Comparative Clinical and Imaging-Based Evaluation of Therapeutic Modalities in CNS Embryonal Tumours With PLAGL Amplification
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print
Document type Journal Article, Comparative Study
Grant support
GN-000707
The Brain Tumour Charity
PubMed
40196918
PubMed Central
PMC11976507
DOI
10.1111/nan.70015
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- PLAGL1, PLAGL2, ET, PLAGL, embryonal CNS tumour, treatment,
- MeSH
- Gene Amplification MeSH
- Child MeSH
- DNA-Binding Proteins * genetics MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal * genetics therapy pathology diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Central Nervous System Neoplasms * genetics therapy pathology diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Brain Neoplasms * genetics therapy MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- DNA-Binding Proteins * MeSH
AIMS: Embryonal tumours with PLAGL1 or PLAGL2 amplification (ET, PLAGL) show substantial heterogeneity regarding their clinical characteristics and have been treated inconsistently, resulting in diverse outcomes. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical behaviour of ET, PLAGL and elucidate their response pattern across the different applied treatment regimens. METHODS: We conducted an in-depth retrospective analysis of clinical and serial imaging data of 18 patients with ET, PLAGL (nine each of PLAGL1 and PLAGL2 amplified). RESULTS: Patients with PLAGL1-amplified tumours (ET, PLAGL1) had fewer relapses (3/9), while PLAGL2-amplified tumours (ET, PLAGL2) were prone to early relapse or progression (8/9) and to distant, leptomeningeal and intraventricular relapses. Progression-free survival differed significantly between the subtypes (log-rank test, p = 0.0055). Postoperative treatment included chemotherapy (n = 17, various protocols), alone (n = 8) or combined with radiotherapy (n = 9). Responses to chemotherapy were observed in both subtypes, and incomplete resection was not associated with inferior survival. All three survivors with ET, PLAGL2 were treated with induction and high-dose chemotherapy with (n = 1-low-dose CSI and boost) or without (n = 2) radiotherapy, whereas five patients with less intensive chemotherapy relapsed. All six survivors with ET, PLAGL1 were treated with conventional chemotherapy regimens, with (n = 4-local radiotherapy n = 3; CSI and boost n = 1) or without (n = 2) radiotherapy. Two patients with ET, PLAGL1 relapsed after 8 years. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant therapy should be considered for all ET, PLAGL patients: Patients with ET, PLAGL2 might benefit from intensified chemotherapy regimens. In contrast, patients with ET, PLAGL1 showed superior outcomes without high-dose chemotherapy or craniospinal irradiation.
Children's Cancer Centre The Royal Children's Hospital Parkville Victoria Australia
Crown Princess Victoria Children's Hospital Linköping University Hospital Linköping Sweden
Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Linköping University Linköping Sweden
Department of Clinical Radiology Kuopio University Hospital Kuopio Finland
Department of Neuro Oncology Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Utrecht the Netherlands
Department of Neuroradiology University Hospital Augsburg Augsburg Germany
Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
Department of Paediatrics The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia
Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology Valley Children's Hospital Madera California USA
Department of Radiology Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust Liverpool UK
Department of Radiology Olgahospital Klinikum Stuttgart Stuttgart Germany
Division of Imaging and Oncology Department of Radiology UMC Utrecht the Netherlands
Division of Pediatric Glioma Research Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen Germany
German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg Germany
Institut d'Hemato oncologie Pediatrique Lyon France
Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Eastern Finland Kuopio Finland
Institute of Neuropathology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Murdoch Children's Research Institute The Royal Children's Hospital Parkville Victoria Australia
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Utrecht The Netherlands
Service de Neurochirurgie B CHU de Bordeaux Bordeaux France
Université de Bordeaux Bordeaux INP CNRS IMB UMR 5251 Talence France
See more in PubMed
Capper D., Jones D. T. W., Sill M., et al., “DNA Methylation‐Based Classification of Central Nervous System Tumours,” Nature 555, no. 7697 (2018): 469–474, 10.1038/nature26000. PubMed DOI PMC
Jones C. and Baker S. J., “Unique Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms Driving Paediatric Diffuse High‐Grade Glioma,” Nature Reviews. Cancer 14, no. 10 (2014): 651–661, 10.1038/nrc3811. PubMed DOI PMC
Jones C., Karajannis M. A., Jones D. T. W., et al., “Pediatric High‐Grade Glioma: Biologically and Clinically in Need of New Thinking,” Neuro‐Oncology 19, no. 2 (2017): 153–161, 10.1093/neuonc/now101. PubMed DOI PMC
Louis D. N., Perry A., Wesseling P., et al., “The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Summary,” Neuro‐Oncology 23, no. 8 (2021): 1231–1251, 10.1093/neuonc/noab106. PubMed DOI PMC
Pfister S. M., Reyes‐Mugica M., Chan J. K. C., et al., “A Summary of the Inaugural WHO Classification of Pediatric Tumors: Transitioning From the Optical Into the Molecular Era,” Cancer Discovery 12, no. 2 (2022): 331–355, 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1094. PubMed DOI PMC
Schwartzentruber J., Korshunov A., Liu X. Y., et al., “Driver Mutations in Histone H3.3 and Chromatin Remodelling Genes in Paediatric Glioblastoma,” Nature 482, no. 7384 (2012): 226–231, 10.1038/nature10833. PubMed DOI
Wu G., Broniscer A., McEachron T. A., et al., “Somatic Histone H3 Alterations in Pediatric Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Gliomas and Non‐Brainstem Glioblastomas,” Nature Genetics 44, no. 3 (2012): 251–253, 10.1038/ng.1102. PubMed DOI PMC
Sturm D., Capper D., Andreiuolo F., et al., “Multiomic Neuropathology Improves Diagnostic Accuracy in Pediatric Neuro‐Oncology,” Nature Medicine 29, no. 4 (2023): 917–926, 10.1038/s41591-023-02255-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Alhalabi K. T., Stichel D., Sievers P., et al., “PATZ1 Fusions Define a Novel Molecularly Distinct Neuroepithelial Tumor Entity With a Broad Histological Spectrum,” Acta Neuropathologica 142, no. 5 (2021): 841–857, 10.1007/s00401-021-02354-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Keck M. K., Sill M., Wittmann A., et al., “Amplification of the PLAG‐Family Genes‐PLAGL1 and PLAGL2‐Is a Key Feature of the Novel Tumor Type CNS Embryonal Tumor With PLAGL Amplification,” Acta Neuropathologica 145, no. 1 (2023): 49–69, 10.1007/s00401-022-02516-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Sievers P., Henneken S. C., Blume C., et al., “Recurrent Fusions in PLAGL1 Define a Distinct Subset of Pediatric‐Type Supratentorial Neuroepithelial Tumors,” Acta Neuropathologica 142, no. 5 (2021): 827–839, 10.1007/s00401-021-02356-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Koelsche C., Schrimpf D., Stichel D., et al., “Sarcoma Classification by DNA Methylation Profiling,” Nature Communications 12, no. 1 (2021): 498, 10.1038/s41467-020-20603-4. PubMed DOI PMC
R Core Team , R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).
