Beliefs in Misinformation About COVID-19 and the Russian Invasion of Ukraine Are Linked: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Survey Study
Jazyk angličtina Země Kanada Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
40063941
PubMed Central
PMC11956375
DOI
10.2196/62913
PII: v5i1e62913
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- COVID, COVID-19, association, belief, belief rigidity, correlation, correlation analysis, digital media, false, health information, media, misinformation, national, news, political, political trust, propaganda, public health, public opinion, questionnaire, survey, trust, vaccine hesitancy, war, war in Ukraine,
- MeSH
- COVID-19 * epidemiologie psychologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- důvěra MeSH
- komunikace * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- odkládání očkování MeSH
- pandemie MeSH
- politika MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- SARS-CoV-2 MeSH
- zdraví - znalosti, postoje, praxe MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Rusko epidemiologie MeSH
- Ukrajina epidemiologie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Detrimental effects of misinformation were observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Presently, amid Russia's military aggression in Ukraine, another wave of misinformation is spreading on the web and impacting our daily lives, with many citizens and politicians embracing Russian propaganda narratives. Despite the lack of an objective connection between these 2 societal issues, anecdotal observations suggest that supporters of misinformation regarding COVID-19 (BM-C) have also adopted misinformation about the war in Ukraine (BM-U) while sharing similar media use patterns and political attitudes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a link between respondents' endorsement of the 2 sets of misinformation narratives, and whether some of the selected factors (media use, political trust, vaccine hesitancy, and belief rigidity) are associated with both BM-C and BM-U. METHODS: We conducted a survey on a nationally representative sample of 1623 individuals in the Czech Republic. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to identify the relationship between BM-C and BM-U. In addition, multiple linear regression was used to determine associations between the examined factors and both sets of misinformation. RESULTS: We discovered that BM-C and BM-U were moderately correlated (Spearman ρ=0.57; P<.001). Furthermore, increased trust in Russia and decreased trust in the local government, public media, and Western allies of the Czech Republic predicted both BM-C and BM-U. Media use indicating frustration with and avoidance of public or mainstream media, consumption of alternative information sources, and participation in web-based discussions indicative of epistemic bubbles predicted beliefs in misinformation narratives. COVID-19 vaccine refusal predicted only BM-C but not BM-U. However, vaccine refusers were overrepresented in the BM-U supporters (64/161, 39.8%) and undecided (128/505, 25.3%) individuals. Both beliefs were associated with belief rigidity. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides empirical evidence that supporters of COVID-19 misinformation were susceptible to ideological misinformation aligning with Russian propaganda. Supporters of both sets of misinformation narratives were primarily linked by their shared trust or distrust in the same geopolitical actors and their distrust in the local government.
1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Faculty of Arts Masaryk University in Brno Brno Czech Republic
Institute of Computer Science Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
De Coninck D, Frissen T, Matthijs K, d'Haenens L, Lits G, Champagne-Poirier O, Carignan M, David MD, Pignard-Cheynel N, Salerno S, Généreux M. Beliefs in conspiracy theories and misinformation about COVID-19: comparative perspectives on the role of anxiety, depression and exposure to and trust in information sources. Front Psychol. 2021;12:646394. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646394. PubMed DOI PMC
Sherman SM, Smith LE, Sim J, Amlôt R, Cutts M, Dasch H, Rubin GJ, Sevdalis N. COVID-19 vaccination intention in the UK: results from the COVID-19 vaccination acceptability study (CoVAccS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021;17(6):1612–1621. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1846397. PubMed DOI PMC
