Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) enables the real-time capture of health-related behaviours, their situational contexts, and associated subjective experiences. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of an EMA targeting physical and eating behaviours, optimise its protocol, and provide recommendations for future large-scale EMA data collections. The study involved 52 participants (age 31±9 years, 56% females) from Czechia, France, Germany, and Ireland completing a 9-day free-living EMA protocol using the HealthReact platform connected to a Fitbit tracker. The EMA protocol included time-based (7/day), event-based (up to 10/day), and self-initiated surveys, each containing 8 to 17 items assessing physical and eating behaviours and related contextual factors such as affective states, location, and company. Qualitative insights were gathered from post-EMA feedback interviews. Compliance was low (median 49%), particularly for event-based surveys (median 34%), and declined over time. Many participants were unable or unwilling to complete surveys in certain contexts (e.g., when with family), faced interference with their daily schedules, and encountered occasional technical issues, suggesting the need for thorough initial training, an individualised protocol, and systematic compliance monitoring. The number of event-based surveys was less than desired for the study, with a median of 2.4/day for sedentary events, when 4 were targeted, and 0.9/day for walking events, when 3 were targeted. Conducting simulations using participants' Fitbit data allowed for optimising the triggering rules, achieving the desired median number of sedentary and walking surveys (3.9/day for both) in similar populations. Self-initiated reports of meals and drinks yielded more reports than those prompted in time-based and event-based EMA surveys, suggesting that self-initiated surveys might better reflect actual eating behaviours. This study highlights the importance of assessing feasibility and optimising EMA protocols to enhance subsequent compliance and data quality. Conducting pre-tests to refine protocols and procedures, including simulations using participants' activity data for optimal event-based triggering rules, is crucial for successful large-scale data collection in EMA studies of physical and eating behaviours.

Department of Human Movement Studies University of Ostrava Ostrava Czechia

Department of Movement and Sports Sciences Ghent University Ghent Belgium

Department of Nutrition Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris Sorbonne University CRNH Ile de France Paris France

Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Charles University Prague Czechia

Faculty of Science University of Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove Czechia

Health Research Institute University of Limerick Limerick Ireland

Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology BIPS Bremen Germany

Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team Bobigny France

School of Public Health University College Cork Cork Ireland

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al.. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Brit J Sport Med. 2020;54: 1451–1462. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955 PubMed DOI PMC

Cena H, Calder PC. Defining a Healthy Diet: Evidence for the Role of Contemporary Dietary Patterns in Health and Disease. Nutrients. 2020;12: 334. doi: 10.3390/nu12020334 PubMed DOI PMC

Rosas LG, Mensink GBM, Finger JD, Schienkiewitz A, Do S, Wolters M, et al.. Selection of key indicators for European policy monitoring and surveillance for dietary behaviour, physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18: 48. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01111-0 PubMed DOI PMC

Troiano RP, Stamatakis E, Bull FC. How can global physical activity surveillance adapt to evolving physical activity guidelines? Needs, challenges and future directions. Brit J Sport Med. 2020;54: 1468–1473. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102621 PubMed DOI PMC

Strain T, Wijndaele K, Dempsey PC, Sharp SJ, Pearce M, Jeon J, et al.. Wearable-device-measured physical activity and future health risk. Nat Med. 2020;26: 1385–1391. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1012-3 PubMed DOI PMC

Limb ES, Ahmad S, Cook DG, Kerry SM, Ekelund U, Whincup PH, et al.. Measuring change in trials of physical activity interventions: a comparison of self-report questionnaire and accelerometry within the PACE-UP trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phy Act. 2019;16: 10. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0762-5 PubMed DOI PMC

Blasco‐Peris C, Climent‐Paya V, Vetrovsky T, García‐Álvarez MI, Manresa‐Rocamora A, Beltrán‐Carrillo VJ, et al.. International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form and accelerometer‐assessed physical activity: concurrent validity using six cut‐points in HF patients. ESC Heart Fail. 2024;11: 126–135. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14514 PubMed DOI PMC

Ravelli MN, Schoeller DA. Traditional Self-Reported Dietary Instruments Are Prone to Inaccuracies and New Approaches Are Needed. Front Nutr. 2020;7: 90. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.00090 PubMed DOI PMC

