From infancy to toddlerhood: A 3D analysis of facial asymmetry in children with and without orofacial clefts
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
40751836
PubMed Central
PMC12317876
DOI
10.1007/s00784-025-06484-1
PII: 10.1007/s00784-025-06484-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- 3D landmarks-based methods, Directional asymmetry, Facial development with cleft, Geometric morphometrics, Infancy & toddlerhood, Polygonal mesh analyses,
- MeSH
- asymetrie obličeje * diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- rozštěp patra * chirurgie diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- rozštěp rtu * chirurgie diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- studie případů a kontrol MeSH
- zobrazování trojrozměrné * MeSH
- Check Tag
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVES: This study investigates facial directional asymmetry (DA) in early childhood. Using 3D imaging, it aims to assess the DA progression in healthy controls and children with unilateral cleft lip (CL) and unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) following early neonatal cheiloplasty and palatoplasty. MATERIALS & METHODS: The sample consisted of 105 children (groups: cleft 42, control 63) aged 0.2-2 years. DA was analysed using geometric morphometrics, including 3D landmark-based and polygonal mesh analyses. Multivariate statistics were used for assessing DA significance and age group differences. RESULTS: Controls showed no DA in landmarks and only mild protrusion of the right hemiface, increasing with age. In groups with cleft, DA was more pronounced in UCLP and especially in the middle of the face. While older UCLP children showed more asymmetrical faces, DA in children with CL became more comparable to that in controls with increasing age. Older children showed no statistical difference between control and CL in the landmark and polygonal maps parts. CONCLUSIONS: After surgical treatment, a DA pattern was identified, and it was specific for both cleft types and age categories. For both diagnoses, the most notable feature is the protrusion at the cleft site, likely related to post-surgical scarring, but in the UCLP group, it is also the hypoplastic nasal wing and a growth insufficiency of the cheek on the cleft side. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: 3D methodologies provide insight into asymmetry progression and surgical outcomes, supporting improved cleft management for enhanced aesthetic and functional results.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Enlow DH, Hans MG (2008) Essentials of facial growth, 2 edn. Needham Press, Inc., Ohio
Kluba S, Bopp C, Bacher M, Reinert S, Krimmel M (2015) Morphological analysis of the lip and nose following cleft lip repair with simultaneous partial primary rhinoplasty: a prospective study over 4 years. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 43:599–605. 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.02.019 PubMed
Semb G, Brattström V, Mølsted K, Prahl-Andersen B, Shaw WC (2005) The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 1: introduction and treatment experience. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 42:64–68. 10.1597/02-119.1.1 PubMed
Gosla Reddy S, Devarakonda V, Reddy RR (2013) Assessment of nostril symmetry after primary cleft rhinoplasty in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 41:147–152. 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.07.001 PubMed
Borský J, Velemínská J, Jurovčík M, Kozak J, Hechtová D, Tvrdek M, Černý M, Kabelka Z, Fajstavr J, Janota J, Zach J, Peterková R, Peterka M (2012) Successful early neonatal repair of cleft lip within first 8 days of life. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76:1616–1626. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.07.031 PubMed
Tobiasen JM, Hiebert JM (1993) Clefting and psychosocial adjustment. Influence of facial aesthetics. Clin Plast Surg 20 PubMed
