Recording of non-musculoskeletal manifestations, comorbidities and safety outcomes in European spondyloarthritis registries: a survey

. 2024 ; 8 (4) : rkae135. [epub] 20241105

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid39611201

OBJECTIVES: Real-world evidence is needed to inform treatment strategies for patients with PsA and axial SpA (axSpA) who have non-musculoskeletal manifestations (NMMs), various risk factors and comorbidities. International collaboration is required to ensure statistical power and to enhance generalizability. The first step forward is identifying which data are currently being collected. Across 17 registries participating in the European Spondyloarthritis Research Collaboration (EuroSpA), we aimed to map recording practices for NMMs, comorbidities and safety outcomes in patients with PsA and axSpA. METHODS: Through a survey with 4,420 questionnaire items, we explored the recording practices of 58 pre-defined conditions (i.e. NMMs, comorbidities and safety outcomes) covering 10 disease areas. In all registries we mapped for each condition whether it was recorded, the recording procedure and the potential to identify it through linkage to other national registries. RESULTS: Conditions were generally recorded at entry into the registry and clinical follow-up visits using a pre-specified list or a coding system. Most registries recorded conditions within the following disease areas: NMMs (number of registries, n = 15-16), cardiovascular diseases (n = 10-14), gastrointestinal diseases (n = 12-13), infections (n = 10-13) and death (n = 14). Nordic countries had the potential for data linkage and generally had limited recording of conditions in their registry, while other countries had comprehensive recording practices. CONCLUSION: A wide range of conditions were consistently recorded across the registries. The recording practices of many conditions and disease areas were comparable across the registries. Our findings support the potential for future collaborative research.

Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK

Amsterdam Rheumatology Immunology Center Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam The Netherlands

Center for Rheumatic Diseases University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest Romania

Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases Diakonhjemmet Hospital Oslo Norway

Centre for Rheumatology Research Landspitali University Hospital Reykjavik Iceland

Clinical Epidemiology Division Department of Medicine Solna Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases Rigshospitalet Glostrup Denmark

DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases Rigshospitalet Glostrup Denmark

Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health University of Milan Milan Italy

Department of Clinical Sciences Lund Rheumatology Skåne University Hospital Lund University Lund Sweden

Department of Internal Medicine Division of Rheumatology Dokuz Eylul School of Medicine Izmir Turkey

Department of Rheumatology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Rheumatology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Amsterdam University Medical Centers Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology and Department of Experimental Immunology Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Rheumatology and Medical Sciences ASST Gaetanoi Pini CTO Milan Italy

Department of Rheumatology East Tallinn Central Hospital Tallinn Estonia

Department of Rheumatology Geneva University Hospital Geneva Switzerland

Department of Rheumatology Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón Madrid Spain

Department of Rheumatology Slagelse Hospital Slagelse Denmark

Department of Rheumatology University Hospital Zurich University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Department of Rheumatology University Medical Centre Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia

Department Rheumatology and Immunology Inselspital University Hospital Bern Switzerland

Departments of Medicine and Rheumatology Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland

Deutsches Rheuma Forschungszentrum Berlin Epidemiologie Berlin Germany

Faculty of Medicine Complutense University of Madrid Madrid Spain

Faculty of Medicine University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland

Faculty of Medicine University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia

Institute of Rheumatology Prague Czech Republic

National Institute for Health Development Tallinn Estonia

Nova Medical School EpiDoC unit CEDOC Lisbon Portugal

Public Health Section Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences Elverum Norway

Research Unit Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand Norway

Research Unit Spanish Society of Rheumatology Madrid Spain

Reuma pt Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia Lisbon Portugal

Rheumatology Unit Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione e Rigenerativa e Area Jonica University of Bari Bari Italy

Rheumatology Unit Hospital dos Lusíadas Lisbon Portugal

Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation Statistics Group Zurich Switzerland

University of Eastern Finland and Hospital Nova Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Finland

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Ashrafi M, Ermann J, Weisman MH.. Spondyloarthritis evolution: what is in your history? Curr Opin Rheumatol 2020;32:321–9. PubMed

Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R. et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:25–31. PubMed

Bengtsson K, Forsblad-d’Elia H, Deminger A. et al. Incidence of extra-articular manifestations in ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis and undifferentiated spondyloarthritis: results from a national register-based cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021;60:2725–34. PubMed PMC

Gupta S, Syrimi Z, Hughes DM, Zhao SS.. Comorbidities in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int 2021;41:275–84. PubMed PMC

Zhao SS, Robertson S, Reich T. et al. Prevalence and impact of comorbidities in axial spondyloarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020;59(Suppl 4):iv47–57. PubMed PMC

Ramiro S, Nikiphorou E, Sepriano A. et al. ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2023;82:19–34. PubMed

Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Kerschbaumer A. et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2023 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:700–12. PubMed PMC

Ward MM, Deodhar A, Gensler LS. et al. 2019 update of the American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network recommendations for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019;71:1285–99. PubMed PMC

Singh JA, Guyatt G, Ogdie A. et al. 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation guideline for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. 2019;71:5–32. PubMed PMC

Coates LC, Corp N, van der Windt DA. et al. GRAPPA treatment recommendations: 2021 update. J Rheumatol 2022;49:52–4. PubMed

Sheffield KM, Dreyer NA, Murray JF, Faries DE, Klopchin MN.. Replication of randomized clinical trial results using real-world data: paving the way for effectiveness decisions. J Comp Eff Res 2020;9:1043–50. PubMed

