Coordinated implementation of a conventional PCR assay to detect all Ebola and Marburg virus species in a European laboratory network
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, validační studie
PubMed
40451100
DOI
10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105808
PII: S1386-6532(25)00050-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Diagnostic testing, Filovirus, Nested PCR, Quality improvement,
- MeSH
- diagnostické techniky molekulární metody MeSH
- hemoragická horečka Ebola * diagnóza virologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- limita detekce MeSH
- marburgská horečka * diagnóza virologie MeSH
- polymerázová řetězová reakce * metody MeSH
- RNA virová genetika MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- virus Ebola * izolace a purifikace genetika MeSH
- virus Marburg * izolace a purifikace genetika MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- validační studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
- Názvy látek
- RNA virová MeSH
BACKGROUND: Filoviruses, including Ebola and Marburg viruses, cause severe hemorrhagic fever in humans and primates. These viruses pose significant threats to public health, making rapid and sensitive detection critical for controlling outbreaks. We developed and validated a hemi-nested generic PanFilo assay to detect all Ebola virus species, Marburg viruses, and recently discovered bat filoviruses. This assay was deployed to 15 European laboratories and evaluated through testing of eight non-infectious samples. OBJECTIVES: Laboratories were asked to determine the detection limit of positive controls and test all samples using the assay provided. The deployed assay enables direct Nanopore sequencing of PCR products, by using tagged primers during the second round of PCR. Sequencing of the samples was carried out on a voluntary basis. RESULTS: Multicenter validation revealed a 95 % limit of detection of 5309 RNA copies/µL for Ebola, 10,273 copies/µL for Marburg, and 2145 copies/µL for Mengla virus. In an implementation quality assessment, 93.3 % (84/90) of samples containing filovirus RNA were correctly identified and 100 % (30/30) of filovirus-negative samples were correctly identified. Thirteen laboratories sequenced PCR products, with nine identifying all positive samples correctly. CONCLUSION: The assay enables rapid and reliable detection of filoviruses, with sequencing capabilities for identifying both known and novel variants. This assay might be used for detection during the initial phase of an emerging filovirus outbreak, before a specific assay has been developed. However, our distribution across 15 laboratories revealed variability challenges due to reagents, human performance, and sequencing capacity, emphasizing the need for more training and standardization.
Croatian Institute of Public Health Zagreb Croatia
Department of Microbiology Immunology and Transplantation Rega Institute KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
Department of Viroscience Erasmus MC Rotterdam the Netherlands
Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital HUS Diagnostic Center Helsinki Finland
Institute of Diagnostic Virology Friedrich Loeffler Institute Greifswald Insel Riems Germany
Malopolska Centre of Biotechnology Jagiellonian University Gronostajowa 7A 30 387 Krakow Poland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org