Sacrococcygeal teratoma - prognosis based on prenatal ultrasound diagnosis, single-center experience and literature review
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
PubMed
40269769
PubMed Central
PMC12016376
DOI
10.1186/s12884-025-07494-3
PII: 10.1186/s12884-025-07494-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Congenital tumor, Prenatal counseling, Prenatal diagnosis, Prognosis, Sacrococcygeal teratoma, Ultrasound,
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- gestační stáří MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- sakrokokcygeální krajina * diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- teratom * diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie vrozené MeSH
- ultrasonografie prenatální * MeSH
- výsledek těhotenství MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) is the most common congenital tumor. The incidence of malignant types is rare but increases with late detection or in case of relapse. Prenatal diagnosis is based on ultrasound examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Since this is a rare congenital anomaly, we should report all cases to improve prenatal diagnosis and postnatal management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of sixteen cases of sacrococcygeal teratoma delivered and treated at the University Hospital Brno between 2005 and 2020. The following criteria were evaluated: gestational week of the primary diagnosis, exact description of ultrasound findings, pregnancy management, delivery mode, correlation of prenatal ultrasound with postnatal findings in the newborn, as well as the occurrence of early and late complications in newborns and children. RESULTS: Out of sixteen cases, seven cases (43.8%) were indicated for pregnancy termination based on ultrasound findings, the parent's decision, and an estimation of an adverse pregnancy outcome. In nine cases (56.2%), the pregnancy continued and was ended by delivery. In one case, there was an early postnatal death of a newborn after birth in the 25th week of gestation. In eight cases, live fetuses were born in which the tumor was surgically removed between day 1 and 14 months after birth. There was a strong correlation between the tumor description made by prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and related severe complications in newborns. The incidence of severe early and late complications in ongoing pregnancies was very low-only one case of infection in the surgical wound requiring reoperation (12.5%) was described. In two patients (25%), a transient stoma establishment was necessary for secondary ileus. One case of recurrence of the disease at two years of age occurred, requiring the administration of chemotherapy (12.5%), and one patient has mild persistent urinary incontinence. CONCLUSION: Sacrococcygeal teratoma is one of the rarest congenital malformations. A detailed prenatal ultrasound examination is essential to estimate the pregnancy prognosis. The most predictive ultrasound predictor of favorable early and late postnatal outcomes and long-term child development is the presence of cystic sacrococcygeal formation, the most common tumor type, and the absence of signs of cardiac failure due to fetal anemia. In these cases, with early surgical treatment provided, the incidence of severe complications and long-term consequences in children is very low, and parents should be informed during prenatal counseling. It is necessary to register all the SCT cases due to the rarity of this congenital anomaly for further statistical analysis of the importance of ultrasound markers.
Sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) is a type of tumor that develops at the base of the spine in newborns. It is the most common congenital tumor. While most SCTs are not cancerous, malignant types do exist. The risk of malignancy increases if SCTs are detected late or if there is a relapse. Doctors can identify SCTs before birth using various imaging techniques: ultrasound examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The primary treatment for SCT is complete surgical removal of the tumor. Early detection and timely intervention are crucial for better outcomes. We analyzed fifteen cases of SCT treated at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Brno, between 2005 and 2020. We evaluated factors such as gestational week of diagnosis, ultrasound findings, pregnancy management, delivery mode, and correlations between prenatal and postnatal findings. Complications in newborns and children were also assessed.
Department of Neonatology University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Department of Pathology University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Brno Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Wessell A, Hersh DS, Ho C-Y, Lumpkins KM, Groves MLA. Surgical treatment of a type IV cystic sacrococcygeal teratoma with intraspinal extension utilizing a posterior-anterior-posterior approach: a case report. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018;34:977–82. 10.1007/s00381-018-3718-9 PubMed PMC
Hassan HS, Elbatarny AM. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: management and outcomes. Annals Pediatr Surg. 2014;10:72–7. 10.1097/01.XPS.0000450329.23885.6c
Yoon HM, Byeon S, Hwang J-Y, Kim JR, Jung AY, Lee JS, et al. Sacrococcygeal teratomas in newborns: a comprehensive review for the radiologists. Acta Radiol. 2018;59:236–46. 10.1177/0284185117710680 PubMed
Danzer E, Hubbard AM, Hedrick HL, Johnson MP, Wilson RD, Howell LJ, et al. Diagnosis and characterization of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma with prenatal MRI. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:W350–6. 10.2214/AJR.05.0152 PubMed
Sun D-J, Lee J-N, Long C-Y, Tsai E-M. Early diagnosis of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma: a case report. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2003;19:313–5. 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70478-4 PubMed PMC
Heurn LJ, Coumans ABC, Derikx JPM, Bekker MN, Bilardo KM, Duin LK, et al. Factors associated with poor outcome in fetuses prenatally diagnosed with sacrococcygeal teratoma. Prenat Diagn. 2021;41:1430–8. 10.1002/pd.6026 PubMed PMC
Villamil V, Girón Vallejo O, Fernández-Ibieta M, Sánchez Sánchez Á, Reyes Ríos PY, Martínez Castaño I, et al. Functional and aesthetic evaluation of sacrococcygeal teratomas. Not everything ends with surgery. Anales De Pediatría (English Edition). 2018;88:39–46. 10.1016/j.anpede.2017.03.013 PubMed
Altman RP, Randolph JG, Lilly JR. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: American Academy of Pediatrics Surgical Section Survey–1973. J Pediatr Surg. 1974;9(3):389–98. 10.1016/s0022-3468(74)80297-6. PMID: 4843993. PubMed
Phi JH. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: a tumor at the center of embryogenesis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2021;64:406–13. 10.3340/jkns.2021.0015 PubMed PMC
Krishan S, Solanki R, Sethi S. Sacrococcygeal teratoma — role of ultrasound in antenatal diagnosis and management. J HK Coll Radiol 2004;7:35–39.
