1 Apr 2024

Arnaud E, Marchac D, Renier D (2006) The treatment of craniosynostosis: indications and techniques. Neurochirurgie 52:264–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0028-3770(06)71221-8 PubMed DOI

Di Rocco F, Knoll BI, Arnaud E, Blanot S, Meyer P, Cuttarree H, Sainte-Rose C, Marchac D (2012) Scaphocephaly correction with retrocoronal and prelambdoid craniotomies (Renier’s “H” technique). Childs Nerv Syst 28:1327–1332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1811-z PubMed DOI

Baker CM, Ravindra VM, Gociman B, Siddiqi FA, Goldstein JA, Smyth MD, Lee A, Anderson RCE, Patel KB, Birgfeld C, Pollack IF, Imahiyerobo T, Kestle JRW, Synostosis Research G (2021) Management of sagittal synostosis in the Synostosis Research Group: baseline data and early outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 50:E3. https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.1.FOCUS201029

Dlouhy BJ, Nguyen DC, Patel KB, Hoben GM, Skolnick GB, Naidoo SD, Woo AS, Smyth MD (2016) Endoscope-assisted management of sagittal synostosis: wide vertex suturectomy and barrel stave osteotomies versus narrow vertex suturectomy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 25:674–678. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.6.PEDS1623 PubMed DOI PMC

Wood BC, Ahn ES, Wang JY, Oh AK, Keating RF, Rogers GF, Magge SN (2017) Less is more: does the addition of barrel staves improve results in endoscopic strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis? J Neurosurg Pediatr 20:86–90. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.1.PEDS16478 PubMed DOI

Massimi L, Di Rocco C (2012) Mini-invasive surgical technique for sagittal craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 28:1341–1345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1799-4 PubMed DOI

Albright AL (1985) Operative normalization of skull shape in sagittal synostosis. Neurosurgery 17:329–331. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198508000-00016 PubMed DOI

Christophis P, Junger TH, Howaldt HP (2001) Surgical correction of scaphocephaly: experiences with a new procedure and follow-up investigations. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 29:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1054/jcms.2000.0182 PubMed DOI

Mutchnick IS, Maugans TA (2012) Nonendoscopic, minimally invasive calvarial vault remodeling without postoperative helmeting for sagittal synostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 9:222–227. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.12.PEDS11306 PubMed DOI

Syrlybayev D, Zharylkassyn B, Seisekulova A, Akhmetov M, Perveen A, Talamona D (2021) Optimisation of strength properties of FDM printed parts-a critical review. Polymers (Basel) 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13101587

Malde O, Cross C, Lim CL, Marghoub A, Cunningham ML, Hopper RA, Moazen M (2020) Predicting calvarial morphology in sagittal craniosynostosis. Sci Rep 10:3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55224-5 PubMed DOI PMC

Cross C, Khonsari RH, Larysz D, Johnson D, Kolby L, Moazen M (2021) Predicting and comparing three corrective techniques for sagittal craniosynostosis. Sci Rep 11:21216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00642-7 PubMed DOI PMC

Kobets AJ, Ammar A, Nakhla J, Scoco A, Nasser R, Goodrich JT, Abbott R (2018) Virtual modeling, stereolithography, and intraoperative CT guidance for the optimization of sagittal synostosis reconstruction: a technical note. Childs Nerv Syst 34:965–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-018-3746-5 PubMed DOI

Li X, Zhu W, He J, Di F, Wang L, Li X, Liu W, Li C, Gong J (2017) Application of computer assisted three-dimensional simulation operation and biomechanics analysis in the treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis. J Clin Neurosci 44:323–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.032 PubMed DOI

Macmillan A, Lopez J, Mundinger GS, Major M, Medina MA 3rd, Dorafshar AH (2018) Virtual surgical planning for correction of delayed presentation scaphocephaly using a modified Melbourne technique. J Craniofac Surg 29:914–919. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004290 PubMed DOI