Migueles JH, Molina-Garcia P, Torres-Lopez LV, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Rowlands AV, Ebner-Priemer UW, et al.. Equivalency of four research-grade movement sensors to assess movement behaviors and its implications for population surveillance. Sci Rep. 2022;12: 5525. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09469-2 PubMed DOI PMC

Stamatakis E, Ahmadi M, Murphy MH, Chico TJ, Milton K, Cruz BDP, et al.. Journey of a thousand miles: from ‘Manpo-Kei’ to the first steps-based physical activity recommendations. Br J Sports Med. 2023;57: 1227–1228. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-106869 PubMed DOI

Reichert M, Giurgiu M, Koch E, Wieland LM, Lautenbach S, Neubauer AB, et al.. Ambulatory assessment for physical activity research: State of the science, best practices and future directions. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2020; 101742. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101742 PubMed DOI PMC

Papini NM, Yang C-H, Do B, Mason TB, Lopez NV. External contexts and movement behaviors in ecological momentary assessment studies: a systematic review and future directions. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2023;16: 337–367. doi: 10.1080/1750984x.2020.1858439 DOI

Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological Momentary Assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4: 1–32. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 PubMed DOI

Dunton GF. Ecological Momentary Assessment in Physical Activity Research. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2017;45: 48–54. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000092 PubMed DOI PMC

Wenzel M, Geelen A, Wolters M, Hebestreit A, Laerhoven KV, Lakerveld J, et al.. The Role of Self-Control and the Presence of Enactment Models on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption: A Pilot Study. Front Psychol. 2019;10: 1511. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01511 PubMed DOI PMC

Perski O, Keller J, Kale D, Asare BY-A, Schneider V, Powell D, et al.. Understanding health behaviours in context: A systematic review and meta-analysis of ecological momentary assessment studies of five key health behaviours. Health Psychol Rev. 2022; 1–26. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2112258 PubMed DOI PMC

Mason TB, Do B, Wang S, Dunton GF. Ecological momentary assessment of eating and dietary intake behaviors in children and adolescents: A systematic review of the literature. Appetite. 2020;144: 104465. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104465 PubMed DOI PMC

Cnudde K, Vylder FD, Cardon G, Maes I, Dyck DV. Within- and between-person associations of time-varying determinants with snacking in older adults: an ecological momentary assessment study. Br J Nutr. 2024; 1–12. doi: 10.1017/s0007114524001004 PubMed DOI

Maes I, Mertens L, Poppe L, Vetrovsky T, Crombez G, Backere FD, et al.. Within-Person Associations of Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity With Time-Varying Determinants in Older Adults: Time-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment Study. JMIR Aging. 2023;6: e44425. doi: 10.2196/44425 PubMed DOI PMC

Kracht CL, Beyl RA, Maher JP, Katzmarzyk PT, Staiano AE. Adolescents’ sedentary time, affect, and contextual factors: An ecological momentary assessment study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18: 53. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01121-y PubMed DOI PMC

Wrzus C, Neubauer AB. Ecological Momentary Assessment: A Meta-Analysis on Designs, Samples, and Compliance Across Research Fields. Assessment. 2023;30: 825–846. doi: 10.1177/10731911211067538 PubMed DOI PMC

Degroote L, DeSmet A, Bourdeaudhuij ID, Dyck DV, Crombez G. Content validity and methodological considerations in ecological momentary assessment studies on physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17: 35. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00932-9 PubMed DOI PMC

Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE, et al.. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN)–Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14: 75. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8 PubMed DOI PMC

Giurgiu M, Niermann C, Ebner-Priemer U, Kanning M. Accuracy of Sedentary Behavior–Triggered Ecological Momentary Assessment for Collecting Contextual Information: Development and Feasibility Study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2020;8: e17852. doi: 10.2196/17852 PubMed DOI PMC

Morshed MB, Kulkarni SS, Li R, Saha K, Roper LG, Nachman L, et al.. A Real-Time Eating Detection System for Capturing Eating Moments and Triggering Ecological Momentary Assessments to Obtain Further Context: System Development and Validation Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8: e20625. doi: 10.2196/20625 PubMed DOI PMC