Hood CA, Bock M, Hosey MT, Bowman A, Ayoub AF (2003) Facial asymmetry – 3D assessment of infants with cleft lip & palate. Int J Paediatr Dent 13:404–410. 10.1046/j.1365-263X.2003.00496.x PubMed
Meyer-Marcotty P, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Bareis U, Hartmann J, Kochel J (2011) Three-dimensional perception of facial asymmetry. Eur J Orthod 33:647–653. 10.1093/ejo/cjq146 PubMed
Radwańska K, Radwański M, Antoszewski B (2021) The assessment of facial asymmetry in patients with uni- or bilateral cleft lip and palate. Pomeranian J Life Sci 67
Moore MLG, Nguyen T-HC, Day KM, Weinfeld AB (2020) Pyriform costal cartilage graft improves cleft-side alar asymmetry in secondary cleft rhinoplasty. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J 57:537–542. 10.1177/1055665619882558 PubMed
Moore KL, Persaud TVN, Torchia MG (2016) Before we are born: essentials of embryology and birth defects, 9th edition. Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA
Bell A, Lo T-WR, Brown D, Bowman AW, Siebert JP, Simmons DR, Millett DT, Ayoub AF (2014) Three-dimensional assessment of facial appearance following surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 51:462–471. 10.1597/12-140 PubMed
Sharma VP, Bella H, Cadier MM, Pigott RW, Goodacre TEE, Richard BM (2012) Outcomes in facial aesthetics in cleft lip and palate surgery: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65:1233–1245. 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.04.001 PubMed
Ross R (1987) Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J PubMed
Ben Bouhjar N, Kleinheinz J, Dirksen D, Berssenbrügge P, Runte C, Wermker K (2019) Facial and midfacial symmetry in cleft patients: comparison to non-cleft children and influence of the primary treatment concept. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 47:741–749. 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.041 PubMed
Jurovčík M, Borský J, Černý M, Velemínská J, Kožejová Jaklová L, Hanousková L, Skřivan J (2020) První Příznaky Sekretorické otitidy u Novorozenců operovaných pro Rozštěpovou vadu – záchyt v desetiletém Souboru. Otorinolaryngologie Foniatrie 55–61
INUS Technology, Inc (2006) Rapidform
Klingenberg C (2015) Analyzing fluctuating asymmetry with geometric morphometrics: concepts, methods, and applications. Symmetry 7:843–934. 10.3390/sym7020843
Dupej J, Krajíček V (2023) Morphome3cs
Klingenberg CP (2011) MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics PubMed
Mardia KV, Bookstein FL, Moreton IJ (2000) Statistical assessment of bilateral symmetry of shapes. Biometrika Trust 285–300
Bonferroni CE (1936) Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilit `a. Pubblicazioni del R Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali di Firenze 3–62
Myronenko A, Xubo S (2010) Point set registration: coherent point drift. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32:2262–2275. 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.46 PubMed
Dupej J, Krajíček V, Velemínská J, Pelikán J (2014) Statistical Mesh Shape Analysis with Nonlandmark Nonrigid Registration
von Cramon-Taubadel N, Frazier BC, Lahr MM (2007) The problem of assessing landmark error in geometric morphometrics: theory, methods, and modifications. Am J Phys Anthropol 134:24–35. 10.1002/ajpa.20616 PubMed
Krajíček V, Dupej J, Velemínská J, Pelikán J (2012) Morphometric analysis of mesh asymmetry. Journal of WSCG
R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Wickham H, Hester J, Bryan J (2024) readr: Read Rectangular Text Data
da Silva AR (2021) biotools: Tools for Biometry and Applied Statistics in Agricultural Science
Fox J, Weisberg S (2019) An R Companion to Applied Regression
Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346–363. 10.1002/bimj.200810425 PubMed
Curran J, Hersh T (2021) Hotelling: hotelling’s T^2. Test and Variants
Friendly M, Fox J (2024) candisc: Visualizing Generalized Canonical Discriminant and Canonical Correlation Analysis
