Coordinated implementation of a conventional PCR assay to detect all Ebola and Marburg virus species in a European laboratory network
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Validation Study
PubMed
40451100
DOI
10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105808
PII: S1386-6532(25)00050-2
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Diagnostic testing, Filovirus, Nested PCR, Quality improvement,
- MeSH
- Molecular Diagnostic Techniques methods MeSH
- Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola * diagnosis virology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Limit of Detection MeSH
- Marburg Virus Disease * diagnosis virology MeSH
- Polymerase Chain Reaction * methods MeSH
- RNA, Viral genetics MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Ebolavirus * isolation & purification genetics MeSH
- Marburgvirus * isolation & purification genetics MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Validation Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
- Names of Substances
- RNA, Viral MeSH
BACKGROUND: Filoviruses, including Ebola and Marburg viruses, cause severe hemorrhagic fever in humans and primates. These viruses pose significant threats to public health, making rapid and sensitive detection critical for controlling outbreaks. We developed and validated a hemi-nested generic PanFilo assay to detect all Ebola virus species, Marburg viruses, and recently discovered bat filoviruses. This assay was deployed to 15 European laboratories and evaluated through testing of eight non-infectious samples. OBJECTIVES: Laboratories were asked to determine the detection limit of positive controls and test all samples using the assay provided. The deployed assay enables direct Nanopore sequencing of PCR products, by using tagged primers during the second round of PCR. Sequencing of the samples was carried out on a voluntary basis. RESULTS: Multicenter validation revealed a 95 % limit of detection of 5309 RNA copies/µL for Ebola, 10,273 copies/µL for Marburg, and 2145 copies/µL for Mengla virus. In an implementation quality assessment, 93.3 % (84/90) of samples containing filovirus RNA were correctly identified and 100 % (30/30) of filovirus-negative samples were correctly identified. Thirteen laboratories sequenced PCR products, with nine identifying all positive samples correctly. CONCLUSION: The assay enables rapid and reliable detection of filoviruses, with sequencing capabilities for identifying both known and novel variants. This assay might be used for detection during the initial phase of an emerging filovirus outbreak, before a specific assay has been developed. However, our distribution across 15 laboratories revealed variability challenges due to reagents, human performance, and sequencing capacity, emphasizing the need for more training and standardization.
Croatian Institute of Public Health Zagreb Croatia
Department of Microbiology Immunology and Transplantation Rega Institute KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
Department of Viroscience Erasmus MC Rotterdam the Netherlands
Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital HUS Diagnostic Center Helsinki Finland
Institute of Diagnostic Virology Friedrich Loeffler Institute Greifswald Insel Riems Germany
Malopolska Centre of Biotechnology Jagiellonian University Gronostajowa 7A 30 387 Krakow Poland
References provided by Crossref.org