Bacterial proteins play important roles in many biological processes. However, many of them remain poorly characterized and their functions not well identified, due to, for example, their low abundances. Preparative fractionation can process and simplify complex biological samples and fractionate them into distinct fractions containing the proteins that are pre-purified from other proteins and unwanted sample impurities. If the proteins in the sample are present in low abundances, continuous collection of fractions allows obtaining sufficient amounts to process them further. Here, the supernatant with bacterial proteins extracted from nine species of probiotic bacterial cells was subjected to preparative fractionation in continuous divergent flow instrumentation working on the basis of bidirectional isotachophoresis/moving boundary electrophoresis. The analysis of the supernatant and collected fractions by SDS-PAGE and gel IEF revealed that the bacterial proteins in the supernatant covered molecular weights from 9 to 160 kDa and isoelectric points from 3.9 to 5.7. The majority of proteins were detected in four neighboring fractions. The analysis of fractions showed that during preparative bidirectional isotachophoresis, the proteins could be uniquely electro-focused and found in a single fraction, enriched as compared to the supernatant and/or separated from the proteins in other fractions. The proteins in separated pre-purified fractions are suitable for further analyses and procedures.

Institute of Analytical Chemistry of Czech Academy of Sciences Veveri 97 Brno 60200 Czechia

See more in PubMed

Stastna M (2024) The role of proteomics in identification of key proteins of bacterial cells with focus on probiotic bacteria. Int J Mol Sci 25:8564. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168564 PubMed DOI PMC

Salzillo M, Vastano V, Capri U, Muscariello L, Sacco M, Marasco R (2015) Identification and characterization of enolase as a collagen-binding protein in Lactobacillus plantarum. J Basic Microbiol 55:890–897. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201400942 PubMed DOI

Hymes JP, Klaenhammer TR (2016) Stuck in the middle: fibronectin-binding proteins in gram-positive bacteria. Front Microbiol 7:1504. https://doi.org/10.13389/fmicb.2015.01504

Dufrene YF, Viljoen A (2020) Binding strength of gram-positive bacterial adhesins. Front Microbiol 11:1457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01457 PubMed DOI PMC

Xiong Y, Zhai Z, Lei Y, Xiao B, Hao Y (2020) A novel major pilin subunit protein FimM is involved in adhesion of Bifidobacterium longum BBMN67 to intestinal epithelial cells. Front Microbiol 11:590435. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.590435 PubMed DOI PMC

Yan F, Polk DB (2012) Characterization of a probiotic-derived soluble protein which reveals a mechanism of preventive and treatment effects of probiotics on intestinal inflammatory diseases. Gut Microbes 3:25–28. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.19245 PubMed DOI PMC

Cuello-Garcia CA, Brozek JL, Fiocchi A, Pawankar R, Yepes-Nunez JJ, Terracciano L, Gandhi S, Agarwal A, Zhang Y, Schunemann HJ (2015) Probiotics for the prevention of allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol 136:952–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2015.04.031 PubMed DOI

Raslan MA, Raslan SA, Shehata EM, Mahmoud AS, Viana MVC, Barh D, Sabri NA, Azevedo V (2024) Applications of proteomics in probiotics having anticancer and chemopreventive properties. Adv Exp Med Biol 1443:243–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50624-6_13 PubMed DOI

Cuthill S, Muroke V, Dubois A, Dube MP, Guertin MC, Millette M, Tardif JC (2025) Effect of probiotic supplementation on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr ESPEN S2405–4577(25):00310–00319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.05.013 DOI

Magistrelli L, Amoruso A, Mogna L, Graziano T, Cantello R, Pane M, Comi C (2019) Probiotics may have beneficial effects in Parkinson’s disease: in vitro evidence. Front Immunol 10:969. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00969 PubMed DOI PMC

Ajith TA, Anita B (2025) Impact of gut microbiota and probiotics on rheumatoid arthritis: a potential treatment challenge. Int J Rheum Dis 28:e70266. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X PubMed DOI

Aggarwal N, Breedon AME, Davis CM, Hwang IY, Chang MW (2020) Engineering probiotics for therapeutic applications: recent examples and translational outlook. Curr Opin Biotechnol 65:171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2020.02.016 PubMed DOI

Silva WM, Sousa CS, Oliveira LC, Soares SC, Souza GFMH, Tavares GC, Resende CP, Folador EL, Pereira FL, Figueiredo H, Azevedo V (2019) Comparative proteomic analysis of four biotechnological strains Lactococcus lactis through label-free quantitative proteomics. Microb Biotechnol 12:265–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13305 PubMed DOI

Abele M, Doll E, Bayer FP, Meng C, Lomp N, Neuhaus K, Scherer S, Kuster B, Ludwig C (2023) Unified workflow for the rapid and in-depth characterization of bacterial proteomes. Mol Cell Proteomics 22:100612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100612 PubMed DOI PMC

