Impact of concomitant aortic valve replacement in patients with mild-to-moderate aortic valve regurgitation undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation: EUROMACS analysis
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
39655652
PubMed Central
PMC11974483
DOI
10.1111/aor.14926
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- EUROMACS, LVAD, advanced heart failure, aortic regurgitation,
- MeSH
- Aortic Valve * surgery MeSH
- Aortic Valve Insufficiency * surgery complications mortality MeSH
- Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation * adverse effects MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Heart-Assist Devices * adverse effects MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Heart Failure * complications mortality surgery therapy MeSH
- Propensity Score MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy may lead to an aortic regurgitation, limiting left ventricular unloading and causing adverse events. Whether concomitant aortic valve replacement may improve outcomes in patients with preoperative mild-to-moderate aortic regurgitation remains unclear. METHODS: A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis of adult patients with preoperative mild-to-moderate aortic regurgitation undergoing durable LVAD implantation between 01/01/2011 and 30/11/2021 was performed. Patients undergoing concomitant valve surgery other than biological aortic valve replacement were excluded, resulting in 77 with concomitant biological aortic valve replacement and 385 without. RESULTS: Following 1:1 propensity score matching, two groups of 55 patients with and without biological aortic valve replacement were obtained, (mean age 59 ± 11 years, 92% male, 59.1% HeartWare). Aortic regurgitation was mild in 72.7% and 76.4% and moderate in 27.3% and 23.6% in non-replacement and replacement cohorts respectively. The 30-day survival was 89.1% vs. 85.5% (p = 0.59), 1-year survival 69.1% vs. 56.4% (p = 0.19), and 2-year survival 61.8% vs. 47.3% (p = 0.10) in the non-replacement and replacement groups, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 1.2 years, non-replacement patients had a higher incidence of pump thrombosis (11 [20%] vs. 3 [5.5%], p = 0.022) and fewer major bleedings (2 [3.6%] vs. 11 [20%], p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Compared with those treated conservatively, patients with mild-to-moderate aortic regurgitation undergoing concomitant aortic valve replacement during LVAD implantation have a similar survival up to 2 years on support. Patients with concomitant valve replacement had a higher risk of bleeding complications but fewer pump thromboses.
Cardiac Surgery Unit Cardiothoracic Department University Hospital of Udine Udine Italy
Department of Cardiac Surgery University Hospital Leuven Leuven Belgium
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité Berlin Germany
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
Department of Health Sciences and Technology ETH Zurich Zürich Switzerland
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna Bologna Italy
Department of Thoracic Cardiac and Vascular Surgery Heart and Diabetes Centre Bad Oeynhausen Germany
See more in PubMed
Cowger J, Rao V, Massey T, Sun B, May‐Newman K, Jorde U, et al. Comprehensive review and suggested strategies for the detection and management of aortic insufficiency in patients with a continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34:149–157. PubMed
Cowger JA, Aaronson KD, Romano MA, Haft J, Pagani FD. Consequences of aortic insufficiency during long‐term axial continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device support. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33:1233–1240. PubMed
Saito T, Wassilew K, Gorodetski B, Stein J, Falk V, Krabatsch T, et al. Aortic valve pathology in patients supported by continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device. Circ J. 2016;80:1371–1377. PubMed
Bouabdallaoui N, El‐Hamamsy I, Pham M, Giraldeau G, Parent MC, Carrier M, et al. Aortic regurgitation in patients with a left ventricular assist device: a contemporary review. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37:1289–1297. PubMed
Saeed D, Feldman D, Banayosy AE, Birks E, Blume E, Cowger J, et al. The 2023 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: a 10‐ year update. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023;42:e1–e222. PubMed
Potapov EV, Antonides C, Crespo‐Leiro MG, Combes A, Färber G, Hannan MM, et al. 2019 EACTS expert consensus on long‐term mechanical circulatory support. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;56:230–270. PubMed PMC
Robertson JO, Naftel DC, Myers SL, Prasad S, Mertz GD, Itoh A, et al. Concomitant aortic valve procedures in patients undergoing implantation of continuous‐flow left ventricular assist devices: an INTERMACS database analysis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34:797–805. PubMed PMC
Loforte A, de By T, Gliozzi G, Schönrath F, Mariani C, Netuka I, et al. Impact of concomitant cardiac valvular surgery during implantation of continuous‐flow left ventricular assist devices: a European registry for patients with mechanical circulatory support (EUROMACS) analysis. Artif Organs. 2022;46:813–826. PubMed
Dranishnikov N, Stepanenko A, Potapov EV, Dandel M, Siniawski H, Mladenow A, et al. Simultaneous aortic valve replacement in left ventricular assist device recipients: single‐center experience. Int J Artif Organs. 2012;35:489–494. PubMed
Truby LK, Garan AR, Givens RC, Wayda B, Takeda K, Yuzefpolskaya M, et al. Aortic insufficiency during contemporary left ventricular assist device support: analysis of the INTERMACS registry. JACC Heart Fail. 2018;6:951–960. PubMed PMC
Austin PC. The use of propensity score methods with survival or time‐to‐event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments. Stat Med. 2014;33:1242–1258. PubMed PMC
Sarwari H, Schaefer A, Barten MJ, Conradi L. TAVI using a self‐expandable device for aortic regurgitation following LVAD implantation. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Rep. 2019;8:e33–e36. PubMed PMC
Ando M, Ono M. Concomitant or late aortic valve intervention and its efficacy for aortic insufficiency associated with continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device implantation. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:1029984. PubMed PMC
Fried J, Garan AR, Shames S, Masoumi A, Yuzefpolskaya M, Takeda K, et al. Aortic root thrombosis in patients supported with continuous‐flow left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37:1425–1432. PubMed PMC
Veenis JF, Brugts JJ, Yalcin YC, Roest S, Bekkers JA, Manintveld OC, et al. Aortic root thrombus after left ventricular assist device implantation and aortic valve replacement. ESC Heart Fail. 2020;7:3208–3212. PubMed PMC
Potapov EV, Nersesian G, Lewin D, Özbaran M, de By TMMH, Stein J, et al. Propensity score‐based analysis of long‐term follow‐up in patients supported with durable centrifugal left ventricular assist devices: the EUROMACS analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;60:579–587. PubMed
Yalcin YC, Veenis JF, Brugts JJ, Antonides CFJ, Veen KM, Muslem R, et al. Rate of thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients undergoing concomitant aortic valve surgery with left ventricular assist device implantation. Int J Cardiol. 2022;359:39–45. PubMed
Hinkov H, Lee CB, Pitts L, Lanmüller P, Klein C, Kukucka M, et al. Transcatheter management of pure native aortic valve regurgitation in patients with left ventricular assist device. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;65. PubMed