Lee SK, Sun J, Jang S, Connelly S. Misinformation of COVID-19 vaccines and vaccine hesitancy. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):13681. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17430-6. 10.1038/s41598-022-17430-6 PubMed DOI PMC
Loomba S, de Figueiredo A, Piatek SJ, de Graaf K, Larson HJ. Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5(3):337–348. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1.10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1 PubMed DOI
Borges do Nascimento IJ, Beatriz Pizarro A, Almeida J, Azzopardi-Muscat N, André Gonçalves M, Björklund M, Novillo-Ortiz D. Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews. Bull World Health Organ. 2022;100(9):544–561. doi: 10.2471/blt.21.287654. PubMed DOI PMC
Bolsen T, Palm R. Politicization and COVID-19 vaccine resistance in the U.S. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2022;188(1):81–100. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.10.002. S1877-1173(21)00186-1 PubMed DOI PMC
Levinsson A, Miconi D, Li Z, Frounfelker RL, Rousseau C. Conspiracy theories, psychological distress, and sympathy for violent radicalization in young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(15):7846. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157846. ijerph18157846 PubMed DOI PMC
Nguyen CT. Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles. Episteme. 2018;17(2):141–161. doi: 10.1017/epi.2018.32. DOI
Gkinopoulos T, Truelsen Elbæk C, Mitkidis P. Morality in the echo chamber: the relationship between belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories and public health support and the mediating role of moral identity and morality-as-cooperation across 67 countries. PLoS One. 2022;17(9):e0273172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273172. PONE-D-22-08033 PubMed DOI PMC
Jiang B, Karami M, Cheng L, Black T, Liu H. Mechanisms and attributes of echo chambers in social media. arXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2106.05401. Preprint posted online on 2021.06.09. DOI
Czech Elves (Cesti Elfove) Monitoring of social media—1/2 May 2021. 2021. [2022-11-07]. https://cesti-elfove.cz/monitor-socialnich-siti/
Štětka V, Mazák J, Vochocová L. “Nobody tells us what to Write about”: the disinformation media ecosystem and its consumers in the Czech Republic. Javnost Public. 2020;28(1):90–109. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2020.1841381. DOI
Czech Security Information Service Annual report of Czech Security Information Service for 2021 (Vyrocni zprava 2021) 2022. Oct 17, [2022-11-24]. https://www.bis.cz/public/site/bis.cz/content/vyrocni-zpravy/2021-vz-cz-2.pdf .
European Digital Media Observatory From the pandemic to the war in Ukraine: One year and a half of countering disinformation. 2023. [2024-10-20]. https://edmo.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/English.pdf .
King KK, Wang B. Diffusion of real versus misinformation during a crisis event: a big data-driven approach. Int J Inform Manage. 2023;71:102390. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102390. DOI
Herasimenka A, Au Y, George A, Joynes-Burgess K, Knuutila A, Bright J, Howard PN. The political economy of digital profiteering: communication resource mobilization by anti-vaccination actors. J Commun. 2023;73(2):126–137. doi: 10.1093/joc/jqac043. jqac043 PubMed DOI PMC
Moy W, Kacper G. COVID-19 effects and Russian disinformation campaigns. Homeland Security Affairs. 2020. [2023-11-20]. https://www.hsaj.org/articles/16533 .
Patel SS, Moncayo OE, Conroy KM, Jordan D, Erickson TB. The landscape of disinformation on health crisis communication during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ukraine: hybrid warfare tactics, fake media news and review of evidence. JCOM J Sci Commun. 2020;19(5):A02. doi: 10.22323/2.19050202. AO2 PubMed DOI PMC
Wenzel M, Stasiuk-Krajewska K, Macková V, Turková K. The penetration of Russian disinformation related to the war in Ukraine: evidence from Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Int Polit Sci Rev. 2023;45(2):192–208. doi: 10.1177/01925121231205259. DOI
Czech Elves (Cesti Elfove) Fighters against foreign disinformation campaigns on the Czech internet. Monthly Report—February, March, April 2022. [2022-11-08]. https://cesti-elfove.cz/mesicni-report-unor-2022 .
Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic. Manifestations of extremism and prejudicial hatred, situation report H2 2022 (Projevy extremismu a predsudecne nenavisti. Souhrnna situacni zprava 2. pololeti roku 2022) 2023. Jan 31, [2023-02-02]. https://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/pololetni-zprava-mv-o-extremismu-211168.aspx .
