OBJECTIVES: A Prague out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) study has demonstrated that an invasive approach (early transport to the hospital, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation [ECPR]) is a feasible and effective treatment strategy in refractory OHCA. This post hoc analysis of the Prague OHCA study aimed to stratify the prognosis of patients according to the detailed course of heart rhythm during prehospital and early hospital periods. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: This analysis included all 256 patients (median age 58, 17% females) randomized to the Prague OHCA study. The sequence of heart rhythms during the prehospital period was analyzed in terms of neurologic outcomes after 180 days. The primary outcome was a composite of survival with Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2 at 180 days. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Within the study cohort, 156 (61%) manifested ventricular fibrillation (VF), 45 pulseless electrical activity, and 55 asystole as the initial rhythm. Patients with an initial VF who reached a sustained recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) had the highest proportion of reaching a primary outcome (32/44 [73%]). Patients who had one or more episodes of asystole during cardiopulmonary resuscitation had the lowest rate of primary endpoint (5/39 [13%]). Patients who experienced intermittent ROSC showed a higher success rate in achieving the primary outcome when treated with an invasive-based approach (including ECPR) compared with the conventional strategy (26/34 [76%] vs. 24/50 [48%]; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Achieving ROSC is the best prognostic marker in OHCA patients with an initially refractory VF. Patients with intermittent ROSC after the initial VF and ongoing VF seem to be optimal candidates for an invasive approach. Asystole detection at any time during resuscitation is a strong negative prognostic marker, irrespective of the initial rhythm.

2nd Department of Medicine Department of Cardiovascular Medicine 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital Prague Prague Czech Republic

Czech Institute of Informatics Robotics and Cybernetics Czech Technical University Prague Prague Czech Republic

Emergency Medical Service Prague Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Perkins GD, Graesner JT, Semeraro F, et al. ; European Resuscitation Council Guideline Collaborators: European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: Executive summary. Resuscitation. 2021; 161:1–60 PubMed

Drennan IR, Lin S, Sidalak DE, et al. : Survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients transported without prehospital return of spontaneous circulation: An observational cohort study. Resuscitation. 2014; 85:1488–1493 PubMed

Wampler DA, Collett L, Manifold CA, et al. : Cardiac arrest survival is rare without prehospital return of spontaneous circulation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012; 16:451–455 PubMed

Haas NL, Coute RA, Hsu CH, et al. : Descriptive analysis of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest—an ELSO registry study. Resuscitation. 2017; 119:56–62 PubMed PMC

Kagawa E, Dote K, Kato M, et al. : Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiac arrest?: Rapid-response extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-arrest percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2012; 126:1605–1613 PubMed

Ortega-Deballon I, Hornby L, Shemie SD, et al. : Extracorporeal resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in adults: A systematic review of international practices and outcomes. Resuscitation. 2016; 101:12–20 PubMed

Schober A, Sterz F, Herkner H, et al. : Emergency extracorporeal life support and ongoing resuscitation: A retrospective comparison for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Emerg Med J. 2017; 34:277–281 PubMed

Wallmuller C, Sterz F, Testori C, et al. : Emergency cardio-pulmonary bypass in cardiac arrest: Seventeen years of experience. Resuscitation. 2013; 84:326–330 PubMed

Belohlavek J, Smalcova J, Rob D, et al. ; Prague OHCA Study Group: Effect of intra-arrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and immediate invasive assessment and treatment on functional neurologic outcome in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022; 327:737–747 PubMed PMC

Belohlavek J, Yannopoulos D, Smalcova J, et al. : Intraarrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and early invasive management in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An individual patient data pooled analysis of two randomised trials. EClinicalMedicine. 2023; 59:101988. PubMed PMC

Berdowski J, Berg RA, Tijssen JG, et al. : Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: Systematic review of 67 prospective studies. Resuscitation. 2010; 81:1479–1487 PubMed

Hasselqvist-Ax I, Riva G, Herlitz J, et al. : Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372:2307–2315 PubMed

Nichol G, Thomas E, Callaway CW, et al. ; Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Investigators: Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome. JAMA. 2008; 300:1423–1431 PubMed PMC

Sasson C, Rogers MA, Dahl J, et al. : Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010; 3:63–81 PubMed

Havranek S, Fingrova Z, Rob D, et al. : Initial rhythm and survival in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Post-hoc analysis of the Prague OHCA randomized trial. Resuscitation. 2022; 181:289–296 PubMed

Bhandari S, Doan J, Blackwood J, et al. : Rhythm profiles and survival after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2018; 125:22–27 PubMed