Nordon C, Karcher H, Groenwold RHH. et al. The “efficacy–effectiveness gap”: historical background and current conceptualization. Value Health 2016;19:75–81. PubMed

Jones GT, Dean LE, Pathan E, Hollick RJ, MacFarlane GJ.. Real-world evidence of TNF inhibition in axial spondyloarthritis: can we generalise the results from clinical trials? Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:914–9. PubMed

Brahe CH, Ørnbjerg LM, Jacobsson L. et al. Retention and response rates in 14 261 PsA patients starting TNF inhibitor treatment-results from 12 countries in EuroSpA. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020;59:1640–50. PubMed

Michelsen B, Lindström U, Codreanu C. et al. Drug retention, inactive disease and response rates in 1860 patients with axial spondyloarthritis initiating secukinumab treatment: routine care data from 13 registries in the EuroSpA collaboration. RMD Open 2020;6:1–12. PubMed PMC

Linde L, Ørnbjerg LM, Rasmussen SH. et al. Commonalities and differences in set-up and data collection across European spondyloarthritis registries–results from the EuroSpA collaboration. Arthritis Res Ther 2023;25:205. PubMed PMC

Regierer AC, Weiß A, Baraliakos X. et al. [RABBIT-SpA: a new disease register for axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis]. Z Rheumatol 2020;79:135–42. PubMed

Önen F, Can G, Çapar S. et al. A real-life analysis of patients with rheumatologic diseases on biological treatments: data from TURKBIO Registry. Eur J Rheumatol 2022;9:82–7. PubMed PMC

Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL. et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019;95:103208. PubMed PMC

Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R. et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377–81. PubMed PMC

Hornik K; R Core Team. R FAQ. 2023. https://cran.r-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html (29 January 2024, date last accessed).

Radner H, Dixon W, Hyrich K, Askling J.. Consistency and utility of data items across European rheumatoid arthritis clinical cohorts and registers. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015;67:1219–29. PubMed

Kearsley-Fleet L, Závada J, Hetland ML. et al. The EULAR Study Group for Registers and Observational Drug Studies: comparability of the patient case mix in the European biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug registers. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2015;54:1074–9. PubMed

Curtis JR, Jain A, Askling J. et al. A comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes in selected European and U.S. rheumatoid arthritis registries. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2010;40:2–14.e1. PubMed PMC

Carmona L, Gómez-Reino J, González-González R.. Spanish registry of adverse events of biological therapies in rheumatic diseases (BIOBADASER): report as of January 14, 2005. Reumatol Clin 2005;1:95–111. PubMed

Chatzidionysiou K, Hetland ML, Frisell T. et al. Opportunities and challenges for Real-World studies on chronic inflammatory joint diseases through data enrichment and collaboration between national registers: the Nordic example. RMD Open 2018;4:e000655. PubMed PMC

Furu K, Wettermark B, Andersen M. et al. The Nordic countries as a cohort for pharmacoepidemiological research. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2010;106:86–94. PubMed

Laas K, Teär CM, Pehme L. et al. Reumatoidartriidi patsientide haigestumus tuberkuloosi enne ja pärast bioloogilise ravi kasutusele- võttu Eestis : kahe perioodi võrdlus. Eesti Arst 2019;98:555–60.

Rotar Z, Svetina P, Tomsic M, Hočevar A, Prapotnik S.. Tuberculosis among patients treated with TNF inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis in Slovenia: a cohort study. BMJ Open 2020;10:e034356. PubMed PMC

Dixon WG, Carmona L, Finckh A. et al. EULAR points to consider when establishing, analysing and reporting safety data of biologics registers in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:1596–602. PubMed

Courvoisier DS, Lauper K, Kedra J. et al. EULAR points to consider when analysing and reporting comparative effectiveness research using observational data in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 2022;81:780–5. PubMed

Baillet A, Gossec L, Carmona L. et al. Points to consider for reporting, screening for and preventing selected comorbidities in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases in daily practice: a EULAR initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:965–73. PubMed

Verstappen SMM, Askling J, Berglind N. et al. Methodological challenges when comparing demographic and clinical characteristics of international observational registries. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015;67:1637–45. PubMed

Lesko CR, Jacobson LP, Althoff KN. et al. Collaborative, pooled and harmonized study designs for epidemiologic research: challenges and opportunities. Int J Epidemiol 2018;47:654–68. PubMed PMC

Lindström U, Di Giuseppe D, Delcoigne B. et al. Effectiveness and treatment retention of TNF inhibitors when used as monotherapy versus comedication with csDMARDs in 15 332 patients with psoriatic arthritis. Data from the EuroSpA collaboration. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:1410–8. PubMed PMC

Ørnbjerg LM, Brahe CH, Askling J. et al. Treatment response and drug retention rates in 24 195 biologic-naïve patients with axial spondyloarthritis initiating TNFi treatment: routine care data from 12 registries in the EuroSpA collaboration. Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78:1536–44. PubMed

Aymon R, Mongin D, Bergstra SA. et al. Evaluation of discontinuation for adverse events of JAK inhibitors and bDMARDs in an international collaboration of rheumatoid arthritis registers (the ‘JAK-pot’ study). Ann Rheum Dis 2024;83:421–8. PubMed PMC

Nyberg F, Askling J, Berglind N. et al. Using epidemiological registry data to provide background rates as context for adverse events in a rheumatoid arthritis drug development program: a coordinated approach. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2015;24:1121–32. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...