GNSS spoofing in conflict zones disrupts wildlife tracking and hampers research and conservation efforts
Status In-Process Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
39885164
PubMed Central
PMC11782602
DOI
10.1038/s41467-025-56630-2
PII: 10.1038/s41467-025-56630-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
In war and conflict zones, the jamming of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNNS) signals by military forces disrupts the tracking of tagged animals, and has increased in frequency following the recent escalation of conflicts in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Such disruption to data collection strongly hampers research into the protection and conservation of endangered animals.
BirdLife Israel Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel Tel Aviv Israel
CEFE Univ Montpellier CNRS EPHE PSL University IRD Montpellier France
Center for Economic Development Transport and the Environment Oulu Finland
Department of Migration Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior Radolfzell Germany
Institute of Vertebrate Biology Czech Academy of Sciences Brno Czechia
Israel Nature and Parks Authority Science Division Jerusalem Israel
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle UMR 7204 CESCO MNHN CNRS Sorbonne Université Paris France
Natural Resources Institute Finland Helsinki Finland
The Finnish Museum of Natural History University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Kays, R., Crofoot, M. C., Jetz, W. & Wikelski, M. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet. Science348, 6240 (2015). PubMed
Jetz, W. et al. Biological Earth observation with animal sensors. Trends Ecol. Evol.37, 293–298 (2022). PubMed
Bonnor, N. A brief history of global navigation satellite systems. J. Navig.65, 1–14 (2012).
International Air Transport Association. EASA Partners with IATA to Counter Safety Threat from GNSS Spoofing & Jamming. Press Release No: 4, 26 January 2024. https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2024-releases/2024-01-26-01/ (2024).
Nathan, R. et al. Big-data approaches lead to an increased understanding of the ecology of animal movement. Science375, eabg1780 (2022). PubMed
Mayrose, A. et al. Bonelli’s Eagle electrocution risk in Israel can be reduced by 80% by insulating only 4% of the pylons. Ornith. Appl.126, duae004 (2024).
Barton, P. S. et al. Guidelines for using movement science to inform biodiversity policy. Environ. Manag.56, 791–801 (2015). PubMed
Doherty, T. S. & Driscoll, D. A. Coupling movement and landscape ecology for animal conservation in production landscapes. Proc. R. Soc.285, 20172272 (2018). PubMed PMC
Pekarsky, S., Schiffner, I., Markin, Y. & Nathan, R. Using movement ecology to evaluate the effectiveness of multiple human-wildlife conflict management practices. Biol. Conserv.262, 109306 (2021).