Evaluation of discontinuation for adverse events of JAK inhibitors and bDMARDs in an international collaboration of rheumatoid arthritis registers (the 'JAK-pot' study)
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu pozorovací studie, časopisecké články
PubMed
38071508
PubMed Central
PMC10958307
DOI
10.1136/ard-2023-224670
PII: S0003-4967(24)00052-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Antirheumatic Agents, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Biological Therapy, Epidemiology,
- MeSH
- antirevmatika * terapeutické užití MeSH
- azetidiny * MeSH
- inhibitory Janus kinas * terapeutické užití MeSH
- inhibitory TNF terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- puriny * MeSH
- pyrazoly * MeSH
- revmatoidní artritida * farmakoterapie MeSH
- sulfonamidy * MeSH
- TNF-alfa MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antirevmatika * MeSH
- azetidiny * MeSH
- baricitinib MeSH Prohlížeč
- inhibitory Janus kinas * MeSH
- inhibitory TNF MeSH
- puriny * MeSH
- pyrazoly * MeSH
- sulfonamidy * MeSH
- TNF-alfa MeSH
BACKGROUND: In a clinical trial setting, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) taking the Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) tofacitinib demonstrated higher adverse events rates compared with those taking the tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) adalimumab or etanercept. OBJECTIVE: Compare treatment discontinuations for adverse events (AEs) among second-line therapies in an international real-world RA population. METHODS: Patients initiating JAKi, TNFi or a biological with another mode of action (OMA) from 17 registers participating in the 'JAK-pot' collaboration were included. The primary outcome was the rate of treatment discontinuation due to AEs. We used unadjusted and adjusted cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models to compare treatment discontinuations for AEs among treatment groups by class, but also evaluating separately the specific type of JAKi. RESULTS: Of the 46 913 treatment courses included, 12 523 were JAKi (43% baricitinib, 40% tofacitinib, 15% upadacitinib, 2% filgotinib), 23 391 TNFi and 10 999 OMA. The adjusted cause-specific hazard rate of treatment discontinuation for AEs was similar for TNFi versus JAKi (1.00, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.10) and higher for OMA versus JAKi (1.11, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.23), lower with TNFi compared with tofacitinib (0.81, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.90), but higher for TNFi versus baricitinib (1.15, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.30) and lower for TNFi versus JAKi in patients 65 or older with at least one cardiovascular risk factor (0.79, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.97). CONCLUSION: While JAKi overall were not associated with more treatment discontinuations for AEs, subgroup analyses suggest varying patterns with specific JAKi, such as tofacitinib, compared with TNFi. However, these observations should be interpreted cautiously, given the observational study design.
Center for Rheumatic Diseases University of Bucharest Bucuresti Romania
Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases Diakonhjemmet Hospital Oslo Norway
Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis The University of Manchester Manchester UK
DiMePRe J Rheumatology Unit University of Bari Bari Puglia Italy
Division of Medicine ROB FIN Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
Division of Rheumatology Firat University Faculty of Medicine Elazig Turkey
Division of Rheumatology Geneva University Hospitals Geneve Switzerland
Institut de recherche en Rhumatologie CHUM Montreal Quebec Canada
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre Manchester UK
Programme Area Epidemiology DRFZ Berlin Germany
Rheumatology DANBIO Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg North Denmark Region Denmark
Rheumatology Division Geneva University Hospitals Geneve Switzerland
Rheumatology Hospital Clinico Universitario Santiago de Compostela Spain
Rheumatology Institute of Rheumatology Praha Czech Republic
Rheumatology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
Rheumatology Marmara University School of Medicine Istanbul Turkey
Rheumatology Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
Skeletal Biology and Engineering research Center KU Leuven Leuven Flanders Belgium
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Lauper K, Hyrich KL. How effective are JAK-inhibitors? Perspectives from clinical trials and real-world studies. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2022;18:207–20. 10.1080/1744666X.2021.1982383 PubMed DOI
Rubbert-Roth A, Enejosa J, Pangan AL, et al. . Trial of upadacitinib or abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1511–21. 10.1056/NEJMoa2008250 PubMed DOI
Taylor PC, Keystone EC, van der Heijde D, et al. . Baricitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2017;376:652–62. 10.1056/NEJMoa1608345 PubMed DOI
Ytterberg SR, Bhatt DL, Mikuls TR, et al. . Cardiovascular and cancer risk with tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2022;386:316–26. 10.1056/NEJMoa2109927 PubMed DOI
Lauper K, Iudici M, Mongin D, et al. . Effectiveness of TNF-inhibitors, abatacept, Il6-inhibitors and JAK-inhibitors in 31 846 patients with rheumatoid arthritis in 19 registers from the ‘JAK-pot’ collaboration. Ann Rheum Dis 2022;81:1358–66. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-222586 PubMed DOI PMC
Pombo-Suarez M, Sanchez-Piedra C, Gómez-Reino J, et al. . After JAK inhibitor failure: to cycle or to switch, that is the question – data from the JAK-pot collaboration of registries. Ann Rheum Dis 2023;82:175–81. 10.1136/ard-2022-222835 PubMed DOI
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. . The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:344–9. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 PubMed DOI
Austin PC, Lee DS, Fine JP. Introduction to the analysis of survival data in the presence of competing risks. Circulation 2016;133:601–9. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017719 PubMed DOI PMC
Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 1999;94:496–509. 10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144 DOI
Charles-Schoeman C, Buch MH, Dougados M, et al. . Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events with tofacitinib versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with or without a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a post hoc analysis from ORAL surveillance. Ann Rheum Dis 2023;82:119–29. 10.1136/ard-2022-222259 PubMed DOI PMC
Kristensen LE, Danese S, Yndestad A, et al. . Identification of two tofacitinib subpopulations with different relative risk versus TNF inhibitors: an analysis of the open label, randomised controlled study ORAL surveillance. Ann Rheum Dis 2023;82:901–10. 10.1136/ard-2022-223715 PubMed DOI PMC
Nocturne G, Pascaud J, Ly B, et al. . JAK inhibitors alter NK cell functions and may impair immunosurveillance against lymphomagenesis. Cell Mol Immunol 2020;17:552–3. 10.1038/s41423-019-0320-3 PubMed DOI PMC
Frisell T, Bower H, Morin M, et al. . Safety of biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis as used in clinical practice: results from the ARTIS programme. Ann Rheum Dis 2023;82:601–10. 10.1136/ard-2022-223762 PubMed DOI PMC