Czech Elves Disinformation on Facebook—February. 2022. [2022-11-19]. https://cesti-elfove.cz/monitoring-dezinfo-facebook-unor-2022/
Sánchez del Vas R, Tuñón Navarro J. Disinformation on the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war: two sides of the same coin? Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2024;11(1):851. doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-03355-0. DOI
Magallón-Rosa R, Fernández-Castrillo C, Garriga M. Fact-checking in war: types of hoaxes and trends from a year of disinformation in the Russo-Ukrainian war. EPI. 2023;32(5):1–14. doi: 10.3145/epi.2023.sep.20. DOI
Moreno-Gil V, Ramon-Vegas X, Rodríguez-Martínez R, Mauri-Ríos M. Explanatory journalism within European fact checking platforms: an ally against disinformation in the post-COVID-19 Era. Societies. 2023;13(11):237. doi: 10.3390/soc13110237. DOI
Zecchinon P, Standaert O. The war in Ukraine through the prism of visual disinformation and the limits of specialized fact-checking. a case-study at. Digital J. 2024:1–19. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2024.2332609. DOI
Georgiou N, Delfabbro P, Balzan R. COVID-19-related conspiracy beliefs and their relationship with perceived stress and pre-existing conspiracy beliefs. Pers Individ Dif. 2020;166:110201. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110201. S0191-8869(20)30390-1 PubMed DOI PMC
Pan W, Liu D, Fang J. An examination of factors contributing to the acceptance of online health misinformation. Front Psychol. 2021;12:630268. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630268. PubMed DOI PMC
Myslivec J. It is all a conspiracy: conspiracy theories about the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine. Cesk Psychol. 2024;68(2):111–134. doi: 10.51561/cspsych.68.2.111. DOI
Bertamini G. Narrative warfare in the Russo-Ukrainian war: a comparison between Ukraine's and Russia's strategic communication. FINABEL The European Army Interoperability Centre. 2023. [2024-09-20]. https://finabel.org/narrative-warfare-in-the-russo-ukrainian-war-a-comparison-between-ukraines-and-russias-strategic-communication/
Zmigrod L. The role of cognitive rigidity in political ideologies: theory, evidence, and future directions. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2020;34:34–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.016. DOI
Leclercq S, Szaffarczyk S, Leptourgos P, Yger P, Fakhri A, Wathelet M, Bouttier V, Denève S, Jardri R. Conspiracy beliefs and perceptual inference in times of political uncertainty. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):9001. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59434-4. 10.1038/s41598-024-59434-4 PubMed DOI PMC
Figà Talamanca G, Arfini S. Through the newsfeed glass: rethinking filter bubbles and echo chambers. Philos Technol. 2022;35(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s13347-021-00494-z. 494 PubMed DOI PMC
Douglas KM, Sutton RM, Cichocka A. The psychology of conspiracy theories. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2017;26(6):538–542. doi: 10.1177/0963721417718261. 10.1177_0963721417718261 PubMed DOI PMC
Cohen S. Cognitive rigidity, overgeneralization and fanaticism. In: Zeigler-Hill V, Shackelford T, editors. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Cham: Springer; 2017. pp. 1–7.
Zmigrod L, Rentfrow PJ, Robbins TW. The partisan mind: is extreme political partisanship related to cognitive inflexibility? J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020;149(3):407–418. doi: 10.1037/xge0000661.2019-44422-001 PubMed DOI
Czech National Panel (Cesky narodni panel) [2022-10-08]. https://www.narodnipanel.cz/
Prokop D, Markova L, Kudrnacova M, Cahlikova J, Bartos V, Bauer M, Chytilova J. Life during a pandemic (Zivot behem pandemie) 2020. [2022-10-28]. https://zivotbehempandemie.cz/projekt .
Coronavirus: overview of the main disinformation messages (Koronavirus: přehled hlavních dezinformačních sdělení) Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic. [2021-09-14]. https://www.mvcr.cz/chh/clanek/koronavirus-prehled-hlavnich-dezinformacnich-sdeleni.aspx .
Conspiratorial framing of Russian aggression against Ukraine in the Czech quasi-media scene (Konspirační rámování ruské agrese vůči Ukrajině na české kvazi-mediální scéně) Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic. [2022-06-05]. https://www.mvcr.cz/chh/clanek/konspiracni-ramovani-ruske-agrese-vuci-ukrajine-na-ceske-kvazi-medialni-scene .