Collyer ML, Adams DC (2024) RPP: Linear Model Evaluation with Randomized Residuals in a Permutation Procedure
Cappella A, Solazzo R, Yang J, Hassan NM, Dolci C, Gibelli D, Tartaglia G, Sforza C (2023) Facial asymmetry of Italian children: a cross-sectional analysis of three-dimensional stereophotogrammetric reference values. Symmetry 15:792. 10.3390/sym15040792
Verhoeven TJ, Vinayahalingam S, Claeys G, Xi T, Berge SJ, Maal TJJ (2024) Does facial asymmetry vary between subjects of different age groups? A 3D stereophotogrammetry analysis. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 52:829–834. 10.1016/j.jcms.2024.04.003 PubMed
Harnádková K, Kočandrlová K, Kožejová Jaklová L, Dupej J, Velemínská J (2023) The effect of sex and age on facial shape directional asymmetry in adults: a 3D landmarks-based method study. PLoS One 18:e0288702. 10.1371/journal.pone.0288702 PubMed PMC
Kondra K, Stanton E, Jimenez C, Ngo K, Wlodarczyk J, Jacob L, Munabi NCO, Chen K, Urata MM, Hammoudeh JA (2023) Rethinking the rule of 10s: early cleft lip repair improves weight gain. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 60:306–312. 10.1177/10556656211062042 PubMed
Wlodarczyk JR, Higuchi EC, Liu A, Urata MM, Gabreel W, Wolfswinkel EM, Lau J, Matar M, Magee WP, Urata MM, Hammoudeh JA (2021) Assessing the safety of a novel neonatal anesthesia protocol: a review of 101 patients with early cleft lip repair. J Craniofac Surg 32:2682–2686. 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007964 PubMed
Selleri L, Rijli FM (2023) Shaping faces: genetic and epigenetic control of craniofacial morphogenesis. Nat Rev Genet 24:610–626. 10.1038/s41576-023-00594-w PubMed
Al-Rudainy D, Ju X, Stanton S, Mehendale FV, Ayoub A (2018) Assessment of regional asymmetry of the face before and after surgical correction of unilateral cleft lip. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 46:974–978. 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.03.023 PubMed
Shi B, Yi X (2015) Evaluation of nasolabial symmetry after cheiloplasty and primary rhinoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:e144–e145. 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.08.806
Bilwatsch S, Kramer M, Haeusler G, Schuster M, Wurm J, Vairaktaris E, Neukam FW, Nkenke E (2006) Nasolabial symmetry following Tennison–Randall lip repair: a three-dimensional approach in 10-year-old patients with unilateral clefts of lip, alveolus and palate. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 34:253–262. 10.1016/j.jcms.2006.03.001 PubMed
Li L, Liao L, Zhong Y, Li Y, Xiang L, Li W (2016) Variation trends of the postoperative outcomes for unilateral cleft lip patients by modified Mohler and Tennison–Randall cheiloplasties. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 44:1786–1795. 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.08.025 PubMed
Cardoso JF, Pucciarelli MGR, Laurenti JAS, Laposta AFE, Neppelenbroek KH, Oliveira TM, Soares S (2023) Arch symmetry in patients without and with cleft lip and palate after orthodontic/rehabilitative treatment—a stereophotogrammetry study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 60:1565–1571. 10.1177/10556656221110096 PubMed
Ousterhout DK, Vargervik K, Clark S (1986) Stability of the maxilla after Le fort III advancement in craniosynostosis syndromes. Cleft Palate J PubMed
Hermann NV, Darvann TA, Kreiborg S (2020) Delayed maturation and reduced crown width of the permanent first mandibular molar in all subgroups of cleft lip and palate. Orthod Craniofac Res 23:432–438. 10.1111/ocr.12386 PubMed
Campbell A, Costello BJ, Ruiz RL (2010) Cleft lip and palate surgery: an update of clinical outcomes for primary repair. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 22:43–58. 10.1016/j.coms.2009.11.003 PubMed