Tietze A., Mankad K., Lequin M. H., et al., “Imaging Characteristics of CNS Neuroblastoma‐FOXR2: A Retrospective and Multi‐Institutional Description of 25 Cases,” AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology 43, no. 10 (2022): 1476–1480, 10.3174/ajnr.A7644. PubMed DOI PMC
Tietze A., Bison B., Engelhardt J., et al., “CNS Embryonal Tumor With PLAGL Amplification, a New Tumor Type in Children and Adolescents: Insights From a Comprehensive MRI Analysis,” American Journal of Neuroradiology 46, no. 3 (2024): 536–543, 10.3174/ajnr.A8496. PubMed DOI PMC
Morana G., Shaw D., MacDonald S. M., et al., “Imaging Response Assessment for CNS Germ Cell Tumours: Consensus Recommendations From the European Society for Paediatric Oncology Brain Tumour Group and North American Children's Oncology Group,” Lancet Oncology 23, no. 5 (2022): e218–e228, 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00063-8. PubMed DOI
Sturm D., Orr B. A., Toprak U. H., et al., “New Brain Tumor Entities Emerge from Molecular Classification of CNS‐PNETs,” Cell 164, no. 5 (2016): 1060–1072, 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.015. PubMed DOI PMC
World Medical Association , “World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects,” Journal of the American Medical Association 310, no. 20 (2013): 2191–2194, 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. PubMed DOI
Tauziède‐Espariat A., Siegfried A., Nicaise Y., et al., “PLAG1 Fusions Extend the Spectrum of PLAG(L)‐Altered CNS Tumors,” Acta Neuropathologica 146, no. 6 (2023): 841–844, 10.1007/s00401-023-02643-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Maldonado F., Geraldo A. F., Guarnizo A., Fernández‐Ponce N., Baroni L., and Rugilo C., “Central Nervous System Embryonal Tumor With PLAGL1 Amplification: A Case Report of a Novel Entity Focusing on Imaging Findings,” Child's Nervous System: ChNS: Official Journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery 40, no. 8 (2024): 2603–2607, 10.1007/s00381-024-06422-8. PubMed DOI
Chang C. H., Housepian E. M., and C. Herbert, Jr. , “An Operative Staging System and a Megavoltage Radiotherapeutic Technic for Cerebellar Medulloblastomas,” Radiology 93, no. 6 (1969): 1351–1359, 10.1148/93.6.1351. PubMed DOI
Coltin H., Pequeno P., Liu N., et al., “The Burden of Surviving Childhood Medulloblastoma: A Population‐Based, Matched Cohort Study in Ontario, Canada,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 41, no. 13 (2023): 2372–2381, 10.1200/JCO.22.02466. PubMed DOI PMC
Taylor M. D., Northcott P. A., Korshunov A., et al., “Molecular Subgroups of Medulloblastoma: The Current Consensus,” Acta Neuropathologica 123, no. 4 (2012): 465–472, 10.1007/s00401-011-0922-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Johann P. D., Erkek S., Zapatka M., et al., “Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors Are Comprised of Three Epigenetic Subgroups With Distinct Enhancer Landscapes,” Cancer Cell 29, no. 3 (2016): 379–393, 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.02.001. PubMed DOI
Torchia J., Picard D., Lafay‐Cousin L., et al., “Molecular Subgroups of Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumours in Children: An Integrated Genomic and Clinicopathological Analysis,” Lancet Oncology 16, no. 5 (2015): 569–582, 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70114-2. PubMed DOI
von Hoff K., Haberler C., Schmitt‐Hoffner F., et al., “Therapeutic Implications of Improved Molecular Diagnostics for Rare CNS Embryonal Tumor Entities: Results of an International, Retrospective Study,” Neuro‐Oncology 23, no. 9 (2021): 1597–1611, 10.1093/neuonc/noab136. PubMed DOI PMC
Gojo J., Kjærsgaard M., Zezschwitz B. V., et al., “Rare Embryonal and Sarcomatous Central Nervous System Tumours: State‐of‐the Art and Future Directions,” European Journal of Medical Genetics 66, no. 1 (2022): 104660, 10.1016/j.ejmg.2022.104660. PubMed DOI