Application of Molecular Dynamic Simulation in the Enantiorecognition Mechanism of the Pharmaceutically Relevant Leu-Phe Dipeptides With Four Zwitterionic Chiral Stationary Phases
Language English Country Germany Media print
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
21-31139J
Czech Science Foundation
ECS00000041
Italian Ministry of University and Research
J97G22000170005
Italian Ministry of University and Research
8J23AT017
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic
PubMed
40629535
PubMed Central
PMC12238692
DOI
10.1002/jssc.70220
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- HPLC, enantiorecognition mechanism, molecular dynamic simulations, zwitterionic Cinchona alkaloids‐based chiral stationary phases,
- MeSH
- Dipeptides * chemistry MeSH
- Phenylalanine * chemistry MeSH
- Molecular Dynamics Simulation * MeSH
- Stereoisomerism MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Dipeptides * MeSH
- Phenylalanine * MeSH
In order to broaden the applicability of the molecular dynamics technique and to further validate the efficacy of a computational protocol recently developed in our laboratory, the present study aims to elucidate the enantiorecognition mechanisms involving four zwitterionic Cinchona alkaloid-based CSPs under reversed-phase (RP) conditions. In this study, we use the enantiomeric dipeptides D-leucine-D-phenylalanine and L-leucine-L-phenylalanine as probes to investigate the properties of CHIRALPAK ZWIX(+) and ZWIX(-), as well as ZWIX(+A) and ZWIX (-A). The Leu-Phe dipeptide has considerable potential in the pharmaceutical field due to its potential applications in drug delivery, therapeutics and as a building block for peptidomimetics. Furthermore, Leu-Phe is one of the few uncapped dipeptides composed of natural amino acids capable of forming stable hydrogels. The in silico protocol was successfully optimized by setting the simulation box size, run time, and number of frames to record to generate molecular dynamics trajectories as informative as possible. Importantly, the analyses were in complete agreement with the experimental EO, providing insights into the driving forces involved in the enantiorecognition mechanism. In particular, salt bridges and hydrogen bonds were confirmed as the primary interactions, while π-π and π-cation interactions were identified as complementary to facilitate the SO-SA association.
Department of Organic Chemistry University of Chemistry and Technology Prague Czech Republic
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences University of Perugia Perugia Italy
See more in PubMed
Peluso P. and Chankvetadze B., “Recent Developments in Molecular Modeling Tools and Applications Related to Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Research,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 238 (2024): 115836. PubMed
Peluso P. and Chankvetadze B., “Recognition in the Domain of Molecular Chirality: From Noncovalent Interactions to Separation of Enantiomers,” Chemical Reviews 122 (2022): 13235–13400. PubMed
Sardella R., Camaioni E., Macchiarulo A., Gioiello A., Marinozzi M., and Carotti A., “Computational Studies in Enantioselective Liquid Chromatography: Forty Years of Evolution in Docking‐ and Molecular Dynamics‐Based Simulations,” TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 122 (2020): 115703.
Scriba G. K. E., “Chiral Recognition in Separation Sciences. Part I: Polysaccharide and Cyclodextrin Selectors,” TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 120 (2019): 115639.
Scriba G. K. E., “Chiral Recognition in Separation Sciences. Part II: Macrocyclic Glycopeptide, Donor‐Acceptor, Ion‐Exchange, Ligand‐Exchange and Micellar Selectors,” TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 119 (2019): 115628.
Laemmerhofer M., “Chiral Recognition by Enantioselective Liquid Chromatography: Mechanisms and Modern Chiral Stationary Phases,” Journal of Chromatography A 1217 (2010): 814–856. PubMed
Ianni F., Cerra B., Moroni G., et al., “Combining Molecular Modeling Approaches to Establish the Chromatographic Enantiomer Elution Order in the Absence of Pure Enantiomeric Standards: A Study Case With Two Tetracyclic Quinolines,” Separation Science Plus 5 (2022): 662–670.
Varfaj I., Pershina M. V., Stepanova M. V., Sardella R., Asnin L. D., and Carotti A., “Elucidation of Retention Mechanism of Dipeptides on a Ristocetin A‐Based Chiral Stationary Phase Using a Combination of Chromatographic and Molecular Simulation Techniques,” Journal of Chromatography A 1675 (2022): 463158. PubMed
Dallocchio R., Dessì A., Sechi B., et al., “Enantioseparation of Planar Chiral Ferrocenes on Cellulose‐Based Chiral Stationary Phases: Benzoate Versus Carbamate Pendant Groups,” Electrophoresis 44 (2022): 203–216. PubMed
Varfaj I., Labikova M., Sardella R., et al., “A Journey in Unraveling the Enantiorecognition Mechanism of 3,5‐Dinitrobenzoyl‐Amino Acids With Two PubMed
Plotska J., Tobiszewski M., Sulej A. M., Kupska M., Górecki T., and Namiesnik J., “Green Chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography A 1307 (2013): 1–20. PubMed
Anastas P. T. and Warner G. C., Green Chemistry Theory and Practice (Oxford University Press, 2000).
