Factors influencing distribution and local coexistence of diploids and tetraploids of Vicia cracca: inferences from a common garden experiment
Jazyk angličtina Země Japonsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
28290078
DOI
10.1007/s10265-017-0925-5
PII: 10.1007/s10265-017-0925-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Drought stress, Polyploid, Seed production, Seed weight, Sympatric, Vegetative growth,
- MeSH
- biomasa MeSH
- diploidie MeSH
- ploidie MeSH
- semena rostlinná genetika růst a vývoj MeSH
- semenáček genetika růst a vývoj MeSH
- sympatrie MeSH
- tetraploidie MeSH
- vikev genetika růst a vývoj MeSH
- zahrady MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
Vicia cracca diploids and autotetraploids are highly parapatric in Europe; tetraploids reside in western and northern part, whereas diploids occupy much drier south-eastern part. They meet together in a Central European contact zone. This distribution pattern raised questions about a transformative effect of polyploidization on plant performance and environmental tolerances. We investigated plant survival, growth, and seed production in two water regimes in a common garden experiment using seeds collected from five localities in the Central European contact zone where diploids and tetraploids occur in sympatry. Obtained data imply that tetraploids of V. cracca are not generally superior in performance to diploids. Significantly larger seeds from tetraploid mother plants collected in the field were not correlated with greater stature of the seedlings. Nonetheless, tetraploids might have a potential to out-compete diploids in the long run due to the tetraploids' ability of greater growth which manifested in the second year of cultivation. Considering the response of diploids and tetraploids to water supply, drought stressed tetraploids but not diploids produced a higher proportion of aborted seeds than watered ones, which implies that tetraploids are more drought susceptible than diploids. On the other hand, decreased plant height in drought stresses tetraploids, which simultaneously increased total seed production, may suggest that tetraploids have a greater ability to avoid local extinction under unfavourable conditions by enhancing biomass allocation into production of seeds at the cost of lower growth. The significant interaction between ploidy level and locality in several traits suggests possible polyfyletic origin of tetraploids and the necessity to clarify the history of the tetraploids in Europe.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Am J Bot. 2014 Jun 11;101(6):935-945 PubMed
Ann Bot. 2014 Jan;113(1):159-70 PubMed
Ann Bot. 2012 Oct;110(5):1047-55 PubMed
Evolution. 2005 Sep;59(9):1928-35 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Feb 7;267(1440):217-23 PubMed
Evolution. 2007 Jan;61(1):125-40 PubMed
Science. 1994 Apr 15;264(5157):421-4 PubMed
Oecologia. 2008 Dec;158(3):463-72 PubMed
Evolution. 1999 Aug;53(4):1114-1127 PubMed
Oecologia. 2006 Mar;147(2):369-78 PubMed
Am J Bot. 2013 Mar;100(3):496-508 PubMed
Nature. 2011 May 5;473(7345):97-100 PubMed
Evolution. 2015 Oct;69(10 ):2689-704 PubMed
BMC Plant Biol. 2013 Nov 04;13:173 PubMed
Breed Sci. 2013 Dec;63(4):393-9 PubMed
Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Sep;14(9):348-352 PubMed
New Phytol. 2009 Nov;184(3):721-31 PubMed
Mol Ecol. 2007 Jul;16(13):2755-67 PubMed
New Phytol. 2011 Oct;192(1):256-65 PubMed
Evolution. 2010 Jul;64(7):2097-109 PubMed
Am J Bot. 2007 Sep;94(9):1527-33 PubMed
Oecologia. 2006 Dec;150(3):398-408 PubMed
New Phytol. 2012 May;194(3):629-46 PubMed
Evolution. 2002 Nov;56(11):2168-77 PubMed
Evolution. 2011 Jun;65(6):1667-79 PubMed
J Plant Res. 2007 Jan;120(1):139-47 PubMed
Am J Bot. 2014 Nov;101(11):1868-75 PubMed
Am J Bot. 2015 Aug;102(8):1380-95 PubMed
Oecologia. 2010 Jul;163(3):661-73 PubMed
Am J Bot. 2011 Oct;98(10):1595-601 PubMed
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Aug 5;369(1648):null PubMed
Am J Bot. 2011 Dec;98(12):1935-42 PubMed
Evolution. 1995 Dec;49(6):1095-1107 PubMed
New Phytol. 2013 Feb;197(3):970-8 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 18;106(33):13875-9 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 26;108(17):7096-101 PubMed
New Phytol. 2008;178(4):888-96 PubMed