Nutritional support is associated with improved clinical outcomes in critically ill patients; however, loss of muscle mass during critical illness leads to weakness, delayed return to work, and increased healthcare consumption. Animal data have suggested that intermittent feeding decreases protein catabolism. This study was aimed at determining whether the mode of enteral nutrition administration might lead to differences in meeting nutritional goals, tolerance, and complications. A prospective, randomized, single-center clinical trial was conducted in four intensive care units in the Czech Republic. Critically ill adult patients with high nutritional risk were randomized to continuous or intermittent enteral nutrition administration through a tolerance-driven protocol. The primary outcome was the time to reach the energetic target. Secondary outcomes included assessment of tolerance (high gastric residual volume, vomitus, and diarrhea), complications (aspiration or ventilator-associated pneumonia), and 28-day mortality. A total of 300 patients were randomized, and 294 were analyzed: 148 in the continuous arm and 146 in the intermittent arm. Regarding the primary outcome, log-rank test indicated that the intermittent group, compared with continuous group, had a statistically significantly shorter time (p = 0.009) and greater diarrhea occurrence (7 (4.7%) vs. 16 (11%), p = 0.049). No statistically significant differences in ventilator-associated pneumonia incidence (18 (12.2%) vs. 18 (12.3%), p = 0.965), 28-day mortality (46 (31.1%) vs. 40 (27.4%), p = 0.488), and other secondary outcomes were observed between groups. Thus, intermittent enteral nutrition was superior to continuous enteral nutrition in terms of time to reach the energetic target with the tolerance-driven administration protocol but was associated with higher diarrhea incidence. No statistically significant differences in the other secondary outcomes were observed.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine University Hospital Brno Czech Republic

Department of Neurosurgery Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Department of Neurosurgery University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic

Department of Pharmacology Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Jihlavska 20 Brno 625 00 Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

McClave, S. A. et al. Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the adult critically ill patient: society of critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N). JPEN J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr.40, 59–211 (2016). PubMed

Singer, P. et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin. Nutr.38, 48–79 (2019). PubMed

Taylor, S. J., Fettes, S. B., Jewkes, C. & Nelson, R. J. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial to determine the effect of early enhanced enteral nutrition on clinical outcome in mechanically ventilated patients suffering head injury. Crit. Care Med.27, 2525–2531 (1999). PubMed

Patel, J. J. et al. Phase 3 pilot randomized controlled trial comparing early Trophic Enteral Nutrition with no Enteral Nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock. JPEN J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr.44, 866–873 (2020). PubMed

Vanhorebeek, I., Latronico, N. & Van den Berghe, G. ICU-acquired weakness. Intensive Care Med.46, 637–653 (2020). PubMed PMC

Deane, A. M. et al. Outcomes six months after delivering 100% or 70% of enteral calorie requirements during critical illness (TARGET). A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am. J. Respir Crit. Care Med.201, 814–822 (2020). PubMed

Ichimaru, S. Methods of Enteral Nutrition Administration in critically ill patients: continuous, cyclic, intermittent, and Bolus Feeding. Nutr. Clin. Pract.33, 790–795 (2018). PubMed

Gazzaneo, M. C. et al. Intermittent bolus feeding has a greater stimulatory effect on protein synthesis in skeletal muscle than continuous feeding in neonatal pigs. J. Nutr.141, 2152–2158 (2011). PubMed PMC

El-Kadi, S. W. et al. Intermittent bolus feeding promotes greater lean growth than continuous feeding in a neonatal piglet model. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.108, 830–841 (2018). PubMed PMC

Bohé, J., Low, J. F., Wolfe, R. R. & Rennie, M. J. Latency and duration of stimulation of human muscle protein synthesis during continuous infusion of amino acids. J. Physiol.15, 575–579 (2001). PubMed PMC

Kocan, M. J. & Hickisch, S. M. A comparison of continuous and intermittent enteral nutrition in NICU patients. J. Neurosci. Nurs.18, 333–337 (1986). PubMed

Gowardman, J. et al. Intermittent enteral nutrition–a comparative study examining the effect on gastric pH and microbial colonization rates. Anaesth. Intensive Care. 31, 28–33 (2003). PubMed

MacLeod, J. B. et al. Prospective randomized control trial of intermittent versus continuous gastric feeds for critically ill trauma patients. J. Trauma.63, 57–61 (2007). PubMed

McNelly, A. S. et al. Effect of intermittent or continuous feed on muscle wasting in critical illness: a phase 2 clinical trial. Chest158, 183–194 (2020). PubMed

Heffernan, A. J. et al. Comparison of continuous versus intermittent enteral feeding in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Care. 2610.1186/s13054-022-04140-8 (2022). PubMed PMC

Evans, D. C. et al. Continuous versus bolus tube feeds: does the modality affect glycemic variability, tube feeding volume, caloric intake, or insulin utilization? Int. J. Crit. Illn. Inj Sci.6, 9–15 (2016). PubMed PMC