Stefanovic V, Halmesmäki E. Peripartum ultrasound-guided drainage of cystic fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma for the prevention of the labor dystocia: a report of two cases. Am J Perinatol Rep. 2011;1:087–90. 10.1055/s-0031-1284220 PubMed PMC
Sinha S, Sarin YK, Deshpande VP. Neonatal sacrococcygeal teratoma: our experience with 10 cases. 2013;2:7. PubMed PMC
Van Mieghem T, Al-Ibrahim A, Deprest J, Lewi L, Langer JC, Baud D, et al. Minimally invasive therapy for fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma: case series and systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:611–9. 10.1002/uog.13315 PubMed
Seilern J, Burnand KM, Ong H, Cross K, Thompson D, Giuliani S. Sacrococcygeal teratoma with intraspinal extension: a case series and review of literature. J Pediatr Surg. 2020:S0022346820301020. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.02.003 PubMed
Wohlmuth C, Bergh E, Bell C, Johnson A, Moise KJ Jr, van Gemert MJC, et al. Clinical monitoring of sacrococcygeal teratoma. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;46:333–40. 10.1159/000496841 PubMed
Avni FE, Guibaud L, Robert Y, Segers V, Ziereisen F, Delaet M-H, et al. MR imaging of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma: diagnosis and assessment. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:179–83. 10.2214/ajr.178.1.1780179 PubMed
Rios LTM, Araujo Júnior E, Nardozza LMM, Moron AF, Martins M. da G. Prenatal diagnosis of sacrococcygeal teratoma using two and three-dimensional ultrasonography. Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012;2012:1–4. 10.1155/2012/131369
Antunes E, Werner H Jr, Daltro PA, Rodrigues L, Amim B, Guerra F, et al. Correlação entre Os Achados ultra-sonográficos e de ressonância magnética no teratoma sacrococcígeo fetal. Radiol Bras. 2008;41:163–6. 10.1590/S0100-39842008000300007
Kishore SR, Rao RM, Sridevi P, Kumar CR. Sacrococcygeal Teratoma (SCT). IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2015;14(7):48–52. 10.9790/0853-14754852
Firszt OP, Myga-Porosiło J, Pośpieszny K, Golus T, Trzeszkowska-Rotkegel S, Głowacki J, et al. Radiological features of sacrococcygeal teratomas in fetal magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography– a case report. Pjr. 2018;83:19–23. 10.5114/pjr.2018.74861 PubMed PMC
Yadav DK, Acharya SK, Bagga D, Jain V, Dhua A, Goel P, Sacrococcygeal Teratoma. Clinical characteristics, management, and long-term outcomes in a prospective study from a tertiary care center. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2020;25:15–21. 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_219_18 PubMed PMC
Cal M, de Carvalho RM, Clode N. Prenatal diagnosis of sacrococcygeal teratoma. Medicine 2016;10:340–341.
Neubert S, Trautmann K, Tanner B, Steiner E, Linke F, Bahlmann F. Sonographic prognostic factors in prenatal diagnosis of SCT. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2004;19:319–26. 10.1159/000077959 PubMed
Partridge EA, Canning D, Long C, Peranteau WH, Hedrick HL, Adzick NS, et al. Urologic and anorectal complications of sacrococcygeal teratomas: prenatal and postnatal predictors. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49:139–43. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.09.042 PubMed
Marković I, Stamenović S, Radovanović Z, Bosnjaković P, Ilić D, Stojanov D. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in prenatal diagnosis of sacrococcygeal teratoma--case report. Med Pregl. 2013;66(5–6):254–7. 10.2298/mpns1306254m. PMID: 23888736. PubMed
Oxford Health Plans, LLC. Intrauterine fetal surgery– Oxford clinical policy. UnitedHealthcare. Effective July 1, 2024.
Solanki S, Menon P, Samujh R, Gupta K, Rao N. Clinical presentation and surgical management of neonatal tumors: retrospective analysis. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2020;25:85. 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_241_18 PubMed PMC