Sustained benefit of zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib in patients with R/R CLL/SLL: final comparative analysis of ALPINE
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, multicentrická studie, klinické zkoušky, fáze III
PubMed
39316666
PubMed Central
PMC11738031
DOI
10.1182/blood.2024024667
PII: 517956
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- adenin * analogy a deriváty terapeutické užití MeSH
- chronická lymfatická leukemie * farmakoterapie mortalita MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- piperidiny * terapeutické užití škodlivé účinky aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- pyrazoly * terapeutické užití aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky MeSH
- pyrimidiny * terapeutické užití aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- adenin * MeSH
- ibrutinib MeSH Prohlížeč
- piperidiny * MeSH
- pyrazoly * MeSH
- pyrimidiny * MeSH
- zanubrutinib MeSH Prohlížeč
The ALPINE trial established the superiority of zanubrutinib over ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma; here, we present data from the final comparative analysis with extended follow-up. Overall, 652 patients received zanubrutinib (n = 327) or ibrutinib (n = 325). At an overall median follow-up of 42.5 months, progression-free survival benefit with zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib was sustained (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.84), including in patients with del(17p)/TP53 mutation (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.78) and across multiple sensitivity analyses. Overall response rate remained higher with zanubrutinib compared with ibrutinib (85.6% vs 75.4%); responses deepened over time with complete response/complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery rates of 11.6% (zanubrutinib) and 7.7% (ibrutinib). Although median overall survival has not been reached in either treatment group, fewer zanubrutinib patients have died than ibrutinib patients (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.55-1.06]). With median exposure time of 41.2 and 37.8 months in zanubrutinib and ibrutinib arms, respectively, the most common nonhematologic adverse events included COVID-19-related infection (46.0% vs 33.3%), diarrhea (18.8% vs 25.6%), upper respiratory tract infection (29.3% vs 19.8%), and hypertension (27.2% vs 25.3%). Cardiac events were lower with zanubrutinib (25.9% vs 35.5%) despite similar rates of hypertension. Incidence of atrial fibrillation/flutter was lower with zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib (7.1% vs 17.0%); no cardiac deaths were reported with zanubrutinib vs 6 cardiac deaths with ibrutinib. This analysis, at 42.5 months median follow-up, demonstrates that zanubrutinib remains more efficacious than ibrutinib with an improved overall safety/tolerability profile. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03734016.
Cancer Immunotherapy Programme Malaghan Institute of Medical Research Wellington New Zealand
Clinical Development BeiGene Co Ltd Beijing China
Clinical Development BeiGene International GmbH Basel Switzerland
Clinical Development BeiGene USA Inc San Mateo CA
Clinical Research Division Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Seattle WA
Department of Haematology Christchurch Hospital Christchurch New Zealand
Department of Haematology Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
Department of Haematology The Alfred Hospital Melbourne VIC Australia
Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Texas Oncology Tyler US Oncology Research Tyler TX
Department of Hematology and Transplantology Medical University of Gdańsk Gdańsk Poland
Department of Hematology Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
Department of Hematology Medical University of Lodz Lodz Poland
Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX
Department of Medical Oncology Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA
Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle WA
Department of Oncology Pathology Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
Medical Oncology and Hematology Blue Ridge Cancer Care Roanoke VA
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Imbruvica. Package insert. Pharmacyclics LLC; 2022.
Byrd JC, Hillmen P, Ghia P, et al. Acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results of the first randomized phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(31):3441–3452. PubMed PMC
Shadman M, Flinn IW, Levy MY, et al. Zanubrutinib in patients with previously treated B-cell malignancies intolerant of previous Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the USA: a phase 2, open-label, single-arm study. Lancet Haematol. 2023;10(1):e35–e45. PubMed
Ou YC, Tang Z, Novotny W, et al. Rationale for once-daily or twice-daily dosing of zanubrutinib in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2021;62(11):2612–2624. PubMed
Tam CS, Trotman J, Opat S, et al. Phase 1 study of the selective BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib in B-cell malignancies and safety and efficacy evaluation in CLL. Blood. 2019;134(11):851–859. PubMed PMC
Byrd JC, Furman RR, Coutre SE, et al. Targeting BTK with ibrutinib in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(1):32–42. PubMed PMC
Hillmen P, Eichhorst B, Brown JR, et al. Zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma: interim analysis of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(5):1035–1045. PubMed PMC
Brown JR, Eichhorst B, Hillmen P, et al. Zanubrutinib or ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Eng J Med. 2023;388(4):319–332. PubMed
Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines. Blood. 2008;111(12):5446–5456. PubMed PMC
Cheson BD, Byrd JC, Rai KR, et al. Novel targeted agents and the need to refine clinical end points in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(23):2820–2822. PubMed PMC
Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(27):3059–3068. PubMed PMC
UK CLL Forum Ibrutinib for relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a UK and Ireland analysis of outcomes in 315 patients. Haematologica. 2016;101(12):1563–1572. PubMed PMC
Mato AR, Nabhan C, Thompson MC, et al. Toxicities and outcomes of 616 ibrutinib-treated patients in the United States: a real-world analysis. Haematologica. 2018;103(5):874–879. PubMed PMC
Mulligan SP, Opat S, Cheah CY, et al. Real-world experience of Australian and New Zealand patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and mantle cell lymphoma accessing ibrutinib through a Named Patient Program. Leuk Lymphoma. 2023;64(2):312–318. PubMed
Signorovitch JE, Sikirica V, Erder MH, et al. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons: a new tool for timely comparative effectiveness research. Value Health. 2012;15(6):940–947. PubMed
Ghia P, Munir T, Burger J, et al. P645: Ibrutinib for treatment of relapsed-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison of 3 randomized phase 3 trials. Hemasphere. 2023;7(S3)
Shadman M, Tedeschi A, Mohseninejad L, et al. Similar efficacy of ibrutinib arms across ALPINE and ELEVATE-RR trials in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Blood Cancer J. 2024;14(1):77. PubMed PMC
Signorovitch JE, Wu EQ, Yu AP, et al. Comparative effectiveness without head-to-head trials: a method for matching-adjusted indirect comparisons applied to psoriasis treatment with adalimumab or etanercept. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):935–945. PubMed
Dimopoulos MA, Opat S, D'Sa S, et al. Zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in symptomatic Waldenström macroglobulinemia: final analysis from the randomized phase III ASPEN study. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(33):5099–5106. PubMed PMC
Tam CS, Dimopoulos M, Garcia-Sanz R, et al. Pooled safety analysis of zanubrutinib monotherapy in patients with B-cell malignancies. Blood Adv. 2022;6(4):1296–1308. PubMed PMC
Shadman M, Liu C, Eakle K, et al. COVID-19 vaccination response and its practical application in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Hemasphere. 2023;7(1) PubMed PMC
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03734016