Serpa, L. F., Kimura, M., Faintuch, J. & Ceconello, I. Effects of continuous versus bolus infusion of enteral nutrition in critical patients. Rev. Hosp. Clin. Fac. Med. Sao Paulo. 58, 9–14 (2003). PubMed

Nasiri, M., Farsi, Z., Ahangari, M. & Dadgari, F. Comparison of intermittent and bolus enteral feeding methods on enteral feeding intolerance of patients with sepsis: a triple-blind controlled trial in intensive care units. Middle East. J. Dig. Dis.9, 218–227 (2017). PubMed PMC

Dionne, J. C. et al. Diarrhea during critical illness: a multicenter cohort study. Intensive Care Med.48, 570–579 (2022). PubMed

Steevens, E. C., Lipscomb, A. F., Poole, G. V. & Sacks, G. S. Comparison of continuous vs intermittent nasogastric enteral feeding in trauma patients: perceptions and practice. Nutr. Clin. Pract.17, 118–122 (2002). PubMed

Ma, Y. et al. Intermittent versus continuous enteral nutrition on feeding intolerance in critically ill adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int. J. Nurs. Stud.113, 103783. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103783 (2021). PubMed

Thong, D., Halim, Z., Chia, J., Chua, F. & Wong, A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of continuous vs intermittent enteral nutrition in critically ill adults. JPEN J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr.46, 1243–1257 (2022). PubMed

Chowdhury, A. H. et al. Effects of Bolus and continuous nasogastric feeding on gastric emptying, small bowel water content, superior mesenteric artery blood flow, and plasma hormone concentrations in healthy adults: a randomized crossover study. Ann. Surg.263, 450–457 (2016). PubMed PMC

Martinez, E. E., Fasano, A. & Mehta, N. M. Gastrointestinal function in critical illness-a complex interplay between the nervous and enteroendocrine systems. Pediatr. Med.3, 23 (2020).

Kadamani, I., Itani, M., Zahran, E. & Taha, N. Incidence of aspiration and gastrointestinal complications in critically ill patients using continuous versus bolus infusion of enteral nutrition: a pseudo-randomised controlled trial. Aust Crit. Care. 27, 188–193 (2014). PubMed

Gaitanidis, A. et al. Enteral nutrition is associated with high rates of pneumonia in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute pancreatitis. J. Crit. Care. 69, 154012. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154012 (2022). PubMed

Chen, S. et al. Trends and Development in Enteral Nutrition Application for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: a Scientometric Research Study (1996–2018). Front. Pharmacol.10, 246. 10.3389/par.2019.00246 (2019). PubMed PMC

Isac, C., Samson, H. R. & John, A. Prevention of VAP: endless evolving evidences-systematic literature review. Nurs. Forum. 56, 905–915 (2021). PubMed

Bear, D. E., Hart, N. & Puthucheary, Z. Continuous or intermittent feeding: pros and cons. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care. 24, 256–261 (2018). PubMed

Van Dyck, L. & Casaer, M. P. Intermittent or continuous feeding: any difference during the first week? Curr. Opin. Crit. Care. 25, 356–362 (2019). PubMed

Hrdy, O. et al. Incidence of muscle wasting in the critically ill: a prospective observational cohort study. Sci. Rep.13, 742. 10.1038/s41598-023-28071-8 (2023). PubMed PMC

Almirall, J., Boixeda, R., de la Torre, M. C. & Torres, A. Aspiration pneumonia: a renewed perspective and practical approach. Respir Med.185, 106485. 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106485 (2021). PubMed

Maloney, J. P. & Ryan, T. A. Detection of aspiration in enterally fed patients: a requiem for bedside monitors of aspiration. JPEN J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr.26, S34–41 (2002). PubMed

Koln-Keeth, C. & Frankel, E. H. Taking blue dye out of tube feedings. Nursing34, 14 (2004). PubMed

Klein, L. Is blue dye safe as a method of detection for pulmonary aspiration? J. Am. Diet. Assoc.104, 1651–1652 (2004). PubMed

Schulz, K. F. et al. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med.8 (18). 10.1186/1741-7015-8-18 (2010). PubMed PMC

Taylor, S. J. Confirming nasogastric feeding tube position versus the need to feed. Intensive Crit. Care Nurs.29, 59–69 (2013). PubMed

Hrdy, O. et al. Comparison of continuous versus intermittent enteral nutrition in critically ill patients (COINN): study protocol for a randomized comparative effectiveness trial. Trials21, 955. 10.1186/s13063-020-04866-2 (2020). PubMed PMC

Marik, P. E. Feeding critically ill patients the right ‘whey’: thinking outside of the box. A personal view. Ann. Intensive Care. 510.1186/s13613-015-0051-2 (2015). PubMed PMC