Abele M, Soleymaniniya A, Bayer FP, Lomp N, Doll E, Meng C, Neuhaus K, Scherer S, Wenning M, Wantia N, Kuster B, Wilhelm M, Ludwig C (2025) Proteomic diversity in bacteria: insight and implications for bacterial identification. Mol Cell Proteomics 24:100917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpro.2025.100917 PubMed DOI PMC

Guiochon G (2002) Preparative liquid chromatography J Chromarogr A 965:129–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9673(01)01471-6 DOI

Jadhav BG, Jadhav AM, Shirode AR, Kadam VJ (2014) A comprehensive review for the learners and users: preparative high performance liquid chromatography. IJCPA 1:121–129

Garcia-Vaquero M, Mora L, Hayes M (2019) In vitro and in silico approaches to generating and identifying angiotensin-converting enzyme I inhibitory peptides from green macroalga Ulva lactuca. Mar Drugs 17:204. https://doi.org/10.3390/md17040204 PubMed DOI PMC

Islinger M, Li KW, Loos M, Liebler S, Angemuller S, Eckerskorn C, Weber G, Abdolzade A, Volkl A (2010) Peroxisomes from the heavy mitochondrial fraction: isolation by zonal free flow electrophoresis and quantitative mass spectrometrical characterization. J Proteome Res 9:113–124. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr9004663 PubMed DOI

Hosken BD, Li C, Mullappally B, Co C, Zhang B (2016) Isolation and characterization of monoclonal antibody charge variants by free flow isoelectric focusing. Anal Chem 88:5662–5669. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03946 PubMed DOI

Duan L, Cao Z, Yobas L (2017) Continuous-flow eelectrophoresis of DNA and proteins in a two-dimensional capillary-well sieve. Anal Chem 89:10022–10028. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02484 PubMed DOI

Solinova V, Sazelova P, Masova A, Jiracek J, Kasicka V (2021) Application of capillary and free-flow zone electrophoresis for analysis and purification of antimicrobial ß-alanyl-tyrosine from hemolymph of fleshfly Neobellieria bullata. Molecules 26:5636. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185636 PubMed DOI PMC

Stastna M (2020) Continuous flow electrophoretic separation – recent developments and applications to biological sample analysis. Electrophoresis 41:36–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201900288 PubMed DOI

Barkla BJ (2018) Free flow zonal electrophoresis for fractionation of plant membrane compartments prior to proteomic analysis. Methods Mol Biol 1696:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7411-5_1 PubMed DOI

Wen J, Wilker EW, Yaffe MB, Jensen KF (2010) Microfluidic preparative free-flow isoelectric focusing: system optimization for protein complex separation. Anal Chem 82:1253–1260. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac902157e PubMed DOI PMC

Janasek D, Schilling M, Franzke J, Manz A (2006) Isotachophoresis in free-flow using a miniaturized device. Anal Chem 78:3815–3819. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac060063l PubMed DOI

Slais K (1993) Electrophoretic focusing in a natural steady state moving pH gradient, J Microcol Sep 5:469–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcs.1220050511 .

Slais K, Stastna M (2014) Electrolyte system for fast preparative focusing in wide pH range based on bidirectional isotachophoresis. Electrophoresis 35:2438–2445. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201400057 PubMed DOI

Stastna M, Slais K (2015) Continuous fast focusing in trapezoidal void channel based on bidirectional isotachophoresis in a wide pH range. Electrophoresis 36:2579–2586. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201500223 PubMed DOI

Stastna M, Slais K (2021) Preparative continuous flow electrophoretic instrumentation for purification of biological samples. Electrophoresis 42:2103–2111. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.202100160 PubMed DOI

Stastna M, Slais K (2023) Preparative separation of immunoglobulins from bovine colostrum by continuous divergent-flow electrophoresis. J Sep Sci 46:e2200679. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.202200679 PubMed DOI

Slais K, Friedl Z (1994) Low-molecular-mass pI markers for isoelectric focusing. J Chromatogr A 661:249–256

Slais K, Friedl Z (1995) Ampholytic dyes for spectroscopic determination of pH in electrofocusing. J Chromatogr A 695:113–122

Stastna M, Travnicek M, Slais K (2005) New azo dyes as colored isoelectric point markers for isoelectric focusing in acidic pH region. Electrophoresis 26:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200406088 PubMed DOI

Dusa F, Moravcova D, Slais K (2019) Low-molecular-mass nitrophenol-based compounds suitable for the effective tracking of pH gradient in isoelectric focusing. Anal Chim Acta 1076:144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2019.05.010 PubMed DOI

Goldberg S (2021) Mechanical/physical methods of cell disruption and tissue homogenization. Methods Mol Biol 2261:563–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1186-9_36 PubMed DOI

Islam MS, Aryasomayajula A, Selvaganapathy PR (2017) A review on macroscale and microscale cell lysis methods. Micromachines 8:83. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi8030083 DOI