After JAK inhibitor failure: to cycle or to switch, that is the question - data from the JAK-pot collaboration of registries
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
36100351
DOI
10.1136/ard-2022-222835
PII: S0003-4967(24)08575-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Antirheumatic Agents, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Therapeutics,
- MeSH
- antirevmatika * terapeutické užití MeSH
- inhibitory Janus kinas * terapeutické užití MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- registrace MeSH
- revmatoidní artritida * farmakoterapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antirevmatika * MeSH
- inhibitory Janus kinas * MeSH
OBJECTIVES: The expanded therapeutic arsenal in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) raises new clinical questions. The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of cycling Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) with switching to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) in patients with RA after failure to the first JAKi. METHODS: This is a nested cohort study within data pooled from an international collaboration of 17 national registries (JAK-pot collaboration). Data from patients with RA with JAKi treatment failure and who were subsequently treated with either a second JAKi or with a bDMARD were prospectively collected. Differences in drug retention rates after second treatment initiation were assessed by log-rank test and Cox regression analysis adjusting for potential confounders. Change in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) over time was estimated using a linear regression model, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: 365 cycling and 1635 switching patients were studied. Cyclers were older and received a higher number of previous bDMARDs. Both strategies showed similar observed retention rates after 2 years of follow-up. However, adjusted analysis revealed that cycling was associated with higher retention (p=0.04). Among cyclers, when the first JAKi was discontinued due to an adverse event (AE), it was more likely that the second JAKi would also be stopped due to an AE. Improvement in CDAI over time was similar in both strategies. CONCLUSIONS: After failing the first JAKi, cycling JAKi and switching to a bDMARD appear to have similar effectiveness. Caution is advised if an AE was the reason to stop the first JAKi.
Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Charité University Medicine Berlin Germany
Department of Rheumatology Charles University Praha Czech Republic
Department of Rheumatology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
Department of Rheumatology University Medical Centre Ljubljana Slovenia
Division of Rheumatology and Research Diakonhjemmet Hospital Oslo Norway
Division of Rheumatology Marmara University School of Medicine Istanbul Turkey
Epidemiology Unit German Rheumatism Research Center Berlin Germany
Faculty of Medicine University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia
Fundacion IDIS Hospital Clinico Universitario Santiago de Compostela Spain
GISEA DETO Rheumatology Unit University of Bari Bari Italy
Health Technology Assessment Agency Instituto de Salud Carlos 3 Madrid Spain
Institut de Recherche en Rhumatologie de Montréal University of Montreal Montreal Quebec Canada
Private Office Hollabrunn Austria
Rheumatology Center of Rheumatic Diseases University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest Romania
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org