Guidelines for the correct use of the nomenclature of biochemical indices of bone status: a position statement of the Joint IOF Working Group and IFCC Committee on Bone Metabolism

. 2025 Mar 26 ; 63 (4) : 704-711. [epub] 20241125

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium electronic-print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid39576737

The presented guidelines are an update of the position paper, endorsed by the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF), on nomenclature of bone markers published over 2 decades ago. Novel insight into bone biology and pathophysiology of bone disorders has highlighted the increasing relevance of new and known mediators implicated in various aspects of bone metabolism. This updated guideline proposes the nomenclature Bone Status Indices (BSI) as the comprehensive classification rather than bone turnover markers, bone markers, metabolic markers of bone turnover or metabolic markers of bone turnover, that are currently in use for the implicated molecules. On behalf of the IFCC Committee on Bone Metabolism and the Joint IOF Working Group and IFCC Committee on Bone Metabolism, the authors propose standardized nomenclature, abbreviations and measurement units for the bone status indices.

Cedars Sinai Medical Center and Geffen School of Medicine UCLA Los Angeles CA USA

Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases University of Sheffield Sheffield UK

Clinical Biochemistry Department KAT General Hospital Kifissia Athens Greece

Department of Athletics Strength and Conditioning Poznań University of Physical Education Poznań Poland

Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Bone Metabolism Klatovska Hospital Klatovy Czech Republic

Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Haematology Faculty of Medicine Pilsen Charles University Prague Pilsen Czech Republic

Department of Clinical Biochemistry Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

Department of Clinical Chemistry CIRM University of Liège CHU de Liège Belgium

Department of Clinical Sciences Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit Lund University Malmö Sweden

Department of Laboratory Medicine Faculty of Medicine University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

Department of Medicine Division of Rheumatology U C Davis Health Sacramento CA USA

Department of Orthopaedics Skåne University Hospital Malmö Sweden

Division of Clinical Medicine School of Medicine and Population Health University of Sheffield Sheffield UK

Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Faculty of Health Care Studies University of West Bohemia Pilsen Czech Republic

INSERM Unit 1033 Edouard Herriot Hospital Lyon France

International Institute for Biosensing University of Minnesota Minneapolis USA

Laboratory for the Research of Musculoskeletal System Th Garofalidis School of Medicine National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece

Laboratory of Experimental Biochemistry IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio Milan Italy

Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research Australian Catholic University Melbourne Australia

Mellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing University of Sheffield Sheffield UK

MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre University of Southampton Southampton UK

NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK

Oregon Osteoporosis Center Portland OR USA

PathWest Laboratory Medicine Fiona Stanley Hospital Murdoch WA Australia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Delmas, PD, Eastell, R, Garnero, P, Seibel, MJ, Stepan, J, Committee of Scientific Advisors of the International Osteoporosis Foundation . The use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:S2–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980070002 . DOI

Delmas, PD. Committee of scientific advisors of the international osteoporosis. Bone marker nomenclature. Bone 2001;28:575–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00480-x . DOI

Delmas, PD. Standardization of bone marker nomenclature. Clin Chem 2001;47:1497. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/47.8.1497 . DOI

Lombardi, G, Perego, S, Luzi, L, Banfi, G. A four-season molecule: osteocalcin. Updates in its physiological roles. Endocrine 2015;48:394–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-014-0401-0 . DOI

Ladang, A, Rauch, F, Delvin, E, Cavalier, E. Bone turnover markers in children: from laboratory challenges to clinical interpretation. Calcif Tissue Int 2023;112:218–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-022-00964-2 . DOI

Cremers, S, Garnero, P, Seibel, MJ. Chapter 87 – biochemical markers of bone metabolism. In: Bilezikian, JP, Raisz, LG, Martin, TJ, editors. Principles of Bone Biology . 3rd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2008:1857–81 pp.

Glendenning, P, Chubb, SAP, Vasikaran, SD. Clinical utility of bone turnover markers in the management of common metabolic bone diseases in adults. Clin Chim Acta 2018;481:161–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.03.009 . DOI

Vasikaran, SD, Miura, M, Pikner, R, Bhattoa, HP, Cavalier, E. Practical considerations for the clinical application of bone turnover markers in osteoporosis. Calcif Tiusse Int 2023;112:148–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-021-00930-4 . DOI

Garnero, P. The contribution of collagen crosslinks to bone strength. BoneKEy Rep 2012;1:182. https://doi.org/10.1038/bonekey.2012.182 . DOI

Garnero, P, Ferreras, M, Karsdal, MA, Nicamhlaoibh, R, Risteli, J, Borel, O, et al.. The type I collagen fragments ICTP and CTX reveal distinct enzymatic pathways of bone collagen degradation. J Bone Miner Res 2023;18:859–67. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.5.859 . DOI

Cavalier, E, Souberbielle, JC, Gadisseur, R, Dubois, B, Krzesinski, JM, Delanaye, P. Inter-method variability in bone alkaline phosphatase measurement: clinical impact on the management of dialysis patients. Clin Biochem 2014;47:1227–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.04.007 . DOI

Hansen, YBL. Recommendations on measurement units – why and how. Eur J IFCC 2019;30:250–75.

Alonso, N, Zelzer, S, Eibinger, G, Herrmann, M. Vitamin D metabolites: analytical challenges and clinical relevance. Calcif Tissue Int 2023;112:158–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-022-00961-5 . DOI

Tang, JCY, Jackson, S, Walsh, NP, Greeves, J, Fraser, WD, Ball, N, et al.. Bioanalytical Facility team. The dynamic relationships between the active and catabolic vitamin D metabolites, their ratios, and associations with PTH. Sci Rep 2019;9:6974. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43462-6 . DOI

Dugar, A, Hoofnagle, AN, Sanchez, AP, Ward, DM, Corey-Bloom, J, Cheng, JH, et al.. The vitamin D metabolite ratio (VMR) is a biomarker of vitamin D status that is not affected by acute changes in vitamin D binding protein. Clin Chem 2023;69:718–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvad050 . DOI

Cavalier, E, Fraser, CG, Bhattoa, HP, Heijboer, AC, Makris, K, Vasikaran, S, et al.. the IFCC-IOF Committee for Bone Metabolism . Analytical performance specifications for the measurement uncertainty of 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D examinations. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;61:1561–6. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0176 . DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...