Grygarová D, Adámek P, Juríčková V, Horáček J, Bakštein E, Fajnerová I, Kesner L. Impact of a long lockdown on mental health and the role of media use: web-based survey study. JMIR Ment Health. 2022;9(6):e36050. doi: 10.2196/36050. v9i6e36050 PubMed DOI PMC
Typology of Czech news websites (Typologie domacich zpravodajských webu) Czech Independent Journalism Foundation. 2018. Nov 13, [2021-05-06]. https://www.nfnz.cz/studie-a-analyzy/typologie-domacich-zpravodajskych-webu/
Merlan A. The conspiracy singularity has arrived. 2020. Jul 17, [2024-09-29]. https://www.vice.com/en/article/the-conspiracy-singularity-has-arrived/
Tuters M, Willaert T. Deep state phobia: narrative convergence in coronavirus conspiracism on Instagram. Convergence Int J Res New Media Technol. 2022;28(4):1214–1238. doi: 10.1177/13548565221118751. DOI
Murru M. QAnon and its conspiracy milieu: the Italian case. In: Eslen-Ziya H, Giorgi A, editors. Populism and Science in Europe. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2022. pp. 163–184.
Xia Y, Gronow A, Malkamäki A, Ylä-Anttila T, Keller B, Kivelä M. The Russian invasion of Ukraine selectively depolarized the Finnish NATO discussion on Twitter. EPJ Data Sci. 2024;13(1):1. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00441-2. DOI
Lintner T, Diviák T, Nekardová B, Lehotský L, Vašečka M. Slovak MPs’ response to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine in light of conspiracy theories and the polarization of political discourse. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):758. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-02276-8. DOI
Franic J. What lies behind substantial differences in COVID-19 vaccination rates between EU member states? Front Public Health. 2022;10:858265. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.858265. PubMed DOI PMC
Jennings W, Stoker G, Bunting H, Valgarðsson VO, Gaskell J, Devine D, McKay L, Mills MC. Lack of trust, conspiracy beliefs, and social media use predict COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Vaccines (Basel) 2021;9(6):593. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9060593. vaccines9060593 PubMed DOI PMC
Melki J, Tamim H, Hadid D, Makki M, El Amine J, Hitti E. Mitigating infodemics: the relationship between news exposure and trust and belief in COVID-19 fake news and social media spreading. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0252830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252830. PONE-D-21-06890 PubMed DOI PMC
Sallam M, Dababseh D, Eid H, Al-Mahzoum K, Al-Haidar A, Taim D, Yaseen A, Ababneh NA, Bakri FG, Mahafzah A. High rates of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and its association with conspiracy beliefs: a study in Jordan and Kuwait among other Arab Countries. Vaccines (Basel) 2021;9(1):42. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9010042. vaccines9010042 PubMed DOI PMC
Gupta M, Dennehy D, Parra CM, Mäntymäki M, Dwivedi YK. Fake news believability: the effects of political beliefs and espoused cultural values. Inf Manag. 2023;60(2):103745. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2022.103745. DOI
Calvillo DP, Ross BJ, Garcia RJB, Smelter TJ, Rutchick AM. Political ideology predicts perceptions of the threat of COVID-19 (and Susceptibility to Fake News About It) Soc Psychol Pers Sci. 2020;11(8):1119–1128. doi: 10.1177/1948550620940539. DOI
Motta M. Republicans, not democrats, are more likely to endorse anti-vaccine misinformation. Am Polit Res. 2021;49(5):428–438. doi: 10.1177/1532673x211022639. DOI
Eady G, Paskhalis T, Zilinsky J, Bonneau R, Nagler J, Tucker JA. Exposure to the Russian internet research agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):62. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35576-9. 10.1038/s41467-022-35576-9 PubMed DOI PMC
Hoyle A, Powell T, Cadet B, Kuijt J. COVID-19 Disinformation: A Multi-National, Whole of Society Perspective (Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications) Cham: Springer; 2022. Web of Lies: mapping the narratives, effects, and amplifiers of Russian COVID-19 disinformation; pp. 113–141.