Deshmukh M, Vaidya S, Deshpande G, Galinde J, Natarajan S (2019) Comparative evaluation of esthetic outcomes in unilateral cleft lip repair between the Mohler and fisher repair techniques: A prospective, randomized, Observer-Blind study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 77:182e1. 10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.029 PubMed
Vyas T, Gupta P, Kumar S, Gupta R, Gupta T, Singh H (2020) Cleft of lip and palate: a review. J Family Med Prim Care 9:2621. 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_472_20 PubMed PMC
Vyas K, Gibreel W, Mardini S (2022) Virtual surgical planning (VSP) in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 30:239–253. 10.1016/j.fsc.2022.01.016 PubMed
Patel A, Islam SMS, Murray K, Goonewardene MS (2015) Facial asymmetry assessment in adults using three-dimensional surface imaging. Prog Orthod 16:36. 10.1186/s40510-015-0106-9 PubMed PMC
Stellwagen L, Hubbard E, Chambers C, Jones KL (2008) Torticollis, facial asymmetry and plagiocephaly in normal newborns. Arch Dis Child 93:827–831. 10.1136/adc.2007.124123 PubMed
Launonen AM, Vuollo V, Aarnivala H, Heikkinen T, Pirttiniemi P, Valkama AM, Harila V (2023) A longitudinal study of facial asymmetry in a normal birth cohort up to 6 years of age and the predisposing factors. Eur J Orthod 45:396–407. 10.1093/ejo/cjad012 PubMed PMC
Kuijpers MA, Desmedt DJ, Nada RM, Bergé SJ, Fudalej PS, Maal TJ (2015) Regional facial asymmetries in unilateral orofacial clefts. EORTHO 37:636–642. 10.1093/ejo/cju104 PubMed
Moslerová V, Dadáková M, Dupej J, Hoffmannova E, Borský J, Černý M, Bejda P, Kočandrlová K, Velemínská J (2018) Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry in preschool patients with orofacial clefts after neonatal cheiloplasty. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 108:40–45. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.02.023 PubMed
Bugaighis I, Mattick CR, Tiddeman B, Hobson R (2014) 3D asymmetry of operated children with oral clefts. Orthod Craniofac Res 17:27–37. 10.1111/ocr.12026 PubMed
Duffy S, Noar JH, Evans RD, Sanders R (2000) Three-dimensional analysis of the child cleft face. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 37:137–144. 10.1597/1545-1569_2000_037_0137_tdaotc_2.3.co_2 PubMed
Ayoub A, Garrahy A, Millett D, Bowman A, Siebert JP, Miller J, Ray A (2011) Three-dimensional assessment of early surgical outcome in repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate: part 1. Nasal changes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 48:571–577. 10.1597/09-147 PubMed
Bugaighis I, Mattick CR, Tiddeman B, Hobson R (2014) 3D facial morphometry in children with oral clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 51:452–461. 10.1597/12-217 PubMed
Mawji A, Vollman AR, Hatfield J, McNeil DA, Sauvé R (2013) The incidence of positional plagiocephaly: a cohort study. Pediatrics 132:298–304. 10.1542/peds.2012-3438 PubMed
Dadáková M, Cagáňová V, Dupej J, Hoffmannová E, Borský J, Velemínská J (2016) Three-dimensional evaluation of facial morphology in pre-school cleft patients following neonatal cheiloplasty. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 44:1109–1116. 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.023 PubMed
Kauffmann P, Kolle J, Quast A, Wolfer S, Schminke B, Meyer-Marcotty P, Schliephake H (2024) Effect of facial and nasolabial asymmetry on perceived facial esthetics in children with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate. Clin Oral Invest 28:449. 10.1007/s00784-024-05839-4 PubMed PMC
Aycart MA, Caterson EJ (2023) Advances in cleft lip and palate surgery. Medicina (B Aires) 59:1932. 10.3390/medicina59111932 PubMed PMC
Tighe D, Petrick L, Cobourne MT, Rabe H (2011) Cleft lip and palate: effects on neonatal care. NeoReviews 12:e315–e324. 10.1542/neo.12-6-e315
Quast A, Batschkus S, Brinkmann J, Henning Schliephake, Alpers GW, Meyer-Marcotty P, Gerdes ABM (2022) Effect of cleft lip on adolescent evaluation of faces: an Eye-Tracking study. Pediatr Dent 108–113 PubMed