Translation, adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale (BSPAS) for Czech patients with burn injuries
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, validační studie
PubMed
40424670
DOI
10.1016/j.burns.2025.107546
PII: S0305-4179(25)00175-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Anxiety, Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale, Dressing changes, Pain management, Patient with burn injuries,
- MeSH
- bolest * psychologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- faktorová analýza statistická MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- měření bolesti MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- popálení * psychologie komplikace MeSH
- překlady MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- psychometrie MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- úzkost * diagnóza psychologie etiologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- validační studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
This study aimed to adapt the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale (BSPAS) for use in the Czech language and evaluate its validity and reliability. Conducted across three university hospitals in the Czech Republic-Prague, Brno, and Ostrava-from September 2022 to February 2024, the study involved 203 inpatients and outpatients from burn units who met inclusion criteria and consented to participate. The adaptation process included rigorous analysis of validity and reliability, employing language, content, and construct validity assessments. Language validity was ensured through back translation, whereas content validity was confirmed through expert evaluations. Exploratory factor analysis revealed at least a two-factor structure with satisfactory factor loading. Loading of factors to questions was consistent between BSPAS-9 and BSPAS-5. Confirmatory factor analysis further substantiated the model fit for both five- and nine-item versions (RMSEA 0.06 and 0.1 respectively). Internal consistency was assessed using item-total correlation, yielding acceptable results (range 0.63-0.82 for nine items and 0.71-0.82 for five items). Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.94 for the nine-item version and 0.91 for the five-item version. These findings indicate that the Czech version of the BSPAS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing pain-related anxiety in patients with burns. Additionally, we show that in our population, the information from the nine-item version is well captured by the five-item version and pain alone explains most of the variance in BSPAS scores.
2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Bioinformatics 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
