The visual evaluation of data derived from screening and optimization experiments in the development of new analytical methods poses a considerable time investment and introduces the risk of subjectivity. This study presents a novel approach to processing such data, based on factor analysis of mixed data and hierarchical clustering - multivariate techniques implemented in the R programming language. The methodology is demonstrated in the early-stage screening and optimization of the chromatographic separation of 15 structurally diverse drugs that affect the central nervous system, using a custom R Language script. The presented explorative approach enabled the identification of key parameters affecting the separation and significantly reduced the time required to evaluate the comprehensive dataset from the screening experiments. Based on the data analysis results, the optimal combination of stationary phase and mobile phase composition was selected, considering retention, overall resolution, and peak shape of compounds. Additionally, compounds vulnerable to changes in selected chromatographic conditions were identified. As a complement to the presented R Language script, a web-based application ChromaFAMDeX has been developed to offer an intuitive interface that enhances the accessibility of the used statistical methods. Accompanying the publication, the R script and the link to the standalone application are provided, enabling replication and adaptation of the methodology.

Department of Medical Biochemistry Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové Charles University Šimkova 870 500 03 Hradec Králové Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Wang JN, Han XL. Analytical challenges of shotgun lipidomics at different resolution of measurements, Trac-Trend. Anal Chem. 2019;121:1–27. 10.1016/j.trac.2019.115697. PubMed PMC

Hsu FF. Mass spectrometry-based shotgun lipidomics - a critical review from the technical point of view. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410:6387–409. 10.1007/s00216-018-1252-y. PubMed PMC

Furuhashi T, Weckwerth W. Isomer analysis by mass spectrometry in clinical science. Trac-Trend Anal Chem. 2023;159: 116907. 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116907.

Qiu JB, Chen HD, Ji Y, Li TS, Li AF. Evaluation of different strategies to minimize the matrix effects on LC-MS/MS analysis of multiple lipophilic shellfish toxins in both acidic and alkaline chromatographic conditions. Toxicon. 2020;188:16–26. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.10.002. PubMed

An GH, Bach T, Abdallah I, Nalbant D. Aspects of matrix and analyte effects in clinical pharmacokinetic sample analyses using LC-ESI/MS/MS - Two case examples. J Pharmaceut Biomed. 2020;183: 113135. 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113135. PubMed PMC

Kovalczuk T, Jech M, Poustka J, Hajslová J. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: A novel challenge in multiresidue pesticide analysis in food. Anal Chim Acta. 2006;577:8–17. 10.1016/j.aca.2006.06.023. PubMed

Dorkó Z, Verbic T, Horvai G. Selectivity in analytical chemistry: Two interpretations for univariate methods. Talanta. 2015;132:680–4. 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.10.018. PubMed

Tome T, Zigart N, Casar Z, Obreza A. Development and Optimization of Liquid Chromatography Analytical Methods by Using AQbD Principles: Overview and Recent Advances. Org Process Res Dev. 2019;23:1784–802. 10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00238.

Szabolcs F, Molnár I, Software-Assisted Method Development in High Performance Liquid Chromatography, 1st ed., World Scientific Pub Co Inc, 2018, pp. 11–93

Giorgi FM, Ceraolo C, Mercatelli D. The R Language: An Engine for Bioinformatics and Data Science. Life-Basel. 2022;12:1–25. 10.3390/life12050648. PubMed PMC

Zisi C, Pappa-Louisi A, Nikitas P. Separation optimization in HPLC analysis implemented in R programming language. J Chromatogr A. 2020;1617: 460823. 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460823. PubMed

Peris-Díaz MD, Alcoriza-Balaguer MI, García-Cañaveras JC, Santonja F, Sentandreu E, Lahoz A. RpeakChrom: Novel R package for the automated characterization and optimization of column efficiency in high-performance liquid chromatography analysis. Electrophoresis. 2017;38:2985–95. 10.1002/elps.201700180. PubMed

ChromatographR. 2023. https://ethanbass.github.io/chromatographR/index.html . Accessed on 10.1. 2024.

Ferreira SLC, Lemos VA, de Carvalho VS, da Silva EGP, Queiroz AFS, Felix CSA, da Silva DLF, Dourado GB, Oliveira RV. Multivariate optimization techniques in analytical chemistry-an overview. Microchem J. 2018;140:176–82. 10.1016/j.microc.2018.04.002.

Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P. Principal Component Analysis. Chemometr Intell Lab. 1987;2:37–52. 10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9.

Abdi H, Williams LJ. Principal component analysis, Wires. Comput Stat. 2010;2:433–59. 10.1002/wics.101.

Bro R, Smilde AK. Principal component analysis. Anal Methods-Uk. 2014;6:2812–31. 10.1039/c3ay41907j.

Wold S, Sjöström M, Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2001;58:109–30. 10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00155-1.

Souza AS, Bezerra MA, Cerqueira UMFM, Rodrigues CJO, Santos BC, Novaes CG, Almeida ERV. An introductory review on the application of principal component analysis in the data exploration of the chemical analysis of food samples. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2024;33:1323–36. 10.1007/s10068-023-01509-5. PubMed PMC

Felinger A, Kele M, Guiochon G. Identification of the factors that influence the reproducibility of chromatographic retention data. J Chromatogr A. 2001;913:23–48. 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)01044-X. PubMed

Pagès J. Multiple factor analysis by example using R, 1st ed., CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2014, pp. 1–246.

Bécue-Bertaut M, Pagès J. Multiple factor analysis and clustering of a mixture of quantitative, categorical and frequency data. Comput Stat Data An. 2008;52:3255–68. 10.1016/j.csda.2007.09.023.

Everitt B. Cluster analysis. 5th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley; 2011. p. 71–110.

Dolan JW, Snyder LR, Djordjevic NM, Hill DW, Waeghe TJ. Reversed-phase liquid chromatographic separation of complex samples by optimizing temperature and gradient time I. Peak capacity limitations, J Chromatogr A. 1999;857:1–20. 10.1016/S0021-9673(99)00765-7. PubMed

Le S, Josse J, Husson F, FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw. 25 (2008) 1–18, 10.18637/jss.v025.i01.

factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. 2020. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/factoextra/index.html. Accessed on 10.1.2024.

Factoshiny: Perform Factorial Analysis from ‘FactoMineR’ with a Shiny Application. 2023. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Factoshiny/index.html. Accessed on 10.1.2024.

Kuhn M. Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package, J Stat Softw. 2008;28:1–26. 10.18637/jss.v028.i05.

3D Visualization Using OpenGL. 2024. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rgl/index.html. Accessed on 10.1.2024.

ape: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2023. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ape/index.html.  Accessed on 10.1.2024.

Lenth RV. Response-Surface Methods in R, Using rsm. J Stat Softw. 2009;32:1–17. 10.18637/jss.v032.i07.

ggrepel: Automatically Position Non-Overlapping Text Labels with ‘ggplot2’. 2024. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggrepel/index.html. Accessed on 10.1.2024

Villanueva RAM, Chen ZJ. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, 2nd ed., Meas-Interdiscip Res. 2019;17:160–167. 10.1080/15366367.2019.1565254.

shiny: Web Application Framework for R. (2024). https://shiny.posit.co/ . Accessed on 10.4. 2024.

Box GEP, Behnken DW. Some New Three Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables. Technometrics. 1960;2:455–75. 10.2307/1266454.

M.J. Greenacre, Correspondence analysis in practice, 3rd ed., CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2017, pp. 1–233.