Stone AA, Schneider S, Smyth JM. Evaluation of Pressing Issues in Ecological Momentary Assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2022;19: 107–131. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080921-083128 PubMed DOI

Williams MT, Lewthwaite H, Fraysse F, Gajewska A, Ignatavicius J, Ferrar K. Compliance With Mobile Ecological Momentary Assessment of Self-Reported Health-Related Behaviors and Psychological Constructs in Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23: e17023. doi: 10.2196/17023 PubMed DOI PMC

Compernolle S, Vetrovsky T, Maes I, Delobelle J, Lebuf E, Vylder FD, et al.. Older adults’ compliance with mobile ecological momentary assessments in health behavior research: pooled results of four intensive longitudinal studies and recommendations for future research. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024;21: 92. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01629-z PubMed DOI PMC

Hartson KR, Huntington-Moskos L, Sears CG, Genova G, Mathis C, Ford W, et al.. Use of Electronic Ecological Momentary Assessment Methodologies in Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Sleep Research in Young Adults: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25: e46783. doi: 10.2196/46783 PubMed DOI PMC

Delobelle J, Lebuf E, Dyck DV, Compernolle S, Janek M, Backere FD, et al.. Fitbit’s accuracy to measure short bouts of stepping and sedentary behaviour: validation, sensitivity and specificity study. Digit Health. 2024;10: 20552076241262710. doi: 10.1177/20552076241262710 PubMed DOI PMC

Maugeri A, Barchitta M. A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment of Diet: Implications and Perspectives for Nutritional Epidemiology. Nutrients. 2019;11: 2696. doi: 10.3390/nu11112696 PubMed DOI PMC

Battaglia B, Lee L, Jia SS, Partridge SR, Allman-Farinelli M. The Use of Mobile-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment (mEMA) Methodology to Assess Dietary Intake, Food Consumption Behaviours and Context in Young People: A Systematic Review. Healthcare. 2022;10: 1329. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071329 PubMed DOI PMC

Wouters S, Thewissen V, Duif M, Lechner L, Jacobs N. Assessing Energy Intake in Daily Life: Signal-Contingent Smartphone Application Versus Event-Contingent Paper and Pencil Estimated Diet Diary. Psychol Belg. 2016;56: 357–369. doi: 10.5334/pb.339 PubMed DOI PMC

Hayes G, Buck C, Cardon G, Cimler R, Elavsky S, Fezeu K L, et al.. Standardized Methods for Evaluating Physical and Eating Behaviours: The Wearable Sensor Assessment of Physical and Eating Behaviours “WEALTH” Project. JMIR Preprints.17/12/2024:70186. doi: 10.2196/preprints.70186 DOI

Novak J, Jurkova K, Lojkaskova A, Jaklova A, Kuhnova J, Pfeiferova M, et al.. Participatory development of an mHealth intervention delivered in general practice to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour of patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (ENERGISED). BMC Public Health. 2024;24: 927. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18384-2 PubMed DOI PMC

Tudor-Locke C, Camhi SM, Leonardi C, Johnson WD, Katzmarzyk PT, Earnest CP, et al.. Patterns of adult stepping cadence in the 2005–2006 NHANES. Prev Med. 2011;53: 178–181. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.06.004 PubMed DOI

Liao Y, Skelton K, Dunton G, Bruening M. A Systematic Review of Methods and Procedures Used in Ecological Momentary Assessments of Diet and Physical Activity Research in Youth: An Adapted STROBE Checklist for Reporting EMA Studies (CREMAS). J Med Internet Res. 2016;18: e151–12. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4954 PubMed DOI PMC

Stamatakis E, Ekelund U, Ding D, Hamer M, Bauman AE, Lee IM. Is the time right for quantitative public health guidelines on sitting? A narrative review of sedentary behaviour research paradigms and findings. Brit J Sport Med 2019;53: 377–382. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099131 PubMed DOI PMC

Kanning M, Bollenbach L, Schmitz J, Niermann C, Fina S. Analyzing Person-Place Interactions During Walking Episodes: Innovative Ambulatory Assessment Approach of Walking-Triggered e-Diaries. JMIR Form Res 2022;6(11): e39322. doi: 10.2196/39322 PubMed DOI PMC