Atkinson C. Hybrid warfare and societal resilience: implications for democratic governance. ISIJ. 2018;39(1):63–76. doi: 10.11610/isij.3906. DOI
Galgoczy M, Phatak A, Vinson D, Mago V, Giabbanelli P. (Re)shaping online narratives: when bots promote the message of president trump during his first impeachment. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022;8:e947. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.947. cs-947 PubMed DOI PMC
Kasapoglu C. Russia's renewed military thinking: non-linear warfare and reflexive control. Research Division—NATO Defense College. 2015. [2022-11-12]. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/195099/rp_121.pdf .
Pierre JM. Mistrust and misinformation: a two-component, socio-epistemic model of belief in conspiracy theories. J Soc Polit Psych. 2020;8(2):617–641. doi: 10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1362. DOI
Boberg S, Quandt T, Schatto-Eckrodt T, Frischlich L. Pandemic populism: Facebook pages of alternative news media and the corona crisis—a computational content analysis. arXiv. Preprint posted online on 2020.
Dhawan D, Bekalu M, Pinnamaneni R, McCloud R, Viswanath K. COVID-19 news and misinformation: do they matter for public health Prevention? J Health Commun. 2021;26(11):799–808. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2021.2010841. PubMed DOI
Guelmami N, Ben Khalifa M, Chalghaf N, Kong JD, Amayra T, Wu J, Azaiez F, Bragazzi NL. Development of the 12-item social media disinformation scale and its association with social media addiction and mental health related to COVID-19 in Tunisia: survey-based pilot case study. JMIR Form Res. 2021;5(6):e27280. doi: 10.2196/27280. v5i6e27280 PubMed DOI PMC
Chen E, Jiang J, Chang HH, Muric G, Ferrara E. Charting the information and misinformation landscape to characterize misinfodemics on social media: COVID-19 infodemiology study at a planetary scale. JMIR Infodemiology. 2022;2(1):e32378. doi: 10.2196/32378. v2i1e32378 PubMed DOI PMC
Pierri F, Piccardi C, Ceri S. Topology comparison of Twitter diffusion networks effectively reveals misleading information. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1372. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58166-5. 10.1038/s41598-020-58166-5 PubMed DOI PMC
Wang X, Song Y. Viral misinformation and echo chambers: the diffusion of rumors about genetically modified organisms on social media. INTR. 2020;30(5):1547–1564. doi: 10.1108/intr-11-2019-0491. DOI
Bryanov K, Vziatysheva V. Determinants of individuals' belief in fake news: a scoping review determinants of belief in fake news. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0253717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253717. PONE-D-21-00513 PubMed DOI PMC
Balakrishnan V, Ng WZ, Soo MC, Han GJ, Lee CJ. Infodemic and fake news—a comprehensive overview of its global magnitude during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021: a scoping review. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022;78:103144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103144. S2212-4209(22)00363-6 PubMed DOI PMC
t'Serstevens F, Piccillo G, Grigoriev A. Fake news zealots: effect of perception of news on online sharing behavior. Front Psychol. 2022;13:859534. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859534. PubMed DOI PMC
Oleksy T, Wnuk A, Gambin M, Łyś A. Dynamic relationships between different types of conspiracy theories about COVID-19 and protective behaviour: a four-wave panel study in Poland. Soc Sci Med. 2021;280:114028. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114028. S0277-9536(21)00360-9 PubMed DOI PMC