Mandigers L, Rietdijk WJR, den Uil CA, et al. : Cardiac rhythm changes during transfer from the emergency medical service to the emergency department: A retrospective tertiary single-center analysis on prevalence and outcomes. J Emerg Med. 2023; 65:e180–e187 PubMed

Kandori K, Okada Y, Okada A, et al. : Association between cardiac rhythm conversion and neurological outcome among cardiac arrest patients with initial shockable rhythm: A nationwide prospective study in Japan. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021; 10:119–126 PubMed

Maeda K, Inoue A, Kuroda Y, et al. : Association between converting asystole from initial shockable ECG rhythm before extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and outcome. Shock. 2021; 56:701–708 PubMed

Nakashima T, Noguchi T, Tahara Y, et al. ; SAVE-J Group: Patients with refractory out-of-cardiac arrest and sustained ventricular fibrillation as candidates for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation—prospective multi-center observational study. Circ J. 2019; 83:1011–1018 PubMed

Cournoyer A, Cossette S, Potter BJ, et al. : Prognostic impact of the conversion to a shockable rhythm from a non-shockable rhythm for patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2019; 140:43–49 PubMed

Luo S, Zhang Y, Zhang W, et al. : Prognostic significance of spontaneous shockable rhythm conversion in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with initial non-shockable heart rhythms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2017; 121:1–8 PubMed

Myat A, Song KJ, Rea T: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Current concepts. Lancet. 2018; 391:970–979 PubMed

Rob D, Farkasovska K, Kavalkova P, et al. : Heart rhythm at hospital admission: A factor for survival and neurological outcome among ECPR recipients? Resuscitation. 2024; 204:110412. PubMed

Belohlavek J, Kucera K, Jarkovsky J, et al. : Hyperinvasive approach to out-of hospital cardiac arrest using mechanical chest compression device, prehospital intraarrest cooling, extracorporeal life support and early invasive assessment compared to standard of care. A randomized parallel groups comparative study proposal. “Prague OHCA study”. J Transl Med. 2012; 10:163. PubMed PMC

Monsieurs KG, Nolan JP, Bossaert LL, et al. ; ERC Guidelines 2015 Writing Group: European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation. 2015; 95:1–80 PubMed

Nolan JP, Soar J, Zideman DA, et al. ; ERC Guidelines Writing Group: European Resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2010 section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation. 2010; 81:1219–1276 PubMed

Pozzi M, Koffel C, Armoiry X, et al. : Extracorporeal life support for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Should we still fight for? A single-centre, 5-year experience. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 204:70–76 PubMed

Kim SJ, Jung JS, Park JH, et al. : An optimal transition time to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for predicting good neurological outcome in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A propensity-matched study. Crit Care. 2014; 18:535. PubMed PMC

Pabst D, Brehm CE: Is pulseless electrical activity a reason to refuse cardiopulmonary resuscitation with ECMO support? Am J Emerg Med. 2018; 36:637–640 PubMed

Kern KB, Garewal HS, Sanders AB, et al. : Depletion of myocardial adenosine triphosphate during prolonged untreated ventricular fibrillation: Effect on defibrillation success. Resuscitation. 1990; 20:221–229 PubMed

Weisfeldt ML, Becker LB: Resuscitation after cardiac arrest: A 3-phase time-sensitive model. JAMA. 2002; 288:3035–3038 PubMed

Grunau B, Rob D, Huptych M, et al. : The time-dependent yield of invasive vs. standard resuscitation strategies: A secondary analysis of the Prague out-of-hospital cardiac arrest study. Resuscitation. 2024; 203:110347. PubMed

Grunau B, Kime N, Leroux B, et al. : Association of intra-arrest transport vs continued on-scene resuscitation with survival to hospital discharge among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2020; 324:1058–1067 PubMed PMC

Rajan S, Folke F, Hansen SM, et al. : Incidence and survival outcome according to heart rhythm during resuscitation attempt in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with presumed cardiac etiology. Resuscitation. 2017; 114:157–163 PubMed

Goto T, Morita S, Kitamura T, et al. : Impact of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation on outcomes of elderly patients who had out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: A single-centre retrospective analysis. BMJ Open. 2018; 8:e019811 PubMed PMC

Hallstrom A, Rea TD, Mosesso VN, Jr, et al. : The relationship between shocks and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients initially found in PEA or asystole. Resuscitation. 2007; 74:418–426 PubMed

Herlitz J, Svensson L, Engdahl J, et al. : Characteristics and outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest when patients are found in a non-shockable rhythm. Resuscitation. 2008; 76:31–36 PubMed

Kajino K, Iwami T, Daya M, et al. : Subsequent ventricular fibrillation and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests presenting with PEA or asystole. Resuscitation. 2008; 79:34–40 PubMed