Electrophysiological Phenotype-Genotype Study of Sustained Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia in Inherited, High Arrhythmic Risk, Left Ventricular Cardiomyopathy
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Observational Study
- Keywords
- cytoskeleton, desmosome, electrophysiology, sarcoplasmic reticulum, ventricular tachycardiagenotype,
- MeSH
- Action Potentials MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac MeSH
- Phenotype * MeSH
- Genetic Predisposition to Disease * MeSH
- Genetic Association Studies MeSH
- Genotype MeSH
- Risk Assessment MeSH
- Cardiomyopathies genetics physiopathology diagnosis MeSH
- Catheter Ablation MeSH
- Tachycardia, Ventricular * genetics physiopathology diagnosis MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Observational Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
BACKGROUND: Among inherited cardiomyopathies involving the left ventricle, whether dilated or not, certain genotypes carry a well-established arrhythmic risk, notably manifested as sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT). Nonetheless, the precise localization and electrophysiological profile of this substrate remain undisclosed across different genotypes. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with cardiomyopathy and left ventricle involvement due to high-risk genetic variants and SMVT treated by electrophysiological study were recruited from 18 European/US centers. Electrophysiological study, imaging, and outcomes data after ablation were assessed in relation to genotype. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included (49.6 Q1-Q3 [40-60] years, 76% men). They were divided into 4 groups according to the affected protein: desmosomal (DSP, PKP2, DSG2, and DSC2), nuclear membrane (LMNA and TMEM43), cytoskeleton (FLNC and DES), and sarcoplasmic reticulum (PLN). Desmosomal genes, TMEM43, and PLN were associated with biventricular disease, while variants in LMNA and cytoskeleton genes had predominant left ventricle involvement (P=0.001). The location of the clinical-SMVT substrate was significantly different based on genotype (P=0.005). DSP and cytoskeleton genes presented SMVTs with right bundle branch block morphology, which origin was identified in the inferolateral segments of the left ventricle. The other desmosomal genes (PKP2 and DSG2), along with TMEM43, showed SMVTs with left bundle branch block morphology and predominantly right ventricular substrate. In contrast, LMNA substrate was mainly observed in the interventricular septum. During a median of 26 Q1-Q3 (10.6-65) months, 27% of patients experienced recurrences of clinical SMVT with differences between genotypes (log-rank 0.016). Nuclear membrane genes demonstrated the highest recurrence rate compared with desmosomal genes (hazard ratio, 4.56 [95% CI, 1.5-13.8]). CONCLUSIONS: The anatomic substrate of SMVTs shows a strong correlation with the underlying genotype, electrocardiographic morphology, and recurrence rate. Particularly, patients with nuclear membrane gene variants have a significantly higher recurrence rate compared with those with desmosomal gene variants.
Barts Heart Centre London United Kingdom
Cardiac Electrophysiology Section Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares
Clinic Hospital Barcelona Spain
Division of Cardiology School of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD
Institut Klinické a Experimentální Medicíny Prague Czech Republic
Institute of Cardiovascular Science University College London United Kingdom
Monzino Cardiologic Centre IRCCS Milan Italy
Puerta del Hierro Hospital Madrid Spain
San Cecilio University Hospital Granada Spain
Santiago University Clinical Hospital Spain
University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti Umberto 1 Lancisi Salesi Ancona Italy
References provided by Crossref.org