Pavlović T, Azevedo F, De K, Riaño-Moreno JC, Maglić M, Gkinopoulos T, Donnelly-Kehoe PA, Payán-Gómez C, Huang G, Kantorowicz J, Birtel MD, Schönegger P, Capraro V, Santamaría-García H, Yucel M, Ibanez A, Rathje S, Wetter E, Stanojević D, van Prooijen JW, Hesse E, Elbaek CT, Franc R, Pavlović Z, Mitkidis P, Cichocka A, Gelfand M, Alfano M, Ross RM, Sjåstad H, Nezlek JB, Cislak A, Lockwood P, Abts K, Agadullina E, Amodio DM, Apps MAJ, Aruta JJB, Besharati S, Bor A, Choma B, Cunningham W, Ejaz W, Farmer H, Findor A, Gjoneska B, Gualda E, Huynh TLD, Imran MA, Israelashvili J, Kantorowicz-Reznichenko E, Krouwel A, Kutiyski Y, Laakasuo M, Lamm C, Levy J, Leygue C, Lin MJ, Mansoor MS, Marie A, Mayiwar L, Mazepus H, McHugh C, Olsson A, Otterbring T, Packer D, Palomäki J, Perry A, Petersen MB, Puthillam A, Rothmund T, Schmid PC, Stadelmann D, Stoica A, Stoyanov D, Stoyanova K, Tewari S, Todosijević B, Torgler B, Tsakiris M, Tung HH, Umbreș RG, Vanags E, Vlasceanu M, Vonasch AJ, Zhang Y, Abad M, Adler E, Mdarhri HA, Antazo B, Ay FC, Ba MEH, Barbosa S, Bastian B, Berg A, Białek M, Bilancini E, Bogatyreva N, Boncinelli L, Booth JE, Borau S, Buchel O, de Carvalho CF, Celadin T, Cerami C, Chalise HN, Cheng X, Cian L, Cockcroft K, Conway J, Córdoba-Delgado MA, Crespi C, Crouzevialle M, Cutler J, Cypryańska M, Dabrowska J, Davis VH, Minda JP, Dayley PN, Delouvée S, Denkovski O, Dezecache G, Dhaliwal NA, Diato A, Di Paolo R, Dulleck U, Ekmanis J, Etienne TW, Farhana HH, Farkhari F, Fidanovski K, Flew T, Fraser S, Frempong RB, Fugelsang J, Gale J, García-Navarro EB, Garladinne P, Gray K, Griffin SM, Gronfeldt B, Gruber J, Halperin E, Herzon V, Hruška M, Hudecek MFC, Isler O, Jangard S, Jørgensen F, Keudel O, Koppel L, Koverola M, Kunnari A, Leota J, Lermer E, Li C, Longoni C, McCashin D, Mikloušić I, Molina-Paredes J, Monroy-Fonseca C, Morales-Marente E, Moreau D, Muda R, Myer A, Nash K, Nitschke JP, Nurse MS, de Mello VO, Palacios-Galvez MS, Pan Y, Papp Z, Pärnamets P, Paruzel-Czachura M, Perander S, Pitman M, Raza A, Rêgo GG, Robertson C, Rodríguez-Pascual I, Saikkonen T, Salvador-Ginez O, Sampaio WM, Santi GC, Schultner D, Schutte E, Scott A, Skali A, Stefaniak A, Sternisko A, Strickland B, Thomas JP, Tinghög G, Traast IJ, Tucciarelli R, Tyrala M, Ungson ND, Uysal MS, Van Rooy D, Västfjäll Dl, Vieira JB, von Sikorski C, Walker AC, Watermeyer J, Willardt R, Wohl MJA, Wójcik AD, Wu K, Yamada Y, Yilmaz O, Yogeeswaran K, Ziemer CT, Zwaan RA, Boggio PS, Whillans A, Van Lange PAM, Prasad R, Onderco M, O'Madagain C, Nesh-Nash T, Laguna OM, Kubin E, Gümren M, Fenwick A, Ertan AS, Bernstein MJ, Amara H, Van Bavel JJ. Predicting attitudinal and behavioral responses to COVID-19 pandemic using machine learning. PNAS Nexus. 2022;1(3):pgac093. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac093. pgac093 PubMed DOI PMC
Thaker J, Subramanian A. Exposure to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is as impactful as vaccine misinformation in inducing a decline in vaccination intentions in New Zealand: results from pre-post between-groups randomized block Experiment. Front Commun. 2021;6:721982. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2021.721982. DOI
Verma G, Bhardwaj A, Aledavood T, De Choudhury M, Kumar S. Examining the impact of sharing COVID-19 misinformation online on mental health. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):8045. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11488-y. 10.1038/s41598-022-11488-y PubMed DOI PMC
Bodrunova S, Nepiyuschikh D. Social Computing and Social Media: Design, User Experience and Impact. HCII 2022. Cham: Springer; 2022. Dynamics of distrust, aggression,conspiracy thinking in the anti-vaccination discourse on Russian Telegram; pp. 468–484.
Wu JS, Hauert C, Kremen C, Zhao J. A framework on polarization, cognitive inflexibility, and rigid cognitive specialization. Front Psychol. 2022;13:776891. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.776891. PubMed DOI PMC