Bellotto O., Kralj S., De Zorzi R., Geremia S., and Marchesan S., “Supramolecular Hydrogels From Unprotected Dipeptides: A Comparative Study on Stereoisomers and Structural Isomers,” Soft Matter 16 (2020): 10151–10157. PubMed
Kulkarni N., Rao P., Jadhav G. S., et al., “Emerging Role of Injectable Dipeptide Hydrogels in Biomedical Applications,” ACS Omega 8 (2023): 3551–3570. PubMed PMC
Martinez L., Andrade R., Birgin E. G., and Martinez J. M., “PACKMOL: A Package for Building Initial Configurations for Molecular Dynamics Simulations,” Journal of Computational Chemistry 30 (2009): 2157–2164. PubMed
Hoover W. G., “Canonical Dynamics: Equilibrium Phase‐Space Distributions,” Physical Review A 31 (1985): 1695–1697. PubMed
Nosé S. A., “A Unified Formulation of the Constant Temperature Molecular Dynamics Methods,” Journal of Chemical Physics 81 (1984): 511–519.
Shaw D. E., “A Fast, Scalable Method for the Parallel Evaluation of Distance‐Limited Pairwise Particle Interactions,” Journal of Computational Chemistry 26 (2005): 1318–1328. PubMed
Gargano A. F. G., Kohout M., Macíková P., Laemmerhofer M., and Lindner W., “Direct High‐Performance Liquid Chromatographic Enantioseparation of Free α‐, β‐ and γ‐Aminophosphonic Acids Employing PubMed
Mimini V., Ianni F., Marini F., Hettegger H., Sardella R., and Lindner W., “Electrostatic Attraction‐Repulsion Model With PubMed
Ianni F., Carotti A., Marinozz M., et al., “Diastereo‐ and Enantioseparation of a N(α)‐Boc Amino Acid With a Zwitterionic Quinine‐Based Stationary Phase: Focus on the Stereorecognition Mechanism,” Analytica Chimica Acta 885 (2015): 174–182. PubMed
Varfaj I., Protti M., Di Michele A., et al., “Efficient Enantioresolution of Aromatic α‐Hydroxy Acids With PubMed
Cerra B., Macchiarulo A., Carotti A., et al., “Enantioselective HPLC Analysis to Assist the Chemical Exploration of Chiral Imidazolines,” Molecules 25 (2020): 640. PubMed PMC
Cerra B., Carotti A., Passeri D., et al., “Exploiting Chemical Toolboxes for the Expedited Generation of Tetracyclic Quinolines as a Novel Class of PXR Agonists,” ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 10 (2019): 677–681. PubMed PMC
Varfaj I., Abualzulof G. W. A., Moretti S., et al., “Development of an Easy‐To‐Set‐Up Multiple Heart‐Cutting Achiral–Chiral LC–LC Method for the Analysis of Branched‐Chain Amino Acids in Commercial Tablets,” Electrophoresis 45 (2024): 1041–1053. PubMed
Varfaj I., Di Michele A., Ianni F., et al., “Enantioseparation of Novel Anti‐Inflammatory Chiral Sulfoxides With Two Cellulose Dichlorophenylcarbamate‐Based Chiral Stationary Phases and Polar‐Organic Mobile Phase(s),” Journal of Chromatography Open 1 (2021): 100022.
Sardella R., Ianni F., Di Michele A., et al., “Enantioresolution and Stereochemical Characterization of Two Chiral Sulfoxides Endowed With COX‐2 Inhibitory Activity,” Chirality 29 (2017): 536–540. PubMed
Grecso N., Kohout M., Carotti A., et al., “Mechanistic Considerations of Enantiorecognition on Novel PubMed
Sardella R., Macchiarulo A., Urbinati F., et al., “Exploring the Enantiorecognition Mechanism of PubMed
Maier N. M., Schefzick S., Lombardo G. M., et al., “Elucidation of the Chiral Recognition Mechanism of PubMed
Berthod M. R., Cebron N., Dill F., et al., “KNIME: The Konstanz Information Miner,” in Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization, ed. Gaul W. and Vichi M. (Springer, 2015).
Asnin L., Hercikova J., Lindner W., et al., “Chiral Separation of Dipeptides on PubMed
Scriba G., “Chiral Recognition Mechanisms in Analytical Separation Sciences,” Chromatographia 75 (2012): 815–838.
Ilisz A. B., Peter A., and Lindner W., “ PubMed
Laemmerhofer M. and Lindner W., “Chiral Stationary Phases Derived From Cinchona Alkaloids,” in Chiral Separations and Stereochemical Elucidation, ed. Cass Q. B., Tiritan M. E., Batista Junior J. M., and Barreiro J. C. (Wiley, 2023), 415–460.
Laemmerhofer M. and Lindner W., “Quinine and Quinidine Derivatives as Chiral Selectors I. Brush Type Chiral Stationary Phases for High‐Performance Liquid Chromatography Based on Cinchonan Carbamates and Their Application as Chiral Anion Exchangers,” Journal of Chromatography A 741 (1996): 33–48.
Maier N. M., Nicoletti L., Laemmerhofer M., and Lindner W., “Enantioselective Anion Exchangers Based on PubMed
Lammerhofer M. and Lindner W., “Liquid Chromatographic Enantiomer Separation and Chiral Recognition by PubMed
Ilisz A. M., Tymecka D., Lázár L., Lindner W., and Péter A., “Comparison of the Separation Performances of PubMed PMC
Bajtai A., Ilisz I., Peter A., and Lindner W., “Liquid Chromatographic Resolution of Natural and Racemic PubMed
Hellriegel U. S., Albert K., Laemmerhofer M., Maier N. M., and Lindner W., “Characterization of a Chiral Stationary Phase by HR/MAS NMR Spectroscopy and Investigation of Enantioselective Interaction With Chiral Ligates by Transferred NOE,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 126 (2004): 3809–3816. PubMed